AVL List GmbH (Headquarters)

Global Vehicle Benchmarking

グローバル車両ベンチマーク
Objective vehicle testing, analysis and comparison to competitors
定量的な車両評価、解析、及び競合車との比較
 Global AVL Network for Vehicle Benchmarking
車両ベンチマークにおけるAVLの国際ネットワーク

> 100 PEFORMANCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

new vehicles per year cost efficient

DRIVEABILITY REAL WORLD DRIVING

> 500 customer

HANDLING ENERGY EFFICIENCY

vehicles in database individual RIDE COMFORT DRIVING RESISTANCE

SOUND/NVH CHARGING EXPERIENCE

> 60 independent
vehicle ADAS QUALITY
benchmarking staff
comparison

11 11 functional driving attributes

target setting >1000 single criteria
global affiliates

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 2
Fun-to-Drive – Efficiency Balance
運転する楽しさ と 高効率 のバランス

FUN-TO-DRIVE EFFICIENCY

PEFORMANCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

AVL-DRIVE™
DRIVEABILITY REAL WORLD DRIVING

HANDLING ENERGY EFFICIENCY

RIDE COMFORT DRIVING RESISTANCE

making driving SOUND/NVH CHARGING EXPERIENCE

experiences
measureable and
assessable ADAS QUALITY

Objective KPIs for all driving attributes

運転に関する指標全てについて定量的評価指標(KPI)を設定
Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 3
 Global Vehicle Benchmarking 国際車両ベンチマーク
Key aspects and process 鍵となる着眼点 と 業務プロセス
Why does it necessary to benchmark competitor vehicle? なぜ競合車両をベンチマークする必要がある？

Comparison to Characterization and Defining potential for

Scouting technologies
competition Branding optimization

How does AVL do it? AVLはどうやってベンチマークを実施している？

Automatic
Operation Mode
Detection

Online
Parameter Automatic
Calculation Report
Generation

Instant
Attributes
Assessment

Vehicle Instrumentation Vehicle Testing Report – Highlights and Vehicle Target Setting
(test tracks and dynos) improvement potential

How long does it take? 時間はどれぐらい掛かる？

1. Instrumentation, data acquisition/testing and assessment: ~ 3-5 weeks 計測準備・テスト・解析で3～5週間

2. Customer report generation: ~ 3 weeks 顧客レポート作成で～3週間
Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 4
 What’s new in AVL’s data base?
AVLのデータベース品揃えの最新ラインナップ(予定)？
*SO: system output

~30 electric/fuel cell 2019 Nissan Leaf e+ 2019 Hyundai Nexo 2019 Audi Q6 etron
(BEV, 62kWh) (BEV, 95kWh)
electric vehicles
(FCEV, 1.65kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019
Existing vehicle database
already including

2018 NIO ES8 2019 Mercedes EQC 2019 Roewe Marvel X

(BEV, 70kWh) (BEV, 80kWh) (BEV, 52,5kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q3/2019

~50 gasoline
PHEV/HEV vehicles
2019 BMW 330i 2019 Infinty QX50 2019 VW Golf GTI TCR
(AT8, 190kW) (CVT, 200kW) (DCT7, 213kW)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019

~200 gasoline vehicles 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
(HEV, SO:163kW,
4.6l/100km)
Planning in progress
2019 Honda Accord 2019 Honda CR-V Hybrid
Hybrid (HEV, SO:135kW,
(HEV, SO:156kW, 5.5l/100km)
5l/100km) Planning in progress
Planning in progress

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～ がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 5
Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 6
 Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例
16
9.6 9.6
2.6

14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12

8.1
Attribute Rating

10 7.7 7.8

16.6
8 7.5 7.1
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7 VW eGolf
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0

5.7
2
5.5

DR … AVL-DRIVE Rating
0
Efficiency Electric range 0-100 80-120 Agility Body motion Max. lateral Powerfulness Pedal to Transient Speed Assist Lane Assist
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR] Chevrolet Bolt
[kWh/100km] [km] [m/s²] [DR] [DR] [DR]

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

(in total more than 800 single criteria for driving attributes)

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 7
 Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例
Class leading scores for
16 handling, but big potentials for
State of the art electric range 9.6
longitudinal handling 9.6
2.6
also due to high recuperation
14 11.7
rates
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12

