Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Draft Methods Guide On The Conduct of HIA For Policies and Programs (For Preparers)
Draft Methods Guide On The Conduct of HIA For Policies and Programs (For Preparers)
Draft Methods Guide On The Conduct of HIA For Policies and Programs (For Preparers)
1
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
13 Acknowledgement
14
15 Editorial Board
16 Beverly Lorraine C. Ho, MD, MPH
17 Rodley Desmond Daniel Carza, RN, MPH
18
19
20 Editorial Staff
21 Frances Claire C. Onagan, MPH
22 Alyzza Vienn M. Eclavea
23 Lizelle Christine Jusayan
24 Karl Mari Clemente
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 Preface
33 This Methods Guide supplements DOH Administrative Order No. 2021-0064:
34 Guidelines on the Implementation of the Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for Policies
35 and Programs pursuant to Republic Act No. 11223, which operationalizes the HIA
36 Process for DOH and non-DOH policies and programs. It outlines the governance
37 structure, procedural framework, and operational guidelines in conducting an HIA
38 for policies and programs anchored on the Social Determinants of Health
39 Framework and as envisioned by the Universal Health Care Act.
40
41 Suggested citation:
42 Department of Health Philippines. 2022. Methods Guide for Conducting Health Impact
43 Assessment for Policies and Programs
44
2
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
45 Table of Contents
46
47 Overview of the HIA Process 1
51 Governance Structure 3
52
55 Screening 6
56 Scoping 8
57 Appraisal 11
58 Endorsement 13
59 Dissemination 13
60
61 Annexes 15
62
63
64
3
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
1
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
2
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
3
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
4
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
5
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
6
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
277 emanating from the HIA Unit shall constitute proof of complete staff work
278 that will be submitted to the Health Policy Development and Planning
279 Bureau. The Requesting Party and/or Policy Owner shall not self-exempt
280 their policy or program plan from the HIA Process on the basis of their
281 understanding of the evaluation criteria.
282
283 All Requesting Parties requiring the endorsement documents on HIA must
284 abide by the submission procedures promulgated in this Methods Guide.
285
286 II. Screening
287
288 Screening of Policies and Programs
289
290 The screening stage shall assess the eligibility of policies and program plans to
291 warrant the conduct of an HIA, and identify preliminary impacts of the policy or
292 program plan to the social determinants of health. The HIA Unit shall ensure that
293 applications satisfy all the initial screening criteria provided in Annex B.
294 Screening Form.
295
296 Identifying Changes in the Social Determinants of Health
297
298 A scoring mechanism shall be utilized to identify the potential impacts of the policy
299 or program to various Social Determinants of Health and its projected level of risk
300 to the general public and/or disadvantaged groups.
301
302 Based on the provided implementing provisions of the policy or program and on
303 best available evidence and literature, the HIA Unit shall identify the social
304 determinants of health that may be positively and/or negatively affected by the
305 policy or program by checking the appropriate box. Further, the HIA Unit shall rate
306 the level of risk/ likely magnitude of the negative effect to the SDH from one (1)
307 being the lowest to three (3) being the highest.
308
309 III. Scoping
310
311 The scoping stage shall develop the assessment plan (i.e., HIA Terms of Reference)
312 and determine key areas of assessment for the conduct of the HIA for the policy
313 or program plan.
314
315 A. Methodology
316
317 The scoping stage employs a two-part process namely the community scoping and
318 technical scoping, which aims to extract both community-based and technical
319 information on the policy or program.
320
7
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
321 To conduct community and technical scoping, the HIA Unit may employ
322 participatory methodologies such as but not limited to key informant interviews,
323 conversation, inter-agency meetings, and/or workshops with the appropriate
324 stakeholders. In conducting the scoping activities, the HIA Unit must ensure that
325 lay knowledge perspectives are gathered from affected group/s of interest as well
326 as technical knowledge from content and subject-matter experts.
327
328 Data gathering techniques and data management employed during the scoping
329 activity/ies shall be conducted based on standard ethical conduct of data
330 gathering and the Data Privacy Act of 2012. The HIA Unit shall exert all means to
331 generate, at the minimum, the following data and information on the group/s of
332 interest:
333
334 1. Special population/s present (e.g. minors or children under 18 years
335 old, elderly, differently-abled persons, refugees or displaced persons,
336 indigenous peoples and ethnic minority groups, etc.
337 2. Demographic characteristics (e.g. population estimate of the group of
338 interest, gender identifications and expressions present,
339 socioeconomic status and distribution, employment and/or sources of
340 income, educational status, etc.)
341 3. Baseline health condition (e.g. disease prevalence and incidence)
342 4. Available and/or accessible health and social services and safety nets
343 (e.g. livelihood programs, access to medicine and health care, social
344 amelioration programs, cash grants, etc.)
