Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2 - Yarn and Weave Types
Chapter 2 - Yarn and Weave Types
www.sidestone.com
IKAT FROM TIMOR
AND ITS OUTER ISLANDS
INSULAR AND INTERWOVEN
Photograph cover: Detail of a men’s wrap from Tombra village on the isle of Leti (South
Moluccas), field-acquired in 1911. The main ikated band has clearly rendered keu motifs,
discussed in Section 3.4.8. Source: PC 248 (see Fig. 172).
Although one must avoid comparing textile elements from one region to another in an atomistic
way, one must not lose sight of the fact that, in Indonesia, the textiles of a particular area may be
part of a wider geographical as well as a technical and symbolic system forming a ‘textile system’.
Danielle C. Geirnaert-Martin (1992:xxviii)
Geirnaert-Martin argues that technical choices about colour, texture and disposition are dictated
by both material and socio-cosmic constraints. In this sense, the textile system which informs the
production of cloth is linked to wider systems of classification so that the cloths can be regarded as
‘visualisations’ of society.
Sandra Pannell (1998:313)
[I]t would be a major mistake to conclude that women do not compete in signaling games. While
women (and female animals in general) have been portrayed as relatively passive, selfless mothers,
more modern views have tended to show the opposite (Hrdy 1999). Females compete, often directly,
with other females not only for access to resources needed to support their families but also for
high-quality mates and allies.
Rebecca Bliege Bird & Eric A. Smith (2005:235)
To the individual of high breeding it is only the more honorific esteem accorded by the cultivated
sense of the members of his own high class that is of material consequence. Since the wealthy
leisure class has grown so large, or the contact of the leisure-class individual with members of his
own class has grown so wide, as to constitute a human environment sufficient for the honorific
purpose, there arises a tendency to exclude the baser elements of the population from the scheme
even as spectators whose applause or mortification should be sought. The result of all this is a
refinement of methods, a resort to subtler contrivances, and a spiritualisation of the scheme of
symbolism in dress.
Thorstein Veblen ([1899] 1931:187)
“There is no one living now that can make cloth like we had in the past. That is lost now. Even the
old women are nearly gone. The ones who could do that. We don’t see that kind of cloth in Sumba
now. Some might be in the ground, some might be with foreigners far from here, but we can’t see
it now.”
Sumbanese woman to Jill Forshee (2001:46)
Fig. 1 Geographic map of the region under study. Source: Detail from a map of Nederlandsch Oost-Indië, published
by Joh. Ykema in The Hague. Printed by Senefelder, Amsterdam, presumably for use in schools. Undated, likely late
colonial. Note that 'Timorlaoet' is the old name for the Tanimbar Islands. The map is lightly edited. The label of an island
irrelevant for the current study, Moa, was removed; in its stead neighbouring Leti as well as Kisar, both important for this
investigation, were added. Also added was a label ‘Timor - zee’, at the instigation of a user of the original map, who had
penciled it in. Source inset: vemaps.com.
Contents
PREFACE 9
1. ANGLES OF INVESTIGATION 13
1.1 Status quaestionis 15
1.2 The Austronesian ikat tradition 21
1.3 The field of study 32
1.4 Focus on older specimens 34
1.5 The Reference Set 39
2. YARN AND WEAVE TYPES 45
2.1 Fibres under the microscope 47
2.2 Varieties of plying 53
2.3 Introduction of machine-made thread 54
2.4 Weave varieties per region 56
2.5 Irregular weaves pose questions about motivation 61
3. DISTRIBUTION OF SHARED MOTIFS 69
3.1 Emblems of identity and connection 70
3.2 Motives for adopting ‘foreign’ motifs 73
3.3 Whose pattern is it anyway? 78
3.4 Motifs shared across the region under study 80
3.4.1 Linked hexagons 80
3.4.2 The Pictorial Strip, Rimanu 86
3.4.3 The Human figure, stand-alone 98
3.4.4 The Double-headed eagle 118
3.4.5 The Triangle-with-projections 129
3.4.6 The Eight-pointed star 136
3.4.7 The ‘Breast beam’ motif 141
3.4.8 The Keu motif 146
4. ASYMMETRY – IN DEFIANCE OF IKAT’S TECHNICAL DIKTAT 155
4.1 Techniques to achieve asymmetry 161
4.2 Sought complexity: asymmetry as costly signal 194
5. IKAT IN ITS SOCIAL CONTEXT 265
CONCLUSION: TECHNICAL RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS FEMALE TALENTS 283
ABSTRACT 289
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 293
CURRICULUM VITAE 295
PRONUNCIATION GUIDE 296
COLOPHON 297
APPENDIX 300
BIBLIOGRAPHY 301
INDEX 311
CHAPTER 2
Fig. 19 A market vendor on Alor spindle spinning cotton while waiting for customers. A touch of irony: a yarn spool for
machine-made thread machine-made yarn is put into service for the creation of hand-spun yarn. Photograph by the
present author, 1981.
