Structural Properties of Rice Husk Ash C

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

May 2013. Vol. 3, No.

3 ISSN2305-8269
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
© 2012 EAAS & ARF. All rights reserved
www.eaas-journal.org

STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES OF RICE HUSK ASH CONCRETE.


Godwin A. Akeke, Maurice E. Ephraim, Akobo, I.Z.S and Joseph O. Ukpata.
Department of Civil Engineering, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria.

Abstract

This research was experimentally carried out to investigate the effects of introducing Rice Husk Ash
(RHA) as a Partial Replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) on the Structural Properties of
Concrete. Rice Husk Ash which is an Agro-Waste and known to be a Super Pozzoland have been
used for mass concrete and found to have compressive strength ranging from 33-38.4N/mm2at
replacement percentages of 10-25% in a mix of 1:1.5:3. A further study was carried out on its
flexural properties to determine their moduli of rupture as well as its tensile strength characteristics
for the determination of cracking, the values obtained at 28days are 3, 2.5 and 2.4N/mm2 while the
tensile strength values are 1.94, 1.17 and 0.91N/mm2 at replacement percentages of 10%, 20% and
25%. This research has proved that RHA Concrete can be used as a Structural Concrete at suitable
replacement percentages. This research therefore is an investigation of the performance of the
concrete made of partially replacing OPC with RHA on the structural integrity and properties of
RHA concrete.

Keywords: Rice Husk Ash, Structural Properties and Concrete.

INTRODUCTION

which itself possess little or no cementing property,


This research is aimed at putting into effective use but will in a finely divided form and in the
Rice Hush Ash (RHA) a local additive which has presence of moisture chemically react with calcium
been investigated to be super pozzolanic in a good hydroxide at ordinary temperatures to form
proportion to reduce the high cost of structural compounds possessing cementite’s properties. A
concrete. Rice Husk Ash (RHA) is an agricultural good way of utilizing this material is to use it for
waste product, and how to dispose of it is a making “high performance concrete” which means
problem to waste mangers. While Concrete today high workability and very high early strengths, or
has assumed the position of the most widely used consider high workability and long term durability
building material globally. The most expensive of the concrete.
concrete material is the binder (cement) and if such
all-important expensive material is partially Materials
replaced with more natural, local and affordable Rice Husk Ash (RHA); Rice Husk was
material like RHA will not only take care of waste burnt for approximately 48hrs in an open
management but will also reduce the problem of air and uncontrolled burning process. The
high cost of concrete and housing. temperature was in the range of 400-
6000C. The ash collected was sieved
There is an increasing importance to preserve the through BS standard sieve size 75µm and
environment in the present day world. RHA from its colour was grey. Batching was done by
the parboiling plants is posing serious volume at replacement percentages of 10,
environmental threat and ways are being thought of 20, and 25%.
to dispose them. This material is actually a super Cement
pozzolan since it is rich in Silica and has about Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was used
85% to 90% Silica content. in which the composition and properties is
A “pozzolan” is therefore defined as “a siliceous or in compliance with the Nigerian
siliceous and aluminum material, standard organization defined standard of
cement for concrete production.

57
May 2013. Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN2305-8269
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
© 2012 EAAS & ARF. All rights reserved
www.eaas-journal.org

Aggregates The following tests were carried out in


The project work is restricted to sand accordance with relevant BS Standards.
collected from the river. The sand was 1. The aggregates were tested for physical
collected to ensure that there was no properties such as: specific gravity,
allowance for deleterious materials Particle distribution test and bulk density.
contained in the sand. 2. The fresh concrete was subjected to the
In this research, granite of 20mm following tests.
maximum size was used. Proper (i) Slump
inspection was carried out to ensure that it While the following properties were tested
was free from deleterious materials. in the hardened state of the concrete.
Granite was gotten from zenith quarry in (i) Density test
Akamkpa Cross River state. (iii) Compressive strength test.
Water (iv) Flexural strength test
Water plays an important role in concrete (v) Split tensile test.
production (mix) in that it starts the
reaction between the cement and the RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
aggregates. It helps in the hydration of the Physical Properties of Rice Husk Ash (RHA);
mix. In this project, the water used was Sand and Gravel
Pipe borne water and free from The following physical properties of
contaminants. RHA, sand and aggregate were
Method of Experiment investigated in the laboratory and the
Concrete is a mixture of water, cement, results obtained from the specific gravity
aggregate (coarse and fine) and admixture. test as shown below
It is important that the constituent material Results of Specific Gravity
remain uniformly distributed within the These results show that the specific
concrete mass during the various stages of gravity of RHA varies from 1.5 to 1.56
handling and that full compaction is with an average value of 1.55, while the
achieved, and making sure that the specific gravity of sand used had a
characteristics of concrete which affect constant value of 1.52
full compaction like consistency, mobility Particle Size Distribution : The results of the
and compatibility are in conformity with particle size distribution analysis carried out in this
relevant codes of practice. research work are as shown bellow