345 5. Social risks and issues present among the members of the group of
346 interest (e.g., poverty and homelessness, unemployment,
347 discrimination such as gender, race, religion, culture, age, etc., gender-
348 based violence, violence against children, social disorganization,
349 illiteracy, etc.
350
351 B. Community Scoping
352
353 The HIA Unit shall conduct a stakeholder analysis to identify group/s of interest to
354 be invited in order to gain insight on their perceived impacts of the policy or
355 program plan once implemented.
356
357 C. Technical Scoping
358
359 The HIA Unit shall elicit additional technical information from content or
360 subject-matter experts to determine aspects of the proposed policy or
361 program plan that need to be further investigated during the Appraisal
362 phase of the HIA. Invited technical experts shall be contingent on the
363 identified potential impact as determined in the screening stage.
364
365
366 D. Developing the Health Impact Pathway Diagram
8
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
367
368 The Health Impact Pathway Diagram shall be informed by the insights on
369 potential impact areas that were raised during the community and technical
370 scoping. This exercise shall guide the HIA Unit in prioritizing and
371 systematically identifying the key areas of assessment that will be the focus
372 in the Appraisal stage of the HIA Process.
373
374 The HIA Unit shall provide information on the corresponding categories:
375 1. Policy or Program Component - identify specific implementing
376 measures or components of the policy or program that will be integral
377 in the attainment of the policy/ program goals and objectives
378 2. Proximal Impacts - per policy/program component, enumerate
379 immediate positive and/or negative impacts of the policy or program
380 to the affected population
381 3. Health Determinants - specify the determinant of health that will be
382 affected by the proximal impacts
383 4. Health Indicators - based on best available evidence and initial data
384 collected, identify the health effect caused by the changes in the SDH
385 identified in the previous item
386
9
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
406 analysis in the course of conducting HIA for the policy or program plan under
407 evaluation.
408
409 At the minimum, the HIA TOR shall discuss in detail the following sections:
410 1. Overview of the Policy or Program Plan
411 2. Suggested Methodology
412 a. Data Gathering Methodologies
413 b. Data Analysis Plan
414 c. Timelines
415 3. List of HIA Preparer/s
416
417 Once finalized, the draft HIA Terms of Reference shall be endorsed to the HIA
418 Technical Committee for ad referendum review and approval prior to the
419 commencement of the HIA.
420
421 IV. Appraisal
422
423 The appraisal stage shall gather and synthesize relevant data on impacts using
424 best available data sources, and systematically cull out recommendations for
425 mitigating measures to address the identified health impacts of a policy or
426 program plan if implemented. The conduct of the appraisal stage shall be done
427 based on ethical and scientific conduct of research and data gathering.
428
429 A. Suggested Methodology
430
431 a. Literature Review
432
433 A review of published evidence relevant to the HIA being done will be
434 conducted to supplement the data acquired from the community and
435 technical scoping. The HIA Unit shall collect quantitative and qualitative data
436 from all relevant and available data sources, as well as evidence bases
437 comprising primary and secondary data. The stages and procedures outlined
438 in the London Health Observatory's "A Guide to Reviewing Evidence for Use in
439 Health Impact Assessment" will be used to guide the literature review.
440
441 In conducting literature review, the HIA Unit must ensure that:
442 1. The question/s or key areas of assessment to be analyzed is/are
443 clear and focused, and as identified with the group/s of interest;
444 2. Data and information on group/s of interest and other
445 demographic factors, including vulnerable groups and others with
446 different exposure or susceptibility, are comprehensively collected
447 and collated;
448 3. The purpose of the review is stated clearly;
449 4. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are clearly defined and
450 distinguished;
451 5. Search strategies are explicit and outlined; and,
10
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
11
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
496 - Potential social and cultural impacts on health such as housing and
497 settlement conditions, local education system, local transport or mobility,
498 social cohesion and capital
499 - Potential economic impacts on health such as local livelihood, household
500 employment, and sources of income
501 - Potential Impacts on other health determinants
502
503 The HIA Unit shall comprehensively triangulate evidence collected from
504 technical scoping and literature review with the data gathered from the
505 community scoping to validate evidence and identify critical health impacts to
506 be prioritized for management and mitigation.
507
508 C. Characterization of Potential Impacts
509
510 To assess the level of impact of the identified potential health consequences, the
511 HIA Unit shall discuss and determine - using an assessment matrix (Annex E), the
512 following categories:
513 1. Nature of the impact - whether the identified health impact will cause
514 positive, negative, or unclear impact based on the collected data;
515 2. Likelihood and/or certainty of impact - as defined:
516 a. Definite - as established by evidence from both published literature,
517 grey literature, and scoping evidence
518 b. Probable - as identified in the community and technical scoping
519 with supporting evidence from grey literature
520 c. Speculate - as mentioned in the technical and community scoping
521 with inadequate literary evidence to establish certainty
522 3. Size and severity of possible health consequences - the scale of which the
523 potential impact will affect (i.e., the larger the population group/s, the
524 higher the severity of health consequences)
525
526 The HIA unit shall also identify specific group/s that will bear the identified
527 impact/s and the corresponding nature of the impact in terms of its effect to the
528 identified group/s of interest.
