Musuan Es Gad Plan With Hadagada

GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT (GAD) PLAN FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2024
Agency/School: MUSUAN INTEGARETED SCHOOL

Governance Level: School level
Total MOOE : 895,000
Total Expenditure for GAD: 46,057
No. Gender Issue Cause of the Gender Issue GAD Result Statement/ Relevant GAD Program/s GAD Activity/ies Target Platform (Web- Proposed Date Output GAD Budget Source of Responsible Actual HGDG Remarks
(2) GAD Objective Agency (5) aligned to Participants Based, Limited (9) Performance (11) Budget Unit/Office Expenses Assessmen
(3) MFO/ Column 5 (7) Face to Face) Indicators and (12) (13) t Result
PAP (6) (8) Target
(4) (10)
Client-focused
1 Insufficient number of Lack of Proper and Applicable To rehabilitate PAP Physical Facilities Enhance All learners, N/A January 2024 Provide 30,017.25 MOOE, LGU, School Head, 20
Genderized toilet in school Genderized toilet inside the genderized toilet inside genderized Stakeholders, women, girl- NGOs, GAD
school premises. the school premises common toilet and visitors child friendly Donations Coordinator
inside the school facilities that
premises
meet standards
for MHM,
gender
segregation,
and water
facilities,
Provisions of
facilities that
meet the
standards for
PWds and
Promotes
breastfeeding
in the
workplace.
2
1. Organize
school Anti
Bullying
To develop School Team/Committe School
e. Crafted
Handbook on different Head, GAD
No crafted Handbook on No Crafted handbook on April 2024-June Handbook on 4,550.00
forms of gender-based PAP's Learners Support 2. Orientation
Coordinator Face to Face MOOE School 19
school bullying. Bullying in Schools.
violence bullying in
and Capacity 2024 Bullying in
building of and all the
school. Schools
teachers on teachers
crafting school
handbook on
bullying.
Revisit and
reorienattion of
To conduct Capacity new GAD
1. Lack of 1 School Head,
Building of School GAD Coordinator and School Head School Head
Training/Orientation/Revisit on 1 School GAD
GAD PPAs are not properly Coordinator on Gender- Human Resource teachers on and GAD April 2024-June School GAD and School
3 Gender-Responsive Basic PAPs Face to Face Coordinator 4550 20
implemented in schools. Responsive Basic Development Gender- Focal Person 2024 Funds GAD
Education Policy Cum Action Responsive Basic and 33 teachers
Education Policy Cum and Teachers Coordinator
Planning. Education Policy Capacitated
Action Planning.
Cum Action
Planning.
Orientation Action Plan to

To conduct school address the gender
and symposiom Grade 4 to 6 issue on
orientation/symposia JULY -
on gender issue Learners stereotyping and
Sexual harassment, violence Stereotyping about roles of on gender issue on School GAD School GAD
4 MFO-2 Learners Support on stereotyping face to face SEPTEMBER other forms of 6,940.00 20
about roles of and Focal Person
and substance abuse in school boys/men and girls/women stereotyping about sexual harassment, Funds
roles of boys and girls in 2024
boys and girls teachers violence and
school substance abuse in
in school. school
Prepared by: Reviewed by: Availability of Funds: Recommending Approval: Approved:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE WEENKIE JHON A. MARCELO RANDY H. PORRAS, CPA ARIEL B. MONTECALBO, PhD VICTORIA V. GAZO
Proponent School Head Division Accountant Division GAD Focal Person Schools Division Superintendent
HARMONIZED GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES (HGDG)
School: MUSUAN INTEGRATED SCHOOL
Title of the Activity: Rehabilitation of genderized common toilet inside the school premises
Response (col.2)
Score for an
Elements and Item/question item/ element Gender Issues
(col.1) No (2a) Partly (2b) Yeas (2c) (col.3) Identified (Col.4)
1.0 Involvement of Women and Men

