Powered by AI

a. To find the equilibrium price and quantity, we need to set the demand and
supply equations equal to each other and solve for P:

QD = QS 50 - 10P = 20 + 2.5P 30 = 12.5P P = 30/12.5 P = 2.4

The equilibrium price is Br.2.40. To find the equilibrium quantity, we can plug
this value into either the demand or supply equation:

QD = 50 - 10(2.4) QD = 26

The equilibrium quantity is 26 units.

b. If the government imposes a price ceiling of Br.3.00, this means that the
price cannot go above this level. Since the price ceiling is above the
equilibrium price, it will not have any effect on the market. The price and
quantity will remain at Br.2.40 and 26 units, respectively.

However, if the demand increases to QD = 75 - 10P, this means that the

demand curve will shift to the right. The new equilibrium price and quantity
will be:

QD = QS

75 - 10P = 20 + 2.5P

55 = 12.5P

P = 55/12.5

P = 4.4

QD = 75 - 10(4.4)

QD = 31

The new equilibrium price is Br.4.40 and the new equilibrium quantity is 31
units. However, since the price ceiling is still in effect, the price cannot rise
above Br.3.00. This means that the market price will be Br.3.00, but the
quantity supplied will be less than the quantity demanded at this price. To find
the quantity supplied, we can plug the price ceiling into the supply equation:

QS = 20 + 2.5(3) QS = 27.5

The quantity supplied is 27.5 units, which is less than the quantity demanded
of 31 units. This creates a shortage of 3.5 units in the market. A shortage
means that there is excess demand and some consumers will not be able to
 Powered by AI
buy the product. This may lead to rationing, waiting lines, black markets, or
other inefficiencies. A shortage also creates a deadweight loss, which is a loss
of economic surplus that occurs when the market is not in equilibrium. You
can learn more about deadweight loss from [this article].

c. I'll try to create a supply and demand graph showing the equilibrium price
and quantity, the price ceiling, and the shortage

2
The market demand for brand X has been estimated as
QX = 1,500 –3PX – 0.05I –2.5PY +7.5PZ; where PX is the price of brand X, I is per-capita
income, PY is the price of brand Y, and PZ is the price of brand Z. Assume that PX = Br.2, I
= Br.20,000, PY = Br.4, and PZ = Br.4.
where Px is the price of brand X, I is per-capita income, Py is the price of brand Y, and Pz is
the price of brand Z. Assume that Px = $2, I = $20,000, Py = $4, and Pz = $4.

a. With respect to changes in per-capita income, what kind of good is brand X?

b. How are brands X and Y related?
c. How are brands X and Z related?
d. How are brands Z and Y related?
e. What is the market demand for brand X?

a) Good X is a Geffen good because its income elasticity of demand is negative. This
means that as consumers' income increase, demand for good X decreases and when income
decreases, demand for good X increases.
Powered by AI
Powered by AI
 Powered by AI

=514
3 Suppose the demand function for a firm's product is given by ௗ 𝑙𝑛𝑄௫ = 3 − 0.5 ln
𝑃௫ − 2.5 ln 𝑃௬ + ln 𝑀 + 2 ln 𝐴 Where Px is the price of the product = GHS 10 Py is the
price of another product produced by the firm = GHS4 M is the income of consumers =
GHS 20,000 and A is the expenditure on advertising for the product = GHS 250 a)
Determine the own price elasticity of demand, and state whether the demand is elastic,
inelastic or unitary elastic. b) Determine the cross-price elasticity of demand between
good X and Y, and state whether the two goods are substitutes or complements. c)
Determine the income elasticity of demand, and state whether the good X is a normal or
an inferior good. d) Determine the own advertising elasticity of demand.
a) Own price elasticity of demand = Δln QxΔln Px.
E = -0.5
Demand is inelastic because the absolute value of the elasticity is <0
b) Cross price elasticity Ec = ΔLn Qx/ΔLn Py.
Ec =-2.5
the two goods in question are substitutes. This is because a positive relation between
the price of one and demand of the other proves the same. As the price of one
increases, the other automatically becomes cheaper to buy and hence the demand
increases.
c)Income elasticity Em = ΔLnQx/Δ LnM.
Em = 1
Positive sign shows that the good X is a normal good.
d) Advertising elasticity Ea = ΔLn Qx/Δ Ln A.
 Powered by AI
Ea = 2
Notice that the values of M, A or prices don't matter. What matters is the coefficients of
the logarithm of these values, which is the partial derivatives.