529
530 D. Developing the HIA Report
531
532 A more thorough analysis of the community and the primary areas of assessment
533 is provided in the HIA Report (Annex F. , which is created following the completion
534 of the HIA based on the agreed-upon techniques and scope outlined in the HIA
535 Terms of Reference. The HIA Report details the processes and data collection
536 procedures used, the synthesis of possible impacts and available information, and
537 the conclusions and recommendations of the HIA Preparers based on the
538 examined data.
539
540 The HIA Report shall be developed by the HIA Unit to discuss the HIA conducted
541 and provide information on data collected, summary of analysis, and comments
12
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
542 and recommendations on the policy or program. The report shall be developed in
543 accordance with ethical and scientific integrity standards in developing technical
544 documents.
545
546 The HIA Report for Policies and Programs shall discuss in detail the following
547 sections:
548 1. Evidence from Community and Technical Scoping
549 2. Evidence from Literature Review
550 3. Appraisal of Impacts
551 4. Recommendations
552 a. What to retain
553 b. What to enhance
554 c. What to reconsider
555 d. What to monitor
556
557 E. Convening the Technical Committee
558
559 To triangulate evidence and recommendations provided by the HIA Unit, the HIA
560 Technical Committee shall be convened by the HIA Unit to assess and validate the
561 output, policy or program recommendations, and proposed mitigating measures
562 stipulated in the HIA Report.
563
564 V. Endorsement
565
566 The endorsement stage shall ensure that comments, recommendations, and
567 proposed mitigation measures of the HIA Unit on the policy or program plan
568 under review are disseminated and forwarded to the Requesting Party for their
569 review and consideration.
570
571 The findings of the HIA and the recommendations and mitigating measures
572 provided in the HIA Report are recommendatory in nature for consideration of
573 the Policy Owner. Likewise, it does not represent the official stand of the
574 Department of Health on the policy or program plan under review and should
575 not be used to ascertain the DOH’s official position on other matters relevant to
576 the policy or program plan. Further to this, HIA endorsements emanating from
577 the HIA Unit shall not substitute the final endorsement of the DOH in the
578 issuance of appropriate authorizations.
579
580 The decision to adopt, implement, and monitor the mitigating measures
581 provided in the HIA Report shall be the responsibility of the Policy Owner.
582
583 VI. Dissemination
584
585 To contribute to the policy- and decision-making process of Policy Owners and
586 Concerned Agencies as well as ensure transparency of the HIA Process, the DOH
13
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
587 shall extensively disseminate the HIA outputs and recommendations through
588 various modalities and platforms.
14
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
15
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
634 11. Social Determinants of Health refers to the non-medical factors that influence
635 health outcomes. They are the conditions in which people are born, grow, work,
636 live, and age, and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of
637 daily life. These forces and systems include economic policies and systems,
638 development agendas, social norms, social policies and political systems.
16
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
641 Harris, P., Harris-Roxas, B., Harris, E., & Kemp, L. (2007). (tech.). Health Impact Assessment:
642 A Practical Guide. NSW Department of Health. Retrieved 2022, from
643 https://hiaconnect.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Health_
644 Impact_Assessment_A_Practical_Guide.pdf.
645 Health impact assessment (HIA) tools and methods. World Health Organization. (n.d.).
646 Retrieved 2022, from https://www.who.int/tools/health-impact-assessments
647 Ministry of Health, Department of Hygiene and Prevention. (n.d.). (tech.). A Practical
648 Guideline on Health Impact Assessment in Lao PDR. Retrieved 2022, from
649 http://www.hianetworkasiapac.com/wp-content/uploads/Laos_Health-Impact-
650 Assessment-practical-guideline-complete-.pdf.
651 Mindell J., Biddulph J.P., Boaz A., Boltong A., Curtis S., Joffe M., Lock K, Taylor L. (2006). A
652 Guide to Reviewing Evidence for use in Health Impact Assessment. London: London
653 Health Observatory. Retrieved 2022, from
654 https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/122644/1/Mindell_Reviewing%20Evidence-
655 Final%20v6.4_230806.pdf
17
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Annex A.1. Request for the Conduct of HIA for Policy and Programs (Letter Template)
[DATE]
Good day!