Highly irregular hand-spun cotton Highly irregular hand-spun cotton in a Highly irregular hand-spun cotton
in a 19th-century ceremonial shawl, 19th- to early 20th-century sarong from in an early 20th-century adat
geringsing, from Tenganan (Bali). an unidentified island in the Babar sarong from Adonara (Solor & Alor
Gauge variation factor ~9. Specific Archipelago. Gauge variation factor ~4. Archipelago). Gauge variation factor
weight: 121 g/m2 (PC 060). Specific weight: 289 g/m2 (PC 301). ~6. Specific weight: 297 g/m2 (PC 130).
Highly irregular hand-spun cotton Highly irregular hand-spun cotton in a Regular hand-spun cotton, twined,
in a 19th-century men’s blanket 19th-century tuka dulang, sarong, from in a late colonial sarong from Kisar.
from Manulea (West Timor). Gauge Lembata (Solor & Alor Archipelago). Gauge variation factor ~1.5. Specific
variation factor ~10. Specific weight Gauge variation factor ~5. Specific weight: 451 g/m2 (PC 276).
435 g/m2 (PC 224). weight: 348 g/m2 (PC 068).
Extremely fine hand-spun cotton, Regular hand-spun cotton, twined, in Rather regular hand-spun cotton,
on a circa 1900 East Sumbanese a pre-1950 sarong from Savu. Gauge twined, in a circa 1950 sarong from
hinggi of the highest class, pairing variation factor ~2. Specific weight: Kisar. Gauge variation factor ~2.
the complications of longitudinal and 294 g/m2 (PC 185). Specific weight: 371 g/m2 (PC 274).
axial asymmetry. Gauge variation
factor ~6.5. Specific weight: a mere
194 g/m2 (PC 351).
Fig. 20 The development of hand-spun yarn over time: from very fine and highly irregular to quite smooth, approaching
the regularity of machine-made thread, and generally coarser. In several island regions the highest-class cloths were all
made of the finest hand-spun yarn, with a very low specific weight.
2 The present author’s translation of the original Dutch text: “Hoe fijner
de draad is, hoe soepeler het weefsel zal worden: een zeer gewenscht
resultaat, maar welks verkrijgen de arbeid belangrijk vertraagt.” 3 Data available on the present author’s website.
But other factors do come into the equation and is not likely to affect their weight more than fractionally.9
preclude exact calculation. Humidity could be a factor Spot checks on microscopic photographs of ikat cloths from
because cotton is hydrophilic; but all weighing was done in different age groups validated the above calculations. (See
the same environment with a fairly stable humidity, rarely also Fig. 20). To leave a margin for error, the calculated 18
outside the 55‑65 per cent range. Tightness of spin could be a per cent was corrected downward to 15 per cent.
factor, and no doubt variation would be found if there were This still substantial percentage implies a) that the
a way to measure it, but the size of the sample (n = 215) weavers in that earlier period before circa 1920, needed
averages out variation to a degree considered sufficient for circa 15 per cent more warp yarns to achieve the same
approximate comparison. Intensity of use and laundering width of cloth; (b) when drawing in strokes of the same
could also be a factor, as both would cause degradation x-yarn width had to place circa 15 per cent more bindings;
and loss of fibre, but because most specimens in the sample
are ceremonial cloths that were rarely if ever washed, this
9 Owners of an heirloom textile may proudly state that “…it has
never been washed”. Meaning that it was cherished and very well
taken care of. “Those that had never been washed were considered
more valuable.” Marianne van Vuuren, pers. comm., 2017, cited in
ten Hoopen (2018:485).
Fig. 22 Highly unusual homodirectional plying in a Mualang tubeskirt from the late 19th or early 20th century.
and (c) could create proportionally more intricate twined without exception, Sumba, we encounter both types,
drawings in cloths of the same size. Inversely, it entails that though S-type is predominant. Across the other regions
the weavers of the last 100 years had to settle for drawing under study where twining was practiced, we encounter
in substantially lower definition than their grandmothers double-ply, triple-ply, and quadruple-ply; the latter mostly on
and great-grandmothers – and provides overdue empirical Timor, but only with commercial yarn, presumably to give
substantiation for the subjective sense of a steep decline of it more body, but also on four specimens from the Moluccas
ikat in the region under study. made from hand-spun yarn. As single yarn was found far
more common than twined, and the investigation’s focus
2.2 VARIETIES OF PLYING was on weave types and changes of yarn gauge over time,
Microscopic observation revealed that the vast majority of no attempt was made to link ply-counts to specific regions
the ikat textiles from the region under study were made of beyond the observations made above.
single yarn. Twining, most common on Sumba and Savu, Why would women go through the trouble of creating
and occasionally seen elsewhere, e.g. on Timor and in the double-ply from very thin yarn if they could just as well
Moluccas, is of two kinds, called S-type or Z-type depending spin it a little thicker to begin with? Double-ply yarn is
on the direction in which the yarns were twisted together. qualitatively better than single-ply yarn made twice as thick.