7 Here is my response based on the information I found:

To find the profit function of each firm, we need to first find the inverse demand
function, which is obtained by solving for P in the market demand function:

P = 400 - 2Q

Q = 200 - 0.5P

The inverse demand function is:

P(Q) = 400 - 2Q

where Q is the total output of both firms, Q = QL + QF.

The profit function of each firm is the difference between its revenue and its cost,
which are given by:

Ri = P(Q)Qi

Ci = 40Qi

where i = L, F.

Therefore, the profit function of each firm is:

πi = P(Q)Qi - 40Qi

πi = (400 - 2Q)Qi - 40Qi

πi = 400Qi - 2Q^2 - 40Qi

πi = 360Qi - 2Q^2

To find the optimal output of each firm, we need to maximize their profit functions
with respect to their own output, taking the output of the other firm as given. This
means that we need to find the first-order conditions and set them equal to zero:

∂πL/∂QL = 360 - 4QL - 2QF = 0

∂πF/∂QF = 360 - 4QF - 2QL = 0

 Powered by AI
Solving these equations simultaneously, we get the Cournot equilibrium outputs of
each firm:

QL = 60 - 0.5QF

QF = 60 - 0.5QL

QL = 40

QF = 40

The optimal price is obtained by plugging the equilibrium outputs into the inverse
demand function:

P(Q) = 400 - 2Q

P(Q) = 400 - 2(40 + 40)

P(Q) = 400 - 160

P(Q) = 240

The profit of each firm is obtained by plugging the equilibrium outputs and price
into the profit function:

πi = 360Qi - 2Q^2

πL = 360(40) - 2(40)^2

πL = 14400 - 3200

πL = 11200

πF = 360(40) - 2(40)^2

πF = 14400 - 3200

πF = 11200

The profit of each firm is the same, since they have the same cost function and
produce the same output. The total profit of the industry is the sum of the profits of
each firm:

πtot = πL + πF

πtot = 11200 + 11200

πtot = 22400
 Powered by AI
The Cournot duopoly model shows that the firms will produce less than the
monopoly output, but more than the competitive output, and charge a price that is
higher than the competitive price, but lower than the monopoly price. The firms
will earn positive profits, but less than the monopoly profit. The consumers will
have lower surplus than the competitive case, but higher than the monopoly case.
The total surplus will be lower than the competitive case, but higher than the
monopoly case..

8 Here is my response based on the information I found:

a. To calculate the firm’s profit-maximizing price and output level in each market,
we need to use the concept of price discrimination. Price discrimination is a pricing
strategy that charges consumers different prices for the identical good or service
based on their willingness to pay. Price Discrimination - Definition, Types and
Practical Example

There are three types of price discrimination: first-degree, second-degree, and

third-degree. In this case, the firm is practicing third-degree price discrimination,
which involves charging different prices depending on a particular market segment
or consumer group. Price Discrimination - Economics Help

To find the optimal price and output for each market, we need to follow these
steps:

 First, we need to find the inverse demand functions for each market by
solving for P in terms of Q. The inverse demand functions are:

P1 = 20 - Q1

P2 = 15 - Q2
 Powered by AI
 Second, we need to find the marginal revenue functions for each market by
taking the derivative of the total revenue functions with respect to Q. The
total revenue functions are:

TR1 = P1Q1 = (20 - Q1)Q1

TR2 = P2Q2 = (15 - Q2)Q2

The marginal revenue functions are:

MR1 = dTR1/dQ1 = 20 - 2Q1

MR2 = dTR2/dQ2 = 15 - 2Q2

 Third, we need to equate the marginal revenue functions to the marginal cost
function and solve for Q. The marginal cost function is:

MC = dTC/dQ = 5 + 5

MC = 10

Equating MR1 to MC, we get:

MR1 = MC

20 - 2Q1 = 10

Q1 = 5

Equating MR2 to MC, we get:

MR2 = MC

15 - 2Q2 = 10

Q2 = 2.5

 Fourth, we need to plug in the optimal output levels into the inverse demand
functions to find the optimal prices. The optimal prices are:

