- During the Spanish colonial period, lands in the Philippines originally belonged to communities but were gradually controlled by Spanish authorities and religious orders like the Dominicans through the concept of encomiendas and land grants.
- The Dominicans in particular came to own vast haciendas, including the Hacienda de Calamba, which they leased to inquilinos who then subleased to tenant farmers called kasamas.
- Rizal's family benefited from being tenants on the Dominican hacienda in Calamba, but Rizal later criticized the Dominicans for exploiting tenants and overextending their land control after experiencing European ideas of land reform.
Original Description:
Original Title
Lesson 7 Land Ownership _ Rizal_s First Homecoming
- During the Spanish colonial period, lands in the Philippines originally belonged to communities but were gradually controlled by Spanish authorities and religious orders like the Dominicans through the concept of encomiendas and land grants.
- The Dominicans in particular came to own vast haciendas, including the Hacienda de Calamba, which they leased to inquilinos who then subleased to tenant farmers called kasamas.
- Rizal's family benefited from being tenants on the Dominican hacienda in Calamba, but Rizal later criticized the Dominicans for exploiting tenants and overextending their land control after experiencing European ideas of land reform.
- During the Spanish colonial period, lands in the Philippines originally belonged to communities but were gradually controlled by Spanish authorities and religious orders like the Dominicans through the concept of encomiendas and land grants.
- The Dominicans in particular came to own vast haciendas, including the Hacienda de Calamba, which they leased to inquilinos who then subleased to tenant farmers called kasamas.
- Rizal's family benefited from being tenants on the Dominican hacienda in Calamba, but Rizal later criticized the Dominicans for exploiting tenants and overextending their land control after experiencing European ideas of land reform.
• During the precolonial period, lands belonged to the community where
the inhabitants of the barangay or village lived. Though the best lands were reserved for the datu, any person can ask permission from the datu where to settle. • With the coming of the Spaniards, a REGALIAN DOCTRINE on the ownership of land was adopted. This means all lands belonged to the King. Lands were given to encomenderos as a reward for helping in the pacification of the islands. These are called personal encomiendas. Technically the encomenderos do not own the land but was only its trustee. The word encomienda comes from the word “encomendar” which means to commend or entrust. • Later the practice of titling lands was observed. Some lands were given to individuals for having done something meritorious to the government such as being allies during a foreign invasion. • The religious orders were given lands to support their evangelical activities. Later they receive land from pious donors. As their financial power grew, religious orders were able to buy lands from their owners. • In the case of Dominicans, lands were not only used for agricultural purposes but also for businesses such as shops. South of Manila the Dominicans manage the hacienda de Naic, in Cavite extended their borders to San Pedro Laguna. • The reason for the Dominicans in owning the haciendas is the same as those of other religious orders: income from these lands through the rent paid by the farmers support Dominican institution such as the University of Santo Tomas, the Colegio se San Juan de Letran and the Hospital de San Gabriel. • All the religious orders had landholdings. The Dominicans, Franciscan, Recollects and Agustinians had holdings up to the end of Spanish Rule. • Vast lands owned by individuals and institutions were leased to primary tenants called inquilinos. • These inquilinos were mostly mestizos and they were more managers rather than actual farmers. Physically it was impossible for them to farm the entire hacienda, which is the reason they had to hire sharecroppers or kasamas, which was term for tenant farmers. • Payment is depending on the arrangement they entered into. It can be a 70/30 or a 50/50 arrangement. • In many instances the kasama was forced to borrow from his inquilino and the borrowing rates were usurious. • The inquilino on the other hand is in charge of getting the products of the kasamas and they look they look for the best prices of the products possible. • The inquilinos paid the landlord the dues for the use of the land plus a portion of the harvest. As for the landlords, they would only wait for the harvest and collect the rent when it is due. • After getting married to Teodora, Francisco Engracio Mercado decided to move to the neighboring town of Calamba where the Dominicans had a hacienda. • In fact, the entire town was a Dominican hacienda. Calamba was originally owned by the Jesuits but it became government property when they were expelled in 1768. • The Government managed the hacienda up to 1808 until it was placed on public auction. Jose G. Azanza won in the public bidding and managed the Hacienda de Calamba until 1831. That year Azanza suffered from financial difficulties and he was forced to sell the hacienda to the Dominicans. The hacienda was over two thousand hectares from the boundary of Biñan and Santa Rosa to the foothills of Mount Makiling. • The Dominicans leased the land to inquilinos or primary tenants and Francisco Engracio Mercado was one of these inquilinos. • Don Francisco