We would like to request for the conduct of a Health Impact Assessment, as operationalized by
the Department of Health (DOH) Administrative Order No. 2021-0064: Guidelines on the
Implementation of the Health Impact Assessment Process for Policies and Programs Pursuant to
Republic Act No. 11223, of the [policy or program plan] with the following details:
1. Title of the Policy or Program Plan:
2. General Objective/s:
3. Policy Owner/s or Author/s:
4. Legal or Policy Basis (if any):
5. Target Implementation Date (Month and/or Year)
Attached herewith are the copies of the draft [policy or program plan] and other reference
documents (if any), for your perusal. Soft copies of the aforementioned documents may be
accessed here: [link to documents]
For questions or clarifications, your office may contact [Name of Focal Person] at [contact
number] or via email at [email address.]
Thank you.
[Signature]
[Name of Requesting Party]
[Affiliation of Requesting Party]
18
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Annex A.2 Request for the Conduct of HIA for Policy and Programs (Memo Template)
[DATE]
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Request for Health Impact Assessment of the [Insert Title of Policy
or Program Plan]
_____________________________________________________________________________
We would like to request for the conduct of a Health Impact Assessment, as operationalized by
the Department of Health (DOH) Administrative Order No. 2021-0064: Guidelines on the
Implementation of the Health Impact Assessment Process for Policies and Programs Pursuant to
Republic Act No. 11223, of the [policy or program plan] with the following details:
1. Title of the Policy or Program Plan:
2. General Objective/s:
3. Policy Owner/s or Author/s:
4. Legal or Policy Basis (if any):
5. Target Implementation Date (Month and/or Year)
Attached herewith are the copies of the draft [policy or program plan] and other reference
documents (if any), for your perusal. Soft copies of the aforementioned documents may be
accessed here: [link to documents]
For questions or clarifications, your office may contact [Name of Focal Person] at [contact
number] or via email at [email address.]
Thank you.
19
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Annex B. Screening Form
FORM 1
SCREENING FORM
To be filled up by the HIA Unit
Y/N Remarks
Biophysical Environment
Housing Conditions
Working Conditions
Noise
Food Supply
20
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Employment
Job stability
Employment opportunities
Income
Cost-of-living
Access to financial services
Household Cohesion
Vulnerable Population
Children under 18 years old
Pregnant Women
Senior Citizens
Ethnic Minority Group
People with disabilities
People living in isolated areas
Chronically Ill
Unemployed
Indigent Population
Diet
Physical Activity
Substance abuse
Tobacco use
Alcohol use
Prescription drug abuse
Illicit drug abuse
Sexual behavior
21
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Local Services
Education
Childcare
Housing services
Transportation
TOTAL:
LEVEL OF RISK:
Y/N REMARKS
22
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Annex C. HIA Terms of Reference
FORM 2
HIA Terms of Reference
Scope of Evidence
Key Area of Research Type of Data Data Sources
Assessment Question Needed
Data Analysis Plan Provide information and work plan for data analysis
23
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Annex D. Thematic Content Analysis Framework
Data Code Key Area of Assessment Additional Key Area (if any)
24
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Annex E. Assessment Matrix
Policy or Affected SDH/ Source of Potential Nature of Impact1 Size of Likelihood4 Groups, Nature of Differential Impacts
Program KRA Information Impact Magnitude3 Communities, or
Component Populations
+ - Unclear +/-/Unclear Is this Is this
Bearing
Avoidable fair?
Differential
Impacts5
Component 1 Determinant 1
Determinant 2
Notes
Component 1 Determinant 1
Determinant 2
Notes
1
Impacts can be both positive and negative - provide notes on what aspects are negative, positive, unclear.
2
Long, medium or short. Note the information this assessment of timing of impacts is based on.
3
Large, medium, small, or negligible. Note the information this assessment of magnitude is based on and why that category was chosen.
4
Definite, probable, or speculate. Note the information this assessment of likelihood is based on.
5
List groups, communities, or populations who may bear differential impacts. At a minimum, consider differential impacts in terms of age, gender, ethnicity/culture,
socioeconomic position and locational disadvantage. Include the size of the population (large, medium, small, negligible, unclear), noting the information this assessment
of size is based on.
6
High, medium, low, or negligible. Note the information this assessment of achieving change is based on.
25
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
Annex F. HIA Report
FORM 4
HIA Report
Evidence Synthesis of Present and triangulate all relevant empirical evidence on the predicted
Potential Impacts impacts of the policy or program plan to health and its determinants.
Discussion of evidence may include:
Characterization of Using the assessment matrix, describe the nature of the impact, likelihood
Potential Impacts and/or certainty of impact, severity or magnitude of potential health
consequence, and inequitable distribution of impacts (if any)
What to retain
26
Draft version. For copyediting and layouting in alignment with the Healthy Pilipinas branding.
What to enhance
What to reconsider
What to monitor
Contact Person
Signature
27