Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microeconomics A Contemporary Introduction 9th Edition Mceachern Solutions Manual
Microeconomics A Contemporary Introduction 9th Edition Mceachern Solutions Manual
INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter, the assumptions, logic, and implications of perfect competition were
covered. This chapter examines monopoly by contrasting it with pure competition. Perhaps the
most important distinction is that while there are no barriers to entry under perfect competition,
under monopoly there is a sole supplier because some barrier blocks entry. All the important
distinctions between the two market structures flow from the difference in entry barriers. The chapter
also identifies similarities between perfect competition and monopoly. For example, both types of
firms try to maximize profit by producing at a level at which marginal cost equals marginal revenue.
The chapter concludes with a comparison of monopoly and perfect competition models from both
equity and efficiency perspectives. These comparisons are tempered by a number of factors that
make such comparisons problematic.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
Use PowerPoint slides 2-4 for the following section
Barriers to Entry: Restrictions on entry of new firms into an industry.
Legal Restrictions
• Patents and Invention Incentives
• Patent: Awards exclusive right to produce a good or service for 20 years.
• Licenses and Other Entry Restrictions
• Government sometimes confers monopoly rights.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
106 Chapter 9 Monopoly
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Chapter 9 Monopoly 107
Allocative and Distributive Effects: Consumer surplus is smaller under monopoly. Some of this
loss in consumer surplus is redistributed to the monopolist, but some is a deadweight loss, or welfare
loss, that is gained by no one.
CONCLUSION
Pure monopoly, like perfect competition, is not that common. Although some firms may enjoy mo-
nopoly power in the short run, the lure of economic profit encourages rivals to hurdle seemingly high
entry barriers in the long run. The examination of perfect competition and pure monopoly provides a
framework to understand market structures that lie between the two extremes.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use
as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for class-
room use.
108 Chapter 9 Monopoly
CHAPTER SUMMARY
A monopolist sells a product with no close substitutes. Short-run economic profit earned by a
monopolist can persist in the long run only if the entry of new firms is blocked. Three barriers to
entry are (a) legal restrictions, such as patents and operating licenses; (b) economies of scale over
abroad range of output; and (c) control over a key resource.
Because a monopolist is the sole supplier of a product with no close substitutes, a monopolist’s
demand curve is also the market demand curve. Because a monopolist that does not price
discriminate can sell more only by lowering the price for all units, marginal revenue is less than the
price. Where demand is price elastic, marginal revenue is positive and total revenue increases as the
price falls. Where demand is price inelastic, marginal revenue is negative and total revenue decreases
as the price falls. A monopolist never voluntarily produces where demand is inelastic because raising
the price and reducing output would increase total revenue.
If the monopolist can at least cover variable cost, profit is maximized or loss is minimized in the
short run by finding the output rate that equates marginal revenue with marginal cost. At the profit-
maximizing quantity, the price is found on the demand curve.
In the short run, a monopolist, like a perfect competitor, can earn economic profit but will shut down
unless price at least covers average variable cost. In the long run, a monopolist, unlike a perfect
competitor, can continue to earn economic profit as long as entry of potential competitors is blocked.
If costs are similar, a monopolist charges a higher price and supplies less output than does a perfectly
competitive industry. Monopoly usually results in a deadweight loss when compared with perfect
competition because the loss of consumer surplus exceeds the gains in monopoly profit.
To increase profit through price discrimination, the monopolist must have at least two identifiable
groups of customers, each with a different price elasticity of demand at a given price, and must be
able to prevent customers charged the lower price from reselling to those charged the higher price.
A perfect price discriminator charges a different price for each unit sold, thereby converting all
consumer surplus into economic profit. Perfect price discrimination seems unfair because the
monopolist reaps maximum profit and consumers get no consumer surplus. Yet perfect price
discrimination is as efficient as perfect competition because the monopolist has no incentive to
restrict output, so there is no deadweight loss.
