Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Credit Management 7th Semester Final Examination Study Manual
Credit Management 7th Semester Final Examination Study Manual
Credit Management
7th Semester Final Examination
Study Manual
Credit:
Credit is a financial concept that refers to the ability of an individual or entity to borrow
money or access goods and services with the understanding that they will repay the
borrowed funds or cover the cost of the goods and services at a later date.
Credit involves a creditor (lender or provider of goods/services) extending trust and
allowing the borrower (debtor or recipient) to use funds or resources temporarily, with
the expectation that they will be paid back, typically with interest or fees, over time.
Basic Differences between credit and Investment:
Or,
1. Purpose:
Credit: The primary purpose of credit is to borrow money or access
goods/services with the expectation of repayment. It is used to meet
immediate financial needs
Investment: The primary purpose of investment is to use money to acquire
assets or financial instruments with the goal of generating returns or
profits over time. Investments are typically made to grow wealth
2. Ownership:
Credit: When you use credit, you do not gain ownership of an asset.
Instead, you acquire the benefit of using borrowed funds or goods
temporarily, with an obligation to repay.
Investment: Investment involves acquiring ownership or a stake in an
asset, such as stocks, bonds, real estate, or a business. Investors hold assets
with the expectation of benefiting from capital appreciation, income
generation, or both.
3. Risk and Return:
Credit: Credit transactions are generally lower risk for the creditor (lender)
because they expect repayment with interest or fees.
Investment: Investments come with varying levels of risk, depending on
the chosen asset or investment vehicle. Investments offer the potential for
higher returns, but they also carry the risk of losing some or all of the
invested capital.
4. Timeframe:
Credit: Credit transactions are typically short to medium-term, with
borrowers expected to repay the borrowed funds within a specified
period, which could range from months to years.
Investment: Investments are typically long-term in nature, and investors
often hold assets for an extended period, sometimes many years or even
decades, to achieve their financial goals.
5. Purpose of Funds:
Credit: Credit is usually used to finance immediate or near-term expenses,
such as purchasing a car, paying for education, or covering everyday living
expenses.
Investment: Investment involves allocating funds with the aim of achieving
long-term financial objectives, such as retirement savings, wealth
accumulation, or generating income over time.
6. Ownership of Risk:
Credit: The borrower primarily bears the responsibility for managing and
mitigating the risk associated with credit. Failure to repay credit can
negatively impact the borrower's creditworthiness.
Investment: Investors take on the risk associated with their investment
choices, such as market volatility or asset-specific risks. They have the
potential to benefit from investment gains but may also incur losses.
7. Returns:
Credit: Credit transactions generate returns for the creditor in the form of
interest payments, fees, or other charges.
Investment: Investments have the potential to generate returns through
capital appreciation, dividends, interest income, or rental income,
depending on the type of asset or investment.
Types of Credit Facilities :
A) Funded and
B) Non-funded.
A. Funded Credit:
A funded credit facility means the actual disbursement of cash to the customer or to any
designated supplier of the customer. In order to provide a funded facility to a customer
the bank has to incur real liability beforehand, i.e; the bank has to arrange for funds
primarily through accepting deposits or otherwise .
Funded facility affects the balance sheet of the bank both in terms of increase of liability
and increase of assets. Funded credit facilities may be classified into four types:
i) Loans ii) Cash Credit iii) Overdraft and iv) Bill Purchased & discount.
2. Cash Credit facility is allowed against pledge or hypothecation of goods. Under this
arrangement, the borrower can borrow at any time within the agreed limit and can deposit
money to adjust whenever he does have surplus cash in hand.
3. Overdraft is an arrangement between a banker and his customer by which the latter is
allowed to withdraw over and above his credit balance in his current account. This is a temporary
accommodation of funds to the client.
Discount: Banks allow advances to the clients by discounting a bill of Exchange/promissory note
which matures after a fixed tenor) In this method, the bank calculates and realizes the interest at
a prefixed rate and credits the amount after deducting the interest from the amount of
instrument.
Purchase of bills:
Banks also make advances by purchasing bills, instead of discounting, which are accompanied by
documents of title of goods such as bill of lading or railway receipts etc.
B. Non Funded Credit
Non funded credit facility to a customer refers to a bank's commitment to a third party
on behalf of the customer. The bank's commitment essentially states that in the event of
occurrence / non-occurrence of a particular event, within a particular date, due to a
particular reason or reasons, a specific sum of money shall be paid by the bank to the
third party upon claim in a particular manner.
Letter of Credit:
A banker's documentary credit is an instrument or letter issued by a bank on behalf of
and for the account of the buyer of the merchandise. A Letter of Credit (LC), also known
as a documentary credit, is a financial instrument used in international trade to facilitate
transactions between a buyer and a seller, especially when they may not have a well-
established business relationship or trust in each other.
It provides a guarantee to the seller that they will receive payment for the goods or
services they provide, as long as they meet the terms and conditions specified in the
letter of credit.
A banker's letter of credit gives the seller or the exporter:
a) Credit security- by eliminating the credit risk in the sale and the shipments of goods;
b) Credit facilities- by financing the sale when the goods are in transit; and
c) Exchange security- by assuring him that the required amount is available to him
under credit from the time he receives the buyer's order and the time of shipment and
presentation of shipping documents.
Principles of Sound Lending:
Lending of money to different kinds of borrowers is one of the most important functions
of commercial bank. Not only this, it is the most profitable business of the commercial
bank and the major source of income.
But lending is a risky business. The borrowers of a bank range from individuals to
partnership, companies, institutions, societies, corporations etc. engaged in such
activities as business, industry, transport, farming etc. The nature of their activities, the
location 'of business, financial stability, earning and repaying capacity, purpose of
advance, securities all differ and their degree of risks also differ.
Although all lending involve risks of default in repayment a bank has to go with it for
earning profit and economic upliftment as well. As such the banks are required to follow
certain basic principles of lending which are known as the principles of sound lending.
Risk involvement may be kept at minimum if the lending principles are followed.
To do the lending business profitably the following principles may be followed:
a) . Safety:
The very survival of a banker and for the matter of that safety of bank depends on
his/her loans and advances. The ideal position is when all the loans and advances
positions are fully secured.
Thus safety of the advances should be the first principle of lending. Now the question is
how to ensure safety of lending? To ensure the safety of lending the following most
essential elements of the borrower may be considered:-
Five C’s
Character Capacity Capital Conditions Collateral
Five P’s
Person Purpose Product Place Profit
C) Liquidity:
The banker while making advances must see to it that the money lent is not locked up
for a long time because, majority of commercial bank liabilities are payable
either on demand or after short notice. So the banker should be sure that loan would be
liquid. Otherwise, the liquidity position of a bank may be threatened. Thus liquidity of
money lent is another important principle of lending.
Liquidity means availability or readiness of bank funds on short notice. The liquidity of advance
means its repayment on demand on due date or after a short notice. The loan must have fair
chances of repayment according to repayment schedule.
So a commercial banker should normally grant short term advances which could be
recalled in time to satisfy the demand of the depositors. A bank cannot afford to lend
short period funds for a long term lending.
d) Security:
The security offered by a borrower for an advance is insurance to the banker. It serves as
the safety value for an unforeseen emergency. So another principle of sound lending is
the security of lending Security offered against loan may be various. The securities may
vary from gold and silver to goods of various types, immovable properties (land, building
etc.), life insurance policies, stock exchange securities, promissory notes, third party
guarantee etc.
The banker who has to see it that the title he/she get on them is not unsafe. Not
only this, the security accepted by a banker to cover a bank advance must be
adequate, readily marketable, easy to handle and free from any encumbrance.
e) Profitability:
Commercial banks obtain funds from shareholders and if dividend is to be paid on such
shares it can only be paid by earning profits. Even in the case of public sector banks
although they work on service motive they also have to justify their existence by earning
profits. This is not possible unless funds are employed profitably. In other words banking
is essentially a business which aims at earning a good profit. The working funds of a
bank are collected mainly by means of deposits from the public and interest has to be
paid on these deposits.
From out of the profit the banker has to pay interest on deposits, salary to the
staff, meet other expenses, build up reserves etc. So the banker should not enter
into a transaction unless fair return from it is assured.
Spread/Dispersal/Diversification:
The advances should be as much broad based as possible and must be in conformity
with the deposit structure. The advances should not be in one particular
direction/industry/activity or one or few borrowers because any adversity faced by
that particular industry will have serious adverse affect on the bank. Again, advances
should not be given in one area alone.
Here the principle is "Do not put all the eggs in the same basket".
Organizational feasibility
Organizational feasibility will see under what type of organization the activities will be
undertaken. Whether it is under proprietorship / sole trader ship or partnership or
private limited company, public limited company or cooperative societies or any state
corporation.
Technical side
Technical side will take care of location of business / activities/project, construction of
building/shed etc. requirements to be used like power, fuel, water, materials etc.
Marketing side
Marketing side will ensure about the marketability of the product(s) out of activities /
business/project.
Financial aspect
Financial aspect will tell total requirement of fund for the business/activities/projects and
how much will be required from bank, what amount will be given by the borrower
himself cash inflow and cash outflow, sale forecasts, balance sheet, profit and
loss account etc.
Economic aspect
Economic aspect will look into socio-economic benefit out of the business /
activities/ project. If it is found that fund can be provided to a particular
activity/business/project then sanction will be given.
After that proper documentation will be done by the banker. This is an integrated
approach of lending by bank which covers safety, liquidity, purpose, security,
profitability etc.
DIFFERENT STAGES OF CREDIT OPERATION:
Credit operation starts with application submitted by the customer to the Relationship
Manager/ Credit Marketing Division and ends with recover/adjustment of the facility.
How- ever, the different stages of credit operation being practiced in commercial banks
are as under:
2nd stage: Sending application and other relevant papers to Credit Risk
Management (CRM) Unit of Head Office for analysis.
3rd stage: After analysis if it is found feasible and complied with credit policy
of the bank,CRM unit place the credit proposal with recommendation of
Head Office Credit Committee and the Credit Committee under delegated
authority approves the credit proposals.
4th stage: Executive Committee of the Board approves the credit proposals
which are beyond the delegated authority of credit committee. The Board of
Directors reviews the proposals approved by the Executive Committee.
5th stage: upon receipt of approval / sanction letter from Head Office, the
branch / RM will arrange completion of the documentation formalities as per
sanction terms.
6th stage: After completion of documentation formalities, the branch / RM will send
a security compliance certificate to Credit Administration Department (CAD) under
CRM. The Head of CAD will conduct concurrent audit periodically to physically verify
the docu- ments, possession, and confirmation of title of property documents, if
necessary.
Question :
Is there any relationship between credit and investment ?? [see discussion]
4 Credit Assessment and Risk Grading
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction to Credit Policy:
Credit Policy:
A credit policy is a set of guidelines and rules established by a business or financial institution to
manage and control the extension of credit to its customers or borrowers.
It outlines the terms and conditions under which credit will be granted, the criteria for
evaluating the creditworthiness of applicants, and the procedures for monitoring and
collecting outstanding debts.
As per CRM guidelines as prescribed by Bangladesh Bank all banks should have established
Credit Policies ("Lending Guidelines") that clearly outline the senior management's view of
business development priorities and the terms and conditions that should be adhered to in
order for loans to be approved.
The Lending Guidelines should be updated at least annually to reflect changes in the
economic outlook and the evolution of the bank's loan portfolio, and be distributed to all
lending/marketing officers.
Underlying Meaning of Credit Risk
Credit risk is one of the major risks ben faced by banks. This can be described as
potential loss arising from the failure of a counter party to perform according to
contractual arrangement with the bank. The failure may arise due to unwillingness of
the counter party or decline in economic condition etc.
The goal of credit risk management is to maximize a bank's risk adjusted rate of return
by maintaining credit risk exposure within acceptable parameters Banks need to
manage the credit risk inherent in the entire portfolio as well as the risk in individual
credits or transactions.
The effective management of credit risk is a critical component of a comprehensive
approach to risk management and essential to the long-term success of any banking
organization.
Financial Risk
Business/Industry Risk
Management Risk
Security Risk
Relationship Risk
Each of the above mentioned key risk areas require to be evaluated in order to address
and mitigate the potential credit risk.
Financial Risk:
Risk that counterparties will fail to meet obligation due to financial distress. This typically
entails analysis of financials i.e. analysis of leverage, liquidity, profitability & interest
cover- age ratios. To conclude, this capitalizes on the risk of high leverage, poor liquidity,
low profit- ability & insufficient cash flow.
Business/Industry Risk:
Risk that adverse industry situation or unfavorable business condition will impact
borrowers' capacity to meet obligation. The evaluation of this category of risk looks at
parameters such as business outlook, size of business, industry growth, government
regulation, economic state of condition, market competition & barriers to entry/exit.
Management Risk:
Risk that counterparties may default as a result of poor managerial ability including
experience of the management, age, its succession plan and team work. On evaluating
management risk the followings should also be taken into consideration:
Performance, growth and profit record, consistency, flexibility, judgment. (Any real
blunder in the past.
Security Risk:
Risk that the bank might be exposed due to poor quality or strength of the security in
case of default is called security risk. This may entail strength of security & collateral,
location of collateral and support.