If we hold the twined yarn vertical and the spiralling yarns Plying produces a smoother yarn, as it evens out inequalities,
slant from bottom left to top right, we speak of Z-type ply; if be they differences in thickness or variations in tension (ten
they slant from bottom right to top left, of S-type ply (Jager Hoopen 2018:34) and, when noticed, may have the additional
Gerlings 1952:153.) On the only island where the warp was advantage of showing off effort, investment of time – a form
Fig. 23 Mixed use of hand-spun yarn and machine-made thread on a 1925‑1950 Savu sarong. Source: PC 012 (shown in
full on Fig. 220).
of pecuniary emulation sensu Veblen. During the plying The vast majority (72 per cent) was done in ‘two over, two
process, a length of yarn, spun by twisting together strands of under’ as Kreifeldt, one of very few sources on Kalimantan
cotton fibre, is twined with another length of yarn, typically ikat calls it, 10 the rest in twin warp and double or triple
(with the odd exception) in a direction opposite to that in weft – except this particular Mualang skirt, in which
which they were originally twisted. This procedure settles everything was done differently.
the fibre, counteracts the tension created by the spinning
process and protects parts of the fibre from abrasion – the 2.3 INTRODUCTION OF MACHINE-MADE
more plies, the more significant the effect. THREAD
Several oddities were observed. The most intriguing Microscopic analysis of the yarn yielded a few anomalies
is a probably 19th-century skirt from the Mualang in West suggesting that around the fin-de-siècle in most regions
Kalimantan (PC 230, see Fig. 22). It shows homodirectional a reversal of values took place: machine-made yarn was
quadruple-ply made by twining two threads, not counter- given a higher appreciation than hand-spun. It appears
twisted, but in the same direction; then twining together that this reversal took place at the introduction of machine-
two strands of this double yarn, again not counter-twisted made thread, which, because a cash outlay was required
but in the same direction. While Kalimantan is outside the to obtain it, must have been seen as a luxury. During this
studied area, it is brought up here in order to illustrate the transitional period a few weavers chose to do their ikat
occasional occurrence, across the archipelago, of gross work in machine-made yarn, which temporarily was seen
deviations from the regional standards, even with regard as status-enhancing, while using hand-spun yarn for all
to a technique as basic as twining. The Mualang weaver the plain bands.
of this kain kebat lived over a century ago in an extremely A typical example is the Savu sarong PC 012, described
remote place, given the simple designs almost certainly in detail in the caption of Fig. 220, which is estimated to
far up-river. In all her life she may never have come to have been made between 1925 and 1940. Remarkably, the
the Mualang heartland, nor have had more than a few ikat work (the ‘posh’ part) was all executed on commercial
occasions to study evolved designs. All indications are that thread, whereas the plain areas were done in very fine
she was living on the extremities of the Mualang realm, in hand-spun. This suggests that on Savu at that particular
the thinnest veins of the tribe’s cultural bloodstream. This time commercial thread – which allowed exceedingly
gives us a reasonable assumption of her physical place in precise ikat – was considered a luxury, something one
the world, but who was she? would not waste on plain sections.
Not only was she a contrarian in terms of spinning, her
weave is also what the Dutch call tegendraads (‘counter-
yarnish’, i.e. deviant): hers is the only one found in all of
the Borneo sample (n = 29) not woven with twin warp. 10 John Kreifeldt, pers. comm., 2017.
Fig. 24 The mixed use of hand-spun yarn and machine-made thread found on an antique Palu’e sarong. Source: PC 305
(see Fig. 211).
Hand-spun yarn and double-ply machine-made thread On a background of indigo hand-spun yarn, deeply
running in parallel, the latter in the white stripes. saturated, a single thread of quadruple-ply benang
belanda (or other benang toko) creates a narrow yellow
pinstripe.
Fig. 25 The mixed use of hand-spun yarn and machine-made thread found on an antique Palu’e sarong. This sarong is of a
type called wua wela, actually one of the two most common types on the island; the main difference with today’s wua wela
being that the patterning on PC 305 is continuous – asymmetric – which is more laborious. The constant adjusting and
moving of yarns (ére tone), already arduous with the usual symmetric designs, during her reconstruction of the asymmetric
textile was mentioned by the weaver as extra labourious. Stefan Danerek, pers. comm, 2019. Source: PC 305 (see Fig. 211).
Fig. 46 Hand-spun cotton in a ceremonial shawl of the Fig. 47 Yarn of an early, but only sparingly used East
highest rank, Ndao, 1900‑1925. Rather heavily degraded Timorese ikat. Even though it is 80‑90 years old, the yarn
yarn, but the cloth shows no signs of intensive use and of this tais feto, ceremonial sarong, from the ruler’s family
given its rank was probably used sparingly (PC 290, see in Suai-Loro, Covalima (East Timor), the hand-spun cotton
Figs. 82, 198). is only moderately degraded. This no doubt results from
the fact that such sarongs were worn only a few times a
year and rarely, if ever, washed (PC 328).
9 789464 280128