Team score

Criteria 2 point 4 point 8 point 16 point

Team Support Team Against
Unclear about Seemed to Understood topic Clearly understood
Understanding of debate topic. understand main in-depth topic in- depth and
Topic points. presented
information
Unorganized data, Some moments Organized materials Well organized
Organization evidence and disorganization of and presentation materials and
presentation materials presentation
Debate lacked Less than four Four arguments Five or more
arguments that arguments raised clearly presented to arguments presented
support proposition throughout debate support proposition to support
Arguments
to support proposition,
arguments complex
proposition
and articulate
Few or no relevant Some relevant Debate adequately Numerous support
supporting evidence given, supported with materials given with
Evidence evidence relevant somewhat relevant evidence every point
questionable. addressed
throughout debate
Not convincing few Few style features Most style features Most style features
style features used were used were used were used
Delivery
convincingly effectively convincingly and
persuasively
Arguments were Each member of the Each member of the Each member of the
overlapping, team presented a team presented team presented an
repetitive, or different argument different by argument that built
Teamwork
contradictory with minimal complementary on previous
among teammates. overlap and arguments arguments
repetition
TOTAL SCORE: ______ / 96 _______ /96

Topic: Banning Online shops

 Team score
Criteria 2 point 4 point 8 point 16 point
Team Support Team Against
Unclear about Seemed to Understood topic Clearly understood
Understanding of debate topic. understand main in-depth topic in- depth and
Topic points. presented
information
Unorganized data, Some moments Organized materials Well organized
Organization evidence and disorganization of and presentation materials and
presentation materials presentation
Debate lacked Less than four Four arguments Five or more
arguments that arguments raised clearly presented to arguments presented
support proposition throughout debate support proposition to support
Arguments
to support proposition,
arguments complex
proposition
and articulate
Few or no relevant Some relevant Debate adequately Numerous support
supporting evidence given, supported with materials given with
Evidence evidence relevant somewhat relevant evidence every point
questionable. addressed
throughout debate
Not convincing few Few style features Most style features Most style features
style features used were used were used were used
Delivery
convincingly effectively convincingly and
persuasively
Arguments were Each member of the Each member of the Each member of the
overlapping, team presented a team presented team presented an
repetitive, or different argument different by argument that built
Teamwork
contradictory with minimal complementary on previous
among teammates. overlap and arguments arguments
repetition
TOTAL SCORE: ______ / 96 _______ /96

Topic: President and Vice President Legal Age