Professional Documents
Culture Documents
s2.0 S0002937823X000641 s2.0 S0002937822007244main - PDFX Amz Security Token IQoJb
s2.0 S0002937823X000641 s2.0 S0002937822007244main - PDFX Amz Security Token IQoJb
org
Normal labor and delivery are dependent on the presence of regular and effective contractions of the uterine myometrium. The
mechanisms responsible for the initiation and maintenance of adequate and synchronized uterine activity that are necessary for
labor and delivery result from a complex interplay of hormonal, mechanical, and electrical factors that have not yet been fully
elucidated.
Monitoring uterine activity during term labor and in suspected preterm labor is an important component of obstetrical care because
cases of inadequate and excessive uterine activity can be associated with substantial maternal and neonatal morbidity and
mortality. Inadequate labor progress is a common challenge encountered in intrapartum care, with labor dystocia being the most
common indication for cesarean deliveries performed during labor. Hereafter, an accurate assessment of uterine activity during
labor can assist in the management of protracted labor by diagnosing inadequate uterine activity and facilitating the titration of
uterotonic medications before a trial of labor is prematurely terminated. Conversely, the ability to diagnose unwanted or excessive
uterine activity is also critical in cases of threatened preterm labor, tachysystole, or patients undergoing a trial of labor after
cesarean delivery. Knowledge of uterine activity in these cases may guide the use of tocolytic medications or raise suspicion of
uterine rupture. Current diagnostic capabilities are less than optimal, hindering the medical management of term and preterm
labor.
Currently, different methods exist for evaluating uterine activity during labor, including manual palpation, external tocodynamometry,
intrauterine pressure monitoring, and electrical uterine myometrial activity tracing. Legacy uterine monitoring techniques have advantages
and limitations. External tocodynamometry is the most widespread tool in clinical use owing to its noninvasive nature and its ability to time
contractions against the fetal heart rate monitor. However, it does not provide information regarding the strength of uterine contractions
and is limited by signal loss with maternal movements. Conversely, the intrauterine pressure catheter quantifies the strength of uterine
contractions; however, its use is limited by its invasiveness, risk for complications, and limited additive value in all but few clinical
scenarios. New monitoring methods are being used, such as electrical uterine monitoring, which is noninvasive and does not require
ruptured membranes. Electrical uterine monitoring has yet to be incorporated into common clinical practice because of lack of access to
this technology, its high cost, and the need for appropriate training of clinical staff. Further work needs to be done to increase the
accessibility and implementation of this technique by experts, and further research is needed to implement new practical and useful
methods. This review describes current clinical tools for uterine activity assessment during labor and discusses their advantages and
shortcomings.
The review also summarizes current knowledge regarding novel technologies for monitoring uterine contractions that are not yet in
widespread use, but are promising and could help improve our understanding of the physiology of labor, delivery, and preterm labor, and
ultimately enhance patient care.
Key words: action potentials, contraction frequency, contraction intensity, contractions, dysfunctional labor, electrical activity, electrical
uterine monitoring, electro hysterogram, external tocodynamometry, gap junctions, hysterography, intrauterine pressure catheter, labor
augmentation, labor induction, labor progression, manual palpation, Montevideo units, myometrium, preterm labor, tachysystole, uterine
activity
Introduction
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayanei Hayeshua Medical Center, Bnei Brak, Monitoring uterine activity is a common
Israel (Dr Rosen); Lis Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv,
Israel (Dr Yogev); and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Drs Rosen and
obstetrical practice. During labor, it
Yogev). allows for the supervision of labor pro-
Received May 28, 2022; revised Sept. 1, 2022; accepted Sept. 1, 2022. gression and can aid clinical decision-
The authors report no conflict of interest.
making regarding intervention. Uterine
activity may be assumed adequate when
Corresponding author: Hadar Rosen, MD. rosenhadar@gmail.com
progressive cervical dilatation and
0002-9378/$36.00 ! ª 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. ! https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.003
fetal descent occur. Dysfunctional
labor has been estimated to affect up to
Click Video under article title in Contents at
21% of primigravid labors,1 and it is the
systems are connected to the fetal heart Montevideo unit multiplied by the mean
FIGURE 3
rate monitor, obviating the need for a duration of contractions over a 10-
Terminology of uterine fluid-filled catheter. Because no signifi- minute period,41 or uterine activity
contractions cant difference has been demonstrated units, which calculate the area under the
between the different types of IUPCs in pressure curve42 (Figure 4). However,
relation to maternal and fetal complica- these have not been adopted in clinical
tions, the choice of catheter used is practice. Planimeter units are used
determined by availability, cost, or to determine the area of an arbitrary
preference.35e37 One randomized trial 2-dimensional shape, defined by the area
that included 249 patients showed a under the curve$10.
