Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Csa W48-23
Csa W48-23
Canadian Standards Association (operating as CSA Group") develops standards throug, a consensus standards developrrent process appro.ted
tty the Standards Council of Canada. This process brings together volunteers representing varied viewpoints and interests to achieve consensus
and develop a standard Althouifl CSA Group adrrinisters the process and establishes rules to prarote fairness in achieving consensus, it does
not independently test, evaluate, or verify the content of standards.
Patent r i ghts
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elerrents of this standard may be the subject of patent riiflts. CSA Group shall not be
held responsible for identifying any or all such patent riiflts. Users of this standard are expressly advised that deterrrination of the validity of
any such patent riiflts is entirely their own responsibility.
CSAW48:23
Febr uar y 2023
Contents
Technical Corrmittee on Welding Filler Metals 4
Preface 6
0 Introduction 8
1 Scope 10
1. 1 Specifications 10
1.2 Exceptions 11
1.3 Corrpliance 12
1.4 Safety 12
1. 5 Terninologj 12
1.6 S! units 13
1. 7 Metric consurrable classification 13
2 Reference publications 13
4 Q.Jality system 16
4. 1 Q.Jality control 16
4.2 Repackagng control 16
4.3 Regstered quality system 16
4.4 Approval ag=ncy 17
4. 5 Unregstered quality system 17
5 Diameter tolerances 17
6 Test requirements 18
6. 1 Required tests 18
6.2 Retests 18
7 Test procedures 19
7. 1 Electrodes 19
7.1. 1 General 19
7. 1.2 SMAW electrodes 19
7. 1. 3 Gt#..W electrodes 19
7.1.4 Sizes for testing 19
7. 1. 5 Q.Jalification sizes 20
7.2 Material for test assemblies 20
7. 3 Shielding g:�ses 20
7.3. 1 Gt#..W filler metals for fine-gain and non-alloy steel 21
7.3.2 Carbon and !em-alloy steel electrodes for FCAW and MCAW 21
7. 3. 3 Chronium and chronium-nickel steel electrodes for FCAW and MCAW 22
7.3.4 Carbon and !em-alloy steel rods for GTAW and PAW 22
7.3. 5 Alumnum electrcx:les and rods for Grv1AW, GrAW, and PAW 22
7.4 Weld metal test asserrblies 22
7.4. 1 All-weld-metal test asserrbly 22
7.4.2 Transverse tensile and longtudinal g..� ided bend test asserrbly 23
7.4. 3 l-leat treatment condition 23
7. 5 Radicgaphic test 23
7.5. 1 Test preparation 23
7. 5.2 Pass/fail criteria 24
7.6 All-weld-rretal tensile test 24
7.6. 1 Test preparation 24
7.6.2 Machining 24
7.6. 3 fogng 24
7.6.4 Test method 24
7.6. 5 Pass/fail criteria 24
7. 7 Irrpact test 25
7.7. 1 Test preparation 25
7.7.2 Machining 25
7.7. 3 Test method 25
7. 7.4 Test terllJerature 25
7.7. 5 Pass/fail criteria 25
7.8 Transverse tensile test 25
7.8. 1 Conditions 25
7.8.2 Pass/fail criteria 25
7.9 Longtudinal g..� i ded bend test 25
7. 9. 1 Conditions 25
7.9.2 fogng 25
7. 10 Fillet weld test 26
7.10.1 General conditions 26
7. 10.2 FCAW carbon and lavv-alloy steel 26
7.10.3 rvlCAW carbon and lavv-alloy steel 26
7. 10.4 Measurement of maxirrum fillet weld dimensions 26
7.10.5 Pass/fail criteria 26
7. 11 Chemcal analysis - D=posit 26
7. 11. 1 General conditions 26
7.11.2 SatllJies of the deposited weld metal 26
7. 11.3 Weld pad 27
7.11.4 Chemcal analysis 27
7. 11. 5 Pass/fail criteria 27
7. 12 Chemcal analysis -Solid electrcx:le 27
7. 12. 1 SatllJies 27
7.12.2 Method 27
7.12.3 Pass/fail criteria 27
7.13 Dffusible hydrc:>g:n test 27
7. 13. 1 General 27
7.13.2 Applicable desig-,ator 27
7. 13.3 Pass/fail criteria 28
8 Marking 28
9 Packag ng 28
10 Certification 28
10. 1 Test witnessing 28
10.2 Technical data sheets 29
Pr eface
This is the fifth edition of CSA. W48, Filler rretals and allied materials for metal arc welding. It
supersedes the previous editions published in 2018, 2014, 2006, and 2001.
Fil ler metals standards are intended to provide a generic method of classification and evaluation that
al lows the end user to select appropriate welding consumables for a gven welding process and product
or application. The procedures and tests set out in this Standard, when correctly followed, are designed
to produce a consistent product with test results that are as reproducible as possible.
The following are the major changes to this edition:
a) the reference to AVI/S AS. 10/AS. 10M has been added for the classification of alumnum GrAW and
GMAW electrodes;
b) all specifications and classifications related to carbon and low-alloy steel SMAW electrodes have
been replaced by references to AVI/S AS. l/AS. 1M and AS. 5/AS. SM;
c) all specifications and classifications related to SA.W carbon and low-alloy electrodes/fl uxes have
been replaced by references to AVI/S AS. 17IAS. 17M and AVI/S AS. 23/AS. 23M;
d) updates to Oauses reg:�rding packagng and marking have been made and two new Oauses added,
one for technical data sheets (TDS) and the second for decertified products; and
e) Annexes have been updated and consolidated, providing information on packagng storage, and
conditioning of electrodes (Annex�); general information and an explanation of the classification
system (Annex Q; descriptions and intended uses of the welding filler metals and allied materials
(Annexes Q and f); information on diffusible hydrogen (Annex f); and information on certification
(Annex §).
The Standard has also been rewritten in such a manner to facilitate ease of use and future revisions
with respect to adoption of other regonal and international standards. DJring preparation of this
revision, close liaison was maintained between AVI/S and ISO to create a robust Canadian Standard
supporting gobal efforts towards standard harmonization while satisfying the specific and unique
technical requirements of Canadian industry.
This Standard was prepared by the Technical Corrnittee on Welding Filler Metals, under the jurisdiction
of the Strategc Steering Comnittee on Construction and Infrastructure, and has been formally
approved by the Technical Comnittee.
Notes:
1) Use of the singular does not exclude the pural (and vice versa) when the sense allONs.
2) .L'IIt hough the intended prirmry apf)ication of this Standard is stated in its Scope, it is irflXllia nt to note that it
rermins the resp.::lsll iality of the users of the Standard to judge its suitaality for their particular PJrJX)Se.
3) This Standard was developed tty consensus, which is defined tty c::A Policy gJVerning standardization -Code
of gxxJ practice for standardization as substantial agreerrent. Consensus irnpies much more than a sirnpe
rmjority, but not necessarily unanirrity". It is consistent with this definition that a rrerrber rmy � included in
the Technical Comrittee list and yet not � in full agreerrent with all clauses of this Standard
4) To subrrit a request for interpretation of this Standard, pease send the foiiONing inforrmtion to
inquiries@csagroup.org and include Request for interpretation" in the suqect line:
a) define the problem rmking reference to the specific clause, and, where appropriate, include an
illustrative sketch;
b) prOJide an expanation of circumstances surrounding the actual field condition; and
c) where !XJSSible, phrase the request in such a way that a specific �es" cr l'lo" answer will ad:Jress the
issue.
Cormittee inteq:retatims are processed in acccrdance with the CSA Drectives and gJidelines g:>Verning
standardization and are available on the Current Standards kt:ivities f:Xlge at standardsactivities.csa.ca.
5) This Standard is suqect to review within five years from the date of publication. Suggesti ons fcr its
irrp'"CNerrent will be referred to the appropriate cmnittee. To subrrit a prO!XJSal fcr change, please send the
follcwing infcrmation to inquiries@csagroop.crg and include PrO!XJSal fcr change" in the suqect line:
a) Standard designation (nu�r);
b) relevant clause, table, and,lcr figure nu�r;
c) wcrding of the prO!XJSed change; and
d) rationale fcr the change.