8.1 Potential for improvements for

Leading in longitudinal
ADAS quality, esp. due to TOF
Attribute Rating

7.7 7.8
Overall acceptable efficiency performance
10
switch cut-out
level 16.6
(high vehicle mass and
7.1
8
mid aerodynamics) 7.5
7.0
Good acceleration feel and
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
dynamic character in full load
6.7 and part load condition & quick VW eGolf
6.6
160
6.2
transient response
4
6.0

5.7
2
5.5

DR … AVL-DRIVE Rating
0
Efficiency Electric range 0-100 80-120 Agility Body motion Max. lateral Powerfulness Pedal to Transient Speed Assist Lane Assist
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR] Chevrolet Bolt
[kWh/100km] [km] [m/s²] [DR] [DR] [DR]

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

(in total more than 800 single criteria for driving attributes)

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 8
 Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例
16
9.6 9.6
2.6

14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12

What is Tesla’s operation

8.1 strategy
to reach high driving range?
Attribute Rating

10 7.7 7.8

8
16.6
Let’s have a deeper7.5look 7.1
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0

5.7
2
5.5

DR … AVL-DRIVE Rating
0
Efficiency Electric range 0-100 80-120 Agility Body motion Max. lateral Powerfulness Pedal to Transient Speed Assist Lane Assist
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR]
[kWh/100km] [km] [m/s²] [DR] [DR] [DR]

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

(in total more than 1000 single criteria for driving attributes)

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 9
 Inside into Energy Management & Efficiency
エネルギーマネジメントと高効率の内訳

HV E-MOTOR
75 kWh
REAR AXLE
192 367
kW Nm ENERGY LOSS

18.0 17.8 15.0

3.8 3.9 4.0

Recuperated Energy 9.6

Consumed Energy HV System

AUX. LOAD

Units in kWh/100km

1.6

Recuperated energy:3.8kWh/100km Full utilization of system

Peak recuperation power in WLTC: 55kW capabilities for
System potential for recuperation: 56kW increased driving range

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 10
 Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例
16
9.6 9.6
2.6

14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12
What is Tesla’s performance feel
8.1
and how is the consistency 7.8
over
Attribute Rating

10 7.7
battery SOC?
16.6
8
Let’s have
7.5 a deeper look 7.1
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0

5.7
2
5.5

DR … AVL-DRIVE Rating
0
Efficiency Electric range 0-100 80-120 Agility Body motion Max. lateral Powerfulness Pedal to Transient Speed Assist Lane Assist
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR]
[kWh/100km] [km] [m/s²] [DR] [DR] [DR]

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

(in total more than 800 single criteria for driving attributes)

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 11
 Performance – 0-100kph 0-100km/h加速性能
Competitive landscape 市場競争力の見通し

• The Model 3 shows excellent 0-

100 kph acceleration considering
the weight to power ratio
• It keeps up with models that have
about a 20% better weight to
power ratio and reaches the same
acceleration time

2018 Tesla Model 3

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 12
 Performance from standstill
静止状態からの車両性能(パフォーマンス)
Full load acceleration from Standstill

Tesla Model 3 Tesla Model 3

Weight: 1870 kg OEM data
High SOC Low SOC
0 to 40 kph 2.0 s 2.1 s
Track: dry, 10 deg C 0 to 80 kph 4.1 s 4.3 s

0 to 100 kph 5.5 s 6.1 s 5.3 s

Mode:
Default (only one is 0 to 140 kph 9.9 s 11.9 s
available)
0 to 180 kph 17.5 s 22.6 s • Tesla Model 3 misses the OEM data by
0 to 200 kph 23.4 s 32.0 s
0.2 seconds. With low SOC the car
performs significantly worse than with
0 to 220 kph 32.2 s 48.9 s high SOC especially at speeds above
100 kph.
Initial acceleration 5.4 m/s²
[m/s²]

Standing quarter
miles/ 14.0 @ 163 kph
400 m time

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 13
 Performance Acceleration from standstill
Dependency on SOC SOC依存の加速性能

Accelerator pedal [%]