higher rate of extramembranous place- The rise in cesarean delivery rates over
ment with transducer-tipped than with the years,43 in large part owing to intra-
sensor-tipped catheter (12.5% vs 2.4%), partum cesarean deliveries for failure to
with no difference in the rate of com- progress (Table 1), has highlighted the
Adapted from Michele J. Grimm, Forces plications.37 One retrospective cohort importance of making an accurate
involved with labor and delivery- a biochemical study showed that among 6445 women, diagnosis of arrested labor, which de-
perspective, annals of biochemical engineering, 3944 (61.2%) had internal monitors. pends on the precise assessment of
49,1819-1835 (2021) Women with internal monitors were uterine contractions. Table 1 is adapted
Rosen. Assessment of uterine contractions in labor and de-
livery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023.
more likely to have a fever than women from a consortium study by Zhang et al2
without internal monitors (11.7% vs that evaluated deliveries from 2002 to
4.5%). The risk of cesarean delivery was 2008. Since then, definitions and prac-
Intrauterine pressure catheter for higher in women with internal monitors tices have changed, with new World
uterine activity monitoring (18.6% vs 9.7%). The routine use of Health Organization recommendations
Some of the above-mentioned limita- IUPC in laboring patients should be for nonclinical interventions to reduce
tions of external tocodynamometry may avoided because of an increased risk of unnecessary cesarean deliveries.40 Un-
be overcome using internal monitoring maternal fever.38 derstanding that nonprogressive labor is
of uterine contractions during labor often the result of insufficient uterine
with an IUPC. The first measurement of Role of internal uterine monitoring in contractions rather than a premature
intrauterine pressure to record uterine labor management diagnosis of arrest of dilatation allows for
contractions was performed in 1872 by The main advantage of IUPC over the use of uterotonic medications and
Friedrich Schatz. His method for external tocodynamometry is that it al- thus may in theory reduce the rate of
assessing uterine contractions used a lows quantification of contraction cesarean deliveries performed for labor
small bag of fluid introduced between strength, usually measured by Mon- dystocia. It also supports clinicians in
the membranes and the lower segment tevideo units. IUPC use may also be titrating uterotonic treatment during
of the uterus, connected to a mercury considered when external tocodyna- inductions or augmentation of labor. It
manometer. mometry fails to provide a clear tracing has been suggested that an average of 150
Currently, use of the IUPC requires its of uterine contraction pattern because of to 250 Montevideo units are necessary to
placement within the intraamniotic technical limitations such as obesity or cause cervical dilation and fetal
cavity following either spontaneous or patient movements. In 1952, Caldeyro- descent.40,44 Uterine activity is currently
artificial rupture of the membranes, and Barcia et al39 introduced Montevideo defined by the American College of
is therefore limited to only when delivery units to quantify uterine contraction Obstetricians and Gynecologists
is desired. There are 3 types of IUPCs: power. Montevideo units represent the (ACOG) as “adequate” when Mon-
fluid-filled, transducer-tipped, and sum of the amplitude of each contrac- tevideo units exceed 200 mm Hg.45 Early
sensor-tipped. The fluid-filled catheter tion over a 10-minute period.40 The descriptions by Caldeyro-Barcia et al46
has a column that connects a balloon in amplitude of each contraction is suggested that the average uterine
the amniotic cavity to an external pres- measured as the peak contraction pres- contraction pressures achieved during
sure monitor, and the water column in sure minus the baseline tone to give the the final stages of the first and second
the catheter transmits the intrauterine “active pressure” (Figure 3). stage of labor can reach up to 250
pressure to a transducer on the monitor A major criticism of Montevideo units Montevideo units, yet later studies found
that converts the resulting electrical is that contraction duration and the that average Montevideo units during
signal to contraction waveforms. The 2 resting period between contractions are the active phase of normal spontaneous
more modern systems are one in which only indirectly accounted for in this labors were even lower than those ob-
both the pressure sensor and the trans- calculation. Other calculations incorpo- tained during induced labors.47 In a
ducer are at the intrauterine tip, and one rating duration of uterine contractions study of 109 women undergoing induc-
in which the transducer is extrauterine. have been suggested, such as Alexandria tion or augmentation of labor, all of
Both transducer- and sensor-tipped units, which are equivalent to a whom ultimately delivered vaginally, it
pregnancy) occurring immediately after supine, and is referred to the top of the augmentation of labor.76 There were no
IUPC placement.69,72 IUPC insertion uterus if zeroed. For calibration purposes reports of maternal or neonatal deaths in
has been associated with colonization of the external transducer is initially placed any of the studies. Neonatal outcomes
the amniotic cavity with bacteria. In a at the level of the symphysis pubis, and at (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, umbilical
study of 30 consecutive labors, amniotic this fixed point the “baseline tone” is artery pH <7.15, admission to the
fluid was collected from the IUPC registered. This uterine tone measure- neonatal intensive care unit, and >48
immediately after insertion and 1 hour ment varies with maternal posture. hours of hospitalization) did not differ
after insertion.73 Whereas the amniotic significantly between study groups.
