Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulations of Circular Cylinders Undergoing Two Degree-of-Freedom Vortex-Induced Vibrations
Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulations of Circular Cylinders Undergoing Two Degree-of-Freedom Vortex-Induced Vibrations
158 / Vol. 129, AUGUST 2007 Copyright © 2007 by ASME Transactions of the ASME
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering AUGUST 2007, Vol. 129 / 159
冉 冊
sources, which precludes simulations with a larger spanwise
length with adequate spanwise resolution. 4* 2 2
2 CD共t兲
ẍ + ẋ + x= 共1兲
U* U* m*
冉 冊
Flow Past a Fixed Cylinder
4* 2 2
2 CL共t兲
First, we consider the flow past a fixed cylinder at Re= 105. In ÿ + ẏ + y= 共2兲
this range of Reynolds number, the only three-dimensional simu- U* U* m*
lation results are those reported by Breuer 关7兴 at Re= 1.4⫻ 105, where the dimensionless parameters m*, *, and U* are the struc-
using LES. Still higher Reynolds numbers have been recently at- tural mass ratio, damping ratio, and reduced velocity, respectively.
tempted by Catalano et al. 关8兴 using LES and a wall model, with CD is the instantaneous drag coefficient, and CL is the instanta-
not very accurate results toward the higher end of their Reynolds neous lift coefficient.
number range. Direct numerical simulations have been performed Thus, the problem of VIV is essentially a fluid-structure inter-
at Re= 104 only recently by Dong and Karniadakis 关5兴, using over action problem, where the structure responds instantaneously to
1500 processors in parallel. the fluid-induced lift and drag forces. These forces are computed
At this Reynolds number, the flow is still subcritical, with the using the instantaneous velocity and pressure fields at each time
boundary layer separating laminarly and transition taking place in step, by performing a numerical integration around the circumfer-
the free shear layers close to the wall. As alluded to earlier, we ence of the cylinder. The cylinder is then displaced at each time
avoid the use of any kind of wall functions or transition models step, by numerically solving Eqs. 共1兲 and 共2兲, and the flow field is
and resolve the boundary layer by using fine grid spacing near the time advanced and recomputed to yield new instantaneous lift and
cylinder surface and using the no-slip boundary condition. The drag forces.
near-wall spacing in the radial direction of the cylindrical grid The overset grid capabilities allow for relative motion between
wrapped around the cylinder is taken as ⌬r / D = 10/ Re= 10−4, grid components, allowing for arbitrarily large motions of the cyl-
which is four times smaller than the near-wall spacing used by inder without the need for tedious and costly grid regeneration
Breuer 关7兴. In all our computations, we take the Smagorinsky and/or mesh deformation monitoring. In essence, the grid wrapped
constant in the LES model, as Cs = 0.10. around and/or attached to the structure moves freely inside earth-
As expected, the flow is highly three-dimensional and unsteady, fixed background meshes. Boundary interpolation stencils to com-
exhibiting the well-known von Karman vortex street. Figures 3共a兲 municate between grid components are recomputed every time
and 3共b兲 show instantaneous contours of the spanwise velocity step to ensure a continuous solution across grid fringes. In the
component and of the cross-flow vorticity on the center plane Y present study, the structure’s equations of motion are numerically
= 0.0, from which the three-dimensional effects are evident. Also integrated in time using a fourth-order accurate Runge-Kutta
shown, in Fig. 3共c兲, are isosurfaces of the streamwise vorticity scheme.
component. The cross-flow and streamwise vortices exhibit a co- We are interested in the structure’s response for low mass and
herent structure in the spanwise direction 共Figs. 3共b兲 and 3共c兲兲. damping. The values for the mass ratio, damping ratio, and re-
Figure 3共d兲 shows spanwise vorticity isosurfaces, showing a two- duced velocity used for the simulations in this study are m* = 1.0,
dimensional flow field in-front of the cylinder and an increasingly * = 0.005, and U* = 6.0.
three-dimensional flow field downstream. The cylinder is first held fixed until the shedding has reached
The generally measured and accepted value of the Strouhal full strength, at which point the cylinder is “released” and allowed
number at this Reynolds number is St⬇ 0.20 关9,10兴, in good to respond to the flow field. Figure 5 shows the XY response of the
agreement with the predicted value of St= 0.19. Before presenting cylinder for 100 convective time units, where time is implicit in
additional comparisons to experimental data, we remark that con- the plot.
Initially, the cylinder is pushed downstream due to the acting x共t兲 = AX sin共2t + 兲 共4兲
drag force exerted by the oncoming fluid. Almost immediately, the
cylinder responds to the acting lift forces and starts displaying
strong cross-stream oscillations. Once the pattern of motion has where AY is the average cross-stream amplitude of vibration, AX is
settled, the XY response displays average peak-to-peak cross- the average streamwise amplitude of vibration, = 2 f Y , and is
stream amplitudes of 1.65 cylinder diameters. There is also weak the phase angle. The following coefficients, for use in Eqs. 共3兲 and
in-line motion with average peak-to-peak amplitudes of 0.160 cyl- 共4兲, were extracted from the predicted time history response of our
inder diameters. The response is remarkably stable and corre- simulation: AY = 0.824, AX = 0.0795, f Y = 0.1757, and = −40 deg.
sponds to a “figure-of-eight” pattern, which was maintained In an experimental study, Jeon and Gharib 关13兴 forced a cylin-
throughout the simulation time of 250 convective time units. der to move in the X and Y direction according to Eqs. 共3兲 and 共4兲,
Analysis of the power spectrum of the time history of body as they suggested that nature prefers the “figure-of-eight” pattern.
motion gives f X / f Y = 2.0, i.e., the streamwise oscillation fre- Our simulations confirm that this is indeed the case.
quency is twice that for the transverse 共cross-stream兲 direction. In We believe the response falls toward the start of the recently
addition, we find that a good representation of the average dis- discovered “super-upper” branch 关14兴 for light bodies 共m* ⬍ 6.0兲
placement pattern in the simulation is given by
undergoing two degree-of-freedom VIV. Although the experi-
y共t兲 = AY sin共t兲 共3兲 ments of Jauvtis and Williamson 关14兴 were conducted at lower
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering AUGUST 2007, Vol. 129 / 161
Fig. 7 Instantaneous spanwise vorticity isosurfaces for two- tions show that despite the fact that the fluid-induced forcing is
degree-of-freedom VIV of a circular cylinder. Isosurfaces range nonsinusoidal 共it has higher harmonics兲, the displacement remains
†−4 , 4‡.
remarkably close to sinusoidal.
The power spectrum of the time history of the lift coefficient is
shown in Fig. 9. The frequency is scaled by the first fundamental
frequency, and we see that there is a strong higher harmonic at
three times the first fundamental frequency. The excitation of the
3⫻ harmonic is typical of responses in the supper-upper branch,
although we did not see the 2T mode of vortex shedding at this
reduced velocity.
An increase in the drag coefficient is observed, with a time-
average drag of CD = 2.02. Compared to the fixed case, the mean
drag is doubled. The phase plot of the drag and lift coefficients in
Fig. 10 exhibit an interesting shape. The plot depicts the strong
periodicity of the flow-induced forces.
Concluding Remarks
This work documents three-dimensional numerical simulation
results for two-degree-of-freedom vortex-induced vibrations of a
circular cylinder at low mass ratio, low damping, and a high Rey-
nolds number of Re= 105. The response is characterized by a
Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering AUGUST 2007, Vol. 129 / 163