Priority Analysis

Weakness / Opportunity/Threats/2020/Review Importance Rating Score

(score from (score 1 to 3 (Importance x
0.01 to 1.0; where 1 is Rating)
whereas 0.01 minor
is not weakness /
important and opportunity,
1.0 is 2 is medium
extremely and 3 is
important) major)
Example: “high staff /leadership turnover” 0.13 2 0.26
Weakness
High staff / leadership turnover
Imbalance between priority given to sections of our work
Weak communication, understanding and interaction between
individuals and departments
Weak monitoring and learning agenda
Weak internal and external reporting
Insufficient human resources in certain areas
Lack of in-depth knowledge and experience in human trafficking,
victim identification and other critical areas
“Policing” mentality, often leading to parallel investigations,
duplications and confusion/friction
Culture clashes
Focus on Open Source data
Limited partnership portfolio
Weak pro-activity / staff only moving by direction
Limited focus on Prevention / drivers of trafficking
Weak context knowledge at different levels
Limited capacity and activity geared towards fundraising
Strong reputation limited to a select group of partners
Focus on numbers/KPIs, not reporting on quality work of staff
Minimal focus on systemic change (depth in work)
Unclear Case Management (activate, terminate, timed
deliverable, etc.)
Limited/no strategic/high-level conversations/partners
Minimal focus on empowerment
Legal works too often as a stand-alone
Prosecution not seen as driver of investigation, but as a result
Opportunities
Online Sexual Exploitation / technology instigated trafficking
Thailand has made Trafficking in Person a national priority (new
laws, policies, practices, needs)
Demand/need for capacity strengthening
Opportunities to strategically expand our partnership portfolio
(eg. high-level, non-traditional, etc.)
Step into other forms of Modern Slavery (eg. labour trafficking)
Performing weakness/gap/need assessments among partners
“Less is more” – do less things at a higher quality
(Reversed) Modern Slavery Liaison concept
Intensifying legal aspect of our work (policy advocacy, precedent
setting)
Bridging criminal investigations with reintegration
Strengthen partners’ access to technology
Shed spotlight on issue of sex trafficking/sexual exploitation
Survivors hardly used as sources of intelligence/learning
Vetting and capacity-building of After-Care facilities
Victims become survivors, become champions
Use of local volunteers and community groups
Raise public awareness
Weak victim / perpetrator identification capacity of LE agencies,
public, civil society
Increase in labour trafficking
Investigating/mapping illegal channels of migration and
trafficking routes
Increase in tips on EEHT
Rapid development of ICT

Please Turn Page

Threats
Increase in clandestine trafficking
Increased access to technology to support trafficking
Reduction in funding and grant-making
Shift of resources away from combatting trafficking to addressing
Covid-19 and other issues
Weak victim / trafficking identification
Increased vulnerability of large group of people
Recruitment / staffing challenges due to Covid-19
National regulations and laws that are not supported
Slow/delaying bureaucratic system
Corruption
Limited mobility and need for quarantining
Reduced opportunity to host/visit meetings and events
Non-collaborative approach to combat human trafficking
Dangerous mix between arrogance and incompetence
Over-vocalization of fishery industry
Rapid development of ICT, offering new opportunities for
offenders