CSAW48:23
Filler metals and allied mater ials for metal
ar c welding
0 I ntroducti on
The first edition of a Canadian standard for welding consumables was published in 1938 as Canadian
Engneering Standards Association (CESA) Tentative Standard S48T (CESA became the Canadian
Standards Association in 1944). It covered shielded metal arc welding (SMA.W) electrodes for mid and
low-alloy steels. Tog=ther with two other standards, CESA W47 (Welding QJalification Code for the
Application to Fabricating and Contracting Finns, Their Welding Personnel and Equiprrent) and
CESA W59 (Welding of Bridges, Buildings and Machinery), it was desig1ed to cover all aspects of the
welding of structural steels. f-bwever, the advent of the Second World War prevented the adoption of
these standards.
Weld quality depends to a very larg= degree on the skill and training of the personnel directly involved
in welding operations, and usually cannot be deternined by visual inspection methods. For this reason,
many m.micipal authorities and desig1 engneers had reservations alx>ut using welding in the many
prqects that were necessary for growth after the end of the war. The Canadian Institute of Steel
Construction (OSC) was aware of the advantag=s of welding over other forms of joining as a result, it
prorroted a program that would provide third-party verification of a companys competency to
undertake welding of steel structures. This developrrent culninated in the revision and adoption
(through CSA. S16) of new versions of CSA. W47, CSA. W48, and CSA. W59. In January 1947, the Canadian
Welding Bureau (ONB) was inaugurated for the purpose of qualifying Canadian org:mizations and
operators eng:�ged in welding operations in structural steel and mechanical fields, and the consumables
used by them This innovation proved so popular that the application of these standards has expanded
to many areas outside the orignally intended field.
Fol lowing publication in 1947, further revisions of the CSA. W48 series of standards were published to
acknowledg= the many strides made in the manufacture and application of welding consumables. In the
early 1950s, it was decided that one standard was insufficient to cover the many types of electrodes
available, and CSA. W48. 1 and CSA. W48.2 were published in 1952 and 1953, respectively. Further
revisions were made: CSA. W48. 1 was revised in 1962, 1969, 1976, 1980, and 1991; CSA. W48.2 was
revised in 1977, 1980, and 1992; CSA. W48.3 was first published in 1968 and revised in 1976, 1982, and
1993; CSA. W48.4 was first published in 1970 and revised in 1978 and 1995; CSA. W48. 5 was first
published in 1970 and revised in 1982 and 1990; and CSA. W48. 6 was first published in 1970 and revised
in 1980 and 1996.
The first edition of W48-Q1 consolidated and superseded the previous CSA. W48 series of standards
(CSA. W48. 1 to CSA. W48.6) and contained several technical chang=s, including chang=s intended to
harmonize with other regonal and international standards. D..lring preparation, close liaison was
maintained between the American Welding Society (AW'S), International Institute of Welding (IIW), and
International Qg:�nization for Standardization (ISO). The Technical Corrnittee was also in contact with
other org:�nizations, such as the European Corrnittee for Standardization (CEN) and the Japan Welding
Engneering Society (JWES).
In W48-D6, classification requirerrents for solid wire g:�s rretal arc consumables were replaced by
references to CSA. ISO 14341.
In W48-14, all specifications and classifications related to carbon steel electrcx:Jes for flux-cored arc
welding and rretal-cored arc welding were replaced by the addition of references to
AWS PS. 36/PS. 36M.
In W48-18, all specifications and classifications related to chronium and chronium-nickel steel
electrcx:Jes for shielded rretal arc welding (SMA\IV) were replaced by references to AWS P5.4/P5.4M.
Specifications and classifications related to chronium and chronium-nickel steel electrcx:Jes for g:�s
shielded rretal arc welding (GMA\N), g:�s tungsten arc welding (GrA\N), and submerged arc welding
(SA.\N)were added by including references to AWS P5.9/P5.9M. Specifications and classifications related
to chronium and chronium-nickel steel electrcx:Jes for FCAW and MCAW were added by including
references to AWS P5.22/P5.22M and P5.9/P5.9M as appropriate. Specifications and classifications
related to carbon steel rcx:ls and deposits specifically for GrAW and plasma arc welding (PAW) were
added by including references to AWS P5. 18/P5. 18M. Specifications and classifications related to low
alloy steel rcx:ls and deposits specifically for GrAW and PAW were added by including references to
AWS P5.28/P5.28M. Specifications related to low-alloy steel FCAW and MCAW electrcx:Jes were added
as specified in AWS P5. 36/P5.36M.
1 Scope
Tabl e 1
Appl i cable s peci fi cati ons to be uti l i zed for el ectrode testi ng and certifi cati on
(See Clause 1.1.)
(Continued)
Table 1 ( Concluded)
Stai nless steels Subrrerged arc welding (SAW) AWS AS. 9/AS. 9M
Flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) AWS AS.22/AS. 22M
Metal-cored arc welding (MCAW) AWS AS.22/AS. 22M
Gas tungsten arc welding (GrAW) AWS AS. 9/AS. 9M
AVVS P5.22/P5.22M based on carbon content and shielding g:�s, provided they meet all
requirements for those classifications.
h) For MCAW carbon and low-alloy steel electrodes uti lizing the open-ended classification system in
AVVS P5. 36/P5.36M, a positional designator should be assigned by the manufacturer to the
classification. !" indicates all positions and 0" indicates flat and horizontal.
i) For wire electrodes and deposits for FCAW and MCAW of carbon and low-alloy steel, materials
classified under one classification may be classified under another classification of C5,1\ISO 14341
or AVVS P5.36/P5.36M with a different shielding g:�s provided they meet all requirements for those
classifications (see Annex!).
1.4 Safety
This Standard does not address safety associated with welding and welding practices.
t\bte: CAN/c:A-W117.2 addresses safety in welding and should be foiiONed in addition to applicable workplace
health and safety legislation. It is the respcnsibility of the users of this Standard to establish app-opriate safety and
health practices, and to deterrrine the applicability of regulatory I irritations prior to use.
1.6 SI u n i ts
The values gven in SI units are the units of record for the purposes of this Standard. The values gven in
Annex tJ are for inform:ltion and corrparison only.
C5A. Group
CAf\.VC5A.-ISO 9001: 16 (R2020)
QJality rTEnagement systems - Requirements
G40.20-13/G40.21-13 (R2018)
General requirements for rolled or welded structural qual ity steel/Structural quality steel
W47. 1-19
Certification of corrpa nies for fusion welding of steel
W59-18
Welded steel construction
W117.2: 19
Safety in welding, cutting, and allied processes
ASTM International
A36/A36M-19
Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel
A285/A285M-17
Standard Specification for Pressure Vessel Plates, Carbon Steel, Low- and Intermediate-Tensile Strength
A515/A515M-17
Standard Specification for Pressure Vessel Plates, Carbon Steel, for Intermediate- and Higher
Terr-perature Service
AS16/AS16M-17
Standard Specification for Pressure Vessel Plates, Carbon Steel, for Moderate and Lcmer-Terrperature
Service
A751-21
Standard Test Methods, Practices, and Termndogy for Olemcal Analysis of Steel Products
A830/A830M: 18
Standard Specification for Plates, Carbon Steel, Structural QJality, Furnished to Olemcal Corrp:>s ition
Requi rernents
E23-18
Standard Test Methods for 1\bt:ched Bar Irrpact Testing of Metallic Materials
E1032-19
Standard Test Method for Radiographic Exam nation of Weldrnents
E2033-17
Standard Practice for �ed Radidogy (Photostirn..dable Lumnescence Method)
E2698-18
Standard Practice for Radiographic Exam nation Using Dgital Detector Arrays
AS.4/AS.4M:2014
Specification for Stainless Steel Electrodes for Shielded Metal Arc Welding
A5.9/A5.9M:2017
Specification for Bare Stainless Steel Welding Electrodes and Rods
/l5.22//l5.22M:2012
Specification for Stainless Steel Flux Cored and Metal Cored Welding Electrodes and Rods
/l5.23//l5.23M:2021
Specification for Lo..v-AI Icy Steel and High Manganese Steel Electrodes and Fluxes for Subrerged kc
Welding
/l5.28//l5.28M: 2020
Specification for Lo..v-AI Icy Steel Electrodes and Rods for Gas Shielded kc Welding
B4.0M: 2016
Standard Methods for Mechanical Testing of Welds (Metric custorn:try units)
6847:2020
Welding consurrnbles - Deposition of a weld rretal pad for chenical analysis
14175:2008
Welding consurrnbles - Gases and gas nixtures for fusion welding and allied processes
80000-1:2009
Q.Jantities and units - Part 1: General
Other publications
Ols0ien, M.I., S. Uu, and D. L dson. 1995. LJse of active shielding g:�ses to optimize the weld rretal
nicrostructure." Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and kctic
Engineering Vol. 3: Materials Engineering pp. 503-507.
