2.1. PROCESO QUIROS and LEONARDA VILLEGAS vs. MARCELO ARJONA, et.

al,
G.R. No. 158901, March 9, 2004
(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2004/mar2004/gr_158901_2004.html)
Questions Answers
1.Who were the contending
parties or persons in the Proceso Quiros- Nephew of Marcelo
case?
Leonarda Villegas- Nephew of Marcelo

Marcelo Arjona- Uncle of Proceso and Leonarda

2. What are the important Proceso Quiros and Leonarda Villegas filed with the
facts in the said case that are office of the barangay captain of Labney, San Jacinto,
also related to the topics in Pangasinan, a complaint for recovery of ownership and
the above-mentioned possession of a parcel of land located at Labney, San
PowerPoint? Jacinto, Pangasinan. Petitioners sought to recover from
their uncle Marcelo Arjona, one of the respondents
herein, their lawful share of the inheritance from their
late grandfather.
3. What is/are the issue/s or Whether the amicable settlement between the parties is
dispute in the said case or valid.
why were those parties
contending with each other?
4. What were the arguments According Proceso and Lenarda, they contend that
or standpoint or reasoning despite the failure of the Paknaan to describe with
of the parties or persons certainty the object of the contract, the evidence will
contending in said case? show that after the execution of the agreement,
respondent Marcelo Arjona accompanied them to the
actual site of the land

According to Marcelo Arjona, he could not have

accompanied petitioners to the subject land because he
was physically incapacitated and there was no
motorized vehicle to transport him to the said place.
5. Give the brief decision or The Supreme Court (SC) ruled:
ruling of the Supreme Court
and explain briefly why it is
related to the topic The Court observed that special and exceptional
discussed in the PowerPoint. circumstances, the imperatives of substantial justice, or
facts that may have transpired after the finality of
judgment which would render its execution unjust, may
warrant the suspension of execution of a decision that
has become final and executory. In the case at bar, the
ends of justice would be frustrated if a writ of execution
is issued considering the uncertainty of the object of the
agreement. To do so would open the possibility of error
and future litigations.

The foregoing is related to some of the topics included in

the PowerPoint (Ppt) because:

a. Involved in this case is a Reformation, but there is no

literally reformation because the contract is void.
Although both parties agreed to transfer one-hectare
real property, they failed to include in the written
document a sufficient description of the property to
convey.