developed friendly relations with the Dominicans and was able to leased 500 hectares. • To cultivate this vast estate Don Francisco hired sharecroppers to do the actual cultivation. Don Francisco manage the farm, Doña Teodora manage a store and a ham press which produced preserved meats. • Later he was able to build a second bahay na bato in another part of Calamba. The Rizal house had a library of more than a thousand books, which was a rarity at that time. As one of the principalia Don Francisco accommodated visitors to Calamba consisting of priest and government officials. • Don Francisco saw to it that the good relations with the Dominicans remain friendly and cordial. Every time the Dominican administrator dropped by to collect the rent he would be gifted with a fat turkey. Paciano managed to get very good terms from the Dominicans. No rent was to be charged for the first five years as the farmers were clearing up the land for cultivation. • To keep the goodwill of the Dominicans Paciano wrote to his brother Jose in 1883 to refrain from upsetting the friars because they were very kind to his family. At that time Rizal was already in Spain questioning his faith, the feudal system in the Philippines and domination of the Church in the lives of the Filipinos. He was already influenced by Freemasons in his many encounters in Spain. • When Rizal was still a young boy, he wandered about in the hacienda followed by his dog. Rizal was known as Moy or Pepe. He had a talent for writing and he wrote a play, which he sold to the Mayor of Paete for four pesos. • In 1872 tragedy struck the Rizal family, his mother was accused of being an accomplice to an attempted murder. A close relative Don Jose Alberto was accused of trying to poison his wife Doña Teodora Formoso de Alberto. Don Jose was a rich landowner who went on a trip to Europe. Upon coming home in Biñan he found his house in disarray and his wife was caught committing adultery. She was found to be living with another man. Don Jose sought a divorce from his wife and had her confined to her room. • According to Rizal, his mother tried to reconcile the two. But Doña Teodora de Alberto found a way to get back at Don Jose and Doña Teodora. She alleged that when she was served food she gave it to the dog and the dog died. Doña Teodora de Alberto then had the alferez or the town police Chief to have her husband and Doña Teodora arrested. • These persons, according to Rizal were the persons his family treated with kindness when they were guest at his house. He called the gobernadorcillo a fanatical puppet of the friars while the alferez was someone who bore a grudge on his family just because Don Francisco refused his request for free chickens and turkeys. Also he was refuse fodder for his horse. The gobernadorcillo made Doña Teodora walk from Calamba to the provincial capitol in Santa Cruz- a distance of more than 30 kilometers. • After two years of detention, Doña Teodora was released. • Because of the great favors given by the Dominicans to Rizal and his family, Rizal should have been thankful for what he and his family received from Order. However, when he first retuned to Europe in 1887 he participated in an angry protest against the Dominicans. As a religious order, the Church is exempted from paying taxes for activities connected with the propagation of the faith. However, it was not exempted from paying taxes, which are economic in nature even if this are used to support activities that preach Christian Doctrines, Emilio Terrero the Governador General then wanted to investigate the Dominicans to see if they were paying the proper taxes. • Rizal joined the fray and helped draft an information regarding the agrarian situations in the Hacienda de Calamba. • He alleged that the tenants were losing money because the Dominican administrators were taking advantage of the tenants; that the Dominican landholdings did not just compromise the farm areas but the entire town of Calamba itself including the house of the people; that the Dominicans raised the rent every year; that the tenants were dispossessed of their lands because of high interest rates even if the same tenants were the ones who cleared the lands; that high penalties were charged if the rents were not paid on time and that the management of the hacienda confiscated the carabaos, tools and homes of the tenants if they cannot pay. • He also reported that the Dominicans never paid a single centavo to the town fiesta. Lastly he demanded that the colonial government investigate the Dominicans who may have illegally grab lands. He also questioned the legitimacy of their landholdings in Calamba or at least part of it. • It was common knowledge that the Dominicans illegally extended their landholdings to cover areas not in the legal documents such as the Dominican hacienda of Silang, which extended to Santa Rosa, leaving the farmers tilling the lands between the two haciendas landless and turned them to tenants when they could not show a document of ownership. • In reply to Rizal’s accusations, the Dominicans said that while it was true that they controlled the town and Hacienda of Calamba as well as the neighboring towns of Biñan, San Pedro and Santa Rosa, all these lands were properly titled in the name of the order. Many lands were leased to settlers free of rent for some period and Rizal’s family was one of those who benefited from the policy. As for the yearly increases in rent, the Dominicans said that in many of the lands that were rent –free for many years, it was just right for them to recover their