fluid obtained at the time of insertion Comparison between external and There were no demonstrated increased
was sterile, 50% of patients had bacterial internal contraction monitoring maternal or fetal complications with
colonization of the amniotic fluid 1 hour during labor IUPC vs external tocography. Risks of
later, and 36% developed postpartum Comparison between external tocody- invasive monitoring exist but should not
fever, although there was no correlation namometry and the IUPC has been the be overstated. In addition, there were no
between bacterial count and maternal subject of a few investigations. One large, significant differences between study
fever. Data were not available on the randomized control trial evaluating in- groups in the number of instrumental or
timing of rupture of membranes; there- ternal vs external tocography during in- cesarean deliveries, the use of analgesia,
fore, it is unclear whether bacterial duction and augmentation of labor and time to delivery. Furthermore,
colonization was caused by the insertion aimed to determine the effect of internal women in whom an intrauterine cath-
of the IUPC or by membrane rupture. In tocodynamometry vs external moni- eter was placed had no increased risk of
addition, IUPC use was associated with toring on the rate of operative vaginal infection. It was concluded that internal
an approximately 2-fold increase in the and cesarean deliveries (the rates of tocodynamometry did not improve any
risk of maternal fever before and after which are higher in the United States maternal or neonatal outcomes.74
delivery.38 However, in women under- than in the Netherlands, where the study Because external tocography correlates
going cesarean delivery, internal IUPC was conducted).75 Overall, 1456 women well with internal tocography with
use did not place women at increased with singleton cephalic term pregnancies respect to frequency, and IUPC use may
risk of endometritis.74 (the rates of which are higher in the be associated with complications, as
Maternal fever and chorioamnionitis United States than in the Netherlands, detailed above, ACOG does not recom-
have been examined as secondary out- where the study was conducted) under- mend routine use of IUPCs,77 but rather
comes in studies that randomized went induction or augmentation of labor suggests that they should be considered
women to IUPC placement. One study with intravenous oxytocin and were only in select clinical situations.
that randomized women diagnosed with randomized to receive either IUPC or
labor dystocia to either IUPC or external external tocodynamometry. The authors Electrical uterine monitoring
tocography demonstrated no difference failed to demonstrate a decrease in Electromyography (EMG) of uterine
in the use of antibiotics or clinical signs operative delivery with internal tocog- muscle activity is a monitoring tech-
of maternal or neonatal infection be- raphy. There were also no differences nique that relies on the detection and
tween groups.75 between the groups in the rate of anti- recording of bioelectrical signals pro-
Another limitation of the IUPC con- biotic use, the time from randomization duced by the contracting uterus in a
cerns its sensitivity and accuracy of to delivery, or rate of adverse neonatal similar manner to other better-
measuring uterine activity. During outcomes. There were no reported recognized techniques such as
quiescence, intrauterine tone is referred complications with use of the IUPC, and electrocardiography and electroence
to as the “resting uterine pressure” or there were no neonatal or maternal phalography.
“baseline tone,” which comprises pressure deaths. It is important to note, however, Electrical activity of the uterine mus-
owing to the elastic recoil of the tissues, that 12% of women randomized to cle was first recorded over half a century
and a hydrostatic component, which external monitoring received internal ago.78 Early animal studies showed that
varies with the depth below the upper monitoring because of either inability to propagation of myometrial electrical
fluid level of the uterus. The contribution adequately monitor uterine activity us- activity is facilitated by gap junctions,
of the hydrostatic component to the ing external tocodynamometry or sus- which increase in number before the
overall intrauterine pressure varies from pected arrest of dilation. onset of labor. These studies were then
0 when measured with the upper fluid To better understand the effectiveness followed by noninvasive recordings of
level of the uterus, to approximately 35 of IUPC vs that of external tocography uterine EMG signals from the abdom-
cm H2O (25.7 mm Hg, 3.43 kPa) if when intravenous oxytocin is used to inal surface in human participants. The
measured at the lowest fluid level. Hence, induce or augment labor, a systematic recordings provided convincing evi-
the baseline tone is not a single value but Cochrane review of 3 randomized trials dence that uterine EMG activity tracing
rather varies according to the position of comparing internal with external toco- or EUM can be elucidated from nonin-
the maternal posture referred to as “the dynamometry was conducted, including vasive transabdominal surface measure-
baseline problem.” Baseline is measured 1945 women undergoing induction or ments evaluating uterine contractions
FIGURE 5
Simultaneous recordings of uterine contractions using 2 separate methods
Bottom: standard IUPC recording; top: simultaneous EUM measurement. (Orange dot) on bottom tracing represents the point in time reflected on the top
EUM graph. A, Uterine quiescence; although baseline uterine pressure is measured by IUPC, no electrical uterine activity is recorded simultaneously. B,
Uterine contraction; in parallel with peak intrauterine pressure, peak electrical myometrial electrical activity is recorded. IUPC records pressure of a solitary
point inside the uterus, whereas EUM measures numerous points on the uterine surface, allowing evaluation of progression of the contraction wave.
