Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AOM 2023 001 Can Aporong
AOM 2023 001 Can Aporong
AOM 2023 001 Can Aporong
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
REGIONAL OFFICE NO. VIII
LGAS C – Leyte II and Biliran Province
Provincial Satellite Auditing Office (PSAO)
Baybay City, Leyte
JUDITH A. BRILLO
Barangay Kagawad-CCA
MARIVIC BUGAL
Barangay Bookkeeper
MICHELLE L. EFREN
Municipal Accountant
We have audited some of the Barangay transactions for Calendar Years 2019,
2020, 2021 and 2022 and observed the following deficiencies:
1.2. Pertinent provisions in Chapter VII of the Manual on the Barangay Financial
Management of Barangays provide:
Xxx
7.1.6 Property/Equipment Card (PEC), see Annex 26.1, shall be maintained for
all property and equipment of the barangay by the BT.
7.1.18 The barangay shall conduct an annual physical inventory of all supplies,
property and equipment of the barangay.
Xxx
The Inventory Committee, upon the completion of the physical count, shall
prepare three copies of Report on Inventory of Property and Equipment (RIPE),
as shown in Annex 30 and shall be approved by the PB. The RIPE shall be
distributed as follows:
The RIPE shall be the basis of the C/M Accountant for reconciling the results of
inventory with the PPE accounts.
The RIPE shall be the basis of the BT for reconciling the equipment covered by
PAR and the PECs on file and the ICS for the small items considered as
inventories.
1.3. As of December 31, 2021, the Barangay’s financial statements showed the total,
PPE account of ₱4,868,159.53 representing 61% of its total assets of
₱8,021,867.35 The details of the total PPE account are presented in Table 1.
1.4. The required Subsidiary Ledgers or the PPE Ledger Cards and
Property/Equipment Cards were not maintained by the Municipal Accountant and
the Barangay Treasurer, respectively. The absence of the PPE Ledger Cards made
the confirmation of the balance of the PPE account impossible. Likewise, without
the Property/Equipment Cards, the Barangay Treasurer will have difficulty in
filling-out columns 1 to 6 of the RIPE which will be the basis of the Inventory
Team in the conduct of the physical count.
1.5. Due to the afore-cited deficiencies, the valuation of the properties that constitute
the Property, Plant and Equipment account amounting to ₱4,868,159.53 could not
be established, thus affecting the fair presentation of the account in the FS.
2.1. Section 4.4 of COA Circular 2012-002 states “The unexpended LDRRMF shall
accrue to a special trust fund solely for the purpose of supporting disaster risk
reduction and management activities of the Local Disaster Risk Reduction
Management Council (LDRRMC) within the next five years.
3.0. Disbursements totaling ₱111,300.00 in CY 2019 were paid from prior year’s
unexpended DRRMF despite not being included in the LDRRMF Investment
Plan for CY 2019, contrary to Sections 5.1.2 and 5.1.3.2 of COA Circular
2012-002, thus, resulted to irregular expenditures.
3.1. Section 5.1.2 of COA Circular 2012-002 states that, a Local Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Fund Investment Plan (LDRRMFIP) for the DRRM
program shall be prepared annually. It shall present the 30% allocation for QRF in
lump sum and the allocation for disaster mitigation, prevention and preparedness
with details as to projects and activities to be funded. The LDRRMFIP shall also
include under a separate caption, the list of projects and activities charged to
the unexpended LDRRMF of previous years.
3.2. Section 5.1.3.2 of the same circular states that the release and use of LDRRMF
shall be supported by LDRRMFIP for projects and activities listed in the
approved plan as incorporated in the local development plan and annual work and
financial plan
3.3. During the review of Barangay’s appropriation and utilization of the 5% BDRRM
Fund, the Audit Team noted that Barangay Can-aporong appropriated a total
amount of ₱539,105.45 under DRRM Fund during the 4-year period under audit,
as presented in Table 3.
3.4. It was further noted by the Audit Team that the Barangay still had a balance of
₱292,451.04 out of its prior years’ LDRRM Fund as of December 31, 2018.
