This document provides an evaluation form for assessing student work or assignments. The form is divided into four main sections that are awarded a maximum total score of 100 points: technical content (60 points), organization (10 points), presentation (20 points), and quality of layout and graphics (10 points). Technical content assesses the abstract, introduction, analysis and discussion. Organization examines the introduction, body, conclusions and transitions. Presentation considers spelling, grammar, syntax, and readability. Layout and graphics refer to the overall quality of visual presentation. Space for additional comments and signatures from the advisor and student are also included.
This document provides an evaluation form for assessing student work or assignments. The form is divided into four main sections that are awarded a maximum total score of 100 points: technical content (60 points), organization (10 points), presentation (20 points), and quality of layout and graphics (10 points). Technical content assesses the abstract, introduction, analysis and discussion. Organization examines the introduction, body, conclusions and transitions. Presentation considers spelling, grammar, syntax, and readability. Layout and graphics refer to the overall quality of visual presentation. Space for additional comments and signatures from the advisor and student are also included.
This document provides an evaluation form for assessing student work or assignments. The form is divided into four main sections that are awarded a maximum total score of 100 points: technical content (60 points), organization (10 points), presentation (20 points), and quality of layout and graphics (10 points). Technical content assesses the abstract, introduction, analysis and discussion. Organization examines the introduction, body, conclusions and transitions. Presentation considers spelling, grammar, syntax, and readability. Layout and graphics refer to the overall quality of visual presentation. Space for additional comments and signatures from the advisor and student are also included.
Date: ………………………………… Evaluator: ……………………… Max. Score Comments Technical content (60%) Abstract clearly identifies purpose and summarizes 10 principal content Introduction demonstrates thorough knowledge of 15 relevant background and prior work Analysis and discussion demonstrate good subject 30 mastery Summary and conclusions appropriate and complete 5 Organization (10%) Distinct introduction, body, conclusions 5 Content clearly and logically organized, good transitions 5 Presentation (20%) Correct spelling, grammar, and syntax 10 Clear and easy to read 10 Quality of Layout and Graphics (10%) 10 TOTAL SCORE 100
1. Additional comments (Nhận xét thêm):
Advisor Signature (Chữ ký Người Hướng dẫn): Evaluation Date (Ngày đánh giá):