Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SEO Article - Ritesh
SEO Article - Ritesh
I would like to express my sincere thanks and gratitude to Ms. Avni Singh
Solanki, ma’am for giving me such an opportunity to work on this project. I am
very grateful to her for her guidance and support in completion of this project.
Abstract:
In this article, I will be dealing with the critical significance of a child's testimony in cases
involving child sexual abuse under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO)
Act, 2012 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘the Act’). I’ll be highlighting the profound
implications of these testimonies in ensuring justice for young victims.
The article ultimately asserts that a thorough and legally sound record of a child's testimony is
not only pivotal for securing convictions but also for safeguarding the child's well-being
throughout the legal process.
This article will make an attempt to delineate all important aspects pertaining to examination
of child witnesses in court. Focus will be specifically on judicial precedents, in the form of
guidelines and directions given by courts to examine child witnesses.
Keywords: Child, justice, testimony, victim.
Issue-
Child victim of a sexual crime carries a huge burden of guilt, shame and humiliation, which
gets aggravated when he/she is required to recount the violation to strangers in outside world.
The trauma of a child victim is only multiplied as he/she is required to repeatedly recapitulate
her ordeal to the investigating agencies, prosecutors and then in court.
A child witness is to be treated with special care not only on point of reliability but also on the
need for a special procedure when a child witness is testifying. Provisions under the POCSO
Act, which lay down the procedure of conducting a child’s testimony take into consideration
the special needs of a child. To smoothen the child’s experience and journey through the
criminal justice system, Sections 24, 25, 26, 33, 36 and 37 of the Act (refer the Act) gain
significance while dealing with child witnesses.
The Supreme Court and High Courts have laid down guidelines to ensure that during criminal
trial the child’s rights and interests are safeguarded and protected. Lack of proper
implementation of such guidelines, and absence of adequate safeguards during proceedings,
have continued to create impediments for children and their families during their testimony in
court.
3. Whether the sole evidence of a child can be the basis for conviction?
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the testimony of a child can be the sole basis
for conviction in a case. The Court has consistently held that the rule of corroboration is
only a rule of caution and prudence, and does not need to be followed in every case.
The Supreme Court in the case of Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra,6 held
that:
“6. ...A child witness if found competent to depose to the facts and reliable one such evidence
could be the basis of conviction. In other words, even in the absence of oath the evidence of a
child witness can be considered under Section 118 of the Evidence Act provided that such
witness is able to understand the questions and able to give rational answers thereof. The
evidence of a child witness and credibility thereof would depend upon the circumstances of
each case. The only precaution which the court should bear in mind while assessing the
evidence of a child witness is that the witness must be reliable one and his/her demeanour must
be like any other competent witness and there is no likelihood of being tutored”.
2
AIR 1998 SC 2726.
3
Id.
4
JT 2008 8 SCC 271.
5
1996 Cri.LJ 1728 SC.
6
1997 5 SCC 341.
Even while acquitting the appellant on the grounds that the evidence of the prosecutrix was full
of discrepancies and did not inspire confidence, the Supreme Court in Radhu v. State of
Madhya Pradesh,7 held that:
“5. It is now well settled that a finding of guilt in a case of rape, can be based on the
uncorroborated evidence of the prosecutrix. The very nature of offence makes it difficult Things
to remember… A child against whom a sexual offence has been committed is a crucial
prosecution witness and the success or failure of the prosecution’s case depends on his/her
evidence. Over the years both the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts have
established the importance of victim’s testimony and clearly stated that conviction can be based
on a consistent and reliable testimony of a competent witness. 59 to get direct corroborating
evidence. The evidence of the prosecutrix should not be rejected on the basis of minor
discrepancies and contradictions. …Whether there was rape or not would depend ultimately
on the facts and circumstances of each case”.
In Suryanarayana v. State of Karnataka,8 the Supreme Court held that if upon examination
and scrutiny, if the court is satisfied that the evidence is reliable and not tutored, the court
can secure the conviction of the accused based solely upon the child’s testimony. Further,
it stated that corroboration is not a rule but a matter of prudence, and minor discrepancies and
inconsistencies are not a basis for disregarding the testimony of the child.
7
Appeal (Crl.) 624 of 2005.
8
(2001) 9 SCC 129.
9
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-
rights#:~:text=Article%2025&text=All%20children%2C%20whether%20born%20in,enjoy%20the%20same%20s
ocial%20protection.
10
https://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/docs/2005/resolution%202005-20.pdf.
11
213 (2014) DLT 635.
stages of the justice system. The UN guidelines stresses the importance of ensuring dignity and
physical, mental and moral integrity of the child witness; the justice process should be sensitive
to child's age, wishes, understanding, gender, sexual orientation, ethic, cultural, religious,
linguistic and social background, caste, socioeconomic condition as well as special needs of
the child including health, ability and capacities”
The Delhi High Court in the case of State v. Rahul,13 examined the general principles which
govern a competency examination of the child witness before the court and also referred to the
judgment from other countries to highlight the importance and precautions to be taken at the
time of recording child’s testimony.
“…. It is essential to note that all these concerns apply to all stages of a child witness court
appearance including the competency examination of the child and evaluation of her/his
response thereto. We cannot emphasize enough that the legislation, the statutory
requirements as well as the jurisprudence on the subject have kept the best interest of the
child as the complete focus of every action, especially Court proceedings and the decision.
This aspect cannot be compromised in any manner. The matter assumes even greater
importance in cases involving the sexual offences and abuse of the child as in the present case.”
12
Id.
13
CR.L.P. 250/2012.
Conclusion-
In the pursuit of justice for child victims of sexual abuse, the meticulous recording of their
testimonies under the Act stands as a linchpin of the legal process. This article has centered on
the pivotal role played by judicial precedents in shaping the contours of this process.
Furthermore, these precedents signal a growing societal awareness of the unique challenges
faced by child victims. They reflect a shift toward viewing discrepancies in a child's testimony
through a lens of understanding, acknowledging the profound impact of trauma on a child's
memory and expression.
In conclusion, these precedents, continually evolving, guide us toward a more compassionate,
equitable, and empathetic legal system, ensuring that justice not only prevails but also
prioritizes the best interests of the child.