Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fix Collaborative Assessment

    Uploaded by

    Khalida Kirana
    9 views2 pages
    The document provides a collaborative assessment of a video lesson on a topic. It assesses the lesson material, learning design, audio/video quality, and video implementation based on criteria. Overall, the lesson received a total point of 46 out of 60, indicating it was well organized, had good explanation depth and references, suitable authentic content, clear audio, and was engaging for both individual and group learning. Some areas for improvement included providing more detail in some explanations and making the audio slightly louder.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    fix Collaborative assessment

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides a collaborative assessment of a video lesson on a topic. It assesses the lesson material, learning design, audio/video quality, and video implementation based on criteria. Overall, the lesson received a total point of 46 out of 60, indicating it was well organized, had good explanation depth and references, suitable authentic content, clear audio, and was engaging for both individual and group learning. Some areas for improvement included providing more detail in some explanations and making the audio slightly louder.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    9 views2 pages

    Fix Collaborative Assessment

    Uploaded by

    Khalida Kirana
    The document provides a collaborative assessment of a video lesson on a topic. It assesses the lesson material, learning design, audio/video quality, and video implementation based on criteria. Overall, the lesson received a total point of 46 out of 60, indicating it was well organized, had good explanation depth and references, suitable authentic content, clear audio, and was engaging for both individual and group learning. Some areas for improvement included providing more detail in some explanations and making the audio slightly louder.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Collaborative Assessment

    Instruments Criteria Point


    1 (poor) 2 (bad) 3 (average) 4 (good) 5 (excellent)
    a. The lesson (the topic
    material)
    1. Clear organized – well understood

    2. Depth explanation

    3. Adequate reference used

     Comment/review Good presentation for the presenter’s about the material is easy to be understanding

    b. Learning design 1. The content delivered in the video is suitable for students’ characteristics

    2. The content delivered in the video helps students to understand the
    lesson easily 
    3. The materials reflect a situation that learners may face in an English-
    speaking environment (Authentic material) 
     Comment/review a good learning design because it is wrapped with the progress of the times and the
    discussion is very easy to understand
    c. The audio n video quality 1. Clear and brief audio provided

    2. Language being used is clear in line with the learning objective

    3. Appropriate sound effect

     Comment/review for the sound in the video it's actually not loud enough but it can still be heard enough
    to make us understand
    d. Video implementation 1. It is suitable for both individual and collaborative learning

    2. Attract students’ motivation and interest

    3. Interactive video learning

     Comment/review the video really explains the content of the material even though there are things that
    need to be explained in more detail
    TOTAL POINT 46

    You might also like