Standard Project Risk Register

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

PROJECT RISK REGISTER

SCHEME NAME: Stockton on Tees - Strategic Carriageway / Drainage Renewal

IDENTIFICATION RISK ASSESSMENT RISK ASSESSMENT AFTER MITIGATION

Cost Time Quality Quality


Risk No Cost Impact Time Impact Quality Impact Cost Risk Time Risk Quality Risk Probability Cost Risk Time Risk
Risk Description Impact Description Risk Owner Probability Score Mitigation Description Impact Impact Impact Risk
(Identifier) Score Score Score Ranking Ranking Ranking Score Ranking Ranking
Score Score Score Ranking

Formal objections by stakeholders/ statutory Early engagement and consultation with


Time delays to resolve issues SBC 4 4 4 0 16 16 0 1 4 4 0 4 4 0
undertakers following consultation stakeholders and stautory undertakers.

Negative impact on businesses throughout Claims for compensation due to Appropriate programming on all schemes.
1 SBC 3 3 2 0 9 6 0 2 2 2 0 4 4 0
construction. disruption of business. Communication with stakeholders.

Businesses encountering perceived


Risk to reputation of Council due to negative and disruption or loss of earnings
SBC 4 2 0 0 8 0 0 Effective communication strategy in place. 1 2 0 0 2 0 0
inadequate publicity complain to local press and
councilors.

Unexpected utilities found within the extent of Additional works / diversions


SBC 4 3 2 0 12 8 0 Stats records and Utilities survey procured. 2 2 2 0 4 4 0
proposed works. required.

Utilities to be diverted are not where they are


Existing utilities locations to be marked out.
recorded delaying the diversion and works in the Time delays for diverting apparatus. SBC 4 3 2 0 12 8 0 1 3 2 0 3 2 0
Trial Holes to verify utility locations.
vicinity
2

Costs and time associated with Suitable on site supervision and management
Construction Damage to existing public utilities Contractor 3 4 2 0 12 6 0 2 3 2 0 6 4 0
repairs. systems in place to minimise risks.

Early programming of utility works will reduce


Failure of utilities to perform to programme Additional cost on upgrade Contractor 4 3 4 2 12 16 8 2 2 3 2 4 6 4
any delays to main construction works.

Adverse weather conditions delay progress to the Programme slippage, additional costs Contingency allowed within programme for
3 SBC 4 3 3 0 12 12 0 2 3 3 0 6 6 0
construction works. incurred. days lost due to adverse weather.

Limitations on when materials and


plant can be delivered to site, in order
Restrictions on contractors material/plant delivery No restrictions imposed on access to works
4 to prevent disruption of public Contractor 3 3 3 1 9 9 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
times, disrupt performance. sites.
transport services impact upon
progress on site, causing delays and
CCTV and Drainage survey to identify location
Condition of drainage assets is poor and needs Programme Delays and additional
5 SBC 2 4 4 0 8 8 0 and condition of drainage assets undertaken 1 3 4 0 3 4 0
replacing / repairing costs incurred.
ahead of tender.

Page 1 of 1 24/02/2015 09:51

You might also like