investments. The same would apply to those who benefited in the construction of irrigation canals, which benefited the farmers. • Regarding their income derived from the haciendas, the Dominicans said that income from these lands support churches and institutions like the University of Santo Tomas and the College of San Juan de Letran. They never received any subsidy from the Spanish government and they had to support these institutions as well as those abroad. • As for the farmers losing money, the Dominicans said that the loss of income of the farmers was not due to increase rents or poor harvest but because of the laziness of the farmers themselves who were addicted to gambling. • In reconciliatory move, the Dominicans allowed the tenants to have grace period in paying the increased rents. The Dominicans tried to have an amicable settlement with the farmers. However, after Rizal left Calamba for Europe in February 1888, the tenants openly refused to pay their rents. Their lawyer Felipe Buencamino reportedly told the tenants not to pay a single cent to the Dominicans unless they showed that they really owned the hacienda. • The tenants won their case at the justice of the peace in Calamba where according to historian Fr. Villaroel Paciano practically dictated the decision of the court. But the tenants lost when the cased was appealed to the provincial court at Santa Cruz, Laguna and at the higher court in Manila. The Dominicans was able to prove that they were legitimate owners of the Calamba and the other haciendas. The case went as far as the Supreme Court in Madrid where the Dominicans ultimately won. • The ruling of the Santa Cruz Court was to have the tenants to pay the Dominicans or be expelled. Meanwhile without waiting for the decision of the court in Manila, the agents of the provincial court supported by a detachment of soldiers destroyed 50 houses. When the tenants began to return to their former homes, the new Governor General, Valeriano Weyler sent more troops to expel all the defiant tenants. Among those expelled was Rizal’s own family. Weyler deported Paciano, his brother-in-law Silvestre Ubaldo and twenty-five other individuals to Mindoro. Another brother-in-law, Manuel Hidalgo, was deported to Bohol. Was Rizal right in agitating his townspeople against the Dominicans?
There were potential Calambas in other towns and
provinces as the farm and lands were controlled by the religious orders and powerful individuals. Activities • Exercise 7.1 • Exercise 7.2 LESSON 7.2 I. Jose Rizal First Sojourn Going to Europe; (France and Germany); (1882-1887); (To be discussed Lesson 10 Topic 2). II. Jose Rizal First Homecoming in the Philippines); (Lesson 7; Topic 2); (1887-1888); III. Jose Rizal Second Sojourn Going to Europe; (Brazil and Madrid); (1888-1892); (To be discussed Lesson 10 Topic 2). IV. Jose Rizal Second Home-coming in the Philippines. (1892- 1896). (To be discussed Lesson 10 Topic 2). • On August 6, 1887, Jose Rizal arrived in Manila at 9:00 in the evening. • The first Filipino he encountered was a newspaperman who was astonished when he read the name Jose Rizal in the list of passengers. • Immediately upon arrival, Riza! was called by Governor General Emilio Terrero who said, "You wrote a novel that aroused much comment, and wish to read it." Rizal promised the Governor General that he would look for one. In the course of their conversation the Governor General insisted, “Not only do I permit it, but I demand it.” • The two had congenial conversation on his plans while in the Philippines and in his hometown of Calamba. After a few days, Rizal gave a copy to the Governor General, afterwards he immediately proceeded to Calamba to meet his family, friends and townmates • Rizal was treated with favor Spanish government in the Philippines. Governor General Emilio Terrero y Perinat was a staunched liberal and questioned the Friar Estate in Philippines. The Governor of Manila Don Jose Centeno, was a high- ranking mason, and Rizal as a Mason, would definitely be protected, not because of favors, but by brotherhood obligation. • General Tererro gave instructions to the Civil Guard Lieutenant Jose Taviel de Andrade to protect Rizal from anyone who might harm him. • While in-Calamba, and happily united with his family and friends, Rizal became busy applying the modern technique that he learned in Spain, France and Germany, specifically in the field of Ophthalmology. • When Rizal opened his clinic in Calamba, he was an instant famed Filipino doctor, due to his medical trainings in Europe, curing many patients and charging them according to their means of income, Rizal earned considerable amount of money that he used in traveling to Asian countries, America and back to Europe. • One of the reasons why Rizal took up Ophthalmology was to cure the failing eyesight of Dona Teodora, who for many years was suffering from cataract. • The operation was successful, thus, he gained the local title as Ductor Ullman (German Doctor). He also found time to have a trip with his Spanish Military escort by climbing Mt. Makiling in Laguna, to see the grandeur of the panorama and viewing nature from the mountaintop. • Rizal was in Madrid, Spain when he knew of the problem concerning the Hacienda case. • It was well known at that time, that the Dominican friars, who were in- charge of me curacy of Calamba, owned the large portion of agricultural and residential lands in the area, thus, most of the people, were its tenants. • On July 1885, Paciano informed Rizal of the economic crisis or lack of work in the country. • He sent Rizal