Covered electrode -an electrode in rod form that has a flux coating for use in Sr-..MW.
Electrode -a metal rod or wire that carries the electric current and is melted by the arc to form the
weld dep:>Sit.
Note: Fcr gas-shielded arc welding. the term is used fcr cmtinuous wire fcr the G�W, FCAW, and M:AW
processes.
Rod -a metal rod or wire in strai9"lt lengths of continuous form that does not carry electric current
but is melted by the arc to form the weld dep:>Sit as used for GrAW, PAW, and sirrilar processes.
4 Qua l i ty system
Tabl e 2
Di a meter tol erances
(See Clause�.)
0.6 0.024
0.76 0.030 I
0.8 :±0.03
0.9 0.035 900 +15/--Q -
:±0.05
1.0 0.040
1. 1 0.045
1.2 3/64 I :±0.05
(Continued)
Table 2 ( Concluded)
6 T est requirements
6.2 Retests
If an electrode or flux/electrode cotrbination fails to meet the requirements of the applicable test, then
the test shall be repeated twice and the electrode or flux/electrode cotrbination shall meet the
requirements on each retest. Specimens for the retests may be taken from the orignal test assembly or
from a new test assembly. For chemical analysis, retests need only be performed for those specific
elements that failed to meet their applicable requirement.
If during test preparation or after corrpletion of a test it is determined the proper procedures were not
foiiQI..Ved in preparing the weld assembly or test specimen, or in conducting the test (which includes
itl'lJI"oper welding techniques), then the test shall be considered invalid reg:�rdless of whether the test
was actually corrpleted or whether the test results met the applicable requirements. The test shall be
repeated in accordance with prescribed procedures. In this case, the requirement for doubling the
number of retest specimens shall not apply.
7 T est procedures
7 . 1 E l ectr odes
7 . 1 . 1 General
Testing shall be as per the applicable specifications listed in Gause 1. 1, except as specified in Gause Z.
7.3 Sh i el di ng gases
r'-bte: Shielding gases should cffilJiy with iS0 14175 cr AWS P5.32/P5.32M.
7 . 3 .2 Car bon and l ow -a l l oy steel el ectr odes for F CAW and MCAW
r---.btes:
1) For other shielding gas blends (e.g., tri-gas blends Al/CQ/Q) used for testing, the shielding gas designator
G" in Tabl e 4 of AWS P5.36/P5.36M may be used for classification of the wire/gas coni:Jination or shielding
gas designators srecified in AWS P5.32M/P5.32.
2) The use of a r:Brticular gas for classification p.Jrposes should not be construed to restrict the use of other gas
rrixtures p-CNided the requirements of this srecification are met.
7 . 3 . 3 Ch r omi u m and chromi u m-n i ckel steel el ectr odes for F CAW and rvr::AW
The shielding 93ses used shall be those specified in AWS A5.22/A5.22M.
7.4.1.1 General
All-weld-metal test assemblies shall be prepared in accordance with aauses 7.4. 1.2 to 7.4. 1. 5.
7.4.2 T ra n sverse tensi l e and l ongitudi nal gu i ded bend test assembl y
7.4.2 . 1
When transverse tensile and longtudinal guided bend tests are required, a test asserrbly shall be
prepared as per the applicable specification detailed in Cause 1. 1.
7.4.2.2
The test asserrbly shall be welded in the flat position under the conditions specified in Cause 1. 1 using
the electrode size specified in Cause 7.1.4 and the base metal specified in Cause 7.2. The test asserrbly
rrny be restrained during welding or preset at approximately so to prevent warpage. A welded test
asserrbly that has warped rrore than so from plane shall be discarded. Welded test asserrblies shall not
be straightened.
The test asserrbly shall be tacked at room te111Jerature and welding shall beg n at a ni ni m..J m plate
terrperature of 20 oc Welding shall continue until both sides of the asserrbly have been corrpleted.
Back gougng rrny be pernitted before the second side is welded.
After welding has been corrpleted and the asserrbly has cooled, the test specimen shall be prepared
and tested as specified in Causes 7.8 and 7.9.
Weld ripples shall be rerroved on both sides of the welded joint and the weld faces shall blend
srroot hly into the plate surfaces. The finished surfaces of the reinforcements may be flush with the
orignal surfaces or shall be reasonably uniform but shall not exceed ±1. 5 mm
7 . 5 .2 Pass/fai I cr i ter i a
The completed radiogaphs shall meet the requirements of the applicable specifications in Gause 1. 1,
with the exception of electrodes tested to CSA ISO 14341, in which case the radiogaphic test
requirements applicable shall be per AW5 5. 18/5. 18M and AW5 A5.28/5.28M for tensile strengths
above 550 MPa.
7.6.2 Machi n i ng
Ole all-weld-metal tensile test specimen shall be machined from the test assembly in such a way that
the reduced section is entirely within the weld deposit. \t\lhen smaller plate thicknesses preclude the
use of the standard size specimen, subsize specimens may be used.
Subsize specimens shall
a) maintai n a ratio of g:�uge length to specimen diameter of 4: 1;
b) maxinize the amount of weld deposit sampled by the reduced section; and
c) ensure the reduced section is entirely within the weld deposit.
f\bte: Refer to Gause 1. 1 for suggested dirrensions of subsize s�irrens.
7.6.3 Agi ng
For all carbon and low-alloy steel electrodes, specimens may be aged between 95 oc and 105 oc for a
maxirrum period of 48 h, or at 250 oc for a maxirrum period of 16 h. The specimens shall be cooled to
room temperature before testing
f\bte: For cartm and lew-alloy steel FCAW, GMAW, GrAW, PAW, and rv'O.W electrodes, aging of the tensile
s�irren is pemitted.
7.7.2 rvlach i n i ng
Five Charpy V-notch irllJCict test specimens shal l be rrnchined from the same test asserrbly.
7 .9.2 Agi ng
For all carbon and low-alloy steel electrodes, specimens may be aged between 95 oc and 105 oc for a
rrnxirrum period of 48 h, or at 250 oc for a maxirrum period of 16 h. The specimens shall be cooled to
room terrperature before testing
Fil let weld testing is not required for these electrode types. For electrodes certified utilizing the open
classification system as defined in AV\IS AS. 36/AS. 36M, the electrode manufacturer shall choose the
positional designator 0" or I" (e.g, E491TX-XXX-X-HX and E49QTX-XXX-X-HX).
r'-bte: 0" is for flat and horizontal and I" is for all rn;itions.
7 . 1 1 . 1 General conditi on s
Sarrpes of the weld metal, if applicable, shall be tested to meet the requirements.
7 . 1 1 . 3 Wel d pad
The weld pad shall be defX>Sited in the flat fX>Sition with rrultiple layers to obtain undiluted weld metal,
in accordance with the applicable specification in Oause 1. 1 or ISO 6847.
7 . 1 1 . 5 Pass/fa i l cr i ter i a
The chemical comfX>Sition of the defX>Sited metal shall meet the requirements i n the applicable
specifications detailed in Oause 1. 1.
7 . 1 2 . 1 Sa mpl es
Samples for chemcal analysis shall be taken for those electrodes as per the specifications in Oause 11,
including non-alloy and fine-gain steel GMAW classifications in est>. ISO 14341. Ole sample shall be
taken from the electrode spool selected for mechanical testing as specified in Oause 7. 1.4. For GMAW,
an additional sample shall be taken at random from electrodes of the smallest diameter to be certified
(see Oause 7.1.4).
7.12.2 Meth od
Chemcal analysis shall be done per the applicable specifications detailed in Oause 1. 1.
7 . 1 3 . 1 General
Fil ler metal classifications requiring diffusible hydrogen testing shall be per the specifications detailed in
Oause 1. 1. The diffusible hydrogen test shall be conducted on the defX>Sited weld metal in accordance
with AVI/S AA. 3 or ISO 3690 (Test Assembly � with four sped mens.
The hot carrier 93s extraction method shall be accepted as per AVI/S AA. 3 or ISO 3690.
restricted to current, voltag=, polarity, shielding g:�s, and electrode extension) so that the hydrog=n
content requirerrents of this Standard are rret.
t\btes:
1) The use of these designatcrs in practice and sorre of the factcrs that affect the diffusible 1"-o/drogen content in
weld rretals are discussed in Annex F.