0-200 kph times

Each dot describes the
Result of one single
maneuver
Acceleration Chassis [m/s2]

0-100 kph times Battery SOC [%]

Vehicle Speed [kph]

• The acceleration times to 100 kph stay consistent over the SOC range.
• Over 100 kph the difference between the SOC levels result in much different acceleration times.
• The lower the SOC the longer the 0-200 kph time. The car looses approximately 8 seconds between the fastest (Full SOC) and
slowest times (20% SOC)
Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 14
 Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例
16
9.6 9.6
2.6

14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12

8.1 What is Tesla’s character for lateral

dynamics?
Attribute Rating

10 7.7 7.8

8
16.6 Let’s have a deeper
7.1
look
7.5
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0

5.7
2
5.5

DR … AVL-DRIVE Rating
0
Efficiency Electric range 0-100 80-120 Agility Body motion Max. lateral Powerfulness Pedal to Transient Speed Assist Lane Assist
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR]
[kWh/100km] [km] [m/s²] [DR] [DR] [DR]

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

(in total more than 800 single criteria for driving attributes)

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 15
 HANDLING EVALUATION ハンドリング評価
Body motion 車体の動きに関する評価

The main operation mode Body Motion

rates the body motion of the vehicle in
terms of pitch and roll.
This occurs due to lateral and
longitudinal acceleration forces
generated by accelerating, braking, or
cornering.

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 16
 HANDLING EVALUATION ハンドリング評価
Body motion – Cornering 車体の動きー特にコーナリングに関して

Roll Angle and Roll Characteristic in

cornering situations
The 3D plot shows the relation between
roll angle and lateral acceleration.

Roll angle gradient ~3.1°/g This relation is normally linear, which

enables the calculation of a gradient.

Roll angle gradient: ~3.1°/g

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 17
 Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例
16
9.6 9.6
2.6

14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12

8.1 Why is the Model 3 better rated for

driveability than the competitor?
Attribute Rating

10 7.7 7.8

8
16.6
7.5 7.1 Let’s have a deeper look
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0

5.7
2
5.5

DR … AVL-DRIVE Rating
0
Efficiency Electric range 0-100 80-120 Agility Body motion Max. lateral Powerfulness Pedal to Transient Speed Assist Lane Assist
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR]
[kWh/100km] [km] [m/s²] [DR] [DR] [DR]

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

(in total more than 800 single criteria for driving attributes)

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 18
 Linking drivers perception to physical data
運転者の認知と、物理的データの相関
Deep understanding of “Why”,
Leading position for dynamic feel
based on measurement data
describing driving characteristics

Dynamic acceleration feel

Acceptable controllability
Good level comfort

Objective assessment of “How” Tesla Model 3

Linear pedal map

Good controllability
Class leading comfort

Chevrolet Bolt

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 19
Target setting and Requirement engineering
目標設定と要求工学

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 20
 Customer Market Profile and Target List
顧客の市場プロファイルと目標(値)一覧
Performance

High Moderate

Driveability

Engaging Relaxed
Objective targets Energy
COMFORT Efficiency
Objective targets High Low
SPORTY
Handling

Dynamic Relaxed

Ride Comfort

Controlled Comfortable

Sound /
NVH
Powerful Luxury

Brake & ESC

Aggressive Stable

Further
attributes

Public HighKogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 21 Low
Manfred
 Driveability - Drive away 全開加速時のドライバビリティ
Detailed assessment criteria for „Drive away - Standing start“

Overall competitor character

Target
• best in class ratings for response
delay
• excellent ratings for jerks for all
events
• lowest rating for bump at
Overall
rating standing start (7.3) indicates a
(weighted more dynamic oriented vehicle
average of a Ratings (weighted
high number average) for detailed
calibration
of single criteria characterizing the
maneuvers) maneuver “Drive away” Target
high demand for driving comfort
→ Still good response rating, but
high scores for comfort relevant
criteria, esp. “Bump” (max.
gradient of longitudinal accel-
eration)

Competitor A

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 22
 Drive away 全開加速
Target setting and requirement engineering 目標設定と要求工学

From vehicle targets to system requirements

Component specification and selection according to
• Transient response characteristic
• Max torque build-up gradient
• Max torque level