Relationship Risk:
From the viewpoint of a credit policy within a business, relationship risk primarily relates
to the potential challenges and uncertainties that can arise when extending credit to
customers. These risk areas cover evaluation of limits utilization, account performance,
conditions/covenants compliance by the borrower and deposit relationship.
Post-approval phase:
Poor Monitoring
Improper/ inadequacy in loan documentation
Poor IMS
Un-favorable Investment Climate
Economic Recession
Inconsistent and erratic govt. fiscal policy
Credit Culture promote loan default
It is to be mentioned that the pre-approval phase is the cardinal issue to address and it is
the major part of credit assessment.
ASSESSMENT OF CREDIT RISK
For the purpose of creating performing credit portfolio and to avoid growth of NPL
credit risk should be assessed at pre-approval phase on best effort basis. An appropriate
appraisal of risk in any credit exposure is highly subjective matter involving quantitative
and qualitative judgment.
Financial statements of the borrower/business enterprise do not always portray the
complete picture or the conclusive ground for credit judgment. In analyzing any credit
matter the analyst should follow three distinct and expedient steps.
Historical Analysis:
Evaluate the past performance and determine the major risk factors and
how they have been addressed in the past. It includes analysis of prevailing condition of
business and past performance which may foreshadow the difficulties or dictate the
likelihood of success.
Forecasting:
At time of forecasting please do not allow any personal liking or disliking factors to
dominate your judgment process which may give distorted result. After identification of
the nature of risk make a reasonable forecast of the probable future condition of the
borrower and draw the conclusion about the debt-servicing ability of the potential
borrower/enterprise.
Debt Structuring:
Structuring of credit facility to be done on the basis of judgment of credit worthiness
and right diagnosis of appetite for credit having required security coverage with the
focus on the control of lending relationship.
In addition, the following risk areas should be addressed for the purpose of appropriate
assessment of Credit risk:
Borrower Analysis:
The majority shareholders, management team and group or affiliate companies should
be assessed. Any issues regarding lack of management depth, complicated ownership
struc- tures or inter-group transactions should be addressed, and risks mitigated.
Supplier/Buyer Analysis:
Any customer or supplier concentration should be addressed, as these could have a
significant impact on the future viability of the borrower.
Market Risk:
Whether there is enough market for the products. The sufficient market data is to be
obtained. The clients / borrowers market share in the industry is to be ascertained. The
demand supply gap is to be addressed.
Environmental Risk Analysis:
Environmental and climate change risk refers to the uncertainty or probability of losses that
originates from any adverse environmental or climate change events (natural or man made)
and/or non compliance of the prevailing national environmental regulations.
Land Location:
Borrowers may plan and or operate on land that is prone to environmental impacts by virtue
of its geographical location. Activities on land in the flood prone areas/along the coastal belt
are more vulnerable and sources of risk.
Labor/Social Risk:
The borrower has to provide a safe and healthy working environment for its labor
/employees. If does not, then there is a potential for accidents, injury and death and also
exposure to occupational health issues.
Risk Grading
All Banks should adopt a Credit Risk Grading system. The system should define the risk
profile of borrower's to ensure that account management, structure and pricing are
Commensurate with the fisk involved. Risk grading is a key measurement of a Bank's
asset quality, and as such, it is essential that grading is a robust process. All facilities
should be assigned a risk grade. Where deterioration in risk is noted, the Risk Grade
assigned to a borrower and its facilities should be immediately changed.
CamScanner
CamScanner
CamScanner
7 Credit Appraisal: Analysis of Financial Statement
INTRODUCTION:
The objective of this chapter is to familiarize the bankers with the tools and techniques
of financial analysis to analyze and interpret the data contained in the financial
statements of the customers, so that they can improve their lending decisions.
Balance sheet:
Balance sheet presents financial picture of an organization on a given date. It presents
the balance between the firm's assets and its liabilities, including the stockholder equity,
at a particular point in time, generally at the end of the fiscal year. The liability side
indicates the sources of funds.
On the other hand asset side implies the uses of fund, i.e. it shows the various sources
from where the organization has raised its funds. On the other hand, assets side implies
the uses of funds, i.e. it shows how these funds have been utilized by the organization.
Income Statement
The second basic financial statement is the company's income statement which presents
the gain or loss achieved during the firm's most recent period of operation. It shows the
working result of a company over a definite period of time. If balance sheet is compared
to a to a "still picture" or a "snap short" of a company, income statement can be
compared to a 'moving picture',
Analysis of financial statements means critical and systematic study of financial statements
with a view to obtaining some desired information. The financial statements carry lot of
data which have to be analyzed and such an analysis may help in getting meaningful
guidelines for arriving at certain conclusions when interpreted.
While "Interpretation" stands for the explanations of the accounting data as a starting point
for the discovery of economic facts about a business. Mere examination of the various
components of a set of financial statement cannot be expected to lead to certain
conclusions with regard to the financial status of a business.
After the statements have been broken down into meaningful components, it is desired
that whether the concern(business) has got Sufficient strength to meet its current
obligations, in that case, the amount of liabilities may be compared with the amount
current assets that the business has available to pay them.
If the analyst finds that the current assets are more than current liabilities, as such he can
term it a satisfactory situation. In all the cases, the balance sheet, as far as possible, should
be the latest. If the balance sheet furnished is more than six months old, a banker may ask
for a pro-forma balance sheet of a recent date, along with the past audited balance sheets.
It would be more meaningful and reliable if balance sheets of the last three to four years
are available and comparison is made. This will enable the banker to judge the company's
past and present performance and also help in foreseeing the future prospects.
Objectives of Analysis of Financial Statements:(****)
The objectives of analysis of financial statements are to obtain some indications
regarding the financial health of the business. If we consider it from the viewpoint of a
lending banker then the objective would be to improve decision in the case of
sanctioning of loans, supervision and follow-up of advances and nursing of sick projects.
The main objectives of analysis of financial statements can be summarized as follows:
To determine liquidity position of the organization.
To determine solvency position of the organization
To determine profitability position of the organization
To determine management efficiency of the organization.
Reclassification of data:
This is the first and at the same times most important step in the analysis of financial
statements.
Questions may arise why reclassification is necessary ?
It is essential because data contained in the financial statements in most of the cases are
not suitable for meaningful comparison and logical interpretation. Items are arranged in
haphazard manner and they are not properly grouped. There may also be variation in
the placement of data within the statement from year to year.
Therefore, in order to facilitate comparison and correct interpretation of data, the
analyst should reclassify the items of the financial statements under proper heads. This is
the most important stage in the process of financial analysis.
If some mistakes are committed at this stage, subsequently the comparison is bound
to be wrong and ultimately the interpretation would be definitely a wrong one.
Comparison of Data:
Reclassification is the first step in the analysis of financial statements. When the data
contained in the financial statements are properly grouped under appropriate heads
than the second step comes ie., comparison of data.
Techniques of Comparison:
Data Contained in the financial statements can be compared in two ways: horizontally &
vertically. When we study the relationship of the same item on varying dates in that
case, it becomes horizontal comparison. For example, if profit of the last year is
compared with this year, or current liabilities of the last year is compared with this year
and so no, then it becomes horizontal comparison.
On the other hand, vertical comparison involves the study of relationship on one item of
the same statement with another item or other items. For example, fixed assets are
compared with long term liabilities or long term liabilities with net worth and so on.
Trend comparison: When information are available for several periods, and if we take
a particular period as base, which is free from abnormalities, and compare the data of
the base period with items of the other statements to indicate the trend, then we call it
trend comparison.
Ratio : Ratio can be defined as an indicator of relationship between two variables
having cause and effect relationship or connected with each other, if we compare
figures of one item with another item and expressed in arithmetic terms it will be
ratio comparison.
RATIO ANALYSIS:
Ratio analysis is one of the useful and common methods of analyzing financial
statements. Absolute figures hardly convey any meaningful indication till they are
compared to other related figures. For example whether the operating profit is
adequate or not in an organization cannot be obtained, until we compare it with sales
figure as a percentage to it.
This percentage, if compared to similar other organizations, we get better information
regarding the efficiency and market position of the firm.
The usefulness of the ratio analysis lies in the fact that the data to be analyzed is
reduced and expressed in simple form, which makes it very easy to evaluate the
relationships between various related items as well as the changes that
have taken place.
Why it is important:
Ratio analysis is an important tool in the hands of the bankers for the examination of
financial liquidity, solvency, profit earning capacity and management efficiency of an
organization. Ratios of a company for a given year may also be compared to similar
ratios of other companies in the same trade. In the case of new enterprises, the
projected data can help in making such comparisons.
Broadly speaking a banker is very interested in the analysis and interpretation of rations
relating to the basic four aspects of the borrowing concern:
Liquidity
Ability to meet current dues out of current assets
Solvency
The ability to meet all long term liabilities out of the resources of the organization if need
arises
Profitability:
Capacity of the organization to generate profits and their rate of returns.
Activity:
Efficiency of the organization in utilization of available resources.
Liquidity:
Current Ratio:
The current ratio is a financial ratio that measures a company's ability to cover its short-
term liabilities with its short-term assets. It is calculated using the following formula:
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
If this ratio is more than, 1, it suggests that the current assets are adequate to pay off its all
current liabilities. If it is 1, they are just sufficient and if less than 1, the company will be
unable to pay their current obligations when asked for which will be a unhappy situation.
A very high current ratio is not also desirable as it will indicate less efficient use of funds.
A high ratio will mean excessive dependence on long term sources and very little on
current sources, thus reducing profitability of the concern. Similarly a low current ratio
would mean too much strain on the working capital resources. It is generally believed that
an ideal current ratio should be 2:1.
So just as short-term solvency is tested by applying liquidity ratios, long term solvency can
be measured by solvency rations.
Return of Equity Ratio = (Net operating profit after tax/Tangible Net Worth) x 100
This ratio reflects the earning power of the capital or equity introduced by the shareholders.
This ratio can prove useful to entrepreneurs in making investment decisions for an industrial
enterprise. When an entrepreneur invests his capital in an organization, he not only looses the
opportunity of earning interest by investing that money elsewhere but also bears the risks of
losing such money.
Hence this rate of return on capital should be higher than the alternative rates of return
available in the market.
Activity
Interpretation of Data:
The financial statements carry volumes of Data. Mere glance over these data is not
possible to arrive at certain conclusions regarding the credit worthiness of the borrower.
So, the financial statement have to be analyzed an interpreted to get meaningful
conclusion. Thus interpretation means critically examining and drawing conclusions
from data contained in the financial statements.
An analysis of a single set of financial statement has a very limited value. The results of
an analysis can be useful only if they are compared with past results and to the
corresponding results of other enterprises in the same trade or industry.
Comparisons with other similar units in the same industry or with the results of the
industry as a whole are useful for judging the relative efficiency of the enterprise.
2020.
1. What are the steps of analysis of financial statement ?
See the discussion.
Please discuss the activity ratios that are used in financial statement analysis.
Types of Security
The type of security offered varies from place to place. Securities can be
classified into primary security & collateral security.
1) Primary security:
This is the asset that is being financed by the loan. For example, if a bank lends
money to a business to buy machinery, the machinery would be the primary
security.
Primary security:
Must be of good quality and easily marketable.
Must be sufficient to cover the amount of the loan.
Must be legally enforceable.
2) Collateral security:
This is any other asset that the borrower offers to the bank as a guarantee in
case they default on the loan. For example, the borrower might offer their
house or car as collateral security.
Collateral security:
Can be any asset that the borrower owns.
Is not essential for the borrower's business.
Is only used in case the borrower defaults on the loan.
The type of security that is required will vary depending on the loan amount,
the borrower's creditworthiness, and the nature of the business. In general,
banks prefer to have primary security, but they may also accept collateral
security.
Good collateral security must have the following characteristics /
eligibility of collateral ( y.q 2020, 2019)
Tangible Transferable/negotiable:
Easily marketable
Price stability
Durability (not perishable)
Ascertain ability of market value
Genuineness of title (free from encumbrance)
These are explained below :
Collateral must be something that the lender can physically take possession of
and sell if the borrower defaults on the loan. This means that it must be
tangible, such as a house, car, or jewelry. It must also be transferable or
negotiable, meaning that the lender can easily sell it to someone else.
Easily marketable
The collateral should be something that is easy to sell in a short period of time.
This means that it should be in demand and there should be a large market
for it. For example, a house is a good form of collateral because it is easy to sell
and there is always a demand for housing.
Price stability
The collateral should be something that holds its value well over time. This
means that it should not be volatile or subject to sharp price swings. For
example, stocks are not a good form of collateral because they can be very
volatile and their prices can fluctuate wildly.
The collateral should be something that is durable and will not lose its value
over time due to wear and tear or spoilage. For example, fresh produce is not
a good form of collateral because it is perishable and will quickly lose its value.
The collateral should be something that has a clear and easily ascertainable
market value. This means that it should be something that is easy to appraise
and that there is a consensus on its value. For example, a house is a good
form of collateral because it is easy to appraise and there is a large market for
houses.
