Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study Report
Case Study Report
CHILD DEVELOPMENT
Physical Development
The child is physically sound and has no health problems when asked from her mother.
Cognitive Development
The child seems to be cognitively healthy as per Piaget’s theory.She exhibits a high level of
intelligence while performing the task-in identifying each person’s phone and taking to sub-
mit in the room at the right time.She is seen to be submitting her toy phone too.Her careful-
ness while holding the phone is surprising as if she knew the consequence if it happens to slip
from hand.She grasps and learns things so fast like the names of different colors and things
around her.Her sharp memory in identifying her father despite being away from him and not
having any sort of connection with him for more than eight months is remarkable.
Social Development
The child makes independent choice while selecting what to wear.She is hesitant to wear
what her mom chooses for her.She selects with respect to the color and the type of dress she
likes.She has her own choice when it comes to food also.She disapproves to have food if it is
given in a plate she dislikes and by someone she dislikes despite having a need for it.
Case Analysis
TASK 1:Submitting the Mobile Phones.
The child exhibited excellent performance.This could be the result of her keen observation of
things.She showcases excellent cognitive abilities as per Piaget’s theory:she shows centra-
tion- in her act of submitting her toy phone along with other mobile phones, she is able to
think about things symbolically which is evident from her act of considering a card or even a
price tag to be an actual phone and talking over someone using it.
TASK 2:Cloth Selection.
The child expressed self-confidence, great emotions of autonomy and independence in mak-
ing choices as per Erikson’s theory.
Suggested Intervention
No intervention is necessary since the child is completely normal in all regards.Child is in
perfect physical, cognitive and social health.
Conclusion
In conclusion, as the sample child chosen for observation is average in all observed areas, it
was a fair choice to track the developmental flaws/perfections.The different developmental
stages observed in the child and the theories relating to them were compared and a case anal-
ysis has been sketched.It can be concluded that the theories have the majority of the stages
accurate.However, if a child who developed somewhat below average had been chosen, the
data might have produced a more vivid image that contrasts normal and below normal devel-
opment, making the study more fascinating.
Executive Summary
A study to understand various stages of child development (physical, cognitive and social)is
done on a two year old female child from a middle-class family.The child is physically fit and
showcased good cognitive and social development.The child’s different developmental stages
align with Piaget’s theory on cognitive development and Erikson’s theory on psychosocial
development.
References
Ansorge, R. (2010, October 14). Piaget Stages of development. WebMD.
https://www.webmd.com/children/piaget-stages-of-development
Mcleod, S., PhD. (2023). Piaget’s preoperational stage (Ages 2-7). Simply Psychology.
https://www.simplypsychology.org/preoperational.html
Drew, V. S. a. P. R. B. C. (2023, September 2). Autonomy vs Shame and Doubt: 10 Exam-
ples (Erikson 2nd Stage) (2023). Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/autonomy-
vs-shame-and-doubt-examples/
Valentine-French, M. L. a. S. (n.d.). Piaget’s preoperational stage of cognitive development |
Lifespan development.
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-lifespandevelopment/chapter/piagets-preoperational-
stage-of-cognitive-development/
Autonomy vs. Doubt and shame: Erik Erikson. (n.d.).
https://www.tutorialspoint.com/autonomy-vs-doubt-and-shame-erik-erikson
Mental Health with Dr Amy. (2021, July 13). 🛑AUTONOMY VS SHAME AND DOUBT
IN
PSYCHOSOCIAL STAGE 2 👉 Mental health [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhxURfrM-B0