2) Serre contrdled hydrogen electrodes do not rreet 1-12, H4, and H8 designatcr requirerrents. See Annex f.
7 . 1 3 . 3 Pass/fa i l cr i ter i a
For carbon and low-alloy steel, the diffusible hydrog=n test results, if applicable to the electrode or
electrode/flux corrbination, shall rreet the requirerrents in the applicable specifications detailed in
Gause 1. 1.
For all other electrodes for which the diffusible hydrog=n test is optional, the averag= arrount of
diffusible hydrog=n shall not exceed the value specified i n Gause 7. 13.2 for the applicable designator.
8 rvlark i ng
The following product information shall be legbly marked and visible on the outside of each
unit/packag= of electrode or flux:
a) the standard and classification designation;
b) the manufacturer's or supplier's identification and/or trade designation;
c) the manufacturer's batch nurrber or wire heat nurrber, or both;
d) the electrode size;
e) the point of orign or the specific country of manufacture (e.g, Made in USA'', Made in
Germany'', etc.);
t\bte: The Sj:ffific country of rmnufacture is accepted by the ONB as indication of p::li nt of crigin.
f) a staterrent or marking that the electrodes or fluxes, or both, have been certified by the ONB as
rreeting the requirerrents of this Standard (e.g, Certified by ONB to CSA. W48." Wording such as
Conforms to CSA. W48" shall not be acceptable);
g) a ninim.�m staterrent on safety (see, e.g, CAN'CSA.-W117.2); and
h) for consumables where a reconditioning treatrrent is required, temperature and tirre shal l be
indicated.
t\bte: The prod.Jct infcrrmtion rmy � printed on single cr rrultipe la�ls securely attached to the electrode or
flux package. In the case of rrultipe prod.Jct la�ls, the apPicable prod.Jct trade narre should appear on each
additional la�l.
9 Packagi ng
Products shall be packaged as per the applicable specifications in Gause 1. 1, conforning to
AWS AS.02/5.02M (see Gause M.
10 Certi fi cati on
Annex A ( na-mative)
Equ i va l ency of cl a ss i fi cati ons for G�W el ectr odes
r'\btes:
1) This Mnex is a mandatory part of this Standard.
2) Because it is recognized that the acbption of CSA ISO 14341 as the rrethcx:l for classifying G�W electrcx::les
for non-allcy and fi�rain steels rright cause prol:)erns vis-a-vis acceptance of existing procedure
qualification records (�), weld procedure data sheets {WP[))), and weld procedure specifications 0/VP'SJ,
this Mnex identifies equivalents between the new system in CSA ISO 14341 and the old system in previoos
editions of this Standard.
3) CSA ISO 14341 pro.tides a wider strength range and a larger nurrrer of classifications than previoos editions
of this Standard. Sare of these classifications are equivalent to some of the AVI/S A5.28/AS. 28M
classifications specified in CSA W59. These are also specified in Table A l.
A. l
The CSA ISO 14341 classifications specified in Cdurm 1 of Table A 1 shall be considered equivalent to
the corresponding classifications in Colurms 2, 3, and 4 for the purpose of using existing procedure
qualification records (PQR.), weld procedure data sheets (WPDS), and weld procedure specifications
(WP$).
A.2
The AWS ER70S-XIER49S-X classifications specified in Col urm 4 of Table A 1 are for information only
and shall not be considered equivalent to the corresponding CSA ISO 14341 classifications in Colurm 1
for the purpose specified in Oause Al. Equivalency in this reg3rd shall be determined on a case-by-case
basis by referring to the orignal product certification test results.
T a bl e A.l
Equiva l ency of classifi cati ons for GMA.W wel di ng el ectrodes
(See Cl auses A1 and A2.)
AWS
A5.18/ A5.18M and
AWS
CSA ISO 14341:21 CSA I SO 14341:06 CSA W48-Q1 A5.28/ A5.28M
B-G 49A Z O SO* B-G 49A Z C GO* ER49S-G* ER70S-G/ER49S-Gt
B-G 49A Z M SO* B-G 49A Z M GO*
B-G 49A ZA SO* B-G 49A Z A GO*
B-G 49A 3 0 S2 B-G 49A 3 C G2 ER49S-2 ER70S-2/ER49S-2t
B-G 49A 2 0 S3 B-G 49A 2 C G3 ER49S-3 ER70S-3/ER49S-3t
B-G 49A 3 0 S4 B-G 49A 3 C G4 ER49S-4 ER70S-4/ER49S-4t
B-G 49A 3 0 S6 B-G 49A 3 C G6 ER49S-U ER70S-U/ER46S-Ut
(Continued)
AWS "
c
AWS
CSA ISO 14341:21 CSA I SO 14341:06 CSA W48-Q1 AS.28/ AS.28M
B-G 49A 3 G S8
0
ER70S-8/ER49S-8t a.
B . l Genera l
Users of this Standard should read this Annex in full since it contains useful and relevant backg-ound
information.
B.2 Packagi ng
Electrodes and fluxes shall be suitably packa� to protect them from damag= during shipment and
storag= under normal conditions. Electrodes or fluxes that are, or have been, damp or wet cannot be
restored by baking and should be discarded.
B.3 SMAW
8 . 3 . 1 Ca r bon steel el ectrodes
Electrodes are manufactured to be within acceptable moisture levels consistent with the type of coating
used. Some electrodes require specific levels of moisture to ensure good operating characteristics.
These types g=nerally fall into the cellulosic g-oup. Other electrodes fall into a md-rang= for moisture
or into a lavv rroisture level (e.g, as a lavv-hydrog=n-type electrode). Reg:trdless of the type of
consumable, storag= conditions are important if the welding characteristics and weld deposit properties
are to be met.
Some electrodes (e.g, E4Xl0 and E4Xll) will have rroisture levels in the 3-7% rang=. These moisture
levels are required for good arc operation. Storag= in terrperatures much above arrbient can cause the
rroisture levels to drop, resulting in loss of good operating characteristics. 1\bn-cellulosic electrodes,
primarily those designed to produce lavv-hydrog=n weld rretal deposits, require storag= conditions well
above arrbient temperature. In the carbon steel g-oup, these include the E4Xl5, E4Xl6, E4Xl8, E4X28,
and E4X48 types.
Electrodes exposed to atmosphere for periods beyond the manufacturer's recomrrended exposure
times need reconditioning Guidelines are provided in Table � havvever, the manufacturer should be
consulted.
as lavv as 2 h or as hig, as 8 h depending upon the strength level of the deposit and the design of the
coating
D:lmaged containers that expose the electrode to atrrospheric conditions necessitate reconditioning
Because of the required lavver diffusible hydrogen levels in the weld deposits of some of the electrodes
in this Standard, reconditioning at a hig, temperature is necessary (see Table 8. 1).
t\btes:
1) With higher-strength-alloy electrodes such as E7618-M, hydrogen cracking is a real possibility. Electrodes
sha.Jid be baked before use, even if they are delivered in sealed cmtainers that are apparently undarmged.
The electrcx:le rmnufadurer shruld be cmsulted for p-�r b3king tirres and terrp=ratures.
2) If b3sic lo..v hydrogen electrodes have been exposed to hurrid conditims, whether from darmged cmtainers
or irrpr�r storage conditions, they can be restored Oj baking as indicated in 1\nnex f. For best results, the
rmnufadurer of the electrodes should be consulted
3) t\bn-basic electrodes do not generally absorb too much rroisture in norrmlly hurrid atmospheres, and shruld
be reconditimed with care. In pa rticular, the cellulosic types (EXXlO and EXXll) are designed to have
rroisture levels of 3-7% and their drying could adversely affect perforrmnce. The rmnufadurer should be
cmsulted in these cases.
8 . 3 . 3 Ch r omi u m and c h r omi um-n i ckel steel covered el ectr odes for Srv1AW
Moisture out of range of the manufacturer's design for the coating can prcx:luce starting porosity or
general weld porosity. The -15 series of electrodes in general are the least sensitive to rroisture; the
-17 and -26 series are the rrost sensitive. The -16 series electrodes fall in the mddle, with some being
very sensitive and some i nsensitive.
All electrcx:les should be stored in sealed containers or in holding ovens at 150 oc
Redrying will depend upon the classification. The manufacturer should be consulted.