Genuineness of title (free from encumbrance)
The collateral should be something that the borrower actually owns and that
is not encumbered by any other liens or claims. For example, a house that is
mortgaged to a bank is not good collateral because the bank has a lien on it
Valuation of Security
The main difference between a fixed charge and a floating charge is the level
of control that the charge holder has over the assets that are subject to the
charge. The charge holder has greater control over the assets that are subject
to a fixed charge, as they cannot be disposed of without the charge holder's
consent. The charge holder has less control over the assets that are subject to
a floating charge, as the borrower can continue to use and dispose of these
assets in the normal course of business.
A. Mortgage:
Here is a table summarizing the key differences between particular lien and
general lien:
Right to sell
No Yes (in some cases)
goods
C. Pledge:
Properties :
Ans : precautions :
Assess the value of the goods being hypothecated. The banker should make sure
that the value of the goods is sufficient to cover the amount of the loan.
Insured the goods. The banker should ensure that the goods are insured against
damage or loss. This will protect the banker's interest in the event of a default.
E. Assignment:
1. Get the assignor to sign an irrevocable letter to the debtor instructing them
to pay the debt to the banker. This means that the debtor cannot legally pay
the debt to anyone else, even if they receive a subsequent assignment from
the assignor.
2. Get the debtor to acknowledge the assignment. This means that the debtor
must sign a document confirming that they have received notice of the
assignment and that they agree to pay the debt to the banker.
3. Check for prior assignments. The banker should ask the assignor if there are
any prior assignments of the debt. If there are, the banker should obtain
copies of these assignments and make sure that their own assignment has
priority.
4. Send a notice of assignment to the debtor. This will help to prevent the
debtor from making any subsequent assignments of the debt to other parties.
5. Follow up with the debtor regularly to ensure that they are making
payments to the bank.
6. Make sure that the assignment is for the whole amount of the debt.
Lien
Hypothecation
Possession of collateral: In a lien, the lender may or may not have possession of
the collateral. In hypothecation, the debtor retains possession of the collateral.
Type of assets: Liens can be used for both movable and immovable
assets, while hypothecation is typically used for movable assets.
Enforceability: Liens can be enforced voluntarily (i.e., the debtor agrees to the
lien) or involuntarily (i.e., the lien is imposed by law). Hypothecation is typically
a voluntary lien.
Example of lien
A mechanic who repairs a car has a lien on the car until the repair bill is paid. This
is an involuntary lien, as it is imposed by law.
Example of hypothecation
A person who takes out a loan to buy a car hypothecates the car to the lender.
This is a voluntary lien, as the person agrees to the lien in order to get the loan.
How to create charge on the fixed and floating assets with RJSC:
1. Fill out Form No. XVIII of the RJSC. This form can be downloaded from
the RJSC website.
2. Attach the following documents to the form:
3. Sign all the documents and have them signed by two witnesses.
5. Pay the registration fee to the RJSC. The registration fee is BDT 2250.00.
Importance of Documentation
Charge documents are pre-formatted and printed forms provided by the bank to
the borrower. These documents create a charge on the borrower's assets, such as
property or equipment, as security for the loan.
Legal documents are provided by the borrower to the bank. These documents
certify the borrower's legal status, borrowing power, and title to the assets being
used as security
3) LEGAL DOCUMENTS---
i. Memorendum and Articles of Association (Limited Company).
ii. Registered partnership deed (Partnership firm).
iii. Trade License
i. Limited company
ii. Partnership firm
iii. Proprietorship firm
5) Other documents
Stamping of Documents:
Stamping of documents is a legal requirement for bank credit.
There are two types of stamps used for loan documentation: non-judicial
stamps and adhesive stamps.
Non-judicial stamps are used for deeds, agreements, undertakings, and
powers of attorney.
Adhesive stamps are affixed on various charge documents and forms.
The nature and value of stamps required for different types of charge
documents will be on the basis of government/NBR circular
B. Execution:
Witnessing
Mortgage deed: This document is the legal agreement between the borrower
and the bank that creates the lien on the property. It is important to have this
document witnessed to ensure that both parties understand and agree to its
terms.
Sale deed: This document transfers ownership of the property from the seller to
the buyer. It is important to have this document witnessed to ensure that the
transfer of ownership is valid and legal.
Gift deed: This document transfers ownership of the property from one person to
another as a gift. It is important to have this document witnessed to ensure that
the gift is voluntary and irrevocable.
Will: This document is a legal declaration of a person's wishes for the distribution
of their property after their death. It is important to have a will witnessed to
ensure that it is valid and enforceable.
C. Registration:
Registration is not applicable for all documents. In the following few cases
registration of documents is necessary to give legal effect to the instruments.
Preservation of Documents:
Upon completion of all the documentation formalities “ documentation
checklist” to be prepared consisting of the list of documents
The checklist should be examined & signed by the authorized officer
Documents should be kept in safe custody preferably in the vault
Separate files to be maintained for each customer
Documents Movement Register should be maintained under the
supervision & signature of an authorized officer
The main difference between charge documents and legal documents is that
charge documents create a security interest in property that is being used to
secure a loan, while legal documents provide evidence of the borrower's legal
status and authority to borrow money.
Charge documents are a type of security agreement that gives the lender a
right to take possession of the borrower's property if the borrower defaults on
the loan. They typically include the following:
Legal documents are any documents that establish the borrower's legal status
and authority to borrow money. They typically include the following:
The borrower's memorandum and articles of association (for a limited
company) or registered partnership deed (for a partnership firm).
The borrower's trade license.
Create a standard documentation checklist. This checklist should list all of the
required documents for each type of loan or advance. The checklist should be
clear and concise, and it should be updated regularly to reflect changes in
regulations.
Train bank staff on documentation requirements. All bank staff who are involved
in the loan origination process should be trained on the documentation
requirements. This training should cover the purpose of each document, the
information that should be included in each document, and the steps involved in
completing each document.
There are a variety of methods that can be used for loan monitoring, but some
of the most common include:
Regular financial statement reviews: Lenders will typically require borrowers to
submit periodic financial statements, such as balance sheets and income
statements. These statements can be used to track the borrower's financial health
and identify any changes that could impact their ability to repay the loan.
Cash flow analysis: Lenders may also conduct cash flow analysis to assess the
borrower's ability to generate enough cash to cover their monthly loan payments.
This analysis can be done by reviewing the borrower's bank statements or by
using a cash flow forecasting tool.
Site visits: In some cases, lenders may conduct site visits to the borrower's business
or property. This can help them to get a better understanding of the borrower's
operations and assess the collateral that is securing the loan.
Credit reports: Lenders may also obtain credit reports on borrowers to track their
payment history and credit utilization. This information can be used to identify
borrowers who are at risk of default.
Loan performance monitoring: Lenders may use automated systems to track loan
performance, such as tracking the borrower's payment history, outstanding
balance, and interest rate. This information can be used to identify borrowers
who are at risk of default and take corrective action.
CREDIT RISK MONITORING AND CONTROL
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Periodic reports
Operating statement and cash flow
Identification of company's major suppliers so that information regarding
payment behavior can be collected.
Communication by letter and telephone call.
On-site Monitoring
The heart of an effective loan monitoring program lies open communication between
the bank and the borrower. A bank that has a lending relationship with a borrower
who calls at the first sign of an adverse event is more likely to avoid a problem loan than
a bank with a comprehensive loan review and audit program but with a borrower who
is intent upon hiding a deteriorating financial situation. Another essential ingredient is
complete and accurate credit files.
Credit files are the backbone of loan monitoring because they contain all the documents
(Correspondence and memos, financial statements, credit reports, loan agreements,
collateral records and so forth) that provide a loan officer, bank examiner, loan auditor
and other interested parties with a historical and ongoing record of the borrowing
relationship.
Finally, most bank loan monitoring programs include:
(a) A periodic review of all or selected loans to ensure that they are consistent with
bank loan policy, documentation requirements, profitability requirements, and so forth;
In fact, many business executives complain that their loan officer virtually
disappears after the loan has been made. This gives clients the impression that
the lender's principal interest was only in making the loan. Most clients appreciate
a call from their loan officer inquiring how the business is going, what its
prospects for growth are and other questions that show that the bank and
borrower are partners with the common goal of having the business prosper.
An occasional phone call or periodic visit is not only prudent loan monitoring it is
good customer relations as well.
Finally, the loan officer should make the effort to visit the company's premises
from time to time. Such visits promote good customer relations and are important
for thorough credit administration.
The loan officer should also perform/ maintain the following tasks in order to
ensure effective monitoring system.
a) Credit Files
The commercial loan officer has a major hand in the creation, maintenance, and
updating of the client's credit files.
Credit files represent a written record of the relationship between the bank and its
borrowers and as such, are indispensable to the smooth operation of the commercial
lending function.
Practically everyone associated with lending in a bank has, at one time or another, had
occasion to refer to a credit file. Bank counsel turns to credit files in the event of
litigation or to research and clarify legal concerns and bank auditors and examiners rely
on credit files as their primary Source of information when investigating a borrowing
relationship.
For loan officer credit files have innumerable uses, they provide:
A record of the lending relationship and how it has evolve over time
A reference source for internal credit checks and in the exchange of credit
information with other financial institutions
A picture of the client total account relationship that may prove useful in selling
other bank products and services
A source of financial data in, for example, comparing the performance of several
companies within an industry
Every bank has its own style for organizing the contents of its credit files.
Whatever the arrangement, it is important that all files follow the same
consistent format Although organizational practices vary from bank to bank,
information in credit files is usually grouped into the following general
categories:
Financial information.
This section holds the reports of Credit Information Bureau (CIB) and any private
credit investigations. It may also include records of telephone inquiries, credit
correspondence and bankruptcy notices.
Collateral information.
Any information relating to the collateral securing the loan would be included in
this section. Copies of documents might include security agreements and
assignments of interest in deposit accounts, stocks, and other property. insurance
policies; landlord waivers; and mortgages or deeds of trust. Again origi nals
would be held in a separate collateral file.
A bank loan portfolio is made up of thousands of loans, each of which has been
approved independently of the others. Over time, some of the loans become poor
credit risks (due to deteriorating collateral, improper documentation and so forth);
others deviate from bank loan policy, and sometimes too many loans are made to
companies in a specific industry. To safeguard against these and other risks, banks
periodically conduct an independent, after-the-fact review of some or all of the loans in
their portfolio. Such a review serves to
A thorough loan review entails going over many of the steps in the commercial lending
process: interview notes are reread, credit reports are verified again, memos and
correspondence with the client are reviewed, financial statements are reanalyzed,
documentation is reaffirmed, collateral records are checked and so on.
The apparent duplication of effort is necessary, however, because the key to loan review
is to obtain independent, objective appraisal of credit quality. Again, the resources
committed in loan review vary from bank to bank. Generally, each loan is analyzed to
determine its conformity to bank loan policy; its purpose; the sources and terms of
repayment; the financial condition of the borrower, the presence of documentation,
checks on collateral and loan profitability; and compliance with regulations.
Evaluating the loan in each of these areas should provide a comprehensive picture of its
overall credit quality. The reviewer can then recommend what specific actions, if any,
are needed to strengthen the existing credit arrangement.
Conformity to bank loan policy.: Every bank has a written loan policy that sets forth
management's lending philosophy and provides a formal set of procedures for carrying
it out. A bank loan policy is the one document that provides a framework for all lending
practices. It should be read, reread and then continually referred to by all loan officers.
In the absence of a bank loan policy (or when it is ignored), the bank invariably falls
victim to random,
One lender may be turning down loans that are perfectly acceptable by the
bank's standards, while another lender is approving loans that exceed his or her
lending authority or are to businesses the bank has no experience with. Because
of the dangers inherent in any significant deviation from bank loan policy, all
loans should be reviewed for conformity with the policy.
Purpose.
During the loan review, it is essential to check the purpose of the loan, which
should be clearly identified in the loan documents. The reviewer should also
consider whether the stated use of the loan is appropriate for that particular
borrower. Obviously, a credit arrangement in which no specific reason is given
for the loan leaves the bank with no recourse in ensuring that its funds were
used properly. It might later be discovered, for example, that a working capital
loan was used to satisfy some short-term debt obligations rather than finance the
company's purchase of inventory.
The primary and secondary repayment sources of the loan and its terms should
also be evaluated during a loan review. Both the repayment sources and terms
should be clearly defined in loan documents and should conform with bank loan
policy and the borrower's credit needs. No loan should ever be made without
considering how it will be repaid.
A loan reviewer should also evaluate the financial condition of the borrower, any
improvements or deterioration in income and balance sheet accounts, cash flow,
key ratios and so forth. Other areas of interest include the borrower's record of
loan payments, the borrower's continued ability to meet the loan payments and
the effect, if any, of developments in competition, legislation, the economy
and other external factors.
Documentation.
While collateral is never the primary repayment source for a loan, many loan
losses are a direct result of collateral that was lost, improperly documented, or in
such poor condition that it had little liquidation value. Therefore, a loan review
should also include a physical inspection of collateral and an examination of
collateral records.
Credit checks.
The client's files should also be reviewed to verify that credit inquires were made
and are current. Reviewers should consider whether any unusual
credit inquires (in nature or volume) have been received from other
parties, whether agency credit reports are current and whether the
borrower's payments to other creditors appear to be in order.