Competitor A

Competitor A Competitor A Competitor A

Target
Target

Each dot
describes the
rating of one
single maneuver

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 23
Charging experience 充電性能
An additional aspect in vehicle benchmarking of electrified vehicles
電気自動車(Battery EV)に関する車両ベンチマークの新しい指標

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 24
 Charging experience Benchmarking
充電性能ベンチマーク

Project with fast Influence of battery Charging performance

charging and Chassis temperature to charging and efficiency in
Dyno Tests performance different power classes

Comparison of ELECTRIC VEHICLES with focus on customer usability

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 25
 Charging efficiency 充電効率
100
Recharge efficiency [%]

95

90 Models have different charging concepts

85
40kW (DC) Charging efficiency is almost
independent from battery temp
80
22kW

75 BMW i3 A
Vehicle Charging efficiency strongly depends on
11kW charging power
Chevrolet
Vehicle BBolt
70 C-segment
7kW BEVs Hyundai
VehicleIoniq
C
Charging power is heavily impacting
65 Renault
VehicleZoe
D charging duration
2kW VW eGolf E
Vehicle
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Average charge power [kW]

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 26
What’s new in AVL’s data base?
AVLのデータベース品揃えの最新ラインナップ(予定)？

Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 27
 What’s new in AVL’s data base?
AVLのデータベース品揃えの最新ラインナップ(予定)？
*SO: system output

~30 electric/fuel cell 2019 Nissan Leaf e+ 2019 Hyundai Nexo 2019 Audi Q6 etron
(BEV, 62kWh) (BEV, 95kWh)
electric vehicles
(FCEV, 1.65kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019
Existing vehicle database
already including

2018 NIO ES8 2019 Mercedes EQC 2019 Roewe Marvel X

(BEV, 70kWh) (BEV, 80kWh) (BEV, 52,5kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q3/2019

~50 gasoline
PHEV/HEV vehicles
2019 BMW 330i 2019 Infinty QX50 2019 VW Golf GTI TCR
(AT8, 190kW) (CVT, 200kW) (DCT7, 213kW)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019

~200 gasoline vehicles 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
(HEV, SO:163kW,
4.6l/100km)
Planning in progress
2019 Honda Accord 2019 Honda CR-V Hybrid
Hybrid (HEV, SO:135kW,
(HEV, SO:156kW, 5.5l/100km)
5l/100km) Planning in progress
Planning in progress

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～ がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 28
 What’s new in AVL’s data base?
AVLのデータベース品揃えの最新ラインナップ(予定)？
*SO: system output

~30 electric/fuel cell

弊社AVLのベンチマークプログラムにご興味があるお客様は是非、 2019 Nissan Leaf e+
(BEV, 62kWh)
2019 Hyundai Nexo 2019 Audi Q6 etron
(BEV, 95kWh)
electric vehicles
(FCEV, 1.65kWh)
Q2/2019 Q2/2019

弊社営業担当にお問い合わせください
Q3/2019
Existing vehicle database
already including

• どんな車両がAVLデータベースにラインナップされている (今後の予定)？ 2018 NIO ES8

(BEV, 70kWh)
2019 Mercedes EQC
(BEV, 80kWh)
2019 Roewe Marvel X
(BEV, 52,5kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q3/2019

• 〇〇という着眼点のデータのみ(一部切り分け)が欲しいが、可能か？
~50 gasoline
PHEV/HEV vehicles
2019 BMW 330i 2019 Infinty QX50 2019 VW Golf GTI TCR

• 予算管理の関係上 すぐに成果が欲しい・・・可能か？ (AT8, 190kW)

Q2/2019
(CVT, 200kW)
Q3/2019
(DCT7, 213kW)
Q2/2019

• 新しい車両を企画している、ベンチマークをどう生かすべきか？
→別資料
~200 Vehicle
gasoline Concept Engineering も是非ご覧ください
vehicles 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
(HEV, SO:163kW,
2019 Honda Accord
Hybrid
2019 Honda CR-V Hybrid
(HEV, SO:135kW,
4.6l/100km) (HEV, SO:156kW, 5.5l/100km)
Planning in progress 5l/100km) Planning in progress
Planning in progress

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～ がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 29
Thank You

www.avl.com