8 . 3 .4 t--.bn -a l l oy and fi ne-gr a i n steel el ectr odes for gas meta l a r c wel d i n g
Solid electrodes in this Standard do not require special storage conditions. These types of electrodes are
lavv hydrogen by nature. Althoug, conditions such as excessive lubricants on the wire surface, imperfect
g:lS shielding contamnation in the shielding g:lS, and rust on wire surface can prcx:luce diffusible
hydrogen in the deposit, these levels would normally be belavv 8 ml/100 g of weld metal.
The electrode shall be kept in a dry location. The manufacturer's packagng is usually sufficient to keep
the prcx:luct in gocx:l condition. D:lmaged packagng or poor storage conditions can cause rusting on the
electrode surface. Rusty electrodes should be discarded.
T a bl e B . l
Storage a n d condi ti on i ng of wel d i n g fi l l er meta l s a n d a l l i ed mater i a l s*
(See Clauses B.3.1 and B.3.2.)
E l ectrode
classifi cation Ambi ent a i r Hoi d i ng ovens Dryi ng conditi onst
Carbon steel SMAW
E4X10, E4X11 2G-700/o relative f\bt required Consult manufacturer
humdity
E4X12, E4X13, E4X22, 30 ± 10 °� 500/o 1G-25 oc above 135 ± 15 oc for 1 h
E4X24, E4X27 maximum relative arrbient
humdity temperature
E4X15, E4X16, E4X18, f\bt recomrended 12G-150 oc 230 oc for 2 h or
E4X28, E4X48 430 oc for 1 h
Chromium and chromium-nickel steel SMAW
EXXX-15 f\bt recomrended 12G-150 oc 225-300 oc for 1 h
EXXX-16 f\bt recomrended 12G-150 oc 30G-400 oc for 1 h
EXXX-17 f\bt recomrended 12G-150 oc 340--440 oc for 1 h
EXXX-26 f\bt recomrended 12G-150 oC 30G-400 oc for 1 h
Low-alloy SMAW
EXXlO-X EXX11-X Arrbient temperature 4G-50 oc maximurnt Consult manufacturer
EXX15-X EXX16-X f\bt recomrended 12G-150 oc Consult manufacturer
EXX18-X
FCAW and MCAW
Flux- and metal-core Manufacturer should be
electrode consulted; rusted
electrode should be
discarded
(Continued)
El ectrode
classifi cation Ambi ent a i r Hol d i ng ovens Dryi ng conditionst
SAW
Fluxes for submerged Manufacturer should be
arc consulted
* After rem:Nal fran the manufacturer's packaging.
t Manufacturers shoold � cmsulted for exact drying conditims �a use of a difference in coating materials.
Generally, if the electr<Xle coating flakes after drying, it was dried at too high a te�rature. If pxosity is evident,
then rroisture can still � too high, necessitating higher or lmger �:Eking te�ratures.
:j: Unusually high arrbient rroisture conditims can req_.Jire electr<Xle storage in holding o.tens.
Carbon steel electrodes for SNIAW have been termed earbon steel"; havvever, their chemcal
corrposition requirement does not fall strictly within those norm:�lly termed carbon steel. The alloy
additions to the chemcal corrpositions of these electrodes are m:�de to achieve deoxidation and
irrr>rove usability. Use of the term earbon steel" indicates the chemcal corrposition requirements of
this Standard do not allavv alloy additions for mechanical property irrr>rovement.
C. 1.2
The classification system used in this Standard fol lavvs the pattern used in filler metal specifications by
CSA and AWS standards:
a) The letter E" desig1ates an electrode.
b) In, e.g, E49XX", the first two digts desig1ate the m nimum tensile strength of the deposited weld
metal in the as-welded condition in meg:�pascals (MPa) divided by 10. The third digt indicates the
position in which the electrode is capable of m:�king satisfactory welds.
c) The number !," as in 1:4910," indicates the electrode is suitable for depositing satisfactory welds
in all positions.
d) The number 2," as in 1:4924," indicates the electrode is suitable for depositing satisfactory welds
in the flat position and for m:�king horizontal fillet welds.
e) The number 4," as in 1:4948," indicates the electrode is suitable for m:�king welds in the vertical
position with the welding progression vertical davvn . The last digt of the classification indicates
both the current to be used with the electrode and the type of covering on the electrode.
C. 1.3
Reg:�rdless of their trade name, electrodes that meet all requirements of a classification can be
expected to have m:�jor characteristics that are simlar if not identical. Certain mnor variations exist
among brands due to differences in production facilities and differences of opinion on specific operating
characteristics.
C. 1.4
Since the electrodes within a classification have similar operating characteristics and mechanical
properties, consumers can, after determining the classification best fulfilling their application, limt their
study of available electrodes to those within the classification.
C. l . S
For the method of classification, refer to AWS PS. l/5. 1M Table 10.
Low-alloy steel electrodes for SWIA.W are termed IbN-alloy steel." Users of these electrodes often
desire specific properties, such as creep resistance, that depend on the chenical composition of the
weld metal tn:)l'"e than the mechanical properties measured in this Standard
C.2 . 2
The classification system used in this Standard fol lows the pattern used in filler metal specifications bj
CSP.. and AWS standards:
a) The letter E" desig-,ates an electrode.
b) In, e.g, E49XX," the first two digts desig-,ate the minimum tensile strength of the deposited weld
metal in meg:Jpascals divided bj 10. The third digt i ndicates the position in which the electrode is
capable of making satisfactory welds.
c) The number !," as in 1:4910," indicates the electrode is suitable for depositing welds in all
positions. The fourth digt of the classification indicates the current to be used with the electrode
and the type of covering on the electrode.
C.2 . 3
A letter/number suffix is also used to desig-,ate the chenical composition of the deposited weld metal,
and is necessary for the classification to be meaningful. Thus, a corflJ!ete classification of a low-alloy
electrode under this Standard would be, e.g, 1:4918-Al" or 1:7618-M."
C.2 .4
Reg:Jrdless of their trade name, electrodes that meet all requirements of a classification can be
expected to have major characteristics that are very sinilar if not identical. Certain ninor variations
exist among brands due to differences in production facilities and differences of opinion on specific
operating characteristics.
(.2 . 5
Since the electrodes within a classification have similar operating characteristics and mechanical
properties, consumers can, after determining the classification best fulfilling their application, linit their
study of available electrodes to those within the classification.
C.2 . 6
Because it is not possible to cover every type of electrode in the marketplace, provision has been made
for a G" (general) classification that can be formulated bj the manufacturer to meet very specific
characteristics. The manufacturer should be consulted before using such general classifications.
C.2.7
1\bn-alloy and fine-gain steel filler metals for GrvlAW electrodes are termed rlon-alloy" and fine-gain
steel." Their chemcal corrposition requirement does not fall strictly within this termnoi0£Y because of
alloy additions made to achieve deoxidation, strength, and tougmess, and to ii'Y'pl"ove usability.
C.4.2
This Standard uses the classification system of C5A. ISO 14341. This is a C'ohabitation" Standard
encompassing two approaches to classification. The fl!.' side, typically used in Europe, uses a system
based upon yield strength and an average irrpact energy of 47 J. The B" side, typically used in 1\brth
America and Pacific Rim countries, uses a system based upon tensile strength and an average irrpact
energy of 27 J. Examples of the classification system are gven in C5A. ISO 14341.
C.4.3
In C5A. ISO 14341, one wire can be tested and classified with different shielding 93ses. However, in this
Standard, certain classifications on the B" side, corresponding to those of previous editions of
C5A. W48, have been identified for extending the certification of those classifications to include
Ar-O.?-C0.2 corrbinations, within certain restrictions. See Annex Q for more information.
C.4.4
Since filler metals within a classification have simlar operating characteristics and mechanical
properties, consumers can, after determining the classification best fulfilling their application, limt their
study of available filler metals to those within the classification.
C.6 E l ectrode/fl ux combi nati ons a nd ca r bon steel el ectrodes for SAW
C.6.1 General
Electrode/flux corrbinations and carbon steel electrodes for SA.W have been termed C'arbon steel."
Their chemcal corrposition requirement, however, does not fall strictly within those normally termed
carbon steel. The alloy additions to the chemcal corrposition of the electrode/flux corrbinations
classified in this Annex are made to achieve deoxidation and ii'Y'pl"ove usability. Use of the term C'arbon
steel" indicates the chemical corrposition requirements of this Standard do not allow alloy additions for
mechanical property ii'Y'pl"ovement.
