Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    Es Rubrik Mod4

    Uploaded by

    crizanne barsatan
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating film reviews. It is divided into four sections that will be graded: introduction and organization, information summary, critique, and conclusion. Each section lists the criteria for meeting expectations and exceeding expectations. Introduction and organization are worth 5 points and require an engaging introduction, effective organization, and purposeful conclusion. Information summary is worth 10 points and expects a thorough yet concise summarization of the film's main points. Critique is also worth 10 points and requires using evidence to back up arguments about the director's points. The conclusion is worth 5 points and should tie closely back to the introduction. A group project evaluation rubric is also provided to grade members' contributions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Es Rubrik Mod4

    Uploaded by

    crizanne barsatan
    3 views2 pages
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating film reviews. It is divided into four sections that will be graded: introduction and organization, information summary, critique, and conclusion. Each section lists the criteria for meeting expectations and exceeding expectations. Introduction and organization are worth 5 points and require an engaging introduction, effective organization, and purposeful conclusion. Information summary is worth 10 points and expects a thorough yet concise summarization of the film's main points. Critique is also worth 10 points and requires using evidence to back up arguments about the director's points. The conclusion is worth 5 points and should tie closely back to the introduction. A group project evaluation rubric is also provided to grade members' contributions.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    es-rubrik-mod4

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating film reviews. It is divided into four sections that will be graded: introduction and organization, information summary, critique, and conclusion. Each section lists the criteria for meeting expectations and exceeding expectations. Introduction and organization are worth 5 points and require an engaging introduction, effective organization, and purposeful conclusion. Information summary is worth 10 points and expects a thorough yet concise summarization of the film's main points. Critique is also worth 10 points and requires using evidence to back up arguments about the director's points. The conclusion is worth 5 points and should tie closely back to the introduction. A group project evaluation rubric is also provided to grade members' contributions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    3 views2 pages

    Es Rubrik Mod4

    Uploaded by

    crizanne barsatan
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating film reviews. It is divided into four sections that will be graded: introduction and organization, information summary, critique, and conclusion. Each section lists the criteria for meeting expectations and exceeding expectations. Introduction and organization are worth 5 points and require an engaging introduction, effective organization, and purposeful conclusion. Information summary is worth 10 points and expects a thorough yet concise summarization of the film's main points. Critique is also worth 10 points and requires using evidence to back up arguments about the director's points. The conclusion is worth 5 points and should tie closely back to the introduction. A group project evaluation rubric is also provided to grade members' contributions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Introduction and

    Organization (WW)
    5 pts 3pts 1 pts

    EXCEEDS MEETS BELOW

    Introduces theme of film Introduces theme of film Fails to present the theme, or
    using rich and descriptive effectively Information is fails to provide introduction
    language. Information is organized competently, of the film Missing or
    organized in a fully effective supporting information and ineffective elements.
    manner; presents strong conclusion.
    introduction, expressive
    body, and purposeful
    conclusion
    Information summary (WW)

    10-8 pts 7-5 pts 4-1 pts

    EXCEEDS MEETS BELOW

    Thoughtfully critiques Summarizes main points of Fails to summarize film


    director/ maker's’ main the film competently and effectively due to omission of
    points, using evidence to accurately. key points or inaccurate
    back up arguments. Critique characterization of
    is insightful and thorough. information.

    Critique (WW)

    10-8 pts 7-5 pts 4-1 pts

    EXCEEDS MEETS BELOW

    Provides accurate and Critiques director/ maker's Fails to effectively present


    descriptive, concise summary main points, using evidence critique; and/or fails to use
    of film information, to back up arguments. evidence to back up
    effectively summarizing main arguments; and/or uses
    points of film flawed logic to support
    statements.

    Conclusion (WW)

    5 pts 3 pts 1 pts

    EXCEEDS MEETS BELOW

    Conclusion presents Effective conclusion is Missing or inconsistent


    particularly strong or presented that corresponds conclusion.
    compelling closing statement with introduction
    that ties closely to
    For the PT score, please rate each member’s contribution in the activity.

    Write each member’s average score BELOW YOUR REACTION PAPER, following the format
    below.
    Names Score

    1.
    2.
    3.
    4.
    5.
    6.

    (Each criterion is worth 4 points; for a total of 20 points)


    Group Contributes Completes Prepares Demonstrates Contributes
    Members meaningfully group work in a a cooperative significantly
    to group assignments quality and supportive to the
    discussions. on time. manner. attitude. success of
    the project.

    Member 1

    Member 2

    Member 3

    Member 4

    Member 5

    Total: /20 /20 /20 /20 20

    You might also like