EUM, electrical uterine monitoring; IUPC, intrauterine pressure catheter.
Rosen. Assessment of uterine contractions in labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023.
The results of these studies suggest throughout term labor for both non- contractions in clinical settings where
that EUM is a sensitive method for obese and obese women. EUM allows IUPC is contraindicated or when mem-
improving external uterine monitoring the assessment of intensity of uterine branes are intact. However, unlike IUPC,
EUM may provide some readings of false the mean EUM index during oxytocin consideration should be given to EUM in
positive contractions. administration and time to delivery. these patients because in addition to its
accuracy, it does not carry the previously
Assessment of labor progression by Electrical uterine activity monitoring mentioned risks associated with IUPC
electrical uterine activity monitoring during the third stage of labor placement.
A prospective double-blind study eval- The third stage of labor is defined as the Another study evaluated the influence
uated EUM in 63 active laboring women. time interval from delivery of the fetus of maternal obesity on the performance
The control group consisted of 26 pa- to the expulsion of the placenta and of external tocodynamometry vs EUM
tients with normal labor progression, membranes. EUM was prospectively during labor at term.96 Uterine con-
and the study group included 37 patients measured during the third stage of la- tractions were simultaneously measured
with abnormal labors.90 Analysis of pa- bor and compared with that observed by EUM, external tocodynamometry,
tients with labor abnormalities in the in the second stage of labor.93 Signifi- and IUPC in 14 morbidly obese, 18
active phase revealed that the electrical cant uterine activity was identified obese, and 20 nonobese women. Data
uterine activity increased after the during the third stage, and contraction were compared among these groups. In
administration of oxytocin and during peaks were similar to those observed contrast to external tocodynamometry,
the active phase in spontaneous labor. during the second stage of labor the sensitivity of EUM was not affected
Analysis of the electrical uterine activity (3.43%0.64 vs 3.42%0.57 mWs; P¼.8). by the degree of obesity, further sup-
of patients in spontaneous labor vs those No correlation was found between the porting a role for EUM in obese patients.
receiving oxytocin augmentation was duration of the third-stage length and
similar, suggesting that comparable EUM measurements during the third Limitations of electrical uterine
electrical uterine activity occurs in or second stage of labor. monitoring
spontaneous and augmented labor. Despite the mentioned advantages, there
In an attempt to assess the effect of Electrical uterine activity monitoring are some limitations to the use of EUM.
amniotomy on uterine electrical activity, and labor induction The accuracy of EUM signal transmission
EUM was prospectively measured in 23 Assessment of uterine activity during can be affected by the relative conductivity
women with singleton pregnancies at induction of labor allows the determi- of tissue layers through which the signal
term in the active phase of labor.91 EUM nation of uterine response to cervical must be transmitted. Furthermore, the
was continuously measured at least 30 ripening and uterotonic agents and the quality of the signal can be affected by
minutes before and at least 30 minutes detection of uterine tachysystole. The interference from other signals, such as the
following performance of amniotomy. effect of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on skeletal muscle electromyogram, maternal
There was a significant increase in mean electrical uterine activity was studied in ECG, and movement artifacts.40,97 The
EUM measurement after artificial patients undergoing induction of la- signal can even be lost, which is a major
rupture of the membranes compared bor94; 31 women were monitored before problem of using EUM. Cost is also a sig-
with when the membranes were intact and up to 12 hours after vaginal PGE2 nificant limitation. The introduction of
(3.59%0.39 vs 3.42%0.47 mWs; P<.001), application. The EUM index was not new technology into already equipped and
confirming that amniotomy augments increased significantly during the first 2 trained birthing units demands capital
uterine activity. hours following PGE2 application. Peak investment in material and training re-
In a prospective study,92 electrical EUM activity was observed 2 to 8 hours sources. In addition, the use of EUM re-
uterine activity was measured in women after PGE2 application. sults in a substantial rate of false-positives,
with singleton term gestations undergo- and efforts need to be undertaken to
ing labor augmentation by oxytocin Electrical uterine activity monitoring decrease this rate. Current US Food and
administration. Measurements begun 30 in obese patients Drug Administration clearances for ECG/
minutes before oxytocin infusion initia- Traditional noninvasive methods of EMG fetal monitors are only for term
tion and continued until 4 contractions measuring uterine activity are limited in pregnancies. In the past years, there were
per 10 minutes were achieved. The delta obese women. One study compared EUM no EUM devices that are commercially
EUM index was defined as the difference with traditional tocodynamometry and available for clinical use. Recently, the
between the mean EUM index (mean the IUPC in 25 obese (median body mass Monica device has been made available for
electrical activity in 10-minute intervals index, 39.6) laboring women.95 Tocody- clinical use in the United States, and the
in microjoule) before and after the initi- namometry identified 248 contractions vs device of OBMedical, which was acquired
ation of oxytocin. It was found that uter- the 336 identified by EMG, whereas IUPC by Philips, may be brought soon.
