Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 7 Assessment in Learning 1 Week 7
Module 7 Assessment in Learning 1 Week 7
Prof. Ed. 6
Assessment in Learning 1
Week 7
Module 7: Characteristics of
Quality Assessment Tools
Source:https://medium.com/@group_19546/some-inspiring-activities-for-student-led-formative-assessment-70a7238d66ec
Educational assessment tools are judged by their ability to provide results that
meet the needs of users. For example, a good test provides accurate findings about a
students’ achievement if users intend to determine achievement levels. The achievement
results should remain stable across different conditions so that they can be used for
longer periods of time.
A test is considered reliable if it is taken again by the same students under the
same circumstances and the score average is almost the constant, taking into
consideration that the time between the test and the retest is of reasonable length.
Reliability is the consistency of scores across the conditions of time, forms,
test, items and raters. The consistency of results in an assessment tool is determined
statistically using the correlation coefficient. The types of reliability are: (1) Test-retest
(2) Split-half; (3) Parallel Forms; (4) Internal Consistency; and (5) Inter-rater Reliability.
A more comprehensive discussion will be given in the succeeding modules.
Students are usually keen in determining whether an item is difficult or easy and
whether the test is a good test, or a bad test based on their own judgment. A test item
being judged as easy or difficult is referred to as item difficulty and whether a test is
good or bad is referred to as item discrimination. Identifying a test items’ difficulty
and discrimination is referred to as item analysis. Two approaches will be presented in
this chapter on item analysis: Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory
(IRT). A detailed discussion will be presented in the succeeding modules.
Rate your learning experience in using this module according to the following
scale.
Navarro, Rosita L., et.al., (2017), Assessment of Learning 1. Quezon City, Metro
Manila: Lorimar Publishing Inc., pp. 92 to 95.
Carlo Magno DLSU Araneta (2015), Designing Written Assessment for Student
Learning, pp. 57 to 91