Vermont Licensure Portfolio Evidence Chart Revised 2019

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Vermont Licensure Portfolio

Evidence Chart
Approved 7/16, REV 7/17, REV 8/18, REV 7/19

Directions

Over the span of your preparation program, as you complete course and fieldwork assignments, you will collect evidence of your performance and
align the evidence to Performance Criteria of the Core Teaching Standards for Vermont Educators. The evidence demonstrates your performance of a
specific Performance Criterion. Potential evidence (e.g. lesson plans, videos of teaching performance) for each Performance Criterion may be
identified through the Educator Preparation Program materials or course syllabi.

This Evidence Chart is a mechanism for you to collect and curate your evidence that aligns with specific Performance Criterion. It is encouraged that
you use an electronic platform for the evidence chart. You will collect evidence by title, which is hyperlinked to the evidence, and linked or tagged to
a specific Performance Criterion. Each Performance Criterion must have at least one piece of evidence but may have many. One piece of evidence
may address multiple Performance Criteria. Collate and organize all evidence cited in the evidence chart. For each piece of evidence, a rationale must
be written to explain how the evidence demonstrates the Performance Criterion (2 or 3 sentences).

When you submit a Narrative for Part I, II, or III, you will provide the reviewer with access to all of your collected evidence for the Performance
Criteria of that specific Narrative. Use your Evidence Chart as a cover page. The reviewer will check your Evidence Chart to observe the connection
between your evidence and a specific Performance Criterion. A clear rationale makes this review more efficient.

Part II has required evidence (listed below). Each piece of required evidence must be aligned with a Performance Criterion. However, the
required evidence does not have to be the evidence selected for analysis in the Narrative. Educator Preparation Programs (EPPs) may align this
required evidence with Performance Criteria in their individual programs.
Vermont Licensure Portfolio
Evidence Chart
Approved 7/16, REV 7/17, REV 8/18, REV 7/19
Candidate: River Capell Submission Date:

Program: Advisor:

Reviewer 1: Review Date:

Reviewer 2: Review Date:

Part I: The Learner and Learning


Standard Performance Criterion Evidence & Rationale
PC 1.1 Candidates use an
understanding of learning theory
Standard I: Learner Development
(in areas such as cognitive, Special Ed Feildwork
The teacher understands how learners grow
linguistic, social emotional or Reading interest & aptitude inventory
and develop, recognizing that patterns of
physical) to design appropriate
learning and development vary individually
learning experiences.
within and across the cognitive, linguistic,
PC 1.2 Candidates use an
social, emotional, and physical areas, and
understanding of developmental
designs and implements developmentally
theory (in areas such as cognitive,
appropriate and challenging learning EDU Inquiries unit plan, teaching styles
linguistic, social emotional or
experiences.
physical) to design appropriate
learning experiences.
PC 2.1 Candidates use an
Standard 2: Learning Differences understanding of individual
Special ed E-Book
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences to design inclusive
differences and diverse cultures and learning experiences.
communities to ensure inclusive learning PC 2.2 Candidates use an
environments that enable each learner to meet understanding of diverse cultures
high standards. and communities to design National scout Jamboree staff
inclusive learning experiences.
Standard 3: Learning Environments PC 3.1 Candidates design learning ILST remaking
The teacher works with others to create environments that support
environments that support individual and individual learning marked by
Vermont Licensure Portfolio
Evidence Chart
Approved 7/16, REV 7/17, REV 8/18, REV 7/19
active engagement.
collaborative learning, and that encourage PC 3.2 Candidates design learning
positive social interaction, active engagement environments that support University of scouting ILST
in learning, and self-motivation. collaborative learning marked by
positive social interaction.
Part II: Content Knowledge and Instructional Practice
Required Evidence to be linked in the Evidence Chart below
❏ A unit of study that contains at least five lessons and is representative of a candidate’s endorsement area(s), with an indication of how instruction will accommodate
a range of learners and students with special needs;
❏ 12-15 minutes of video (continuous or in clips) of the candidate providing instruction during the Student Teaching or Internship phase of the program, with
accompanying annotations regarding the candidate’s teaching practice;
❏ A supervisor’s observation or evaluation of the candidate’s teaching practice;
❏ An analysis of samples of one student's work over time (multiple samples of one student) or analysis of samples of multiple students’ work over time drawn from
the unit of study. (Student work means original products instead of teacher-generated tests, worksheets, etc., or standardized assessment tools.)