Profitability.
Of obvious importance in a loan review is whether the loan has been profitable
to the bank. This can be determined by calculating loan revenue (interest earned
on the loan, earning creditors and other income) and loan cost (administrative
expenses and so forth) and then taking into account the average loan amount
outstanding to arrive at the percentage yield on the loan to date.
CREDIT RISK GRADING
The Credit Risk Grading (CRG) is a collective definition based on the pre-specified
scale and reflects the underlying credit-risk for a given exposure.
A Credit Risk Grading deploys a number/ alphabet/ symbol as a primary summary
indicator of risks associated with a credit exposure.
Credit Risk Grading is the basic module for developing a Credit Risk
Management system.
Credit Risk Grading (CRG) is a system used by financial institutions, such as banks,
to assess the creditworthiness of borrowers or counterparty risk associated with
lending. It's a method for evaluating and categorizing the credit risk of individual
loans or credit exposures within a bank's portfolio. The purpose of credit risk
grading is to make informed decisions about lending and to manage the risk
associated with different borrowers.
Well-managed credit risk grading systems promote bank safety and soundness by
facilitating informed decision-making. Grading systems measure credit risk and
differentiate individual credits and groups of credits by the risk they pose. This
allows bank management and examiners to monitor changes and trends in risk
levels. The process also allows bank management to manage risk to
optimize returns.
HOW TO COMPUTE CREDIT RISK GRADING
The following step-wise activities outline the detail process for arriving at credit risk
grading.
• Financial Risk
• Security Risk
• Relationship Risk
Each of the above mentioned key risk areas require to be evaluated and aggregated to
arrive at an overall risk grading measure.
Risk that counterparties will fail to meet obligation due to financial distress. This typically
entails analysis of financials i.e. analysis of leverage, liquidity, profitability & interest
coverage ratios. To conclude, this capitalizes on the risk of high leverage, poor liquidity,
low profitability & insufficient cash flow.
Risk that adverse industry situation or unfavorable business condition will impact
borrowers' capacity to meet obligation. The evaluation of this category of risk looks at
parameters such as business outlook, size of business, industry growth, market
competition & barriers to entry/exit. To conclude, this capitalizes on the risk of failure
due to low market share & poor industry growth.
Risk that counterparties may default as a result of poor managerial ability including
experience of the management, its succession plan and team work.
Risk that the bank might be exposed due to poor quality or strength of the security in
case of default. This may entail strength of security & collateral, location of collateral and
support.
e) Evaluation of Relationship Risk:
The Credit Risk Grading Form of accounts having Early Warning Signals should be
completed by the Relationship Manager and sent to the approving authority in Credit
Risk Management Department. The Credit Risk Grade should be updated as soon as
possible and no delay should be there in referring Early Warning Signal accounts or any
problem accounts to the Credit Risk Management Department for their early
involvement and assistance in recovery.
Year Questions:
A. What is Credit Risk Grading (CRG)? Year 2021
Answer: See the lecture manual.
When does a loan to be classified as marginal/watch
list? Year 2021
Answer:
The classification of a loan as "marginal" or on a "watch list" typically depends on the
financial institution's internal policies and guidelines, as well as regulatory requirements.
However, there are some common factors that can lead to a loan being classified as
marginal or placed on a watch list:
It's important to note that the specific criteria and thresholds for classifying loans can
vary from one financial institution to another. Also, the terminology used (e.g.,
"marginal," "watch list," "substandard," "non-performing") can differ between institutions
and may be subject to regulatory definitions. Typically, when a loan is classified as
marginal or placed on a watch list, it triggers enhanced monitoring, potential loan
restructuring, or other risk mitigation measures to address the concerns and reduce the
risk of default.
In this system, CRG 1 and CRG 2 represent borrowers or loans with the lowest credit risk,
while CRG 9 represents those with the highest credit risk. Borrowers or loans classified
as CRG 5 or higher are typically considered to be of greater concern and may require
closer monitoring, risk mitigation strategies, or loan restructuring.
It's important to note that the specific criteria and definitions for each rating grade can
vary between financial institutions and may be influenced by regulatory guidelines.
Additionally, CRG systems may include additional subcategories or ratings within each
grade to provide a more granular assessment of credit risk. Borrowers or loans are
assigned a particular CRG based on various factors, including financial health,
repayment history, collateral, and overall creditworthiness.
I) Environmental Analysis:
1. Economic Conditions: Evaluate the overall economic environment, including factors like
GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, and unemployment rates. A strong economy
generally supports borrowers' ability to repay loans.
2. Industry Trends: Assess the specific industry in which the borrower operates. Look for
trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes that could affect the borrower's
business.
3. Market Conditions: Consider market conditions that can influence the borrower's
revenue and profitability, such as supply and demand, pricing dynamics, and consumer
behavior.
4. Government Policies: Examine government policies and regulations that might impact
the borrower's industry or business operations.
5. Global Events: Assess how global events like geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, or
pandemics may affect the borrower's business and the broader economy.
Environmental analysis helps financial institutions identify potential risks that are beyond
the control of the borrower and may impact their ability to repay the loan. It provides
valuable context for making lending decisions and risk assessments.
Financial analysis provides quantitative insights into a borrower's financial stability and
creditworthiness. It helps determine the appropriate loan terms, interest rates, and credit
limits.
Understanding and managing these components of credit risk is essential for financial
institutions to make informed lending decisions, set appropriate risk appetite, and
implement risk mitigation strategies to minimize the impact of defaults on their
portfolios.
1. Risk Assessment: Credit risk grading allows lenders to assess and quantify the level of risk associated
with a particular borrower or loan. By assigning a risk grade, lenders can categorize borrowers into
different risk categories, which helps in making informed lending decisions.
2. Risk Differentiation: It helps differentiate between borrowers with varying levels of creditworthiness.
Lenders can use risk grades to distinguish between high-risk and low-risk borrowers, allowing them
to allocate resources and set terms and conditions accordingly.
3. Credit Decision Making: Credit risk grading provides a basis for making credit decisions, including
whether to approve or decline a loan application. It also guides decisions regarding loan terms,
interest rates, and credit limits.
4. Portfolio Management: Lenders often have a portfolio of loans and credits. Credit risk grading assists
in managing the overall credit portfolio by identifying concentrations of risk and enabling risk
diversification strategies.
5. Risk Pricing: Lenders can use risk grades to determine appropriate pricing for loans. Higher-risk
borrowers may be charged higher interest rates to compensate for the increased risk, while lower-
risk borrowers may receive more favorable terms.
6. Risk Monitoring: After a loan is extended, ongoing monitoring of the borrower's creditworthiness is
crucial. Credit risk grading provides a benchmark for tracking changes in a borrower's risk profile
over time and initiating corrective actions if necessary.
7. Regulatory Compliance: Many regulatory authorities require financial institutions to have a
structured credit risk grading system in place as part of their risk management and compliance
frameworks. Compliance with these regulations is essential for the safety and soundness of financial
institutions.
8. Risk Mitigation: When a borrower is assigned a higher risk grade, lenders may implement risk
mitigation measures such as stricter covenants, increased collateral requirements, or more frequent
monitoring to minimize potential losses.
9. Credit Loss Estimation: Credit risk grading assists in estimating potential credit losses within a loan
portfolio. This is important for provisioning and ensuring that adequate reserves are set aside to
cover expected losses.
10. Credit Reporting: Credit risk grades can be reported to credit bureaus and other credit reporting
agencies. This information can impact a borrower's credit score and affect their ability to obtain
credit from other lenders.
11. Investor Confidence: For financial institutions that securitize or sell loans to investors, credit risk
grading provides transparency and confidence to investors about the quality of the underlying
assets.
In summary, credit risk grading is a systematic and structured approach that helps lenders assess,
manage, and mitigate credit risk effectively. It supports sound credit decision-making, regulatory
compliance, risk diversification, and ultimately helps lenders maintain a healthy and profitable loan
portfolio while minimizing losses from defaults.
Superior Grade:
A "superior" grade typically indicates the highest level of creditworthiness and the lowest level of
credit risk for a borrower or a loan. Here's how to interpret a "superior" grade:
1. Very Low Credit Risk: A superior grade suggests that the borrower or the loan being assessed poses
very little credit risk. This means that the borrower is highly likely to meet their financial obligations
and repay the loan on time.
2. Strong Financial Health: Borrowers assigned a superior grade are usually financially strong, with a
stable income, healthy cash flow, and a solid balance sheet. They have a history of consistent and
reliable financial performance.
3. Low Probability of Default: The likelihood of the borrower defaulting on the loan is extremely low.
Lenders can have a high degree of confidence in the borrower's ability to repay the debt.
4. Favorable Loan Terms: Borrowers with a superior credit risk grade may be eligible for more favorable
loan terms, including lower interest rates and more flexible repayment options.
5. Minimal Monitoring: Lenders may require minimal monitoring for loans or borrowers with a superior
grade because the risk of default is so low.
Substandard Grade:
A "substandard" grade, on the other hand, represents a lower level of creditworthiness and a higher
level of credit risk. Here's how to interpret a "substandard" grade:
1. Elevated Credit Risk: A substandard grade indicates that the borrower or the loan being assessed
poses a higher level of credit risk. There is a significant risk that the borrower may not fully meet their
financial obligations.
2. Financial Challenges: Borrowers with a substandard grade may have financial challenges, such as
inconsistent income, limited cash flow, or a weaker balance sheet. They may have a history of
financial difficulties or missed payments.
3. Increased Probability of Default: The likelihood of the borrower defaulting on the loan is higher
when they are assigned a substandard credit risk grade. Lenders need to be cautious and may
implement risk mitigation measures.
4. Less Favorable Loan Terms: Borrowers with a substandard credit risk grade may be offered less
favorable loan terms, including higher interest rates and more stringent repayment conditions, to
compensate for the increased risk.
5. Enhanced Monitoring: Lenders typically require closer and more frequent monitoring of loans or
borrowers with a substandard grade to proactively address any issues that may arise.
It's important to note that the specific criteria and definitions for superior and substandard grades
can vary between financial institutions and credit risk grading systems. The above interpretations
provide a general understanding of how these grades are commonly used, but the exact meaning
may differ based on the institution's policies and guidelines. Additionally, credit risk grading systems
often include other intermediate grades between these extremes to provide a more nuanced
assessment of credit risk.
1. Management Competence: Assess the qualifications, experience, and track record of key executives
and leaders within the organization. Evaluate whether they have the necessary skills to make
informed decisions and navigate complex challenges.
2. Corporate Governance: Evaluate the organization's corporate governance structure, including the
composition and independence of the board of directors, the presence of audit and risk committees,
and adherence to governance best practices.
3. Strategic Planning: Examine the organization's strategic planning processes, including its ability to set
clear goals and objectives, adapt to changing market conditions, and implement effective strategies.
4. Financial Management: Analyze the financial management practices of the organization, including
budgeting, financial reporting, and risk management. Assess the transparency and accuracy of
financial disclosures.
5. Ethical Conduct: Evaluate the organization's commitment to ethical conduct and compliance with
laws and regulations. Assess whether there have been any ethical lapses or legal issues involving
management.
6. Succession Planning: Consider the organization's approach to succession planning and leadership
continuity. Assess whether there are plans in place to ensure smooth transitions in leadership roles.
7. Stakeholder Relationships: Examine the organization's relationships with key stakeholders, such as
shareholders, customers, suppliers, and employees. Assess whether management effectively
communicates and manages these relationships.
8. Crisis Management: Analyze the organization's readiness to respond to crises and unexpected
events. Evaluate the effectiveness of crisis management plans and procedures.
Security risk refers to the risk of harm, loss, or damage to an organization's physical assets,
information, technology infrastructure, and personnel. It encompasses various aspects of security,
including physical security, cybersecurity, and operational security. To measure security risk:
1. Threat Assessment: Identify and assess potential threats and vulnerabilities that could pose security
risks to the organization. These threats may include physical threats (e.g., natural disasters, theft,
vandalism) and cyber threats (e.g., data breaches, cyberattacks).
2. Security Controls: Evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of security controls and measures in place
to mitigate identified threats. This includes physical security measures, access controls, data
encryption, and cybersecurity defenses.
3. Incident Response: Assess the organization's incident response capabilities. Evaluate whether there
are well-defined procedures for responding to security incidents and breaches, including
communication plans and containment strategies.
4. Security Awareness: Measure the level of security awareness and training among employees. Well-
informed and trained staff can be a critical defense against security threats.
5. Compliance: Ensure that the organization complies with relevant laws, regulations, and industry
standards related to security. Non-compliance can increase security risk.
6. Third-Party Risk: Evaluate the security practices of third-party vendors and partners that have access
to the organization's data or systems. Assess their security controls and assess potential risks they
may introduce.
7. Regular Assessments: Conduct regular security risk assessments and testing, including vulnerability
assessments, penetration testing, and security audits.
8. Security Investments: Assess the organization's budget allocation for security measures and whether
it aligns with the identified security risks and needs.