Table 1a-Sieve Analysis of RHA (TM = 1500)

Sieve Size Weight % Retained % Passing


Retained
2.36 0 100
1.18 0 100
600 34 5.8 93.2
425 41 8.2 85
300 150 30 55
212 57 11.4 43.6
150 81 16.2 27.4
63 100 20.0 7.4
Pan 35 7.4 0

58
May 2013. Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN2305-8269
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
© 2012 EAAS & ARF. All rights reserved
www.eaas-journal.org

Table 1b-Sieve Analysis of Sand (TM =500)

Sieve Size Weight % Retained % Passing


Retained
6.3 0 100
5.0 0 100
2.36 5 0.33 99.67
1.18 130 8.7 90.97
600 429 28.6 62.37
425 345 23.0 39.37
300 338 22.5 16.87
212 126 8.4 8.47
150 80 5.3 3.17
63 43 2.9 0.27
Pan 4 0.27 0

Table 1c-Sieve Analysis of Gravel 5-20 (TM=1485)

Sieve Size Weight % Retained % Passing


Retained
20 0 100
13 4 0.3 99.7
10 18 1.2 98.5
6.3 119 8 90.5
4.7 70 4.7 85.8
2.36 234 15.8 70.0
Pan 40 2.70 67.3

Table 1d-Sieve Analysis of Gravel 15-25 (TM=1660)

Sieve Size Weight % Retained % Passing


Retained
37 0 100
25 236 14.2 85.8
20 993 59.8 26.0
13 435 26.2 0
10 0 0 0
pan 0 0 0

59
May 2013. Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN2305-8269
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
© 2012 EAAS & ARF. All rights reserved
www.eaas-journal.org

Bulk Density the European classification ENV 206:1992 having


the slump of 50-90 and by TRRL classification, the
The bulk densities of RHA, sand and the coarse workability is described as medium with
aggregate used was found to be 20, 45 and 65kg/m3 compacting factor of 0.90 and slump of 50 –
respectively. 100mm.

Workability (Slump) Density


The workability test results are presented in The density of RHA was investigated and results
Appendix IV. The workability test results show which are analyzed and presented as a ratio of the
that RHA concrete can be graded under S2 using mass to that of the volume are given below.
Table 1e. Density Values for Various RHA Concrete Mixes.

Age Percentage Replacement with RHA


10% 20% 25%
Average Densities 7 2038 1901 1948
of RHA Concrete in 14 2052 1875 1914
KN/m3 21 2064 1909 1937
28 2017 1950 1902
From the above results of density it can be seen that the density of RHA is in the same range for all replacement
levels. According to BS 877, it can be classified as light weight concrete.

Table 1f.The results of the compressive strength of RHA Concrete.

Age Percentage Replacement with RHA


10% 20% 25%
Average Compressive 7 12 11 10
strength N/mm2 14 14 13 12
21 18 18 14
28 22 20 19

Split Tension Test Results

The results of our investigations on the 28days RHA concrete are presented in Table 1g. below.
From the results it can be seen that the tensile strength results are similar at all replacement
percentages which is in line with the projections of the other researchers.

Table 1g below is the presentation of the results of the split tension test.

SN % Replacement Breaking Load N/mm2 Tensile Strength


N/mm2

1 10% 304738 1.94

2 20% 91500 1.165

3 25% 79500 0.91

60
May 2013. Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN2305-8269
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
© 2012 EAAS & ARF. All rights reserved
www.eaas-journal.org

Flexural strength investigation

The flexural strength properties of RHA concrete was investigated in the laboratory, the results of this
investigation are presented in table 1h below

The flexural strength fb (in N/mm2) is given by

= .