ine electrical activity as evaluated by EUM monitoring identified 319 contractions vs
is significantly intensified following the 342 identified by EMG. These results Summary
oxytocin administration, regardless of suggest that in obese women, EUM is as The monitoring of uterine activity is a
obstetrical characteristics, although no effective as invasive IUPC measurement of routine component of modern ante-
correlation was observed between the uterine activity, and that both are partum and intrapartum obstetrical care.
delta EUM index and time to delivery or superior to tocodynamometry. Therefore, In the United States, fetal monitoring is
not thought to improve outcomes beyond setting. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87: 18. Maul H, Maner WL, Saade GR, Garfield RE.
intermittent manual monitoring, but 216–21. The physiology of uterine contractions. Clin
2. Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, et al. Perinatol 2003;30:665–76.
nonetheless remains a mainstay of Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the 19. Lammers WJEP. The electrical activities of
obstetrical care. There are a few methods United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203: the uterus during pregnancy. Reprod Sci
for monitoring uterine activity that are 326. e1e10. 2013;20:182–9.
currently in clinical use, and each method 3. Garfield RE, Maner WL. Physiology and 20. McEvoy A, Sabir S. Physiology, pregnancy
is associated with inherent advantages electrical activity of uterine contractions. Semin contractions. 2022. Available at: http://www.
Cell Dev Biol 2007;18:289–95. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532927/. June
and disadvantages, and limitations in 4. Kao CY. Electrical properties of uterine 17, 2022.
select clinical settings. External tocog- smooth muscle. In: Biology of the uterus. New 21. Caldeyro-Barcia R, Poseiro JJ. Physiology
raphy, although lacking the ability to York, NY: Plenum Press; 1977. p. 423–96. of the uterine contraction. Clin Obstet Gynaecol
assess contraction intensity, remains the 5. Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, Olivennes F, 1960;3:386–410.
mainstay of routine obstetrical care Schönauer LM, Frydman R. Uterine contractility 22. Lutton EJ, Lammers WJEP, James S, van
decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. den Berg HA, Blanks AM. Identification of
because it is easy to use, relatively inex- Hum Reprod 2001;16:1115–9. uterine pacemaker regions at the myometrial-
pensive, noninvasive, and provides 6. Renthal NE, Chen CC, Williams KC, placental interface in the rat. J Physiol
important information regarding the Gerard RD, Prange-Kiel J, Mendelson CR. miR- 2018;596:2841–52.
presence, regularity, and duration of 200 family and targets, ZEB1 and ZEB2, 23. Zhang M, La Rosa PS, Eswaran H,
contractions, all while maintaining a low modulate uterine quiescence and contractility Nehorai A. Estimating uterine source current
during pregnancy and labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci during contractions using magnetomyography
risk of complications. Although the IUPC U S A 2010;107:20828–33. measurements. PLoS One 2018;13:
provides more accurate information 7. Young RC, Smith LH, McLaren MD. T-type e0202184.
regarding contraction intensity and basal and L-type calcium currents in freshly dispersed 24. Csapo AI, Jaffin H, Kerenyi T, Lipman JI,
uterine tone, there is insufficient evidence human uterine smooth muscle cells. Am J Wood C. Volume and activity of the pregnant
for the routine use of IUPC in terms of Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:785–92. human uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963;85:
8. Young RC, Zhang P. Inhibition of in vitro 819–35.
improving outcomes, including neonatal contractions of human myometrium by mibe- 25. Young RC, Goloman G. Mechano-
outcomes, rates of instrumental de- fradil, a T-type calcium channel blocker: support transduction in rat myometrium: coordination of
liveries, use of analgesia, cesarean delivery for a model using excitation-contraction contractions of electrically and chemically iso-
rates, or time to delivery. The use of IUPC coupling, and autocrine and paracrine signaling lated tissues. Reprod Sci 2011;18:64–9.
is associated with certain risks and limi- mechanisms. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2005;12. 26. Bakker PCAM, van Geijn HP. Uterine activ-
e7e12. ity: implications for the condition of the fetus.
tations, namely the risk of infection and 9. Slattery MM, Brennan C, O’Leary MJ, J Perinat Med 2008;36:30–7.
uterine perforation, and the need for Morrison JJ. Human chorionic gonadotrophin 27. Arrabal PP, Nagey DA. Is manual palpation
ruptured membranes. In addition, there inhibition of pregnant human myometrial of uterine contractions accurate? Am J Obstet
is lack of evidence for IUPC superiority contractility. BJOG 2001;108:704–8. Gynecol 1996;174:217–9.
