Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intermediate Microeconomics and Its Application 11th Edition Nicholson Solutions Manual
Intermediate Microeconomics and Its Application 11th Edition Nicholson Solutions Manual
Intermediate Microeconomics and Its Application 11th Edition Nicholson Solutions Manual
1
2 Chapter 10: General Equilibrium and Welfare
b. See Graph
c. The production possibility frontier is the set of food and cloth outputs that sat-
isfy both constraints (see graph).
d. The frontier is concave because the two goods use differing factor proportions.
The slope changes as a different input becomes the binding constraint.
e. The constraints intersect at F = 50. For F < 50 the slope of the frontier is -1.
P
Hence, in this range, F = 1 . For 50 < F < 75 the slope of the frontier is -2
PC
P
(because land is the binding constraint). In this range therefore F = 2 .
PC
PF 5
f. With these preferences, = .
PC 4
g. Any price ratio between 1.0 and 2.0 will cause production to occur at the kink
in the frontier.
h. This capital constraint lies always outside the previous production possibility
frontier. It will not therefore affect any of the calculations earlier in this prob-
lem.
2 2
b. If Y = 2X, X + 2(2X) = 900.
2
9X = 900; X = 10, Y = 20. This point is shown on the frontier in part a.
c. If X = 9 on the production possibility frontier,
Y = 819 / 2 = 20.24
Given H = 16, U = 4F¼ C¼ and we know that optimality will require C = F since the
goods enter both the utility function and the production possibility frontier symmetri-
2
cally. Since C = F, have 2C = 8 or C = F = 2. Utility = 4 2.
10.5 a. Given the production conditions, the production possibility frontier will be a
straight line with slope - 3/2. Hence the price ratio in this economy must be
PX 3 X Y
= . The equation for the frontier is + = 20 .
PY 2 2 3
3 5 8
b. Using the hint, X S = XJ = XT =
PX PX PX
12
Similarly YT = . Substituting these into the equation for the frontier and us-
PY
2P 4 4 10 1 1
ing the fact that PY = X yields + = = 20 PX = ; PY = . Notice
3 Px PY PX 2 3
how setting the wage here also sets the absolute price level.
Chapter 10: General Equilibrium and Welfare 5
c. With these prices, total demand for X is 16, total demand for Y is 36. Hence 12
hours of labor must be devoted to Y production, 8 hours to X.
10.6 a. For region A the production possibility frontier is X A2 + YA2 = 100 . For region
B it is X B2 + YB2 = 25 . Hence the frontiers are concentric circles with radius 10
for A and 5 for B.
b. Production in both regions must have the same slope of the production possi-
bility frontier. In this case that means that the ratio X/Y must be the same in
both regions – production must take place along a ray through the origin.
c. The geometry of this situation suggests that for efficiency
X A = 2 X B YA = 2YB . Hence X T = 3 X B YT = 3YB and the frontier is given
by X T2 + YT2 = 9( X B2 + YB2 ) = 225 . If X T = 12 YT = 9 .
10.7 a. U1 = 10 U 2 = 5 .
F2
b. F1 = which implies F1 = 40 F2 = 160 .
4
c. The allocation in part a achieves this result --
F1 = F2 = 100 U1 = 10 U 2 = 5 .
d. A natural suggestion would be to maximize the sum of utilities. This would
1 1
require that marginal utilities be equal. Because MU1 = MU 2 =
2 F1 4 F2
equality of marginal utilities requires F1 = 4F2 F1 = 160; F2 = 40 -- a rather
unequal distribution. Still the sum of utilities is 15.8 – the largest possible.
With an equal allocation the sum of utilities, for example, is 15.0.
10.8 a. The total value of transactions is 20w. So, money supply = 60 = money de-
1 12 1 12
mand = 5w. So w = 12. PX = = 0.6 PY = = 0.4 .
2 10 3 10
b. If the money supply increases to 90, all wages and prices increase by 50 per-
cent: w = 18, PX = 0.9, PY = 0.6 . Relative prices and the overall allocation of
resources remain the same. Yes, this economy exhibits the classical dichoto-
my.
6 Chapter 10: General Equilibrium and Welfare
10.10 a. The preferences of Smith and Jones are shown in the figure. The only ex-
change ratio that can prevail is set by Jones’ preferences – 1C must trade for
0.75H. On the other hand, all efficient allocations must lie along the main di-
agonal of the box where, because of Smith’s preferences, C = 2H.
b. This is an equilibrium – the allocation lies on the contract curve and any trade
would make at least one person worse off.
c. Now the initial position is off the contract curve. Smith has 20“extra” H. If
Jones gets all the gains from trade because Smith gives these to him/her, utility
will increase from U J = 4(40) + 3(120) = 520 to U J = 4(60) + 3(120) = 600 . If
Smith gets all the gains from trade, the new equilibrium requires
4 H + 3C = 520 and C = 2 H . Hence, the equilibrium requires Jones to get H =
52, C = 104. Smith gets H = 48, C = 96 and is much better off than at the ini-
tial allocation. Smith may be able to enforce this equilibrium or, if he/she is
especially strong may in fact take everything.