(max score: 2; 1 for each item) 2 2
1.1 Participation of women and men

in beneficiary groups in problem
identification (possible scores: 0, 0.5,
1.0) 1 1
1.2. Participation of women and men

in beneficiary groups in project design
(possible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
2.0 Collection of sex-disaggregated

data and gender-related information
(possible score 0, 1.0, 2.0) 2 2 2
3.0 Conduct of gender analysis and

identification of gender issues (max
score: 2; 1 for each item) 2 2
3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and

inequalities related to gender roles,
perspectives and needs, or access to
and control of resources (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
3.2 Analysis of constraints abd

oppurtunities related to women and
men's participation in the project
(pssible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
Total GAD Score- Project
Identification Stage 6 6
4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes,

and outputs (possible scores: ( 0, 1.0,
2.0) Does the project have clearly
stated gender equality goals,
objectives, outcomes, or outputs? 2 2 2
5.0 Matching of strategies with

gender issues (possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0) Do the strategies and activities
match the gender issues and gender
equality goals identified? 2 2 2
6.0 Gender analysis of likely impacts
of the project (max score: 2; for each
item or question, 0.67) 2.01 2.01
6.1 Are women and girl children

among the direct or indirect
beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0,
0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
6.2 Has a project considered its long-

term impact on women's
socioeconomicstatus and
empowerment? (possible score: 0,
0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
6.3 Has the project included

strategies for avoiding or minimizing
negative impact on women's status
and welfare? (possible score: 0, 0.33,
0.67) 0.67 0.67
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators

(possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the
project include gender equality
targets and indicators to measure
gender equality outputs and
outcomes? 2 2 2
8.0 Sex-disaggregated database

requirement (possible scores: 0, 1.0,
2.0) Does the project M&E system
require the collection of sex-
disaggregated data? 2 2 2
9.0 Resources (max scores: 2; for
each item or question, 1) 2 2
9.1 In the project's budget allotment

sufficient form gender equality
promotion or integration? OR, project
tap counterpart funds from LGUs /
partners for its GAD efforts? (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
9.2 Does the projects have the

expertise in promoting gender
equality and women's
empowerment? OR Does the project
commit itself to investing, project
staff time in building capacities within
the project to integrate GAD or
promote gender equality? (possible
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
10.0 Relationship with the agency's

GAD efforts (max score:2; for each
strengthen the
agency/PCW/government's
commitment to the empowerment of
women? (possible scores: 0, 0.33,
0.67)
IF THE AGENCY HAS NO GAD

PLAN:Will the project help in the
formulation of the implementing
agency's GAD plan? 0.67 0.67
10.2 Will the project build on the

initiatives or actions of other
organizations in the area? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
10.3 Does the project have an exit

plan that will ensure the sustainability
of GAD efforts and benefits? (possible
scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
20 Fully gender-
Total GAD Score- Project responsive (100%
Identification Stage of the budget)
* The possible responses and their corresponding scores are as follows:NO ("0"), YES ("2"), and PARTLY
YES. For elements with multiple items or questions, the score for PARTLY YES to an item or questions
varies per element with the total score for PARTLY YES to an element will be a positive number that is
Prepared by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Proponent
Reviewed by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
School GAD Focal Person
Approved:
WEENKIE JHON A. MARCELO
School Head
Title of the Activity: Crafting of School's Anti School Bullying Handbook
Response (col.2)
Score for an

(max score: 2; 1 for each item) 1.5 2

1.0) 0.5 1

(possible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(possible score 0, 1.0, 2.0) 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
3.2 Analysis of constraints and

(pssible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
Identification Stage 5.5 6



0.33, 0.67) 0.33 0.67

0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

0.67) 0.67 0.67

outcomes? 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

strengthen the
0.67)


scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
19
Total GAD Score- Project Gender-
Identification Stage responsive
Prepared by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Proponent
Reviewed by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Approved:
School Head
Capacity Building of School GAD Coordinator and Orietation of Teachers on

Title of the Activity: Gender-Responsive Basic Education Policy and Action Planning
Response (col.2)
Score for an


1.0) 1 1

(possible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(possible score 0, 1.0, 2.0) 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(pssible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1