relative to other methods, which limits its 10. Tyson EK, Smith R, Read M. Evidence that 28. Freeman RK, Garite TJ, Nageotte MP,
corticotropin-releasing hormone modulates Miller L. Fetal heart rate monitoring, 4th ed.
use to specific clinical settings such as myometrial contractility during human preg- Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
oxytocin titration in cases of labor nancy. Endocrinology 2009;150:5617–25. 29. Bakker PC, Van Rijswijk S, van Geijn HP.
dystocia with ruptured membranes. EUM 11. Sassone-Corsi P. The cyclic AMP pathway. Uterine activity monitoring during labor. J Perinat
may be a promising technology that can Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2012;4: Med 2007;35:468–77.
overcome the aforementioned challenges. a011148. 30. Euliano TY, Nguyen MT, Darmanjian S, et al.
12. Bursztyn L, Eytan O, Jaffa AJ, Elad D. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a com-
In addition to being noninvasive, EUM Mathematical model of excitation-contraction in parison of 3 methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol
provides an accurate assessment of a uterine smooth muscle cell. Am J Physiol Cell 2013;208:66. e1e6.
contraction intensity, and is not associ- Physiol 2007;292:C1816–29. 31. Steer PJ. Standards in fetal monitoring–
ated with the risks, limitations, and con- 13. Wray S, Jones K, Kupittayanant S, et al. practical requirements for uterine activity mea-
traindications that accompany the use of Calcium signaling and uterine contractility. J Soc surement and recording. Br J Obstet Gynaecol
Gynecol Investig 2003;10:252–64. 1993;100(Suppl 9):32–6.
the IUPC. EUM has yet to be incorpo-
14. Demianczuk N, Towell ME, Garfield RE. 32. Bakker PC, Kurver PH, Kuik DJ, Van
rated into clinical practice because of lack Myometrial electrophysiologic activity and gap Geijn HP. Elevated uterine activity increases the
of access to this technology, its high cost, junctions in the pregnant rabbit. Am J Obstet risk of fetal acidosis at birth. Am J Obstet
and the need for appropriate training of Gynecol 1984;149:485–91. Gynecol 2007;196:313. e1e6.
clinical staff. Further research is needed to 15. Garfield RE, Saade G, Buhimschi C, et al. 33. Maul H, Maner WL, Olson G, Saade GR,
Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix Garfield RE. Non-invasive transabdominal uter-
elucidate the precise physiological process
during pregnancy and labour. Hum Reprod ine electromyography correlates with the
of normal and abnormal term and pre- Update 1998;4:673–95. strength of intrauterine pressure and is predic-
term labor progression and their corre- 16. Smith R, Imtiaz M, Banney D, Paul JW, tive of labor and delivery. J Matern Fetal
lation with uterine activity. - Young RC. Why the heart is like an orchestra and Neonatal Med 2004;15:297–301.
the uterus is like a soccer crowd. Am J Obstet 34. Newman RB. Uterine contraction assess-
Gynecol 2015;213:181–5. ment. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005;32:
REFERENCES 17. Bisits AM, Smith R, Mesiano S, et al. In- 341–67.
1. Selin L, Wallin G, Berg M. Dystocia in labour - flammatory aetiology of human myometrial 35. Dowdle MA. Comparison of two intrauterine
risk factors, management and outcome: a activation tested using directed graphs. PLoS pressure catheters during labor. J Reprod Med
retrospective observational study in a Swedish Comput Biol 2005;1:132–6. 2003;48:501–5.
36. Dowdle M. Evaluating a new intrauterine 54. Heuser CC, Knight S, Esplin MS, et al. 70. Wilmink FA, Wilms FF, Heydanus R,
pressure catheter. J Reprod Med 1997;42: Tachysystole in term labor: incidence, risk factors, Mol BWJ, Papatsonis DNM. Fetal complications
506–13. outcomes, and effect on fetal heart tracings. Am J after placement of an intrauterine pressure cath-
37. Sciscione AC, Duhl A, Pollock MA, Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:32. e1e6. eter: a report of two cases and review of the
Hoffman MK, Rhee A, Colmorgen GHC. Extra- 55. Kunz MK, Loftus RJ, Nichols AA. Incidence literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:
membranous placement of an air-coupled vs. of uterine tachysystole in women induced with 880–3.
transducer-tipped intrauterine pressure cath- oxytocin. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 71. Lind BK. Complications caused by extra-
eter. J Reprod Med 2005;50:578–84. 2013;42:12–8. membranous placement of intrauterine pressure
38. Harper LM, Shanks AL, Tuuli MG, Roehl KA, 56. Stewart RD, Bleich AT, Lo JY, catheters. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:
Cahill AG. The risks and benefits of internal Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. 1034–5.
monitors in laboring patients. Am J Obstet Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too 72. Harbison L, Bell L. Anaphylactoid syndrome
Gynecol 2013;209:38. e1e6. much? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:290. after intrauterine pressure catheter placement.