However, it was observed that the LDRRMF IP for CY 2019 did not include the
planned PPAs out of the unutilized DRRMF as of December 31, 2018 but only
those appropriated under CY 2019 Budget. The same observations were noted
for CYs 2020, 2021 and 2022. Consequently, the unexpended balances of prior
years’ cannot be used in the absence of the LDRRMFIP which should have
indicated the PPAs for which said prior years’ balances will be used for.
3.6. Without an approved LDRRMFIP for the previous year’s DRRMF balances, the
Chairman Committee on Appropriation had no basis for certifying the existence
of available appropriations authorized for the purpose. Thus, disbursements
charged against LDRRMF were irregular. In addition, the absence of an
approved plan denotes that the procured items and other activities were not
approved by the other members of the LDRRM council and based only on
arbitrary decision of the requesting officials.
3.7. We recommend that the BDRRMO, through the Punong Barangay, convene
the LDRRM Council and prepare the LDRRMFIP which also includes PPAs
to be paid from previous years’ unexpended DRRMF annually as basis for
the use of the LDRRMF based on the priority programs, projects and
activities outlined in COA Circular 2012-002.
4.1. DBM-DOF-DILG Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1 dated November 24, 2020
provides the revised guidelines on the appropriation and utilization of the 20% of
the annual internal revenue allotment for development projects. The JMC was
issued to increase the responsiveness of the guidelines and promote greater
autonomy, transparency and accountability in the LGUs’ appropriation and
utilization of their respective 20% DF. Pertinent sections of the subject
Memorandum Circular are as follows:
a) Section 3.1 – In accordance with Section 287 of RA No. 7160, each LGU
shall appropriate in its annual budget no less than twenty
percent (20%) of its annual IRA for development projects.
b) Section 3.2 – The LGUs are enjoined to observe the following policies and
guidelines in the appropriation and utilization of the 20% DF:
4.2. During the conduct of our audit, it was noted that the Barangay had appropriated
projects for 20% Development Fund amounting to ₱282,793.00, ₱321,306.60,
₱343,589.40 and ₱486,133.00 for CY 2019, CY 2020, CY 2021 and CY 2022,
respectively. For the 4-year period, the 20% DF appropriation totaled to
₱1,433,822.00. The Barangay had also its beginning balance in the Fund from CY
2018 amounting ₱616,726.49. The said annual appropriations were for the
following projects:
4.3. Review of utilization revealed that out of the available appropriations the
barangay disbursed a total amount of ₱328,000.00 to implement the Construction
of Footbridge funded under 20% Development Fund from CYs 2018 to 2019, per
check number 63772083 dated October 22, 2019 under the contractor Greatwall
Builders
4.4. As can be seen in Table 5, only one project was implemented during the 4-year
period. Out of the ₱2,050,548.49 appropriation, ₱328,000.00 was actually
disbursed, which is only equivalent to 16% of current and previous years
appropriation.
4.5. Review of the status of implementation of projects of the barangay disclosed that
three projects identified and budgeted in CYs 2020 to 2022 totaling
₱1,151,029.00 were not implemented.
4.6. We recommend that the Punong Barangay implement all the projects
appropriated under 20% Development Fund so that funds are utilized to its
optimum to help achieve the desirable socio-economic development and
environmental outcomes of the Barangay.
5.0. No funds were appropriated in the CY 2019 to 2022 budget of the barangay
for the implementation of programs, projects and activities for the protection
of children, contrary to Republic Act No. 9344, thus protection of children’s
rights within the barangay is not strengthened.
5.2. Section 15 of the said Act mandates the creation of Local Councils for the
Protection of Children (LCPC) in all levels of local government. It provides
further that 1% of the internal revenue allotment (IRA) of barangays,
municipalities and cities, shall be allocated for the strengthening and
implementation of the LCPC.
5.3. Our perusal of the Annual Budget of the barangay disclosed that no funds were
appropriated for the implementation of programs, projects and activities (PPA)
intended for the Council for the protection and well-being of children although the
barangay has established and created their own LCPC. Based on the estimated
IRA for the noted budget years, the following could have been appropriated for
LCPC programs and activities:
5.4. Without the necessary budget and plan, the rights, interest and well-being of the
children in the barangay will not be protected, established and strengthened.