a letter concerning the action of the Dominican Corporation: Letter: Comes the month of June and contrary to custom all tenants had not paid their obligations, which was enough to scandalize all the friars, especially the administrator Who, Without stopping to investigate what could be the cause of the insolvency, whether it is lack of will, physical impossibility bad harvest, low price, or the progressive increase in the land rent, he declares vacant all the lands of the estate. Frightened, some paid their obligations with the proceeds of the distress sate of their sugar. • In another letter dated August 29, 1886, Rizal's brother-in-law, Mariano Herbosa, wrote him a letter complaining of the unbearable tax imposed by the friars to the tenants, such as tax on irrigated, dry and residential lands, Herbosa added: Another feature of this system is that, on the day you accept the conditions, the contract will be written, which cannot be changed for four years, but the tax is increased every year. • In the interest of Governor General Terrero to introduce reforms in the agrarian taxation in the country, he gave an official communication dated December 30, 1887, giving instruction to the Department of Finance of the Central Government
to ask information and figures from the tenants of the
Dominican Estate on their agricultural land and production for the past three years. • Upon the receipt of the communication, the tenants and the principales of Calamba entrusted themselves to Rizal to aid them in preparing the report for the government. • This was also Rizal's chance to manifest his love for the poor Filipinos and question the oppressive friars in a formal report. • After a series of interviews with the principales, farmers and tenants, Rizal arrived with a report, which contained the following summarized statements: 1. That the hacienda owned by the friar corporation, covered the entire town of Calamba, and that the profits gained from the Hacienda increased due to arbitrary increase in the land rentals every year, whether with contract or not. 2. Tenants who cleared productive lands are strictly obliged to pay rents, the same policy was also applied on unproductive lands. 3. High interests were being levied for the tenants who, for valid reasons, delayed in paying the rents. Failure to pay would mean confiscation of working animals and residences by the Dominican Corporation, 4. The tenants who paid the high rents were subsequently the town folk themselves who were never given support or incentive such as assistance to agriculture and education of their children. • The report resulted in placing the Dominican friars of Calamba in shame. • The government records showed that the Catholic friars were guilty of corruption, fraud and non-payment of tax in a massive scale, not only for the past three years but from the first year the Dominican congregation took hold of the land. • From a small portion of- land owned by the Jesuits which was bought by the Dominican corporation, now it owned the entire Calamba town. However the tax paid by the Dominicans was the same when the land was acquired from the Jesuits. • The report also revealed that the Dominican Corporation was collecting taxes of all sorts from the land they never owned. As a result, the tenants of Calamba together with the family of Rizal ceased paying their rents and taxes to the Dominican Corporation. This action of the native tenants forced the Dominicans to file eviction charges against the family of Rizal and Calamba tenants. • While Rizal was in Calamba, his parents and friends were worried of his personal safety. • His religious enemies requested Governor General Terrero to deport Rizal, but due to lack of case, the Governor refused. However, he called Rizal in Manila and asked him to leave the country. Rizal was accused by his enemies from the church of being a German spy's agent of Bismarck, Protestant, witch, mason and whose soul condemned to hell. • His father Don Francisco refused to allow Rizal to go alone or eat in the house of other families due to the anonymous letters who's content of which endangered Rizal's life. • To ease the growing pressure form the threats of the church, taking it against his family and the government, Rizal decided to leave the Philippines for his second sojourn to Europe. Thus, at 5:00 p.m. February 3, 1888, he departed and said, "On leaving Manila, I felt that sweetness and melancholy of six years ago, upon seeing the turrets of the cathedrals and the big convents." Before leaving the country, Rizal left another artistic contribution. • His friends from Lipa, Batangas, requested him to compose for them a hymn to be sung on the feast day of Lipa, which was entitled Himno al Trabajo (Hymn to Labor). • The following lines are excerpts form the hymn: Men: Now the East is glowing with light, Go! To the field to till the land, For the labor of man sustains Family, home and Motherland. Hard the land may turn to be. Scorching the rays of the sun above.... for the country, wife and children All will be easy to our love. Sources; • De Viana, Agusto (2019). Laon- Laan, A guide for study and understanding of the life and contributions of Jose Rizal to Philippine nationhood and society. Books Atbp. Publishing Corp. • Zaide & Zaide (2011). Rizal: Life, Works and Writings of a Genius, Writer, Scientist and National Hero. 2nd Ed. All nations Publishing Co., Inc. Cubao, Quezon City, Philippines . • J.A Lopez & A.E Paras.,(2010). Rizal Life Works and Writings of the Greatest Malayan 3rd Edition. HisGoPhil Publishing House, Inc.