39. Caldeyro-Barcia R, Poseiro JJ. Oxytocin e1e6. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:407–8.
and contractility of the pregnant human uterus. 57. Smith S, Zacharias J, Lucas V, Warrick PA, 73. Thadepalli H, Appleman MD, Chan WH,
Ann N Y Acad Sci 1959;75:813–30. Hamilton EF. Clinical associations with uterine Maidman JC, Davidson EC. Amniotic fluid
40. Alberola-Rubio J, Prats-Boluda G, Ye-Lin Y, tachysystole. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med contamination during internal fetal monitoring.
Valero J, Perales A, Garcia-Casado J. Com- 2014;27:709–13. J Reprod Med 1978;20:93–6.
parison of non-invasive electrohysterographic 58. Crane JM, Young DC, Butt KD, Bennett KA, 74. Gibbs RS, Jones PM, Wilder CJ. Internal
recording techniques for monitoring uterine dy- Hutchens D. Excessive uterine activity accom- fetal monitoring and maternal infection following
namics. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:1736–43. panying induced labor. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97: cesarean section. A prospective study. Obstet
41. el-Sahwi S, Gaafar AA, Toppozada HK. 926–31. Gynecol 1978;52:193–7.
A new unit for evaluation of uterine activity. Am J 59. Gee SE, Frey HA. Contractions: traditional 75. Bakker JJ, Verhoeven CJM, Janssen PF,
Obstet Gynecol 1967;98:900–3. concepts and their role in modern obstetrics. et al. Outcomes after internal versus external
42. Miller FC, Yeh SY, Schifrin BS, Paul RH, Semin Perinatol 2020;44:151218. tocodynamometry for monitoring labor. N Engl J
Hon EH. Quantitation of uterine activity in 100 60. Sukumaran S, Jia YJ, Chandraharan E. Med 2010;362:306–13.
primiparous patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol Uterine Tachysystole, hypertonus and hyper- 76. Bakker JJH, Janssen PF, van Halem K, et al.
1976;124:398–405. stimulation: an urgent need to get the definitions Internal versus external tocodynamometry dur-
43. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, right to avoid Intrapartum Hypoxic-ischaemic ing induced or augmented labour. Cochrane
Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2017. Brain Injury. Published online April 1, 2021. doi: Database Syst Rev 2013;8:CD006947.
Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67:1–50. 10.19080/GJORM.2021.08.5556735 77. American College of Obstetrics and Gyne-
44. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction 61. Jonsson M, Nordén-Lindeberg S, Ostlund I, cology Committee on Practice Bulletins-Ob-
of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:386–97. Hanson U. Acidemia at birth, related to obstetric stetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49,
45. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe pre- characteristics and to oxytocin use, during the December 2003: dystocia and augmentation of
vention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet last two hours of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1445–54.
Gynecol 2014;123:693–711. Scand 2008;87:745–50. 78. Steer CM, Hertsch GJ. Electrical activity of
46. Caldeyro-Barcia R, Sica-Blanco Y, 62. Rodriguez MH, Masaki DI, Phelan JP, the human uterus in labor; the electro-
Poseiro JJ, et al. A quantitative study of the ac- Diaz FG. Uterine rupture: are intrauterine pres- hysterograph. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1950;59:
tion of synthetic oxytocin on the pregnant human sure catheters useful in the diagnosis? Am J 25–40.
uterus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1957;121:18–31. Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:666–9. 79. de Lau H, Rabotti C, Haazen N, Oei SG,
47. Steer PJ, Carter MC, Beard RW. Normal 63. Devoe LD, Croom CS, Youssef AA, Mischi M. Towards improving uterine electrical
levels of active contraction area in spontaneous Murray C. The prediction of ”controlled” uterine activity modeling and electrohysterography: ul-
labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:211–9. rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure trasonic quantification of uterine movements
48. Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Gilstrap LC, catheters. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:626–9. during labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Strickland DM, Vance P. Uterine contraction 64. Menihan CA. Uterine rupture in women 2013;92:1323–6.
pressures with oxytocin induction/augmenta- attempting a vaginal birth following prior cesar- 80. Devedeux D, Marque C, Mansour S,
tion. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:305–9. ean birth. J Perinatol 1998;18:440–3. Germain G, Duchêne J. Uterine electromyog-
49. Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Gilstrap LC. Uterine 65. Matsuo K, Scanlon JT, Atlas RO, raphy: a critical review. Am J Obstet Gynecol
contraction pressures achieved in parturients Kopelman JN. Staircase sign: a newly described 1993;169:1636–53.