Measuring management risk and security risk requires a comprehensive and systematic approach
that involves evaluating various factors, conducting assessments, and implementing appropriate risk
management strategies to mitigate these risks effectively. It is an ongoing process that should adapt
to changing circumstances and emerging threats.
H. What do you mean by lending? Is it good or bad? Year
2019
Answer:
Lending refers to the practice of providing financial resources, typically in
the form of loans, to individuals, businesses, or organizations in exchange
for the promise of repayment with interest. Whether lending is good or
bad depends on various factors, including responsible lending practices,
the borrower's ability to repay, and the purpose of the loan. Responsible
lending can support economic growth and financial stability, while
irresponsible lending or borrowing can lead to financial problems and
instability. It's important to assess each lending situation on a case-by-case
basis.
I. Credit risk grading is the basic module of for developing
a credit risk management system? Explain. Year 2018
Answer:
Credit risk grading is indeed a fundamental building block in the
development of a credit risk management system. It provides a systematic
and standardized way to evaluate and categorize the creditworthiness of
borrowers or counterparties. By assigning specific risk grades, financial
institutions can assess the likelihood of default and the potential impact of
default on their loan portfolios. This information is essential for making
informed lending decisions, setting appropriate interest rates, terms, and
loan limits, and establishing risk management policies.
Furthermore, credit risk grading allows financial institutions to monitor the
credit quality of their loan portfolio over time, identify potential areas of
concern, and take proactive measures to mitigate risks. It serves as a critical
tool for regulatory compliance, portfolio diversification, and overall risk
management. Whether in a small, mid-sized, or large financial institution, a
well-implemented credit risk grading system is essential for sound credit
risk management and maintaining the stability and profitability of the
institution.
J. In which sector an individual can use the CRG? Year
2018
Answer:
An individual can use Credit Risk Grading (CRG) primarily in the financial
sector. CRG is a risk assessment tool commonly employed by banks, credit
unions, and other financial institutions when evaluating the
creditworthiness of borrowers seeking loans or credit facilities. It helps
individuals or businesses understand how their creditworthiness is
perceived by lenders, which can affect their ability to secure loans, interest
rates, and loan terms. While individuals themselves do not typically assign
CRG grades, they can access their credit reports, which may include credit
scores and information used by lenders to determine credit risk. These
reports influence their ability to obtain credit in various sectors, including
personal loans, mortgages, and credit cards.
K. According to regulatory definition how a loan can be
differentiate as classified loan by objective criteria? Year
2018
Answer:
The classification of loans by objective criteria, as defined by regulatory authorities,
typically involves categorizing loans into different classifications based on the level of risk
or the likelihood of repayment. These classifications can vary from one regulatory
authority to another but often include the following categories:
1. Standard/Performing Loans: These are loans where borrowers are meeting all their
repayment obligations, and there is no significant risk of default. They are considered
low-risk loans.
2. Substandard Loans: Substandard loans have weaknesses that may lead to some degree
of loss if not addressed. These weaknesses could be related to the borrower's financial
condition or repayment capacity.
3. Doubtful Loans: Doubtful loans have a high risk of default. There are usually substantial
weaknesses in the borrower's financial condition, and full recovery of the loan is
uncertain.
4. Bad and Loss Loans: Bad and loss loans are considered uncollectible. The likelihood of
recovery is very low, and they are written off as losses.
The specific criteria for classifying loans into these categories often include factors like
the borrower's payment performance, financial health, collateral quality, and other
relevant indicators. Regulatory authorities provide guidelines and standards that
financial institutions must follow when determining loan classifications. Accurate loan
classification is crucial for risk assessment, provisioning, and regulatory compliance.
L. Why credit monitoring is needed? Is it helpful to
present a loan review checklist? How? Year 2018
Answer:
Credit monitoring is essential for several reasons, particularly in the context of lending
and managing credit risk:
1. Early Warning System: Credit monitoring serves as an early warning system, alerting
lenders to any changes in a borrower's creditworthiness. This allows lenders to detect
potential issues before they escalate into serious problems.
2. Risk Mitigation: Monitoring helps in identifying deteriorating credit quality or financial
stress in borrowers. Lenders can then take proactive measures to mitigate the risk, such
as restructuring loans, requiring additional collateral, or adjusting the loan terms.
3. Portfolio Management: It enables financial institutions to manage their loan portfolios
effectively by tracking the overall credit quality and diversification of loans. This helps in
balancing risk exposure across different borrowers and industries.
4. Compliance: Regulatory requirements often mandate regular credit monitoring as part
of a financial institution's risk management practices. Compliance with these regulations
is crucial to avoid penalties and ensure the stability of the institution.
5. Default Prevention: By monitoring borrower behavior and financial performance,
lenders can intervene when necessary to prevent defaults and protect their interests.
6. Credit Policy Adherence: Credit monitoring helps ensure that borrowers are adhering to
the terms and conditions of their loans, including timely payments and compliance with
covenants.
A loan review checklist is a valuable tool for credit monitoring. It helps lenders
systematically assess and track various aspects of the loan and the borrower's
creditworthiness. Here's how a loan review checklist can be helpful:
1. Risk Assessment: CRG provides a standardized framework for assessing and categorizing
the credit risk associated with borrowers. It helps determine the risk level of each
borrower or loan, facilitating risk-based decision-making.
2. Portfolio Management: CRG helps financial institutions manage their loan portfolios
effectively by categorizing loans into risk grades. This categorization allows for the
diversification of risk exposure and helps in balancing the overall portfolio risk.
3. Loan Origination: It aids in evaluating loan applications by assessing the
creditworthiness of potential borrowers. Lenders can use CRG to determine whether to
approve a loan, set interest rates, and establish terms and conditions.
4. Early Warning System: CRG serves as an early warning system by identifying borrowers
whose credit risk profile may be deteriorating. Lenders can take proactive measures to
mitigate risks, such as restructuring loans or requesting additional collateral.
5. Credit Policy Adherence: CRG helps ensure that borrowers are adhering to the terms
and conditions of their loans. Any deviation from the expected credit risk grade can
trigger a review and potential action.
6. Regulatory Compliance: Many regulatory authorities require financial institutions to
have a structured credit risk grading system in place. Compliance with these regulations
is essential for the safety and soundness of institutions.
7. Reporting: CRG allows for reporting on the credit quality of the loan portfolio to
management, boards of directors, and regulatory authorities. It provides transparency
and accountability.
8. Risk Mitigation: By identifying higher-risk borrowers, CRG enables lenders to implement
risk mitigation strategies, such as setting aside provisions for expected credit losses.
9. Credit Review: CRG serves as a foundation for conducting periodic credit reviews.
Lenders can review loans with higher risk grades more frequently to assess changes in
the borrower's creditworthiness.
10. Loan Performance Tracking: CRG allows lenders to track the performance of loans over
time. This helps in identifying trends and taking timely actions to address emerging
credit issues.
In summary, CRG is an integral part of credit risk monitoring systems within financial
institutions. It provides a structured and standardized approach to assessing credit risk,
enabling lenders to make informed lending decisions, manage portfolios, and
proactively address credit-related challenges.
N. Mention the loan monitoring method. Year 2018
Answer: See Lecture Manual.
Reference:
Categories of Loans:
a) Continuous loan: This type of loan has no repayment schedule. It has only a
specific limit on Credit Operations and Risk Management in Commercial Banks. For the
purpose of loan classification, all types of loans and advances will be divided under an
expiry date. Such as, cash credit and an overdraft.
b) Demand loan: These are loans for fixed amounts which become due whenever the
banks so loan can be considered as demand loan. Such as: forced LIM, PAD/TR, FDBP,
IDBP etc.
c) Fixed-term loans: These are loans with a contractually fixed schedule for
repayment.
B. Qualitative Judgment Criteria: On the basis of the qualitative judgment a loan will be
classified under the following situations:
i) Loss of capital due to any change in business condition under which loan was
allowed.
ii) If the recovery of the loan is uncertain due to an adverse business environment.
iii) Frequent rescheduling or if the rules regarding rescheduling are not met.
iv) Frequent propensity of excess over the approved limit. v) If the value of the collateral
decreases
vi) If the case is lodged towards recovery of the loan.
vii) If the loan is allowed without the approval of the appropriate authority.
If there is any probability to change the prevailing situation by taking appropriate
measures in spite of the above-mentioned reasons or any other reasons for
which the loan may be turned into defective then on the basis of the qualitative
judgment it will be classified as sub-standard.
In spite of taking appropriate measures if the chance of recovery is uncertain it
will be classified As doubtful and
In spite of all out effort if there is no probability to recover the loan it will be
classified as bad and loss.
For incorporating qualitative judgment, banks must focus on the likelihood that the
borrower will repay all amounts due in a timely manner, using their own judgment and
the following assessment factors:
1. Special Mention:
Assets must be classified not higher than Special Mention if any of the
following deficiencies of Bank Management is present: the loan was not
made in compliance with the Bank's internal policies, failure to maintain
adequate and enforceable documentation; or poor control over collateral.
Assets must be classified as not higher than Special Mention if any of the
following deficiencies of the obligor is present: occasional overdrawn within
the past year; below average or declining profitability; barely acceptable
liquidity; problems in strategic planning.
2. Sub-standard
Assets must be classified no higher than Sub-standard if any of the following
deficiencies of the obligor is present: recurrent overdrawn, low account
turnover, competitive difficulties. location in a volatile industry with an acute
drop in demand; very low profitability that is also declining: inadequate
liquidity: cash flow less than repayment of principal and interest; unjustifiable
lack of external audit; pending litigation of a significant nature.
Asset must be classified no higher than Sub-standard if the primary sources of
repayment are insufficient to service the debt and the bank must look to
secondary sources of repayment, including collateral.
Assets must be classified no higher than Sub-standard if the banking
organization has acquired the asset without the types of adequate
documentation of the obligor's net worth, profitability, liquidity, and cash
flow that are required in the banking organization's lending policy, or there
are doubts about the validity of that documentation.
3. Doubtful
Assets must be classified no higher than Doubtful if any of the following deficiencies of
the obligor is present:
permanent overdrawn;
location in an industry with poor aggregate earnings or loss of markets;
serious competitive problems;
failure of key products;
operational losses, illiquidity, including the necessity to sell assets to meet
operating expenses;
cash flow less than required interest payments; very poor management; non-
cooperative or hostile management;
serious doubts about the integrity of management; doubts about true ownership;
and
complete absence of faith in financial statements.
4. Bad/Loss
Assets must be classified no higher than Bad/Loss if any of the following deficiencies of
the obligor are present:
the obligor seeks new loans to finance operational losses;
location in an industry that is disappearing;
location in the bottom quartile of its industry in terms of profitability;
technological obsolescence;
very high losses;
asset sales at a loss to meet operational expenses;
cash flow less than production costs;
no repayment source except liquidation;
presence of money laundering, fraud, embezzlement, or other criminal activity;
no further support by owners.
C. Improvement in Classification:
From time to time, in the judgment of the bank, the condition of a loan may improve
and it may be justified to move it to a more favourable classification category. The
decision to move a loan to a more favourable classification category must be
accompanied by an analysis showing that there has been improvement in the payment
performance of the loan and/or in the financial condition of the borrower.
The decision to move a loan from Bad/loss to Doubtful or Substandard, or from
Doubtful to Substandard, may, with appropriate justification, be taken by the
Chief Credit Officer, with the concurrence of the Chief Financial Officer.
The decision to move a loan from Substandard, Doubtful, or Bad/Loss to Special
Mention Account or to declassify it completely must be taken by the Board of
Directors, with appropriate justification presented by the branch manager who
originated the loan in question and the Managing Director.
Bangladesh Bank will respond to the bank within 15 days of receiving such a request.
However, in any case where there is a lingering disagreement between the classification
determined by bank management and the classification determined by Bangladesh
Bank, the judgment of the Bank will prevail. Any loan classified during Bangladesh
Bank's on-site inspection on the basis of qualitative judgment cannot be declassified
without the consent of Bangladesh Bank.
b) Specific Provision: Banks will maintain provision at the following rates in respect of
classified Continuous, Demand and Fixed Term Loans:
(1) Sub-standard: 20%
(2) Doubtful: 50% (3) Bad/Loss: 100%
a. Deposit with the same bank under lien against the loan.
b. Government bond/savings certificate
For all other collaterals, the provision will be maintained at the stated rates in Para 4 on
the balance calculated as the greater of the following two amounts:
i. The outstanding balance of the classified loan less the amount of Interest
Suspense and the value of eligible collateral; and
ii. 15% of the outstanding balance of the loan.
However, the basis for the provision shall be further reviewed towards closer
convergence with international best practice standards.
Eligible Collateral
Year Quest 2021,2020,2019: Define “Eligible Collateral” according to
provision policy.
In the definition of 'Eligible Collateral' as mentioned in the above paragraph the
following collateral will be included as eligible collateral in determining the base
for provision:
-100% of the deposit under lien against the loan
-100% of the value of government bond/savings certificate under lien.
-100% of the value of the guarantee given by the Government or Bangladesh
Bank
-100% of the market value of gold or gold ornaments pledged with the bank.