5.5. We recommend that the Punong Barangay include in its annual budget an
appropriation equivalent to 1% of its IRA intended for the protection and
welfare of the children in the barangay, identify and implement the
programs, projects and activities using the said fund pursuant to RA 9344.
6.0. No funds were appropriated for programs and projects for Senior Citizens
and Persons with Disabilities (PWD) in CY 2019 to 2022 which should be 1%
of the barangay’s IRA, contrary to DBM and DSWD Joint Circular No.
2003-01 dated April 28, 2003, thus depriving the elderly citizens in the
barangay the full benefits of the programs due them.
6.2. Our perusal of the Annual Budgets of the barangay disclosed that no funds were
appropriated for Senior Citizens and PWDs programs and activities for the
periods CY 2019, CY 2020, 2021 & CY 2022 as shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Fund for Senior Citizens and PWDs Programs/Projects
Particulars CY 2022 CY 2021 CY 2020 CY 2019
Estimated IRA 2,430,665.00 1,717,947.00 1,606,533.00 1,413,965.00
SHOULD BE - 1% of IRA 24,306.65 17,179.47 16,065.33 14,139.65
ACTUAL Appropriation - - - -
Lacking Appropriation 24,306.65 17,179.47 16,065.33 14,139.65
6.3. Without the necessary appropriation sanctioned by law, the elderly citizens and
PWDs of the barangay are deprived of the benefits of the programs, which could
have been financed from the said amount.
6.4. We recommend that the Punong Barangay and its Council appropriate funds
in its annual budget for programs and projects benefitting Senior Citizens
and Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) at an amount of no less than 1% of the
annual IRA as required by the Expanded Senior Citizen Act, R.A. No. 9994.
PS limitation
7.1. Section 331 (b) of Republic Act (RA) No. 7160 otherwise known as the Local
Government Code of 1991, states that “The total annual appropriations for
personal services of a barangay for one (1) fiscal year shall not exceed fifty-five
percent (55%) of the total annual income actually realized from local sources
during the next preceding fiscal year.”
7.3. Section 4.6 of the same Circular defines next preceding fiscal year as the fiscal year that
is two (2) years before a budget year. For example, if FY 2011 is the budget year, the
next preceding fiscal year is FY 2009.
7.4. Section 4.3 of the same Circular on the other hand provides items which are
waived in the determination of compliance to the PS limitation in LGU PS
budgets which includes payment of minimum Year-end Bonus of ₱1,000.00 for
the Punong Barangay and P600.00 for other mandatory barangay officials, and
their Cash Gifts.
7.5. Review of the annual budget of the barangay disclosed that appropriations for
Personal Services in CY 2022, 2021, 2020 and CY 2019 exceeded fifty-five
percent (55%) of the total annual income actually realized from local sources
during the next preceding fiscal year. The excess amount is computed in Table 9.
7.6. In addition, actual expenditures for CY 2019 to 2022 on personal services also
exceeded the ceiling for the reason that the budget itself for CY 2019 to CY 2022
provided a greater PS appropriation than what was required. Details on Table 10.
Table 10. Excess of Actual PS Expenditure over PS Limitation
2022 2021 2020 2019
PS Limitation 55% 887,821.55 794,717.36 711,896.90 662,211.55
Less: Actual PS 1,206,988.00 1,023,646.00 923,666.00 795,105.00
Expenditures
Difference (319,166.45) (228,928.64) (211,769.10) (132,893.45)
Total PS cost for waived 62,000.00 62,000.00 62,000.00 62,000.00
items
Excess (Difference less (257,166.45) (166,928.64) (149,769.10) (70,893.45)
waived items)
7.10. We further recommend that the barangay council should strive to find ways
to improve collection of revenues from local sources so that the Personal
Services ceiling will correspondingly increase.
May we have your comments on the foregoing audit observations within five (5)
calendar days from receipt hereof.
ARNE S. CABIGAS
State Auditor II
OIC- Audit Team Leader
SANTIAGO P. SEÑASE
State Auditor IV
OIC-Supervising Auditor