P1 = 20 - Q1

P1 = 20 - 5

P1 = 15

P2 = 15 - Q2
 Powered by AI
P2 = 15 - 2.5

P2 = 12.5

Therefore, the firm’s profit-maximizing price and output level in market 1 are P1 =
15 and Q1 = 5, and in market 2 are P2 = 12.5 and Q2 = 2.5.

b. To verify that the demand for the product is less elastic in the market with the
higher price, we need to calculate the price elasticity of demand for each market.
The price elasticity of demand is the percentage change in quantity demanded
divided by the percentage change in price. Price Elasticity of Demand Formula |
Calculation and Examples

The price elasticity of demand for market 1 is:

E1 = (dQ1/dP1)(P1/Q1)

E1 = (-1)(15/5)

E1 = -3

The price elasticity of demand for market 2 is:

E2 = (dQ2/dP2)(P2/Q2)

E2 = (-1)(12.5/2.5)

E2 = -5

The absolute value of the price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness
of quantity demanded to changes in price. A higher absolute value means a more
elastic demand, and a lower absolute value means a less elastic demand. Price
elasticity of demand and price elasticity of supply - Khan Academy

Since the absolute value of E1 is lower than the absolute value of E2, we can
conclude that the demand for the product is less elastic in market 1, which has the
higher price, than in market 2, which has the lower price.

c. To find the firm’s total profit at the profit-maximizing prices and output levels,
we need to subtract the total cost from the total revenue. The total cost is:

TC = 5 + 5Q

TC = 5 + 5(Q1 + Q2)

TC = 5 + 5(5 + 2.5)

TC = 5 + 37.5
 Powered by AI
TC = 42.5

The total revenue is:

TR = TR1 + TR2

TR = P1Q1 + P2Q2

TR = (15)(5) + (12.5)(2.5)

TR = 75 + 31.25

TR = 106.25

The total profit is:

π = TR - TC

π = 106.25 - 42.5

π = 63.75

Therefore, the firm’s total profit at the profit-maximizing prices and output levels
is 63.75.

OR

a. To maximize profit, the firm should set the marginal revenue equal to the
marginal cost in each market. The marginal revenue is the derivative of the total
revenue with respect to the quantity sold in each market. The total revenue is the
product of the price and the quantity sold in each market. The price is given by the
inverse demand function, which is obtained by solving for P in terms of Q in the
demand equation. So, we have:

Market 1: P1 = 20 - 0.5Q1 TR1 = P1*Q1 = (20 - 0.5Q1)Q1 = 20Q1 - 0.25Q1^2

MR1 = dTR1/dQ1 = 20 - 0.5Q1 MC = 5 + 5Q MR1 = MC 20 - 0.5Q1 = 5 + 5Q
Q1 = 2 P1 = 20 - 0.52 = 19

Market 2: P2 = 15 - 0.25Q2 TR2 = P2*Q2 = (15 - 0.25Q2)Q2 = 15Q2 - 0.125Q2^2

MR2 = dTR2/dQ2 = 15 - 0.25Q2 MC = 5 + 5Q MR2 = MC 15 - 0.25Q2 = 5 + 5Q
Q2 = 1.6 P2 = 15 - 0.251.6 = 14.6

b. To verify that the demand for the product is less elastic in the market with the
higher price, we can compare the price elasticities of demand in the two markets.
The price elasticity of demand is the percentage change in quantity demanded
divided by the percentage change in price, or the negative of the ratio of the slope
of the demand curve and the price-to-quantity ratio. So, we have:
 Powered by AI
Market 1: Ed1 = - (dP1/dQ1)(Q1/P1) = - (-0.5)(2/19) = 0.053 Market 2: Ed2 = -
(dP2/dQ2)(Q2/P2) = - (-0.25)(1.6/14.6) = 0.027

Since Ed1 > Ed2, the demand for the product is less elastic in market 1, which has
the higher price.

c. To find the firm’s total profit at the profit-maximizing prices and output levels,
we can use the formula:

Profit = Total revenue - Total cost = (TR1 + TR2) - (TC) = (P1Q1 + P2Q2) - (5 +
5Q) = (192 + 14.61.6) - (5 + 5*(2 + 1.6)) = 67.76 - 43 = 24.76

Therefore, the firm’s total profit is $24.76.