The classification system used in this Standard fol lows as closely as possible the pattern used in filler
metal specifications by C5A. and AWS Standards. The inherent nature of the products being classified
has, however, necessitated changes that more suitably classify the product. Cause C 6.2 provides
examples illustrating the operation of the classification system for carbon steel electrodes.
C.6.2 F49A3 -E L 8 K
I n the classification system for carbon steel electrcx::les, the letter F'' desig1ates a flux and the number
49" shews a minimum tensile strengh of 490 MPa. The letter A" follewingthe strength desig1ator
indicates the weld metal was tested in the as-welded condition. The number 3" shews that irrpact
tests were conducted at -30 oc
Foi l ewing the hyphen, the letter E" indicates an electrcx::le. The letter r· shews a solid electrcx::le with a
maximum of 0.6QO/o Mn. The number 8" i ndicates the nominal carbon content of the electrcx::le is
0.08% The letter K'' shews that the electrcx::le is of silicon killed steel (0. 10-0.25%Si).
Note: See Figure C 1.
F i gu r e C. l
Cl ass i fi cati on system for ca r bon steel el ectr odes
(See Clause C6.2.)
F XX X X - E L XX X
M
H
c
After the hyphen, the letter E" stands for an electrode, while the letter C' shows a corrposite
electrode that can be flux-cored or metal-cored. The nurrber !" indicates the chemical composition of
the weld metal.
It should also be noted that for a singe-pass flux/wire cotrbination, the letter Z' would become S,"
also denoting no impact properties specified.
C.6.4 F49AS-ECG
The letter r" is for a flux and the nurrber 49" shows a minimum tensile strength of 490 MPa. The
letter fl!.' shows testing was performed on weld metal i n the as-welded condition, while the letter S"
indicates a singe-pass electrode/flux cotrbination. Impact testing was not carried out, as such tests are
meaningess for a singe-pass weld.
After the hyphen, the letter E" stands for an electrode, while the letter C' shows a corrposite
electrode that can be flux-cored or metal-cored. The letter G" indicates an unspecified chemical
corrposition for the weld metal.
C.6.5 tvlethod of classifi cati on for ca r bon and l ow-a l l oy steel el ectrodes for SAW
For the method of classification, refer to AWS /l5.17/5.17M Figure 1M and AWS /lS. 23//lS. 23M
Figure C l.
C.7 rvlethod of cl assi fi cati on for stai n l ess steel el ectr odes for FCAW a nd
tv'V::.AW
For method of classification, refer to AWS /l5.22//l5.22M.
C.8 rvlethod of cl assi fi cati on for sol i d wi r e el ectrodes for GMAW and SAW
For the method of classification, refer to AWS /lS. 9/5. 9M.
C.9 rvlethod of cl assi fi cati on for a l umi n u m el ectr odes for GTAW and
GMAW
For the method of classification, refer to AWS /l5. 10/5. 10M Figure 1.
Annex D ( i nformative)
Descr i pti on a nd i ntended use of el ectr odes for ca r bon
steel G�W a nd GTAW
f\bte: This Annex is not a rmndatay part of this Standard
D. l OJervi ew
0.1.1 P u r pose
This Annex describes the characteristics of some of the electrode classifications covered by this
Standard and the intended uses of these classifications. The desig1ations and the chenical cor11J05ition
requirements for all such electrodes are specified in CSA ISO 14341.
having a tensile strength greatly in excess of the base rrnterial. The use of argJn-rich shielding 93ses can
greatly increase the strength of the deposit.
The qualification of any electrode in the as-welded condition provides no guarantee the requirerrents
of this Standard will be rret after stress relief or another form of heat treatrrent.
As shown in Figure D. 1, CE for levels of 0.2 below 5% or CO< below 100/o can be correlated using the
equation specified in aause 7.3.1.2:
OE (%) = (% 02) + 0.5 (% C02}
where
% 0.2 and % C02 = noninal values of the shielding-g3s nixture
The use of nixtures of argJn with CO< or 02, or both, with or without additions of helium increases
rrnn93nese and silicon levels and decreases oxyg=n levels in the weld deposits as corllJCl red with CO<
shielding Increasing the arrount of alloy elerrents in the weld rretal can result in higher tensile and
yield strengths and correspondingy lower elon93tions. It can also affect irllJClct properties. Tests on a
certified B-G 49A 3 Q S6 wire using the weld rretal test procedures specified in this Standard and a
rang= of argJn..CO< shielding 93ses between 15 and 5% CO< 93ve the tensile strength results shown in
Figure D.2. At the 5% CO< Ievel, the tensile strength exceeds the rrnximum level of 650 MPa allowed in
this Standard.
Users are cautioned that low oxyg=n-equivalent shielding 93ses should be used only after consultation
with the electrode rrnnufacturer and careful evaluation of the welding procedure. Testing of the wire-
93S combination for very low oxyg=n-equivalent shielding 93ses to deternine the all-weld-metal
properties should be perforrred using the g=neral procedures specified in this Standard.
added deoxidants, they can be used for welding steels that have a rusty or dirty surface, with a possible
sacrifice of weld quality, depending upon the degee of surface contamination. These filler metals can
be used with C0:1, argon-0.1, or argon-C0:1 shielding 93ses. Although the nominal amounts of titanium
zirconium and aluminum contribute to deoxidation of weld metal during welding of rimming and semi
killed steels, the amounts remaining in the finished weld are generally too low to affect irrpact levels.
0.3 GTAW
0.3 . 1 Gener a l
The filler metals described in this Standard l'l\:IY also be used as filler rods for GrAW and allied
processes. The recommended strai!#lt length for rods for GrAW is 900 +15/-o mn With proper
procedures, the composition of the dep:>Sit, after allowance for dilution by the base metal, will be
sirrilar to that of the filler metal itself. Because of variations in the heat input and other factors
mentioned in Oause D. 1.2, the mechanical properties will be greatly affected by welding technique.
the weld puddle. If the current is below the transition fX)int for a gven size of electrode, transfer tends
to be gobular and erratic.
F i gu r e D. l
Rel ati onshi p between s h i el d i ng gas 02 a n d C02 l evel s for AWS E R70S-3 and
AWS E R70S-6 el ectrodes
(See Clause 0.1.6.)
25
5-3
20 /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
15
,/ %0.2 +0.5(%C0.2)
"
"
"
"
"
10 "
"
"
"
"
"
"
5 10 15 20 25 30
F i gu r e D.2
tvleasu r ed tensi l e strength for a B -G 49A 3 Cl 56 el ectrode as a fu ncti on of s h i el di ng
gas CO;z content
(See Clause 0.1.6.)
iti'i
..9!
�--1-----�
·v;
c
� 600 -
55o ������
0 5 10 15 20
C0.2 in shiel ding g3s, %
f\btes:
1) Electrode carpositioo: Carbon -0.07% Manganese - 1.7% Silicon -o.sgola
2) Base plate: ASTM A 36/A 36M.
In choosing an electrode classification for subrrerged arc welding the rrost irrportant considerations
are
a) the rrechanical properties expected of the weld metal;
b) the requirements for weld metal COtr'4JOSition;
c) whether the weld is to be singe pass or rn..dtiple pass;
d) the cleanliness and COtr'4JOSition of the steel to be welded; and
e) the type of flux to be used.
It is irrportant to note the rrechanical properties obtained on a one-run or two-run weld are often quite
different than those obtained on m..J i tiple pass welds made with the same flux and electrode.
E.1.2
Cotr'4JOSite electrodes are often designed to be used with a certain flux, which is marked on the
electrode package and certificate of conformance. Before a cotr'4JOSite electrode is used with another
flux, the electrode manufacturer should be contacted for recorrmendations.
E.1.3
The choice of electrode and the choice of flux are fully intertwined. VVhile an electrode can be classified
based only on its cherrical composition, the weld metal classification, COtr'4JOSition, and properties are
highly influenced by both the choice of electrode with a specific flux.