with active phase arrest. Obstet Gynecol uterine contraction pattern seen in rupture of 81. de Lau H, Rabotti C, Oosterbaan HP,
1991;78:344–7. unscarred gravid uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res Mischi M, Oei GS. Study protocol: PoPE-prediction
50. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Savage KG, Hauth JC. 2008;34:100–4. of preterm delivery by electrohysterography. BMC
Active phase labor arrest: revisiting the 2-hour 66. Maggio L, Forbes J, Carey LL, Sangi- Pregnancy Childbirth 2014;14:192.
minimum. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:550–4. Haghpeykar H, Davidson C. Association of 82. Ye-Lin Y, Alberola-Rubio J, Prats-Boluda G,
51. Chin JR, Henry E, Holmgren CM, Montevideo units with uterine rupture in women et al. Non-invasive electrohysterogram
Varner MW, Branch DW. Maternal obesity and undergoing a trial of labor. J Reprod Med recording using flexible concentric ring elec-
contraction strength in the first stage of labor. 2014;59:464–70. trode. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:129. e1e6. 67. Vlemminx MWC, de Lau H, Oei SG. Toco- 2014;2014:4050–3.
52. Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Ingemarsson I, gram characteristics of uterine rupture: a sys- 83. Ye-Lin Y, Alberola-Rubio J, Prats-Boluda G,
Singh P, Ratnam SS. Augmentation of labour: tematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295: Perales A, Desantes D, Garcia-Casado J. Feasi-
does oxytocin titration to achieve preset active 17–26. bility and analysis of bipolar concentric recording
contraction area values produce better obstetric 68. Madanes AE, David D, Cetrulo C. Major com- of electrohysterogram with flexible active elec-
outcome? Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol plications associated with intrauterine pressure trode. Ann Biomed Eng 2015;43:968–76.
1989;15:333–7. monitoring. Obstet Gynecol 1982;59:389–91. 84. Huang H, Zhou P, Li G, Kuiken TA. An
53. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: intra- 69. Matsuo K, Lynch MA, Kopelman JN, Atlas RO. analysis of EMG electrode configuration for tar-
partum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomencla- Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy immedi- geted muscle reinnervation based neural ma-
ture, interpretation, and general management ately after intrauterine pressure catheter placement. chine interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil
principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192–202. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:e8–9. Eng 2008;16:37–45.
85. Alexandersson A, Steingrimsdottir T, for uterine activity monitoring during labour. physiology of a deserted stage. J Matern Fetal
Terrien J, Marque C, Karlsson B. The Icelandic J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23: Neonatal Med 2014;27:921–5.
16-electrode electrohysterogram database. Sci 17–22. 94. Aviram A, Melamed N, Hadar E, Raban O,
Data 2015;2:150017. 90. Farinelli C, Langer O, Playforth K, David GB, Hiersch L, Yogev Y. Effect of prostaglandin E2
86. Haran G, Elbaz M, Fejgin MD, Biron- Calderon I. Uterine electromyography during on myometrial electrical activity in women un-
Shental T. A comparison of surface acquired spontaneous and abnormal labor. Am J Obstet dergoing induction of labor. Am J Perinatol
uterine electromyography and intrauterine Gynecol 2008;199:S65. 2014;31:413–8.
pressure catheter to assess uterine activity. Am 91. Hiersch L, Rosen H, Salzer L, Aviram A, 95. Euliano TY, Nguyen MT, Marossero D,
J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:412. e1e5. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y. Does artificial Edwards RK. Monitoring contractions in obese
87. Blanks AM, Eswaran H. Measurement of rupturing of membranes in the active phase of parturients: electrohysterography compared
uterine electrophysiological activity. Curr Opin labor enhance myometrial electrical activity? with traditional monitoring. Obstet Gynecol
Physiol 2020;13:38–42. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28: 2007;109:1136–40.
88. Vlemminx MWC, Thijssen KMJ, Bajlekov GI, 515–8. 96. Vlemminx MWC, Thijssen KMJ, Bajlekov GI,
Dieleman JP, Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB, 92. Lavie A, Shinar S, Hiersch L, Ashwal E, Dieleman JP, Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB,
Oei SG. Electrohysterography for uterine moni- Yogev Y, Aviram A. Uterine electrical activity, Oei SG. Could electrohysterography be the so-
toring during term labour compared to external oxytocin and labor: translating electrical into lution for external uterine monitoring in obese
tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure mechanical. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;297: women? J Perinatol 2018;38:580–6.
catheter. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1405–13. 97. Rabotti C, Mischi M. Propagation of elec-
2017;215:197-205. 93. Rosen H, Salzer L, Hiersch L, Aviram A, trical activity in uterine muscle during preg-
89. Jacod BC, Graatsma EM, Van Hagen E, Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y. Uterine electric activity nancy: a review. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 2015;213:
Visser GHA. A validation of electrohysterography during the third stage of labor; a look into the 406–16.