Cohabitation

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

1

Cohabitation

Psychology‌‌of‌‌Adolescence‌‌
2

Outcomes, Shifts, and Characteristics of Cohabitation According to Guzzo

The rate of cohabitation among young adults in the United States has increased over

recent years. Guzzo (2014) set out to draw the relationship between cohabitation and its

outcomes, that is, either officialization of the union through marriage or its dissolution. A shift

observed in cohabitation is that fewer cohabitation efforts end up in marriage than before. This is

attributed to the fact that those whose cohabitation efforts end up being dissolved are largely

from racial/ethnic minority groups and less educated than their White, educated counterparts.

Since they make up the majority of cohabitators, it is evident why most cohabitations are

dissolved. While the dissolution rate has increased, the rate of marriages formed with

cohabitation preceding it has also increased. More people live together before officiating their

union so as to test and observe whether marriage would work for them. This kind of litmus paper

test allows individuals to put themselves within a marriage environment without legally marrying

anyone. Another shift in cohabitation is that the number of people cohabitating more than once in

different times of their life has increased. These individuals face an even higher risk of dissolved

cohabitation than those that experience only one cohabitation in their lives. Similarly, more

people are cohabitating now, with individuals cohabitating for other reasons other than

solidifying or officiating relationships, such as for economic reasons.

An observable characteristic about cohabitation from the research and analysis

undertaken was that cohabitation was no longer a factor that resulted in a relationship

transitioning into marriage. The number of cohabitations ending before the unions could be

officiated has risen steadily over the years. Cohabitations formed in the last two decades of the

20th century also faced fewer dissolution rates than those formed in the 21st century. Individuals

who had cohabitated and made a commitment to ultimately marry such as through an
3

engagement, faced higher chances of dissolution before marriage than individuals who

cohabitated without committing to marriage. The rate of cohabitations which resulted in the birth

of a child during its course stayed largely the same, with about one-fifth of all cohabitations

initiated in the different year groups resulting in the birth of a child.

Personal Views on Cohabitation

Cohabitation has largely increased due to the increasing weakness in the faith that people

had in the institution of marriage. Individuals want to grow themselves first and attain their goals

before they can commit to a marriage. Therefore, before this time comes, these individuals can

choose to live together so as to solidify and test their relationship and determine whether it is

ready for the next step. From experience, most of these ventures end with the involved parties

going their different ways. Having observed the relationships of my relatives and friends that had

such a foundation, the general consensus would be that cohabitation more than often leads to the

dissolution of the relationship between those involved. My view does not align with my family’s

view because while the evidence overwhelmingly points to a negative outcome, my family

believes that cohabitation is like marrying and that no legalities are required. They hold this

opinion because for several family members this is exactly what happened and their relationships

are still as strong to this date. This view does not align with my culture at the same time because

the religion practiced, that is, Christianity, contests the notion of cohabitation. According to

Christianity, individuals are only supposed to live together after they have married.
4

References

Guzzo, K. B. (2014). Trends in cohabitation outcomes: compositional changes and engagement

among never-married young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(4), 826–842.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12123

You might also like