10

Here is my response based on the information I found:

a. To estimate the effect of the decline in income on car sales, we need to use the
income elasticity of demand (YED) formula, which is:

YED = % change in quantity demanded / % change in income

Given that the YED for cars is 1.25, we can plug in the values and solve for the
percentage change in quantity demanded:

1.25 = % change in quantity demanded / -4

% change in quantity demanded = 1.25 x -4

% change in quantity demanded = -5

This means that the decline in income by 4% caused the quantity demanded of cars
to decrease by 5%. You can learn more about the formula and calculation of
income elasticity of demand from these sources: [Income Elasticity of Demand
Formula - How to Calculate? - WallStreetMojo], [Income Elasticity of Demand:
Definition, Formula, and Types - Investopedia], [Income Elasticity of Demand
Formula - BYJU’S].

b. To estimate the effect of the car price rise on sales, we need to use the price
elasticity of demand (PED) formula, which is:

PED = % change in quantity demanded / % change in price

Given that the PED for cars is -0.8, we can plug in the values and solve for the
percentage change in quantity demanded:
 Powered by AI
-0.8 = % change in quantity demanded / 6

% change in quantity demanded = -0.8 x 6

% change in quantity demanded = -4.8

This means that the increase in the price of cars by 6% caused the quantity
demanded of cars to decrease by 4.8%. You can learn more about the formula and
calculation of price elasticity of demand from these sources: Price Elasticity of
Demand Formula | Calculation and Examples, Calculating Price Elasticity of
Demand - Economics Help, Price elasticity of demand and price elasticity of
supply - Khan Academy.

c. To estimate the cross elasticity of demand (CED) between petrol and cars, we
need to use the cross elasticity of demand formula, which is:

CED = % change in quantity demanded of good X / % change in price of good Y

In this case, good X is cars and good Y is petrol. We can plug in the values and
solve for the CED:

CED = -15 / 20

CED = -0.75

This means that the increase in the price of petrol by 20% caused the quantity
demanded of cars to decrease by 15%. The negative sign indicates that petrol and
cars are complementary goods, meaning that they are used together and the
demand for one good decreases when the price of the other good increases. You
can learn more about the formula and types of cross elasticity of demand from
these sources: Cross Price Elasticity of Demand Formula - WallStreetMojo, Cross
elasticity of demand - Economics Help, Cross Price Elasticity: Definition, Formula
for Calculation, and Example.

Alternatively, we can use a power form of demand equation to estimate the CED
between petrol and cars. A power form of demand equation is a nonlinear function
that expresses the quantity demanded of a good as a function of its own price, the
price of a related good, and income, with constant elasticity coefficients. A general
form of a power demand equation is:

Q = A x P^a x Py^b x I^c

where Q is the quantity demanded, P is the own price, Py is the price of a related
good, I is the income, A is a constant, and a, b, and c are the elasticity coefficients.

To use this equation, we need to know the values of A, a, b, and c for the demand
of cars. For simplicity, let us assume that these values are:
 Powered by AI
A = 1000

a = -0.8

b = -0.75

c = 1.25

Then, the power demand equation for cars is:

Q = 1000 x P^-0.8 x Py^-0.75 x I^1.25

To estimate the CED between petrol and cars using this equation, we need to take
the partial derivative of Q with respect to Py and divide it by Q/Py. This will give
us the same value of b, which is the CED coefficient. The partial derivative of Q
with respect to Py is:

dQ/dPy = 1000 x P^-0.8 x I^1.25 x (-0.75) x Py^-1.75

Dividing this by Q/Py, we get:

(dQ/dPy) / (Q/Py) = (1000 x P^-0.8 x I^1.25 x (-0.75) x Py^-1.75) / (1000 x P^-0.8

x Py^-0.75 x I^1.25 / Py)

Simplifying, we get:

(dQ/dPy) / (Q/Py) = -0.75

This is the same value as the CED we obtained using the simple elasticity formula.
This shows that the power form of demand equation is consistent with the cross
elasticity of demand formula. You can learn more about the power form of demand
equation from these sources: [Power Function Demand Equation - Economics
Stack Exchange], [Nonlinear Demand Functions - University of Wisconsin–
Madison], [Nonlinear Demand Functions - University of California, Berkeley].