Standard Performance Criterion Evidence & Rationale


Standard 4: Content Knowledge PC 4.1 Candidates accurately
The teacher understands the central concepts, communicate central concepts of Effective speaking Speech 2
tools of inquiry, and structures of the the discipline.
discipline(s) they teach and creates learning
experiences that make the discipline accessible PC 4.2 Candidates accurately
and meaningful for learners to assure mastery address common misconceptions Effective speaking Speech 2
of the content. of the discipline.
PC 5.1 Candidates engage learners
in applying perspectives from
varied disciplines in authentic National Scout Jamboree staff
Standard 5: Application of Content
contexts (such as local and global
The teacher understands how to connect
issues).
concepts and use differing perspectives to
PC 5.2 Candidates integrate cross-
engage learners in critical thinking, creativity,
disciplinary skills (such as critical
and collaborative problem solving related to
thinking, creativity, and
authentic local and global issues. Math Midway? – combining math skills with artistic views
collaborative problem solving) to
help learners demonstrate their
learning in unique ways.
Standard 6: Assessment PC 6.1 Candidates plan and
Vermont Licensure Portfolio
Evidence Chart
Approved 7/16, REV 7/17, REV 8/18, REV 7/19
implement multiple methods of
assessment over time, and use the
ILST
The teacher understands and uses multiple results to inform their instructional
methods of assessment to engage learners in practice.
their own growth, to monitor learner progress, PC 6.2 Candidates analyze an
and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s individual student’s work products
decision making. over time, using multiple means of
assessment, in order to adjust Special ED Field Work & Feildnotes
instruction for that student.
PC 7.1 Candidates plan instruction
Standard 7: Planning for Instruction
by drawing upon knowledge of UDL Childhood memories lesson plan
The teacher plans instruction that supports
content areas to meet rigorous UDL Principles of Design lesson plan
every student in meeting rigorous learning
learning goals.
goals by drawing upon knowledge of content
PC 7.2 Candidates plan instruction
areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills,
by drawing upon knowledge of
and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of UDL charcoal lesson plan
learners to meet rigorous learning
learners and the community context.
goals.
PC 8.1 Candidates use a variety of
instructional strategies to make the
Standard 8: Instructional Strategies Special ED Field Work
discipline accessible for diverse
The teacher understands and uses a variety of
learners
instructional strategies to encourage learners
PC 8.2 Candidates use a variety of
to develop deep understanding of content areas
instructional strategies to
and their connections, and to build skills to
encourage learners to build skills Summer Camp Counselor – Arts n crafts & Range Master
apply knowledge in meaningful ways.
to apply knowledge in meaningful
ways.
Part III: Professional Responsibility
Standard Performance Criterion Evidence & Rationale

Standard 9: Professional Learning and PC 9.1 Candidates are prepared for


Ethical Practice self-directed, continuous Youth mental health certification
The teacher engages in ongoing professional professional learning.
Vermont Licensure Portfolio
Evidence Chart
Approved 7/16, REV 7/17, REV 8/18, REV 7/19
learning and uses evidence to continually
evaluate his/her practice, particularly the
PC 9.2 Candidates are prepared to YPT Certification
effects of his/her choices and actions on others
practice in a legal and ethical Summer Camp Counselor
(learners, families, other professionals, and the
manner.
community), and adapts practice to meet the
needs of each learner.
PC 10.1: Candidates are prepared to
Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration collaborate with stakeholders (such
The teacher seeks appropriate leadership roles as learners, families, colleagues, Mentoring Program Certificate (and many more)
and opportunities to take responsibility for other school professionals, or Mentoring Program rebuild & club information
student learning, to collaborate with learners, community members) to ensure
families, colleagues, other school student learning.
professionals, and community members to PC 10.2 Candidates are prepared
ensure learner growth, and to advance the to advance the profession through ILST
profession. advocacy, leadership and/or action Effective speaking speech 2
research.

You might also like