-50% of the market value of easily marketable commodities kept under the control
of the bank
-Maximum 50% of the market value of land and building mortgaged with the bank
-50% of the average market value for the last 06 months or 50% of the face value,
whichever is less, of the shares traded in the stock exchange.
Credit Securitization
Credit securitization can help reduce bank risk in certain situations, but it can also
create new risks if not managed properly.
When a bank securitizes its loans (such as mortgages or auto loans), it transfers the
credit risk associated with those loans to investors who purchase the securities. By
doing so, the bank can remove these loans from its balance sheet, freeing up capital
that can be used for new lending activities. This process helps the bank reduce its
exposure to default risk and can enhance its overall financial stability.
However, it's important to note that if the securitization is not conducted prudently
and the underlying loans are of poor quality or the risks are not adequately disclosed
to investors, it can lead to significant problems. For example, during the 2008 financial
crisis, the securitization of subprime mortgages contributed to widespread financial
instability when these mortgages defaulted at higher rates than expected, causing the
value of mortgage-backed securities to plummet and triggering a crisis in the banking
and financial sectors.
So, while credit securitization has the potential to reduce bank risk, it needs to be done
cautiously, with careful attention to the quality of the underlying loans and
transparent communication of risks to investors. When managed properly, it can help
banks manage their risk exposure effectively.
18 OFF- Balance sheet financing in
banking & credit derivatives
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction:
The banking industry is facing many risks, such as interest rate changes and
loan defaults. To reduce these risks, banks are using a variety of risk
management tools, such as securitization, loan sales, and credit derivatives.
These tools help banks to manage risk more effectively and to generate fee
income. Risk management tools can help banks to reduce their exposure to
risk and to improve their financial performance. The use of risk management
tools is becoming increasingly important for banks as they seek to remain
competitive in the global financial markets.
Process :
2. The bank sells securities that represent claims against these assets to investors
in the open market.
3. As the assets pay out, the income stream flows to the holders of the
securities.
4. The bank receives the money it expended to acquire the assets and uses
those funds to acquire new assets or to cover operating expenses.
In effect, securitization allows banks to transform illiquid assets into liquid
securities that can be traded on the open market. This can help banks raise new
funds and reduce their risk exposure.
Here are some of the benefits of securitization for banks:
The ability to remove the loans from its balance sheet, which can improve
its capital ratios and reduce its risk profile.
The ability to raise new capital by issuing securities.
The ability to earn fees by servicing the loans or by guaranteeing the
securities.
Securitization:
The process of combining individual loans of similar characteristics into a pool and selling
debt securities that draw interest on principal payments from the pool of loans. This turns
illiquid assets of individual loans into marketable securities that can be bought, sold, and
traded on the secondary markets.
Mortgage securitization:
A specific type of securitization that involves pooling mortgages together and selling
securities backed by those mortgages. This allows mortgage originators to sell mortgage
loans from their books and use the money to make more loans
.
Impact of securitization on banks:
Securitization can have a significant impact on banks, both positive and negative. On the
positive side, it can allow banks to recycle loan money to homeowners without retaining
the loan assets on their books. This can free up capital for banks to make more loans. On
the negative side, securitization can make it more difficult for banks to compete for loans,
as corporations and other borrowers may be able to get better terms by issuing securities
directly to investors.
Does Credit Securitization Reduce Bank Risk?
Some argue that securitization can reduce bank risk by transferring credit risk
to other investors. This can free up banks' capital, allowing them to lend more
money to borrowers. Additionally, securitization can help to diversify banks'
portfolios, making them less vulnerable to losses from defaults on individual
loans.
However, others argue that securitization can actually increase bank risk. This
is because securitization can create moral hazard, whereby banks are
encouraged to take on riskier loans in the knowledge that they can then sell
them off to other investors.
Additionally, securitization can make it more difficult for investors to assess the true
risk of the underlying assets, which can lead to financial instability. However, the
securitization model can be abused, which can lead to asset bubbles. It is important
to use securitization responsibly to avoid the risks of asset bubbles.
Banks can sell loans to raise funds.The loans sold by banks usually have a
maturity of 90 days or less, but loans with longer maturities are also sold.The
loan sales market in the United States received a boost during the 1980s when
there was a wave of mergers and corporate buyouts.
The selling bank retains servicing rights on the sold loans, which means they
collect interest and principal payments from borrowers and pass the proceeds
along to loan buyers. Loan sales can take place in several different forms,
including participation loans, assignments, and loan strips.
With strips, the selling bank retains the risk of borrower default and usually has
to put up some of its own funds to support the loan until it reaches maturity.
STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT ( y.q 2021 )
Standby letters of credit (SLCs) are a type of financial guarantee that is used to
enhance the credit standing of a borrower.
SLCs are issued by banks and are a contingent obligation, meaning that
the bank only has to pay out if the borrower defaults on their obligations.
SLCs can be used for a variety of purposes, such as performance bonds,
bid bonds, and advance payment guarantees.
The key advantages of SLCs for banks are that they earn fees, help
customers borrow more cheaply, and are relatively low-cost to issue.
The demand for SLCs has grown rapidly in recent years due to the following
factors:
Pros:
Cons:
Can be expensive to obtain, as the bank will charge a fee for issuing the
SBLC.
Can be time-consuming to get approved, as the bank will need to carefully
assess the applicant's financial situation.
The beneficiary may not be able to access the SBLC payment if the issuing
bank fails or becomes insolvent.
Riskiness of Funded Loans versus Off-Balance-Sheet Financing in
Banks
Studies have shown that direct loans carry substantially higher market risk
premiums than do credit letters. This means that investors are willing to accept
a lower return on credit letters because they are considered to be less risky
than direct loans.
Standby credits, loan sales and securitizations are considered to be less risky
than direct loans because they do not represent a direct obligation of the
bank. However, these transactions can still be risky if the borrower defaults on
the underlying loan.
As the spread between bank's interest income and interest expenses is getting
lower, off-balance-sheet financing may be considered as an additional source
of income in banking sector of Bangladesh. However, banks should carefully
consider the risks involved before using off-balance-sheet financing.
For example, Banks A and B may find a swap dealer, such as a large
insurance company, that agrees to draw up a credit swap contract between
the two banks. Bank A then transmits an amount (perhaps $100 million) in
interest and pricipal payments that it collects from its credit customers to the
dealer Bank B also sends all or a portion of the loan payments its customers
make to the same dealer The swap dealer will ultimately pass these payments
along to the other bank that signed the swap contract.
Credit derivatives can be a useful tool for managing credit risk, but they also
carry some risks. It is important to carefully consider the risks and benefits of
credit derivatives before using them.
This means that Bank B is effectively taking on the credit risk of the loan. If the
borrower defaults on the loan, Bank B will be responsible for the losses.
However, Bank B also benefits from any appreciation in the value of the loan.
Credit option
A credit option is a financial derivative that gives the buyer the right, but not
the obligation, to buy or sell a credit asset at an agreed-upon price and date.
The credit asset can be a loan, bond, or other debt security.
Credit options can be used by banks, investors, and other financial institutions
to hedge against credit risk. They can also be used to speculate on the future
value of credit assets.
For example, a bank worried about default on a large $100 million loan it has
just made might approach an options dealer about an option contract that
pays off if the loan declines significantly in value or completely turns bad. If the
bank's borrowing customer pays off as promised, the bank collects the lour
revenue it expected to gather and the option issued by the dealer (option-
writer) will go unused. The bark involved will, of course, lose the premium it
paid to the dealer writing the option
Credit Default Swaps
Suppose, for example, the bank has recently made a total of 100 million-dollar
commercial real estate loans to support the building of several investment projects
in various cities. Fearing that several of these 100 loans might turn sour because of
weakening local economic conditions, it purchases a put option that pays off if
more than two of these commercial real estate loans are defaulted. Thus, for each
commercial real estate loan that fails to pay out, the bank may receive $1 million
less the resale value of the building used to secure the loan.
In another example of a credit default swap may seek out a guarantor institution to
unload the risk on one of its loans of case of default. For example suppose Bank a
Swap the credit risk from a five year, $ 100 milling construction loan to Bank B.
Typically. A will pay B a fee based upon the loans par or face value (for example ½
percent of $ 100 million or $ 500,000). For its part, B agree to pay Aa stipulated
amount of money or a fixed percentage of the value of the loan only if default
occurs. There may be a so called materiality threshold, a minimum amount of loss
required before any payment occurs. If the swap ends in an actual default, the
amount owed is normally the face value of the loan less the current market value of
the defaulted asset.
In the example, the bank is buying a CDS to protect itself against the default of a
portfolio of commercial real estate loans. If more than two of the loans default, the
bank will receive a payout from the seller of the CDS.
CDS are a complex financial instrument, and there are many different ways they
can be used. However, they can be a useful tool for managing credit risk
.
Risks Associated with Credit Derivatives
Counterparty risk: The risk that the counterparty to the credit derivative contract
will default on its obligations.
Legal risk: The risk that the credit derivative contract will be invalidated by a court
of law.
Regulatory risk: The risk that the regulatory environment for credit derivatives will
change, making them less attractive or even illegal.
Market liquidity risk: The risk that there will be no market for the credit derivative
contract if it needs to be sold.
Model risk: The risk that the models used to price and manage credit derivatives
are inaccurate.
These risks can be significant, and they should be carefully considered before
using credit derivatives. However, credit derivatives can also be a valuable tool for
managing credit risk, and they can help banks to reduce their exposure to losses
from defaults.
The following are some of the key benefits of introducing credit derivatives in
the banking sector of Bangladesh:
Hedge against credit risk: Credit derivatives can be used to hedge against the risk
of default on loans. This can help banks to protect their profits and assets in the
event of a borrower default.
Reduce capital requirements: The use of credit derivatives can help banks to
reduce their capital requirements. This is because credit derivatives can transfer
some of the credit risk from the bank to another party.
Increase liquidity: The introduction of credit derivatives could help to increase
liquidity in the banking sector. This is because credit derivatives can be used to
trade credit risk, which can help to make it easier for banks to buy and sell loans.
However, there are also some risks associated with the introduction of credit
derivatives, such as:
Counterparty risk: Credit derivatives involve counterparty risk, which is the risk
that the other party to the contract will default.
Market volatility: Credit derivatives can be volatile instruments, and their prices
can fluctuate significantly.
Non Performing Loans (NPL)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-performing loans (NPLs), also known as non-performing assets (NPAs) or bad loans,
are loans that a financial institution, such as a bank, has extended to borrowers but
which have stopped generating interest income for the lender. In other words, these
are loans where the borrower has failed to make scheduled interest or principal
payments for an extended period, typically 90 days or more.
NPLs are a concern for financial institutions because they can negatively impact their
financial health and profitability. When a significant portion of a bank's loan portfolio
consists of non-performing loans, it can lead to several problems:
1. Loss of Interest Income: NPLs result in a loss of income for the lender, as they are not
earning interest on these loans. This can reduce the institution's overall profitability.
2. Risk of Default: If a large percentage of loans become non-performing, it can pose a risk
to the institution's solvency and may lead to financial distress or even bankruptcy.
3. Capital Adequacy: Regulatory authorities often require financial institutions to maintain
a certain level of capital to absorb losses from non-performing loans. When NPLs
increase, a bank may need to set aside more capital, reducing its capacity to lend and
grow.
4. Resource Allocation: Banks and other lenders must allocate resources to manage and
recover non-performing loans. This involves legal and administrative expenses, which
can further erode profitability.
5. **Credit Risk: ** A high level of NPLs can also signal poor credit risk assessment and
management practices within the institution, which can affect its reputation and ability
to attract new borrowers.
The cost of NPL to Banks
All problem loans exact, to some degree, a toll on the bank. The most obvious cost is
when a problem loan ultimately results in a charge-off and the bank loses whatever
principal and interest remained to be collected. However, bank loan loss figures tell only
part of the story. Every problem loan has other, less apparent costs that, in the long run,
can be just as damaging to bank profitability. Some of these less visible costs are as
follows.
Damaged reputation.
The foundation of banking is built on trust. A bank can attract the capital it needs for
loans and other investments only if its depositors and investors have confidence in
the bank's ability to prudently handle their money. Above all, this means making few
bad loans. An excessive number of problem loans damages the bank's reputation in
the eyes of its customers and investors. Once that happens, profitability declines, it
becomes increasingly difficult to attract capital, and growth is hindered.
A problem loan demands far more attention from bank personnel. The loan officer must
devote time to working with the borrower, and the added loan review and audit
requirements tie up other bank employees as well. The extra time spent on a
problem loan is basically unproductive it merely serves to protect the bank's assets
and does not generate additional revenue. Furthermore, if outside appraisers,
consultants and other specialists must be brought in, additional costs will be
incurred by the bank.
A bank saddled with an unusually high number of problem loans may find itself subject
to increased regulatory oversight and control from government authorities. Special
reports may have to be filed with bank regulators, with the cost borne by the bank.
In many instances, the bank has to establish special audit committees and institute
more stringent loan approval processes-for example, advances or a renewed line of
credit to criticized borrowers may need special approval from the board of directors.
When regulatory controls such as these are imposed on a bank, the increased
personnel commitment and added delays in getting the requisite approvals may cause
loan opportunities to be lost and eventually hurt bank profitability.