11 Here is my response based on the information I found:

a. The firm is not using the optimal combination of inputs, because it is not
equating the marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) of labour with the
ratio of wages. The MRTS of labour is the amount of one type of labour that can
be substituted for another type of labour while keeping the output constant. The
MRTS of labour can be calculated by dividing the marginal products of the two
types of labour. Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution - Economics Help

For example, the MRTS of manual workers for technicians is:

MRTS(MT) = MP(M) / MP(T)

 Powered by AI
MRTS(MT) = 200 / 275

MRTS(MT) = 0.727

This means that the firm can replace 0.727 manual workers with one technician
without changing the output level.

The ratio of wages of manual workers to technicians is:

W(M) / W(T) = 300 / 400

W(M) / W(T) = 0.75

This means that the firm has to pay 0.75 manual workers for one technician.

Since the MRTS of manual workers for technicians is not equal to the ratio of
wages of manual workers to technicians, the firm is not using the optimal
combination of inputs. The same logic applies to the other pairs of labour types.

b. To reallocate its resources, the firm should follow the rule that the MRTS of
labour should be equal to the ratio of wages of labour for any pair of labour types.
This will ensure that the firm is minimizing its cost of production for a given
output level. Cost Minimization - Economics Online

To achieve this, the firm should compare the MRTS of labour with the ratio of
wages of labour for each pair of labour types, and adjust the quantities of labour
accordingly. For example, if the MRTS of manual workers for technicians is less
than the ratio of wages of manual workers to technicians, as in the case above, the
firm should hire more technicians and less manual workers until the MRTS of
manual workers for technicians is equal to the ratio of wages of manual workers to
technicians. The same logic applies to the other pairs of labour types.
 Powered by AI
12 I can help you with the first part of your question, but I cannot generate code for
you. Here is how I would solve the problem:

To find the break-even output, we need to set the total revenue equal to the total
cost and solve for the quantity. The total revenue is the product of the price and the
quantity, while the total cost is the sum of the fixed cost and the variable cost
multiplied by the quantity. So, we have:

TR = TC PQ = FC + VCQ 20Q = 10000 + 12Q 8*Q = 10000 Q = 1250

Therefore, the break-even output is 1,250 units.

To calculate the degree of operating leverage (DOL), we can use the formula:

DOL = (QP - QVC - FC) / (QP - QVC - FC - MC*Q)

where Q is the quantity, P is the price, VC is the variable cost, FC is the fixed cost,
and MC is the marginal cost. Plugging in the given values, we get:

DOL = (150020 - 150012 - 10000) / (150020 - 150012 - 10000 - 12*1500) DOL =

8000 / 2000 DOL = 4

This means that a 1% change in sales will result in a 4% change in operating

income. You can learn more about the formula and calculation of degree of
operating leverage from these sources: Degree of Operating Leverage (DOL)
Definition - Investopedia, Degree of Operating Leverage - Definition, Formula,
and Example, Operating Leverage: What It Is, How It Works, How To Calculate,
Degree of Operating Leverage - ManagerialAccountingPro.com.

OR

Explore

To find the break-even output, we can use the formula:

Break-even output = Fixed costs ÷ (Selling price per unit − Variable costs per unit)
1
 Powered by AI
Plugging in the given values, we get:

Break-even output = £10,000 ÷ (£20 − £12) = 833.33 units

This means that the firm needs to sell at least 834 units to cover its total costs and
make zero profit.

To find the degree of operating leverage (DOL), we can use the formula:

DOL = Contribution margin / Operating income 2

The contribution margin is the difference between sales and variable costs, and the
operating income is the difference between sales and total costs. Assuming that the
firm sells all 1,500 units it produces, we can calculate the DOL as follows:

Contribution margin = 1,500 × (£20 − £12) = £12,000 Operating income = 1,500 ×

£20 − (£10,000 + 1,500 × £12) = £2,000 DOL = £12,000 / £2,000 = 6

This means that a 1% increase in sales will result in a 6% increase in operating

income, and vice versa. A high DOL indicates that the firm has a high proportion
of fixed costs and is more sensitive to changes in sales.