Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Online Food Delivery
Online Food Delivery
Group Members:
One of the primary aims of this survey is to find the most used food delivery
app and to understand the reasons that contributed to its popularity. We also
intend to find how various factors like covid and ease of access have changed
the perspective of people towards different food delivery apps and derive the
level of satisfaction and perceive the interests of consumers regarding online
food ordering. This project focuses on analyzing what influenced the rise of
these apps in the modern period and what is currently driving the delivery apps
in today's digital market.
Target Population:
Sample Size:
120 people
Objectives:
Confidentiality Note:
Your responses are voluntary and will be confidential. This survey is meant for
educational purposes only. Any information will not be disclosed to a third
party under any circumstances.
The pilot survey conducted had a total of responses of 20 people out of the
mentioned target. The method used for the pilot survey was convenience
sampling. The pilot survey was conducted using google form. The google form
was circulated to the respondents with the confidentiality note and the thank you
note. From the responses received it was indicated that the questions present
were good to analyze and to be finalized with some minor changes in it.
Questionnaire draft :
1. Age
- below 18
- 18-30
- Above 30
2. Gender
- Male
- Female
- Other
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
5. Are you staying with your family?
- Yes
- No
- Hostel
- PG
- Flat/house
- Other
- Restaurant website
- Restaurant apps
- Third party apps(eg: swiggy,zomato)
1.Quality of food
2. User friendliness
3. Discount
4. On time delivery
5. Service quality
6. Relatively cheaper
- Yes
- No
- Daily
- Weekly
- Monthly
13.On an average, how much money( in Rs) do you spend monthly to order
food online?
Analysis :
Out of the 112 responses we got, 52 were females and the rest were males.
85.7% of our respondents were students and 83.2% were employed. Majority of
our respondents were either staying with their family or other roommates. Only
a negligible percent of our sample population were living alone.
Total
14
12
10
0
Total
Less than once a month
Once a month
Once a week
Once a week
Daily or nearly everyday
Moved out and living with Staying with family Living alone Moved out Staying with family
roommate/s and living
with
roommate/s
Unemployed Employed
30
25
20
15
10
Total
5
0
500 to Less than 1000 to 500 to Less than Less than Less than More 1000 to 500 to Less than
1000 500 2000 1000 500 500 500 than 2000 2000 1000 500
Moved out and Staying with family Living Moved out and Staying with family
living with alone living with
roommate/s roommate/s
Unemployed Employed
Source SS DF
MS \
0 Are you employed 5.580157e+05 1.0 558015.67
0287
1 Are you a student 4.348875e+04 1.0 43488.7
48271
2 Are you employed * Are you a student 2.496312e+05 1.0 249631.21
6494
3 Residual 1.467455e+07 109.0 134628.
855127
F p-unc np2
0 4.144845 0.044186 0.036633
1 0.323027 0.570963 0.002955
2 1.854218 0.176102 0.016727
3 NaN NaN NaN
The p value for the employment status (0.044186) is less than 0.05 which
implies that the unemployment status possesses a statistically significant effect
on the money spent on various food delivery apps. The factor of being a student
has a p value (0.570963) greater than 0.05 which depicts that, it has no
statistically significant effect on the money spent. The p value of the interaction
effect (0.176102) is greater than 0.05, hence there is no significant interaction
effect between employment status and whether he/she is a student or not.