Capital tied up with a problem loan is unavailable to be lent or invested for more useful
and profitable purposes. Thus the cost of a problem loan can, therefore, extend beyond
the mere loss of principal and interest on the loan.
Lender Error
Avoiding problem loans begins with a careful and thorough evaluation of the loan
request and an equally committed follow-up effort, the basic principles of which were
covered in the earlier chapters of this text. Any significant breakdown in the commercial
lending process, from a poor loan interview to inadequate monitoring, may result in a
bad loan. Some of the more common lender errors are as follows:
Inadequate monitoring:
Many problem loans can be kept off the books if the loan officer closely follows the
loans he or she has made. Financial statement reviews, occasional on-site visits and
collateral inspections, periodic credit checks and other loan monitoring tasks must be
performed to ensure that the company's financial position remains good and the terms
of the loan agreement are being met. Inadequate follow-up allows small problems to
become big ones until the bank faces a total breakdown in repayment. One key to
avoiding problem loans is a strong commitment to supervising and directing to the
lending function. An ill-defined loan policy or an overemphasis on making loans at the
expense of quality credit can create an environment in which problem loans can
develop.
Poor Business Practices
Many problem loans can be attributed to poor business practices. Included in this
general categorization are bad management, product deterioration, poor marketing
and poor financial controls.
Bad management.
A leading cause of problem loans is bad management, which may not have been
evident when the loan was approved. In particular, small businesses often lack
management depth. For example, a company started by engineers or other technically
oriented persons may grow to the point where finance, marketing and sales personnel
must be brought in. Without qualified management to set up and coordinate these
various company functions, bad decisions may be made. Without trained succession
management, problems may arise when the founder or owner relinquishes control or is
absent for an extended period. Furthermore, if only one person is making all the
decisions, the infusion of ideas and creativity that is needed to help the company grow
may falter. The primary cause of business failure, though, is simply incompetent or
inattentive management. Those heading the company must be able to manage the
various departments effectively while providing good short and long-term planning that
capitalizes on opportunities and is prepared to react to any adverse circumstance.
Product deterioration.
A problem loan often surfaces after a product or service sold by a business is no longer
competitively priced or of consistent quality. Increases in labor or material costs or failure
to modernize equipment and keep pace with the latest production techniques can price
a product out of the market or force the company to cut corners and short-change
quality. Regardless of the reason, the bottom line is a decline in profitability and an
eventual inability to service debt.
Poor marketing
Bad loans can also arise if a company has poor marketing practices. A business must
have a well-defined plan for advertising, selling and distributing its products, Failure to
do so will invariably lead to declining sales and profitability. Another cause of problem
loans is the inability to anticipate and respond to changing markets (as when consumer
tastes shift or a competitor introduces a new product).
Economic factor:
Economic downturns and changes in taxes and interest rates can hamper a business's
ability to service its debt. For example, during recessionary periods, many companies
struggle with their cash flow as sales slow, costs increase and interest rates rise.
Companies particularly susceptible to a recession and therefore prime candidates for a
problem loan include those that have high fixed costs that cannot be reduced
significantly, have few salable assets and cannot generate cash other than through sales
or borrowing and sell a product with an elastic demand.
Changes in tax policies can also prove beneficial to some companies and burdensome
to others. However, the loan officer should not be quick to single out economic factors
as the sole cause of a problem loan. Good management can often overcome or at least
ride out the economic swings that will affect any business.
Competitive factors:
The introduction of a strong competitor can wreak havoc on companies in the same
market. Vulnerable companies may experience lost sales, increased costs (associated
with retaining key personnel, increasing the advertising and sales effort and so forth),
and a declining profit margin. All of these changes can have implications for a
company'sgrowth and its ability to repay debt.
Legal factors:
The limitation of law is another vital point of stuck up loans. The procedure of legal
action against the defaulting borrower is still a time-consuming matter as well as very
expensive one which a banker wants to avoid. Sometimes, the law enforcing authority
cannot or do not implement the decree against the defaulting borrowers for reasons
unknown. At that time a banker becomes very helpless. The act of disposing collateral
security is still a risky procedure in our country. The defaulting borrower gets this
opportunity which arises from limitation of law. The cunning defaulting borrower
knows the limitation of law and also knows how to escape from the legal action. And
that is why a loan becomes stuck up or classified.
Technological factors:
Problem loans may also be caused by technological developments. High-tech
companies can see their financial fortunes suddenly reversed by the introduction of a
more advanced product by a competitor. Another factor is whether a business can keep
pace with others in its market through the development of technically advanced
equipment that increases production speed or quality.
calls from existing suppliers requesting credit information to open new credit lines
legal notices that are served against the borrower for such things as tax liens,
judgments or garnishments
delayed payments to trade suppliers or a request from the company for extended
terms, resulting in a refusal to ship to the company
cash-on-delivery sales
Early Warning Signs form the Bank
Although the borrower may be meeting the terms and conditions of all current loan
obligations, signs of a deterioration of the account relationship with the bank may
still exist one obvious indicator is declining deposit balances. Another is requests for
loan renewals and extensions. Such requests may simply be in response to slow-
paying receivables or some other unforeseen event; however, the loan officer should
be alert to a repeated pattern, which may be indicative of a deeper problem. Early
banking warning signals that may merit further investigation include
Management of NPL
The management of non-performing loans (NPLs) is a critical function for banks and
financial institutions to protect their financial stability and recover as much value as
possible from troubled loans. Effective NPL management involves several strategies and
processes. Here's a comprehensive overview of how to manage NPLs:
One of the first steps in resolving a problem loan is to take stock of the situation. This
involves an evaluation of the bank's and borrower's strengths and weaknesses, which
can then be used to formulate a course of action. A loan officer who discovers that the
value of the bank's collateral has declined markedly and essentially represents no
security for the loan, may decide that a strong effort of lending additional money in
exchange for obtaining other security for the loan. If, on the other hand, the bank
controls the collateral and can sell it, net of costs, for a sum that covers the remaining
balance of the loan, then the loan officer may opt for that course instead
In drafting an appropriate response to the problem loan the loan officer should
Reviewing Documentation
The loan officer should carefully review all pertinent documents in the credit file. Before
sitting down with the borrower, it is also imperative to have a good understanding of
the rights and obligations of both bank and borrower under the loan agreement-for
example, the specific affirmative and negative covenants that were reached.
A. What are the costs of Non- Performing Loans to the banks? Year 2021
Answer: See the lecture material.
B. What is lender error? Discuss about some common lender errors. Year
2021
Answer:
Lender errors encompass a range of mistakes and oversights made by financial
institutions or lenders during the loan origination and servicing processes. These errors
can have significant consequences, both for the lending institution and borrowers. Here
are some common lender errors:
These errors can undermine the financial health of lending institutions, lead to non-
performing loans (NPLs), and damage their reputation. For borrowers, such errors can
result in financial distress, legal challenges, and damaged credit. To mitigate lender
errors, financial institutions must invest in robust risk management practices, thorough
due diligence, and effective communication with borrowers, while adhering to
regulatory standards.
C. What are the proper early warning signs of problem loan? Discuss.
Year2021
Answer: See the lecture material.
D. Define recovery management. Year 2020
Answer: Recovery management, in the context of finance and lending, refers to the
systematic process of attempting to reclaim and rehabilitate non-performing or
delinquent assets, such as loans or debts. This process involves various strategies and
actions, including negotiations, restructuring, legal proceedings, or collateral liquidation,
aimed at recovering as much value as possible from troubled assets. The primary goal of
recovery management is to minimize financial losses for the lender or financial institution
while resolving the borrower's financial difficulties through mutually agreed-upon
arrangements or legal means. Effective recovery management is critical for maintaining
the institution's financial health and mitigating the impact of non-performing loans on its
portfolio.
These components of capital and minimum capital requirements under Basel III aim to
enhance the resilience of banks and minimize the likelihood of financial crises by
ensuring that they maintain adequate capital to absorb losses and continue operating
safely during adverse economic conditions.
G. Explain briefly the overall objectives of BASEL. Year 2020
Answer: The overall objectives of the Basel framework, which includes Basel III and its
predecessors (Basel I and Basel II), are to enhance the stability and soundness of the
global banking system. These objectives are achieved through the following key goals:
1. Risk Reduction: Basel seeks to reduce the risk of financial instability by establishing
minimum capital requirements for banks. Adequate capital cushions help banks absorb
losses, reducing the likelihood of bank failures and systemic crises.
2. Risk Sensitivity: Basel II and III introduce risk-sensitive capital requirements, meaning that
the amount of capital banks are required to hold is proportionate to the risks they face.
This approach encourages better risk management practices and ensures that capital
levels are aligned with the risks a bank takes.
3. Promotion of Sound Banking Practices: Basel encourages banks to adopt best practices
in risk management, internal controls, and governance. It emphasizes transparency and
disclosure to enable market participants to assess a bank's risk profile.
4. Enhanced Market Discipline: Basel III promotes market discipline by requiring banks to
disclose information about their capital, risk exposures, and risk management practices.
This transparency helps investors and counterparties make informed decisions.
5. Protection of Depositors and Creditors: Basel aims to safeguard the interests of
depositors and creditors by ensuring that banks have sufficient capital to cover losses.
This helps prevent the need for government bailouts or taxpayer-funded rescues.
6. Level Playing Field: Basel seeks to create a level playing field among international banks
by establishing common regulatory standards. This reduces the risk of regulatory
arbitrage and competitive disadvantages among banks operating in different
jurisdictions.
7. Adaptability to Market Changes: Basel frameworks are periodically updated to adapt to
evolving market conditions and lessons learned from financial crises. Basel III, for
example, was developed in response to weaknesses exposed during the global financial
crisis of 2008.
In summary, the overall objectives of Basel are to strengthen the resilience of the
banking sector, promote prudent risk management, protect the financial system from
systemic risks, and enhance transparency and market discipline. The Basel framework
plays a vital role in maintaining financial stability and mitigating the potential adverse
effects of banking crises on the global economy.
Answer: Early signs of financial distress or potential non-performing loans (NPLs) can
come from various sources. Here's an assessment of the provided sources:
It's important to note that these early signs should be considered in context and often
require further investigation to assess their significance accurately. Early detection and
proactive management are key to addressing potential financial distress or NPLs
effectively. Financial institutions and lenders often use a combination of financial
metrics, qualitative information, and risk analysis to identify early warning signs.
J. Define corporate governance considering respective elements, pillars
and act. Year 2019
Answer: Corporate governance is a system of rules, practices, and processes that a
company puts in place to guide its overall management and operations. It involves a
framework that ensures transparency, accountability, and the protection of
stakeholders' interests, including shareholders, employees, customers, and the broader
community. Corporate governance typically consists of several key elements, pillars, and
acts, which collectively contribute to its effectiveness:
Corporate governance acts, such as SOX and the UK Corporate Governance Code, serve
as legal frameworks that companies must adhere to in their governance practices to
protect the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders. These elements, pillars, and
acts collectively aim to create a framework of checks and balances that ensure
responsible and ethical management of a company.
To address the rising NPL issue in Bangladesh, it is crucial for banks, regulatory
authorities, and policymakers to implement measures that enhance credit risk
assessment, strengthen regulatory oversight, promote responsible lending practices,
and facilitate efficient loan recovery mechanisms. Additionally, promoting financial
literacy and borrower education can help reduce loan defaults and contribute to a
healthier lending environment.
Controlling the rise of NPLs is an ongoing process that requires collaboration among
banks, regulators, and other stakeholders. A proactive approach, combined with
effective regulatory oversight and prudent risk management, can help mitigate the
impact of NPLs on the financial system and support economic stability.
Corporate governance & credit discipline
3. Transparent disclosure
This means that the company provides timely and accurate information to its shareholders
and other stakeholders about its financial performance, operations, and risks. The company
should also disclose information about its corporate governance practices and policies.
These four pillars are essential for building trust between the company and its
shareholders, and they are also important for attracting and retaining
investors.
Bangladesh Bank Order 1972: This law regulates the banking sector of
Bangladesh. It establishes the Bangladesh Bank as the central bank of the country
and gives it the power to supervise and regulate all commercial banks and
financial institutions.
Bank Companies Act 1991: This law provides a framework for the
incorporation, management, and operation of banks in Bangladesh. It also
prescribes certain corporate governance norms that banks must follow.
Financial Institutions Act 1993: This law regulates all financial institutions in
Bangladesh other than banks. It also prescribes certain corporate governance
norms that financial institutions must follow.
Securities & Exchange Commission Act 1993: This law establishes the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Bangladesh and gives it the power to
regulate the securities market of the country. The SEC also issues various
guidelines and regulations on corporate governance, which listed companies
must follow.
Companies Act 1994: This law provides a general framework for the
incorporation, management, and operation of companies in Bangladesh. It also
prescribes certain corporate governance norms that all companies must follow.
Bankruptcy Act 1997: This law provides a framework for the rehabilitation and
liquidation of insolvent companies in Bangladesh.
