Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Orientation Outcome Evaluation Form v4
Orientation Outcome Evaluation Form v4
Orientation Outcome Evaluation Form v4
Critical Thinking
Ability to make decisions. Appropriate decision-making.
Uses the nursing process to make proper decisions.
Ability to prioritize.
Problem-solving ability Analyzes strengths and weaknesses of patient
situations to achieve best outcome.
Solves problems to improve care to patient.
Utilization of research in clinical Identifies research appropriate for nursing practice.
Practice. Analyzes research findings and incorporates into
nursing care.
General impression of critical Putting it all together.
Thinking.
2
Communication
Verbal with patients, staff, peers, and Conducts thorough interviews to gain information.
interdisciplinary team. (i.e. initial history)
Communicates and offers psychosocial support.
Teaches necessary information.
Reports on patient progress.
Discusses theoretical aspects of care.
Participation in interdisciplinary rounds. (ie MDR
Rounds, Safety Huddles, Team Huddles)
Seeks and offers assistance when required.
Critical Thinking
Ability to make decisions. Appropriate decision-making.
Uses the nursing process to make proper decisions.
Ability to prioritize.
Problem-solving ability Analyzes strengths and weaknesses of patient
situations to achieve best outcome.
Solves problems to improve care to patient.
Utilization of research in clinical Identifies research appropriate for nursing practice.
Practice. Analyzes research findings and incorporates into
nursing care.
General impression of critical Putting it all together.
Thinking.
3
Orientation Evaluation Tool Rating Criteria
The following criteria should be used in evaluating clinical performance of the outcome criteria of therapeutic interventions, communication, and
critical thinking. Please use the most appropriate rating.
5. Excellent
Meets criteria at a high level independently with minimum assistance; discussing process to achieve outcomes with preceptors, colleagues
4. Very Good
Meets criteria independently, seeking advice/confirmation on ways to perform at highly satisfactory level.
3. Satisfactory
Meets most objectives independently at a satisfactory level; needs some assistance to achieve objectives at a highly satisfactory level.
2. Needs Improvement
Performs actions safely; needs to work towards better achievement of outcome criteria; needs moderate amount of guidance in achievement
of criteria.
1. Poor
Fails to achieve these criteria at minimal level; needs extensive changes in behavior/ improvements to adequately meet these criteria.
FINAL COMMENTS
Self/Mentee Evaluation:
Strengths_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Areas for
improvement_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Peer/Mentor Evaluation:
Strengths_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Areas for
improvement_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4
Feedback from CNS/NUA/Nurse Clinician
Completed By:
Original returned to mentee/mentor □
Photocopy kept with CNS/NUA/NC □
Completed By: