Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MarKs and Spencer Financial Analysis
MarKs and Spencer Financial Analysis
<<Name of Institution>>
<<Course ID>>
<<Date>>
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MARKS & SPENCER 2
Introduction
The purpose of this report is to highlight important financial facets of Marks and Spencer
Plc. (M&S) and will focus on analysing the operating as well as financial performance of the
company over a five year period. The report will provide an analysis of Marks and Spencer Plc.
(M&S) financial position and health using Financial Ratio Analysis. It will also highlight the
importance of each of the financial ratios and conclude with an in depth analysis of Financial
Ratio Analysis in general. Lastly it shall draw conclusions on the performance of the company
from these ratios in tandem with that of some of its competitors such as Tesco Plc that is equally
Company Background
Marks and Spencer Plc. is a British organization that deals in home items, luxury food
consumables and products but mainly in clothing. Named after its founding members Michael
Marks and Thomas Spencer and is traded in the London Stock Exchange and is indeed a
multimillion-dollar business. In the United Kingdom alone they have over five hundred and
twenty stores, thirteen group stores in Republic of Ireland, eight group stores in Hong Kong
Looking at business trends the most important trends to follow fall under what is known as
common analysis. This looks at the company’s turnover, Gross profit, Operating income, EBIT
and Net Income. It is useful to see how all the above compare to prior year for the period under
review. It is also a great guide to management at a glance on what facets of the business need the
most attention.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MARKS & SPENCER 3
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
From the graphical trends we can see that year on year there has been a growth in the total
turnover at Marks and Spencer Plc for the period under review. This is indicative of a growing
business that has focus on the sales and driving the grown of the same. However when we look
10,500
Moentary Value
10,000
9,500
9,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Year
Turnover Profit (Loss) before Taxation Profit Margin
From the graph above we can see that there has been significant margin compression over the 5
year period despite higher profits year on year. We can see that turnover grows from £9,740 M to
£10,311 but EBIT falls from £781 to £600 over the same period and in turn Net income from
Profitability Margins
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
In conclusion while turnover is on an upwards trend the rest of the business indicators are on a
downward trend that does not bode well for the business.
Working Capital
Working Capital is the money required by a business or organisation required to support its short
term obligations and such its business continuity. As such is this the difference between the
company’s current assets and its current liabilities. The word "current" signifies or carries
credence to the fact that these items vary in the short term in tandem with operating activities.
Over the five year period there has been a 7.2% reduction in the level of working capital (or
current ratio) available to the business. Current ratios of above 1 show that a business is able to
fulfil its short term obligations in this case M&S are not in a position to do so. It drops from
Profitability ratios
Gross profit margin is simply a yardstick to indicate of how profitably a business can sell its
stock. A higher the ratio, in turn signifies a higher profit and as such a higher ratio is always
preferred. It will also meant that any monies in excess of the cost of sales or inventory costs will
cover operating costs. M&S Plc has a fairly stable GMR that drops marginally between 2011 and
2014 but bounces back in 2015 (38.24% to 37.55%) to stand at 38.66%. Despite the 6% increase
in turnover.
Profit Margin
This ratio expressed as a percentage measures the profit that is left after deducting the operating
costs and the cost of inventory from the turn over. Here we see a significant drop of 2.2% the
question that remains is if the overall margin of 5.82% is enough to sustain the business
comfortably.
This ratio is used to gauge the extent of how well or badly a company applies its deployed capital
indicates a greater effectiveness of conversion. M&S Plc net asset turn over has decreased over
the years 1.97 to 1.83 showing a decrease in the way that the company is using its capital to
Liquidity Ratios
Quick Ratio
Quick ratio that is in essence the same as working capital demonstrates the capability of a
company to pay off is debts with its current assets that are quickly convertible to cash otherwise
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MARKS & SPENCER 6
known as cash and cash equivalents. As already seen the Quick ratio for M&S Plc is less than 1
indicating difficulty in meeting these obligations. The worrying trend here is that the value
Current Ratio
A company’s current ratio measures its capability to pay short term debts as they fall due using
the current assets within their portfolio. The major difference between this and the quick ratio is
that when using the quick ratio you remove inventory from the list of current assets. What this
them means is that the remaining assets are more readily convertible to cash. Given that from the
M&S financials we do not have any items categorised as stocks we then find that the current
M&S Pls current ratios dropped year on year though there was some resurgence in 2015 (2011 –
0.74, 2012 – 0.73, 2013 – 0.57, 2014 – 0.58 and 2015 – 0.69). This continuous drop in current,
and quick ratio as well as working capital means that progressively with the exception of 2015
M&S has been having less and less propensity to meet it short term obligations. Despite the fact
that the quick and current ratios do not measure Cashflow the reduction is probably as a result in
a fall in liquidity over the period especially given the constant year on year decline. This is
further exasperated by the increase in the debtor days that has an impact to M&S Plc cash
conversion cycle.
Gearing Ratios
Gearing ratios are a set of financial ratios used in comparing any of the various forms of owner's
capital or equity to the company’s debt (borrowed funds). The main aim of gearing ratios is to
measure what is known as an entity’s financial leverage. In lay man’s terms it establishes the
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS MARKS & SPENCER 7
extent to which the activities of a firm are funded by its shareholders as opposed to being funded
by its creditors.
This ratio also expressed as a percentage, is computed by taking the total shareholders' equity
and dividing this by total assets of the company. It is representative of assets where the
shareholders still have a residual claim. When analysing the results of the ratio the lower the
result, the more assets have been acquired through debt. In the event of liquidation of the
organisation this ratio also shows what the shareholders will be entitles to receive.
Looking at the year on year progression of this ratio we can see that for the years 2011 to 2014
there was a decline from 1.17 to 1.02 almost to the point where shareholders would get nothing if
the company was liquidated. Bus like the majority of the other ratios we see a resurgence in 2015
Solvency Ratios
Solvency ratios, sometimes referred to as leverage ratios, show a firm's capacity to maintain
operations until further notice by comparing debt levels with earnings assets and equity.
Simply, these ratios recognise going concern issues and a firm's ability to pay its bills in the
foreseeable future long term. It is common for people to confuse solvency and liquidity ratios as
they both look at the ability of a firm or organisation to settle its responsibilities. However
solvency ratios unlike liquidity ratios look at, rather focus on the long term sustainability as
Over the five year period we can see that the solvency ratio based on the M&S Plc assets
improves however on the flip side we also see that eh solvency ratio based on liabilities also
increases. This indicates that M&S plc may have challenges meeting its long term obligations.
This once again is in line with a lot of the ratios that we have already reviewed so far.
From this we can see that solvency ratios demonstrate a firm’s capacity to make payments and
settle its “long-term” responsibilities to creditors, bondholders, and banks. Solvency ratios
differentiate creditworthy and financially sound companies in the long-term from those that are
not.
Conclusion
Financial Ratio Analysis is tremendously pertinent to all interested individuals as it sheds light
on critical information of the performance of the business for decision making. It forms that basis
of a useful tool to investors, managers, suppliers, lenders and customers alike who all require
Conferring to Zion’s Business Resource Centre (2017, p.5), financial analysis can assit in
recognizing problems prior to their manifestation into serious problems to the organisation.
Financial Ratio Analysis is therefore a vital part of finance and accounting and as such will
Marks & Spencer continue to show in their Annual Report a lot of diligence specifically geared
towards their stakeholders and have sculpted their business arrangement on ensuring that they
are satisfied. This has given rise to noteworthy growth and trust in the brand.
With all this being said and done, the financial accounts of Marks and Spencer Plc discloses that
the company has been stable and steadfast over the years. However, looking at the ratios both
current and long term the underlying business factors indicate and give the impression that M&S
Plc is an organisation past its glory days and its market have been infiltrated by competitors that
are more diverse and agile that have eaten into its market share. If the company does not change
References:
23 Nov. 2018].
Bekaert, G. and Hodrick, R., 2017. International financial management. Cambridge University
Press.
Finkler, S.A., Smith, D.L., Calabrese, T.D. and Purtell, R.M., 2016. Financial management for
Karadag, H., 2015. Financial management challenges in small and medium-sized enterprises: A
McKinney, J.B., 2015. Effective financial management in public and nonprofit agencies. ABC-
CLIO.
Petty, J.W., Titman, S., Keown, A.J., Martin, P., Martin, J.D. and Burrow, M., 2015. Financial
https://www.tescoplc.com/investors/reports-results-and-presentations/reports-archive/ [Accessed
23 Nov. 2018].
Zietlow, J., Hankin, J.A., Seidner, A. and O'Brien, T., 2018. Financial management for nonprofit