Corporate governance in banks & financial institutions
Corporate governance in banks and financial institutions is a system of rules
and procedures that ensures that these institutions are managed in a fair,
transparent, and accountable manner. It is important for banks and financial
institutions to have good corporate governance because they play a vital role
in the economy and have a significant impact on the lives of individuals and
businesses.
Banks and financial institutions are responsible for managing large amounts
of money and other assets. This means that it is important to have a system in
place to prevent fraud and mismanagement.
Corporate governance helps to ensure that banks and financial institutions are
run in the best interests of all stakeholders, including shareholders, depositors,
borrowers, and the general public.
Here are some examples of how corporate governance can help to protect
depositors and other stakeholders:
Credit and risk management: The BOD is responsible for developing and
overseeing the bank's credit and risk management policies and procedures.
This includes ensuring that the bank's loan portfolio is well-managed and that
the bank is adequately protected against various risks, such as credit risk,
market risk, and operational risk.
Internal control management: The BOD is responsible for establishing and
maintaining an effective internal control system. This includes ensuring that
the bank has adequate policies and procedures in place to prevent fraud,
ensure the accuracy of financial reporting, and safeguard the bank's assets.
To effectively carry out its responsibilities, the BOD must have a clear
understanding of the bank's business and the risks it faces. The BOD should
also be composed of individuals with the necessary skills and experience.
The BOD is ultimately responsible for the safety and soundness of the bank. By
effectively carrying out its responsibilities, the BOD can help to ensure that the
bank is well-managed and financially stable.
The BOD's authority comes from the fact that it is elected by the bank's
shareholders. This means that the BOD is accountable to the shareholders for
the bank's performance
Non-performing loans (NPLs): NPLs are loans that are not being repaid by the
borrower. They can be a major problem for banks, as they can lead to losses
and financial instability.
Provisions and capital shortfall: Banks are required to hold provisions against
NPLs. If a bank has a lot of NPLs, it may need to raise additional capital to meet
its regulatory requirements.
The CAMELS rating system is a commonly used tool for assessing bank
management quality. The CAMELS rating is based on six components: capital
adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to
market risk
Public sector banks in Bangladesh have historically had higher levels of non-
performing loans than foreign banks. This is partly due to the fact that public
sector banks are often pressured to make loans to borrowers who may not be
creditworthy. Foreign banks, on the other hand, are more likely to make
decisions based on sound commercial principles.
1. Capital adequacy
2. Asset quality
3. Earning & Management quality = ( C+ A+ E + L )/4
4. Liquidity position
Capital adequacy: This refers to the bank's ability to absorb losses and remain
solvent. It is measured by the ratio of the bank's capital to its risk-weighted
assets. A higher capital adequacy ratio indicates a stronger bank.
Asset quality: This refers to the quality of the bank's loans and investments. It is
measured by the percentage of non-performing loans and the level of loan loss
reserves. A lower percentage of non-performing loans and a higher level of loan
loss reserves indicate a better asset quality.
Earning: This refers to the bank's ability to generate profits. It is measured by the
bank's return on assets and return on equity. A higher return on assets and return
on equity indicate a better earning capacity.
Liquidity position: This refers to the bank's ability to meet its short-term
obligations. It is measured by the bank's liquidity ratios, such as the loan-to-
deposit ratio and the cash reserve ratio. A lower loan-to-deposit ratio and a
higher cash reserve ratio indicate a better liquidity position.
Corporate governance is a set of rules and practices that ensure that a company is
managed in a transparent and accountable manner. It helps to protect the interests of
shareholders and other stakeholders, and to promote good business practices.
Productivity is the efficiency with which a company produces outputs. Profitability is the
company's ability to generate profits.
Corporate governance plays a vital role in maintaining credit discipline. For example, a
well-functioning board of directors can help to ensure that loans are made in a sound
and prudent manner.
Basel Accords?
Year Quest 2018: Why Banks Should Comply with BASEL accords?
The Basel Accords refers to a set of banking supervision regulations set by the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). They were developed between 1980 and
2011, undergoing several modifications over the years.
The Basel Accords were formed with the goal of creating an international regulatory
framework for managing credit risk and market risk. Their key function is to ensure that
banks hold enough cash reserves to meet their financial obligations and survive in
financial and economic distress. They also aim to strengthen corporate governance, risk
management, and transparency.
Year Quest, 2018, 2020: Explain Briefly the overall objectives of the BASEL Framework.
The regulations are considered the most comprehensive set of regulations governing
the international banking system. The Basel Accords can be broken down into Basel I,
Basel II, and Basel III.
Basel I
The foundations of the framework were laid by the Basel Committee in 1988 with the
first standard, the Basel Accord. This established the first global minimum capital
requirements for international banks, in order to improve the stability of the financial
sector and maintain confidence in bank solvency. Banks were required at the time to
maintain a minimum of 8% of regulatory capital measured in terms of credit risk-
weighted assets. The accord was amended in 1996 to incorporate market risk
regulation. This meant that a bank's 8% minimum level for regulatory capital was
measured as a percentage of its total risk-weighted assets, which consisted of credit risk
and market risk positions.
A key limitation of Basel I was that the minimum capital requirements were determined
by looking at credit risk only. It provided a partial risk management system, as both
operational and market risks were ignored.
Basel II (Year Quest, 2018: Did Bangladeshi Banks comply with BASEL II
accord properly)
Basel II, an extension of Basel I, was introduced in 2004. Basel II included new regulatory
additions and was centred around improving three key issues – minimum capital
requirements, supervisory mechanisms and transparency, and market discipline.
Basel II created a more comprehensive risk management framework. It did so by
creating standardized measures for credit, operational, and market risk. Banks needed to
use these measures to determine their minimum capital requirements.
Basel II created standardized measures for measuring operational risk. It also focused on
market values, instead of book values, when looking at credit exposure. Additionally, it
strengthened supervisory mechanisms and market transparency by developing
disclosure requirements to oversee regulations. Finally, it ensured that market
participants obtained better access to information.
Basel III
The Global Financial Crisis of 2008 exposed the weaknesses of the international
financial system and led to the creation of Basel III. The Basel III regulations were created
in November 2010 after the financial crisis; however, they are yet to be implemented.
Their implementation has constantly been delayed in recent years and is expected to
occur in January 2022.
Basel III identified the key reasons that caused the financial crisis. They include poor
corporate governance and liquidity management, over-levered capital structures due to
a shortage of regulatory restrictions, and misaligned incentives in Basel I and II.
Basel III strengthened the minimum capital requirements outlined in Basel I and II. In
addition, it introduced various capital, leverage, and liquidity ratio requirements.
Also, Basel III included new capital reserve requirements and countercyclical measures
to increase reserves in periods of credit expansion and to relax requirements during
periods of reduced lending. Under the new guideline, banks were categorized into
different groups based on their size and overall importance to the economy. Larger
banks were subjected to higher reserve requirements due to their greater importance to
the economy.
For the foreign banks operating in Bangladesh, Common Equity Tier 1 (CET 1) shall
consist of the following items:
i. Funds from the Head Office for the purpose of meeting the capital adequacy
ii. Statutory reserve kept in books in Bangladesh
iii. Retained earnings
iv. Actual gain/loss kept in books in Bangladesh
Less: Regulatory adjustments applicable on CETI (refer to Guidelines on RBCA, Published
by Bangladesh Bank on December 2014 for details)
For the foreign banks operating in Bangladesh, Additional Tier 1 (AT 1) shall consist
of the following items:
i. Head office borrowings in foreign currency by foreign banks operating in
Bangladesh for inclusion in Additional Tier 1 capital which comply with the
regulatory requirements
ii. Any other item specifically allowed by Bangladesh Bank from time to time for
inclusion in Additional Tier 1 capital;
Less: Regulatory adjustments applicable on AT 1 (refer to Guidelines on RBCA, Published
by
Bangladesh Bank on December 2014 for details)
2. Tier 2 Capital (gone concern capital')
Tier 2 capital, also called 'gone-concern capital', represents other elements which fall
short of some of the characteristics of the core capital but contribute to the overall
strength of a bank.
For the local banks, Tier 2 capital shall consist of the following items:
i. General Provisions".
ii. Subordinated debt/ instruments issued by the banks that meet the qualifying
criteria for Tier 2 capital (refer to Annex 4, RBCA Guideline for details)
iii. Minority interest i. e; Tier -2 issued by consolidated subsidiaries to third parties
as specified in Annex 2, RBCA guideline.
Less: Regulatory adjustments applicable on Tier 2 capital
For the foreign banks operating in Bangladesh, Tier 2 capital shall consist of the
following items
i. General provision
ii. Head office borrowings in foreign currency received that meet the criteria of
Tier 2 debt capital
Less: Regulatory adjustments applicable on Tier 2 capital (refer to Para 3.4, Guidelines on
RBCA, Published by Bangladesh Bank in December 2014 for details)
The measures suggested by Basel III to diffuse the threats as mentioned above have
been discussed below:
2. Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR): The objective of NSFR is to promote resilience
over a field horizon of one year by requiring banks to fund the activities with
store-stable sources of funding.
Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) are the pros and
cons of the Basel-III framework. The LCR is a new liquidity standard introduced by the
Basel Committee to ensure that a bank maintains an adequate level of unencumbered,
high-quality assets that can be converted into cash to meet its liquidity needs for 30
calendar days. The NSFR is a longer-term liquidity monitoring tool.
The objective of LCR is to promote short-term resilience of the bank's liquidity risk profile
by ensuring that it has a sufficient high-quality liquid asset to survive in a significant
stress scenario fasting for one month. The objective of NSFR is to promote resilience over
a field horizon of one year by requiring banks to fund the activities with store-stable
sources of funding
To address pro-cyclicality, Basel III suggested a countercyclical buffer. This buffer varies
from 0 to 2.5 per cent at the discretion of the national supervisory authority. The buffer
is to be built up at the time of high credit growth that may signal a build-up of system-
wide risk and is withdrawn when such threat disappears.
b) The analysis of credit risk should adequately identify any weaknesses at the portfolio
level, including any concentrations of risk. It should also adequately take into
consideration the risks involved in managing credit concentrations and other portfolio
issues through such mechanisms as securitization programs and complex credit
derivatives.
For the purpose of ensuring minimum capital charge with respect to credit risk, the
credit policy of the bank should incorporate the following:
Introduction of comprehensive risk assessment techniques Establishing a method
for calculating risk-adjusted rate of return
Using credit derivatives to manage credit risk exposure
Minimizing risk-weighted assets
Obtaining adequate collateral/coverage
Regular benchmarking of the security value vis-à-vis outstanding should be a part
of the credit culture
Achieving the appropriate asset mix- under Basel-III increase in the proportion of
short-term assets to manage the Net Stable funding ratio (NSFR) will be required.
More emphasis should be given on syndicated loan Floating rate vs. fixed rate on
lending
Ensure that businesses credit customers are correctly charged for the capital costs
of the business they are doing
Ensure that Basel-Ill capital implications are taken into account for new business
and consider how existing long-dated business can be revisited
Strengthening post-disbursement follow-up and monitoring system
Year Quest: 2021: How would evaluate the 6%-9% interest ceiling set by Bangladesh
Bank? Discuss the impact mainly in the Bank Credit management.
Bangladesh Bank Interest Impact
The Bangladesh Bank's decision to set a 6%-9% interest ceiling can have significant
implications for bank credit management. Such an interest rate cap affects various
aspects of the banking sector:
1. Credit Availability: A lower interest rate ceiling can make borrowing more
affordable for businesses and individuals, potentially increasing the demand for
credit. However, if the rates are too low, banks might become reluctant to lend,
fearing reduced profitability.
2. Risk Management: Banks may become more cautious in their lending practices to
mitigate the risks associated with lower interest rates. This caution could lead to
stricter eligibility criteria for borrowers, impacting small businesses and individuals
with lower credit ratings.
3. Profit Margins: Banks rely on the interest rate spread (the difference between the
interest earned on loans and paid on deposits) for profitability. A narrow interest
rate spread due to low ceilings could affect the banks' profit margins, potentially
impacting their ability to cover operational costs and invest in new technologies.
4. Investment in the Economy: Lower interest rates could stimulate investments in
various sectors, potentially boosting economic growth. However, if banks are not
making sufficient profits due to the interest rate ceiling, their ability to contribute
to economic development through loans and investments might be constrained.
5. Savings and Deposits: Lower interest rates on loans might lead to reduced
interest rates on savings accounts. This could discourage saving among the
population, affecting individuals who rely on interest income from their savings.
6. Market Competition: Banks might face increased competition due to the interest
rate ceiling. To maintain profits, they could focus on improving operational
efficiency, and customer service, and exploring fee-based services to remain
competitive.
7.
8. Government Policies: The government's fiscal and monetary policies, in
conjunction with the interest rate ceiling, play a crucial role. Coordinated efforts
are necessary to ensure stability in the financial sector while promoting economic
growth.
In summary, while a 6%-9% interest ceiling can enhance credit affordability and
stimulate economic activity, it also poses challenges for banks' credit management,
potentially affecting their profitability, risk management strategies, and overall
contribution to the economy. Effective monitoring and adjustment of policies are
essential to strike a balance between promoting economic growth and maintaining the
stability of the banking sector.
The End