TEACHING POINTS
1. Monopoly is always an interesting topic to discuss in class. The text takes the view that
monopoly refers to a single seller of a good. Some economists prefer to use the term more
loosely, since a single seller of a product is quite difficult to find. The first issue to deal with in
this chapter is that of barriers to entry. The text identifies three main barriers that are the
sources of monopoly—legal restrictions, economies of scale, and control of an essential
resource.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Chapter 9 Monopoly 109
2. To fully appreciate the difference between monopoly and competitive profit maximization
solutions, it is important to recognize an important similarity—that both maximize profits
where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. Assuming identical market demand and cost
curves, the difference between profit-maximizing quantity and price occurs because for the
monopolist the relevant demand curve is the market demand curve, and hence marginal
revenue is less than price. It is vital for the student to appreciate the relationship between
demand and marginal revenue before adding cost data to the picture. Many students will find
numerical examples the most compelling evidence.
3. Sometimes students have the idea that monopolies are immune to losses. Remind them that
even monopolies may need to shut down in the short run.
4. Students often have the idea that monopoly is bad because of the excessive profits that a
monopoly makes. Actually, what is bad is not making profits but the deadweight loss created
as the monopolist reduces output below the competitive level. A related point to make is that
monopoly does not lead to efficient pricing. There is always a divergence between marginal
cost and price.
Marginal cost is the additional cost to society of using certain resources in a particular way.
Presumably these resources should be used to produce the goods that consumers value most
highly. A monopoly produces less than the amount of a good for which society is willing and
able to pay. Resources are therefore redirected toward the production of other, less desirable
goods. Monopoly underproduces goods that society wants.
5. The latter part of the chapter is concerned with price discrimination. For example, senior
citizens are often given discounts on meals at restaurants, students are given discounts on
movie tickets, and so on. You might encourage students to find their own examples of price
discrimination.
It is tempting to argue that price discrimination is bad because it flies in the face of our view of
fairness. However, it is easy to show that overall resource allocation is actually improved when
a monopolist is allowed to price discriminate because such behavior leads to an increase in
output. Thus, the argument against this behavior is purely a distributional one. When a
monopolist price discriminates, monopoly profits are increased and the price to some
consumers is also increased relative to the pure monopoly result. However, other consumers
enjoy lower prices, and total output is increased (toward the competitive industry level).
Because additional units of the good are produced, this generates a net gain to consumers
because the value (marginal benefit) exceeds the alternative resource use value (marginal cost)
of those units.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use
as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for class-
room use.
110 Chapter 9 Monopoly
a. patent
b. legal restrictions
c. natural monopoly
d. essential or nonreproducible resource
If a firm’s long-run average cost curve slopes downward throughout the range of market
demand, a single firm can produce at a lower average cost than any other firm that tries to
enter the market. As firms compete to increase their market shares by expanding and thus
lowering cost and price, a single firm emerges naturally from the process. Any new firm trying
to enter the market is unable to match the monopolist’s economies of scale and, therefore, is
unable to match the monopolist’s price.
3. (CaseStudy: Is a Diamond Forever?) How did the De Beers cartel try to maintain control of the
price in the diamond market? How has this control been undermined?
De Beers kept their price high by limiting the supply of rough diamonds mined elsewhere. The
company withheld diamonds from the market when necessary to maintain the price—acting as
a price maker. De Beers also used marketing efforts to shore up demand for diamonds.
The cartel’s price control depended on maintaining control of the key resource—the rough
diamonds. De Beers’ price control has been lessened by new entrants into the market, such as
Russia, Australia’s Argyle mines, and Yellowknife in Canada.
4. (Revenue for the Monopolist) How does the demand curve faced by a monopolist differ from
the demand curve faced by a perfectly competitive firm?
A perfectly competitive firm faces a horizontal demand curve. It can sell as many units as it
wishes at the prevailing market price. In contrast, the monopolist faces the market demand
curve, which slopes downward. The monopolist can sell more output only if it lowers price. The
perfectly competitive firm is one of many firms selling a commodity, and no single competitive
firm is large enough to affect the market. However, the monopolist is a single firm producing a
unique product—with only one firm, the market demand curve applies to its output.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Chapter 9 Monopoly 111
This is impossible because the monopolist cannot control the demand curve. Once the price of
the product is chosen, the demand curve, which is determined by consumers, indicates the
quantity demanded. Alternatively, the monopolist can choose the quantity, but the demand
curve will indicate the price at which that quantity can be sold.