E.1.4
For the welding of stainless, low-alloy steel, and nickel alloys, the cherrical COtr'4JOSition of the weld
metal produced is often a primary consideration for electrode selection. Together with appropriate heat
treatments, each composition can achieve a wide range of corrosion resistance and rrechanical
properties at various service terrperatures. It is usually desirable for weld metal to match the cherrical
COtr'4JOSition and the rrechanical properties of the base metal as closely as possible. It should be noted
that changes in welding variables or heat treatment can affect the rrechanical properties. Except for the
effects of dilution, the cherrical COtr'4JOSition can be expected to remain reasonably unchanged when
using a neutral flux and may change significantly when welding with active or alloy fluxes.
E.l.S
The specific mechanical properties of a weld are a function of its chemical corrtJOSition, cooling rate,
and any post-weld heat treatment. Higher-ai11Jerag=, singe-pass welds have a geater depth of fusion,
resulting in geater dilution by the base metal than lower ai11Jerag=, rrultiple pass welds. rvloreover,
larg=, singe-pass welds solidify and cool rrore slowly than the smaller weld beads of rrultiple pass
welds. Furtherrrore, the succeeding passes of a rrultiple-pass weld suqject the weld metal of previous
passes to a variety of terrperature and cooling cycles that alter the metallurgcal structure of different
portions of those beads. For these reasons, the properties of a singe-pass weld may be significantly
different from those of a rrultiple-pass weld made with the same electrode and flux.
E . 1 .6
When welding singe-pass fillet welds, especially on scaly base metal, it is irrp::>rtant that the flux,
electrode, or both provide sufficient deoxidation to avoid unacceptable porosity. Silicon is a rrore
powerful deoxidizer than mangmese. In such applications, use of a silicon-killed electrode, an active
flux, or both might be essential.
E.2.4 Al l oy fl uxes
Alloy fluxes are those fluxes designed to mcx:lify the chemical composition of the weld using metals
other than, or in addition to, ��"anganese and silicon. For example, some alloy fluxes can be used with a
carbon steel electrode to prcx:luce a low-alloy or hard-facing weld deposit by adding elements such as
nickel, molybdenum chromium or copper.
Alloy fluxes are of significant interest to those welding stainless steels, nickel-alloys, or some low-alloy
steels. The addition of chrorrium to the flux and its subsequent recovery during welding can be used to
corrpensate for chrorrium lost from an electrode during the metal transfer across the arc or in the
molten weld puddle. These fluxes are often called cnromium corrpensating" and should be considered
alloy fluxes.
Fluxes designed for joining or cladding can add elements such as nickel, chrorrium or niobium to
prcx:luce a deposit of a different alloy composition from that of the electrode used.
Alloy fluxes can be used i n cladding of mild or low-alloy steels to achieve an alloy deposit in fewer
passes. Chang=s in weld metal composition that can occur with different welding parameters l'l\:IY alter
the alloy designation, ferrite number, corrosion resistance, or mechanical properties of the weld
deposit.
The recovery of alloying elements from the flux l'l\:IY be significantly affected by the flux to electrode
ratio. With alloy fluxes, the welding procedure should be tightly controlled if desired weld metal
compositions are to be obtained. Ole alloy flux should not be substituted for another without testing or
data to determine that the results will be as desired.
E . 3 Cr us hed sl ags
E.3.2 B l ended fl ux
Blends of crushed slag with the orignal brand of virgn flux from which it was generated cannot be
assumed to conform to the classification of either component, even when both the crushed slag and
virgn flux conform to the same classification (except for the S" designator).
c) it is crushed by the fabricator or another crushing org:mization, possibly blended with a specific
virgn flux; and
d) it is returned to the same fabricator for use as a welding flux, at which point it is defined as closed-
loop crushed slag
dosed-loop crushed slags, or blends of closed-loop crushed slag with the orignal brand of virgn flux,
ensure better control of i nput rrnterial by virtue of the i nherent partnering of the fabricator with the
crusher. In some instances, these partners rrny be one and the same.
F . l I ntroducti on
The purpose of deternining weld metal diffusible hydrogen content is to enable an assessment of the
potential for hydrogen-induced cold cracking in the weld zone and apply suitable preheat, if necessary.
For exalf'4Jies, water-containing corrpounds in the fluxes, lubricants on electrode wires, and moisture
on the workpieces break dovvn in the welding arc to produce atonic hydrogen that is absorbed by the
weld metal. When critical corrbinations of weld metal hydrogen content, residual stresses, and hard
nicrostructure (high carbon equivalent) are present, cracks are likely to be formed as or after the weld
COOS beiON 200 oc; hence the term C'old cracks".
Austenitic stainless steels have a high solubility and ION diffusivity for hydrogen, and are not prone to
cold cracking 1\b hydrogen tests are specified for electrodes depositing austenitic weld metal because
the hydrogen will not diffuse out of austenite unless temperatures much higher than those for ferritic
steels are used. l-lovvever, hydrogen-induced cracking has been knONn to occur along the bond line
between austenitic filler metals and ferritic or martensitic base metals. Filler metals and fluxes for such
joints should be handled as hydrogen-controlled materials, including drying them before use.
noted that very few welding filler metals and allied materials are able to consistently meet the H2
designator requirements. Filler metals and allied materials designed to consistently meet the H2
designator requirements are under development and wil l be meant for high-strength steels with a yield
strength of 690 MPa or greater.
F .4 Va r i a bl es
Users of this Standard are cautioned that actual fabrication can result in diffusible hydrogen values
different from those indicated by the hydrogen designator. Some fX>SSible reasons for this are:
a) M open welding arc is always imperfectly shielded. Moisture from the air, distinct from that in the
electrode, can enter the arc and then the weld pool, and thereby contribute to the observed
diffusible hydrogen. It is for this reason that the standard diffusible hydrogen test specified in
AWS AA. 3 is conducted under a reference atmospheric condition. This effect can be nininized by
maintai ning as short an arc length as fX>SSible, consistent with a steady arc. Experience has shavvn
that the effect of arc length is ninor at the H16 1evel, but can be very significant at the H4 1evel. M
electrode meeting the H4 requirements under the reference atmospheric conditions will not
necessarily do so under conditions of high hunidity at the time of welding especial ly if a long arc
length is maintained.
b) Electrode extension also affects diffusible hydrogen with flux-cored electrodes. In g=neral, a long=r
electrode extension will preheat the electrode more, which will cause some rerroval of hydro
bearing COITlJOUnds (moisture and lubricants) before they reach the arc. The result of long=r
electrode extension can be reduced diffusible hydrogen. 1-bvvever, excessive electrode extension
with external g:�s-shielded electrodes can cause some loss of g:�s shielding unless the contact tip is
recessed in the g:�s cup. If the g:�s shielding is disturbed, more air can enter the arc and increase
the diffusible hydrogen. This can also cause porosity due to nitrogen pickup.
c) Users are cautioned that the shielding g:�s can contribute significantly to diffusible hydrogen.
1\brmally, weldinggade shielding g:�ses are intended to have very lavv dew points and very lavv
irrpurity levels. This, havvever, is not always the case. Instances have occurred where a
contaninated g:�s cylinder resulted in a significant i ncrease of diffusible hydrogen in the weld
metal. In cases of doubt, the g:�s dew point should be checked. A dew point of --40 oc or lavver is
considered satisfactory for most applications.
d) A chang= in shielding g:�s can also influence the diffusible hydrogen level in weld metal. With flux
cored wires, argon-rich shielding g:�ses gve somewhat higher hydrogen levels than shielding g:�ses
containing high levels of C�.
e) Electrodes and fluxes can absorb significant moisture if stored in a hunid environment in damag=d
or open packag=s, especially if left unprotected for any length of time. In worst-case hunidity, an
hour for unprotected covered electrodes or overnight exfX>Sure for flux-cored wire can lead to a
significant increase of diffusible hydrogen. If an electrode has been exfX>Sed, or if there is any
doubt about the condition of the electrodes and fluxes, the manufacturer should be consulted
about probable damag= and fX>SSible reconditioning of the electrodes. Typical storag= and rebake
conditions are specified in Mnex �-
Annex G ( i nformative)
Certifi cati on
r'\bte: This inforrmtive f'lnnex has been written in rmndatory language to facilitate adoption where users of the
Standard or regulatory authorities wish to adopt it forrmlly as additional requirements to this Standard
G. l General
G. l.l P r oduct certifi cation
\!\then certification of consumables is required, tests in accordance with this Standard shall be witnessed
by the Canadian Welding Bureau (ONB). \!\then compliance with the test and quality system
requirements of this Standard has been established to the satisfaction of the ONB, a document of
certification shall be issued. The ONB may accept sinilar tests and satisfactory results certified by other
authorities. Cleek testing at two-year intervals shall be as required by Oause 4. 5 and shall be witnessed
by the ONB.