Where, = the breaking load (in N)

d1 and d2 are the lateral dimensions of the cross-section (in mm)

L = the distance between the supporting rollers (in mm)

Table 1h- Flexural Strength Values of RHA Concrete at 1:11/2:3 mix

SN % Replacement Breaking Load N/mm2 Flexural Strength


N/mm2

1 10% 7000 3.0

2 20% 6000 2.5

3 25% 4800 2.4

CONCLUSION

From the experiments and analysis of good for structural concrete at 10% replacement
results of findings in this research work, level.
the following facts are established about
RHA Concrete. References

RHA is a super pozzolan and its use in 1. Ephraim etal, (2012): Compressive
Strength of Concrete with RHA as
Civil Construction, besides reducing environmental partial replacement of ordinary
polluters factors, will bring several improvements Portland Cement. Scholarly Journal
to concrete Characteristics. The compressive of Engineering Research Vol.
1(2)pp32-36.
strength and workability tests suggests that RHA
could be substituted for OPC at up to 25% in the 2. Ogunbode etal (2012): An evaluation
production of concrete with no loss in workability of compressive Strength of Concrete
or strength. Based on the results of split Tensile made with RHA obtained by open air
burning. www. Academia.edu.
Strength test, it is convenient to state that there is
no Substantial increase in Tensile Strength due to 3. Muga,H etal (2005): Development of
the addition of RHA. The Flexural strength studies appropriate and Sustainable
Construction Materials. www.
indicate that there is a marginal improvement with
Ricehuskash.com
10 to 25% RHA replacement levels. Rice Husk Ash
concrete possess a number of good qualities that 4. Karim, MR (2012): Strength of
make a durable and good structural concrete for Mortar and Concrete as influence by
RHA.
both short term and long term considerations. It is Idosi.org/wasj/wasj19(10)12/19.

61
May 2013. Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN2305-8269
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
© 2012 EAAS & ARF. All rights reserved
www.eaas-journal.org

5. Cook, D. J. (1996): “Rice Husk Ash” 14. ASTM C1202: Electrical indication
increment Replacement Materials, of concrete’s Ability to Resist
Concrete Technology and Design, Chloride ion penetration, Annual
Vol. 3 Ed. R. N Swamy, Surrey Book of American Society for testing
University Press, Uk. Materials Standards, Vol. C04, 02,
1993.
6. Coard, J. R (1993): Natural
Pozzolans, “Published by the 15. British American Institution (1993a):
Development and needs of the Specification for aggregates from
Building Industry in Nigeria” Paper Natural Sources for Concrete,
Presented at the USSR/UNIDO London BS 882:1992.
Conference in Moscow.
16. British American Institution (1997):
Code of Practice for the structural
7. Gupta, B.L Gupta, A (2004): use of Concrete. BS 8110 London,
Concrete Technology Standard England 1997.
Publishers New Delhi, India
17. British American Institution (2001):
8. Gray, R. J Atwater, and W. Dunbar Specification, Performance,
(2003): “The Potential use of Natural Production and conformity of
Pozzolans in British Columbia as Concrete BSEN 2006 Feb, 2001.
Supplementary Cementitious English Version of Eurocode
Materials. “Prepared for the
Ecosmart concrete Project by CMP
Technologies LTD. 2003.

9. G.A Habeeb, M.M Fayyaah


(2009):Dept. of Civil Engineering
University of Malaya, Malaysia –
Australian Journal of Basic Applied
Sciences 3(3). 2009.

10. Ganesan, K, Rajagopal, K.


Thangavel, K. Selvaraji, R Sara
Swarthi, V. “Rice Husk Ash – As
Versatile Supplementary
Cementitious Material “India
Concrete Institute Journal, March
2004.

11. Hanle, L. Jayaraman, K, and Smith, J


(2004) “ C02 emmissions profile of
the US Cement Industry”. Paper
Presented at the 13th International
Emmissions inventory Conference,
Clearwater, FL, June 8 – 10, 2004.

12. Harris, R.A, T. D Eatmon Jr; H.E .


Muga; “Natural Pozzolans for
sustainable Development:
Environmentally Friendly Concrete
Technology “Paper Presented at
Southwestern Social Science
Association Annual Meeting, New
Orleans, Louissiana, March 23-26,
2005.

13. International Institute of Concrete


Technology Journal, Uk, N0.55
Autumn 2004. ASTM Standard C311
Standard Test Methods for Sampling
and testing Fly Ash or Natural
Pozzolans for use in Portland cement
concrete. West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania.

62

You might also like