0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

0.67) 0.67 0.67

outcomes? 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

strengthen the
0.67)


scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
20 Fully gender-
Total GAD Score- Project responsive (100%
Identification Stage of the budget)
Prepared by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Proponent
Reviewed by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Approved:
School Head
Orientation and Symposiom on Gender Issue on Stereotyping About Roles

Title of the Activity: of Boys and Girls in School
Response (col.2)
Score for an


1.0) 1 1

(possible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(possible score 0, 1.0, 2.0) 2 2 2


inequalities related to genfer roles,
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(pssible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1



0.33, 0.67) 0.33 0.67

0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

0.67) 0.67 0.67

outcomes? 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

strengthen the
0.67)


scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
20
Prepared by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Proponent
Reviewed by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Approved:
School Head
Orientation on the Profiling and Collection of Sex Disaggregated Data of

Title of the Activity: School Teaching Pesonnel
Response (col.2)
Score for an


1.0) 1 1

(possible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(possible score 0, 1.0, 2.0) 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(pssible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1



0.33, 0.67) 0.33 0.67

0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

0.67) 0.67 0.67

outcomes? 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 0.5 1

item or question,
strengthen the 0.67) 1.34 2.01
0.67)


scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
18
Prepared by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Proponent
Reviewed by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Approved:
School Head
Title of the Activity: Women's month Celebration in the school
Response (col.2)
Score for an


1.0) 0.5 1

(possible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 0.5 1

(possible score 0, 1.0, 2.0) 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

(pssible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1



0.33, 0.67) 0.33 0.67

0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

0.67) 0.67 0.67

outcomes? 2 2 2


scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1
scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) 1 1

item or question,
strengthen the 0.67) 2.01 2.01
0.67)


scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67

scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) 0.67 0.67
19
Prepared by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Proponent
Reviewed by:
MA. GLEN G. TALLE
Approved:
School Head

Musuan Es Gad Plan With Hadagada

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Musuan Es Gad Plan With Hadagada

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT (GAD) PLAN FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2024

Agency/School: MUSUAN INTEGARETED SCHOOL

Orientation Action Plan to

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Availability of Funds: Recommending Approval: Approved:

1.0 Involvement of Women and Men

1.1 Participation of women and men

1.2. Participation of women and men

2.0 Collection of sex-disaggregated

3.0 Conduct of gender analysis and

3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and

3.2 Analysis of constraints abd

4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes,

5.0 Matching of strategies with

6.1 Are women and girl children

6.2 Has a project considered its long-

6.3 Has the project included

7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators

8.0 Sex-disaggregated database

9.1 In the project's budget allotment

9.2 Does the projects have the

10.0 Relationship with the agency's

IF THE AGENCY HAS NO GAD

10.2 Will the project build on the

10.3 Does the project have an exit

Title of the Activity: Crafting of School's Anti School Bullying Handbook

1.0 Involvement of Women and Men

1.1 Participation of women and men

1.2. Participation of women and men

2.0 Collection of sex-disaggregated

3.0 Conduct of gender analysis and

3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and

3.2 Analysis of constraints and

4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes,

5.0 Matching of strategies with

6.1 Are women and girl children

6.2 Has a project considered its long-

6.3 Has the project included

7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators

8.0 Sex-disaggregated database

9.1 In the project's budget allotment

9.2 Does the projects have the

10.0 Relationship with the agency's

IF THE AGENCY HAS NO GAD

10.2 Will the project build on the

10.3 Does the project have an exit

Capacity Building of School GAD Coordinator and Orietation of Teachers on

1.0 Involvement of Women and Men

1.1 Participation of women and men

1.2. Participation of women and men

2.0 Collection of sex-disaggregated

3.0 Conduct of gender analysis and

3.1 Analysis of gender gaps and

3.2 Analysis of constraints and

4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes,

5.0 Matching of strategies with

6.1 Are women and girl children

6.2 Has a project considered its long-

6.3 Has the project included

7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators

8.0 Sex-disaggregated database

9.1 In the project's budget allotment

9.2 Does the projects have the

10.0 Relationship with the agency's