G. l . S T est fa i I u r es
The ONB shall withdraw certification of electrodes or electrode/flux corrbinations that fall below the
requirements of this Standard (as deternined by check testing or other tests). The electrode or
electrode/flux combination may be resubrritted for certification at any time and shall meet all
requirements of this Standard.
For non-alloy and fine-gain steels, including lavv-alloy Gt>M.W, the size of the wire to be tested shall be
1.2 mm or the nearest manufactured. The welding polarity shall be Drect Current Electrode Positive
(CCEP). The ninimJm diameter manufactured shall be tested for chenical analysis.
For chrooium and chronium-nickel steel Gt>M.W, GrAW, and Sf:...W, the size of the wire to be tested
shall be a singe diameter.
For carbon steel and lavv-alloy MCAW and FCAW electrodes, the size of wire to be tested shall be a
singe diameter. The wire diameter shall differ from the orignal electrode used for the initial product
approval and the same diameter shall not be used for two consecutive check test periods. The welding
polarity shall be as specified in AWS AS. 36/AS. 36M.
For chrooium and chronium-nickel steel FCAW and MCAW, the size of wire to be tested shall be a
singe diameter. The diameters for testing shall alternate between all sizes manufactured.
For carbon and lavv-alloy steel Sf:...W, the size of the electrode to be used shall be 4.0 mn The welding
polarity shall be as specified in AWS AS. 17/AS.17M and AS.23/AS.23M.
For aluninum and aluninum-alloy Gt>M.W and GrAW, the size of electrode to be tested shall be the
smallest and larg!st diameter for Gt>M.W. For GrAW, the larg!st diameter shall only be tested. The
welding polarity shall be as specified in AWS AS. 10/AS. 10M.
T a bl e G. l
E l ectrode types and requ i r ed check tests
(See Clause G2.2.)
G. 3 Retests
If any check test fails to meet the applicable test requirements, two additional tests shall be performed.
The results of both tests shall meet the applicable test requirements (see Gause §1) .
In case of failure of the retest, full initial certification shall be required for the electrode or
electrode/flux combination that is being tested.
Annex H ( i nformative)
SI ( metr i c) a nd non-SI equi va l ents
r'\bte: This llnnex is not a rmndatay part of this Standard
H.l General
This Standard is written in SI (metric) units only. Previous editions of the CSA. W48 series of standards
(CSA. W48. 1 to CSA. W48.6) g:�ve non-SI equivalents where appropriate; however, published sizes and
dimensions in the two systems are not identical, and for this reason conversion from a published size or
dimension in one system does not always coincide with the published size or dimension in the other.
This Annex provides information that enables conversion to lrllJE=r ial equivalents. It should be noted
that in cases of dispute the SI (metric) version is to be reg:�rded as the standard.
Table H . l
Conver s i on factor s
(See Clause H.3.)
(Continued)
T a bl e H . l ( Concl uded)
Table H.2
Sol i d w i r e d i a meter equ i val ents
(See Clause H.2.)
1\bmi nal SI size, Converted non - 1\bmi nal non- Tol erance on
mm SI ra nge, mm* SI range, mmt SI si ze, i n non-51 si ze, i n*
0. 5 0.47-0. 53 0.48-0. 53 0.020 ±0.001
0.6 0. 57-0.63 0.61-0.66 0.025 ±0.001
0.8 0.77-0.83 0.74---0.79 0.030 ±0.001
0.9 0.87-0.93 0.86-0.91 0.035 ±0.001
1.0 0.97-1.03 0.99--1.04 0.040 ±0.001
1.2 1. 15-1.25 1. 10-1. 18 0.045 ±0.0015
1.4 1. 35-1.45 1.28-1.36 0.052 ±0.0015
1.6 1. 55-1.65 1. 55-1.63 1/16 ±0.0015
(Continued)
1\Jomi nal Sl size, Converted non - 1\Jomi nal non- Tol erance on
mm Sl ra nge, mm* Sl range, mmt Sl si ze, i n non-51 si ze, i n*
2.0 1.95-2.05 1.93-2.04 5/64 ±0.002
2.4 2. 35-2.45 2.33-2.43 3/32 ±0.002
2. 5 2.45-2. 55 2.33-2.43 3/32 ±0.002
3.2 3. 12-3.28 3. 10-3.25 l/8 ±0.003
4.0 3.90-4.10 3.87-4.07 5/32 ±0.004
5.0 4.90-5. 10 4.66-4.86 3/16 ±0.004
6.0 5.90-6. 10 6.25-6.45 l/4 ±0.004
* Range calculated using tderance SP=Cified in Gause _2.
t Range calculated using norri na l i rrperial sizes ± irrperial tderance and then converted to rrillirretres.
* 1\bn-S! size tderances in accordance with previoos editions of CSA W48.
Table H . 3
SAW composi te wi re d i a meter equ i va l ents
(See Clause H.2.)
1\Jomi nal Sl size, Converted non- 1\Jomi nal non- Tol erance on
mm Sl ra nge, mm* Sl range, mmt Sl si ze, i n non-51 si ze, i n*
1.2 1. 15-1.25
1.27-1.37 0.052 ±0.002
1.4 1. 35-1.45
1.6 1. 55-1.65 1. 54-1. 64 l/16 ±0.002
1.7 1.65-1.75 1.65-1.80 0.068 ±0.003
1.8 1.75-1.85 1.75-1.91 0.072 ±0.003
2.0 1.95-2.05 1.91-2.06 5/64 ±0.003
2.4 2. 35-2.45 2.31-2.46 3/32 ±0.003
2. 5 2.45-2. 55
2.8 2.72-2.88 2.70-2.85 7/64 ±0.003
3.0 2.92-3.08 2.97-3. 12 0. 120 ±0.003
3.2 3. 12-3.28 3. 10-3.25 l/8 ±0.003
4.0 3.99-4. 10 3.89-4.04 5/32 ±0.003
4.69-4.84 3/16 ±0.003
5.0 4.9-5.10
(Continued)
1\Jomi nal SI size, Converted non- 1\Jomi nal non- Tol erance on
mm SI ra nge, mm* SI range, mmt SI size, i n non-51 si ze, i n*
6.0 5.9-6.10
6.27-6.43 l/4 ±0.003
* Range calculated using tolerance S[E:ified in Gause _2.
t Range calculated using norri na l nm-SI sizes ± nm-SI tolerance and then converted to nillirretres.
* 1\bn-SI size tolerances in accordance with previrus editions of CSA.. W48.
I . l FCAW and tv"CAW el ectr ode equ i va l ency of cl assi fi cati ons with fi xed
requi rements
The AWS A5.36/A5.36M fixed and open classification systems specified in Colurrn 1 and 2 shall be
considered equivalent to Colurrn 2 (Q:len classification system) and Colurrn 4 (CSA W48-Q6) of Table 1. 1
for the purpose of using existing procedure qualification records (PQR), weld procedure data sheets
(WPDS), and weld procedure specifications 0/VP'S).
T a bl e 1 . 1
Equival ency of cl assi fi cati ons for F CAW and rv'CAW el ectrode classifi cations with
fi xed requ i r ements
(See Clause I.l.)
(Continued)
T a b l e 1 . 1 ( Concl uded)
Annex J ( i nfa-mative)
B i bl i ogr a phy
r'\bte: This llnnex is not a rmndatay part of this Standard
ASM International
ASM Handbook, Vol. 6: Welding brazing and soldering (1993)
ASTM International
A3-D1 (2012)
Standard Specification for Steel Joint Bars, LCMt, Medium and High Carbon (1\bn-Heat-Treated)
G4-D1 (2014)
Standard Guide for Conducting Corrosion Tests in Field Applications
A5.29/A5.29M:2010
Specification for LCMt-AI ICMt Steel Electrodes for Flux Core Arc Welding
WM1.4-94
Welding Metallurgy: Carbon and AI Icy Steels, Vol. 1, Fundam:ntals, 4th ed.
5178:2019
Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials - Longitudinal tensile test on weld metal in fusion
welded joints
9016:2012
Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials -Irrpact tests -Test specim:n location, notch
orientation and exam nation
15792-1:2020
Welding consumables -Test m:thods - Part 1: Preparation of all-weld m:tal test pieces and
specim:ns in steel, nickel and nickel allcys