6. (Revenue Schedules) Explain why the marginal revenue curve for a monopolist lies below its
demand curve, rather than coinciding with the demand curve, as is the case for a perfectly
competitive firm. Is it ever possible for a monopolist’s marginal revenue curve to coincide with
its demand curve?
The perfectly competitive firm faces a perfectly elastic demand curve, indicating that it can sell
additional units of its output without lowering its price. Thus, each additional unit has a
marginal revenue equal to the prevailing market price. However, the monopolist faces a
downward-sloping demand curve, indicating that it can sell additional units of its output only
by lowering the price on all units. If the monopolist lowers its price, the gap between price and
marginal revenue widens because the loss from selling all diamonds for less increases and the
gain from selling an additional diamond decreases Thus, beginning with the second unit sold,
marginal revenue is below the price, and the marginal revenue curve is below the demand
curve. A monopolist’s marginal revenue curve can coincide with its demand curve if the firm is
practicing perfect price discrimination—selling each unit for a different price.
7. (Revenue Curves) Why would a monopoly firm never knowingly produce on the inelastic
portion of its demand curve?
When demand is inelastic, a decrease in price actually reduces total revenue in spite of the
increased unit sales. Thus, marginal revenue is negative and a firm will never produce where
marginal revenue is negative.
8. (Profit Maximization) Review the following graph showing the short-run situation of a
monopolist. What output level does the firm choose in the short run? Why?
The firm will shut down in the short run. Average total cost exceeds average revenue at all
output levels, indicating that the monopolist cannot earn a normal profit in the short run. In
addition, average variable cost also exceeds price. Thus, if the firm operates in the short run, it
will suffer a loss equal to its fixed cost plus the uncovered portion of its variable cost.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use
as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for class-
room use.
112 Chapter 9 Monopoly
9. (Allocative and Distributive Effects) Why is society worse off under monopoly than under
perfect competition, even if both market structures face the same constant long-run average
cost curve?
The reduction in consumer surplus in both market structures is considered the deadweight loss
because it is a loss to consumers and no one reaps the benefits. A deadweight loss is a result of
higher prices and reduced output. In a monopoly, price always exceeds marginal costs, so
society would be worse off under a monopoly.
10. (Welfare Cost of Monopoly) Explain why the welfare loss of a monopoly may be smaller or
larger than the loss shown in Exhibit 8 in this chapter.
The loss may be smaller because a monopolist may have economies of scale that are not
available to a perfectly competitive firm and, thus, can charge a lower price. A monopolist may
charge a lower price to discourage entry of new firms or in response to political pressure. The
loss may be larger because resources may be diverted from more productive uses to secure the
monopolist’s position (rent seeking). Lack of competition may eliminate pressure for the
monopolist to maximize efficiency or to be innovative.
11. (CaseStudy: The Mail Monopoly) Can the U.S. Postal Service be considered a monopoly in
first-class mail? Why or why not? What has happened to the price elasticity of demand for
first-class mail in recent years?
A monopoly is a single firm producing a unique product that has no close substitutes. The
USPS was granted a monopoly in 1775. However, in recent years new firms providing close
substitutes for the USPS have entered the industry, such as email, text messaging, Federal
Express, UPS, etc. Many customers now use these methods in place of the USPS’s first-class
mail, eroding the Postal Service’s control of the market—reducing its monopoly power. The
availability of substitutes has greatly increased the elasticity of demand for first-class postage.
12. (Conditions for Price Discrimination) List three conditions that must be met for a monopolist
to price discriminate successfully.
First, the firm must be a price maker—that is, it must have some control over its price. Second,
it must be able to separate consumers into two or more groups with different elasticities of
demand. Finally, the firm must be able to prevent the group facing the lower price from
reselling the product to the group facing the higher price.
13. (Price Discrimination) Explain how it may be profitable for South Korean manufacturers to
sell new autos at a lower price in the United States than in South Korea, even with
transportation costs included.
This is a simple price discrimination problem. One need only assume that the demand elasticity
in the United States is greater than in Korea. This assumption is reasonable if the U.S. market
has more substitutes. Also, the long distance would prevent U.S. buyers from reselling in
Korea. Price discrimination calls for a higher price in Korea, where the price elasticity of
demand is lower. (By the way, it appears that autos are indeed sold at a higher price in Korea
than in the United States.)
14. (Perfect Price Discrimination) Why is the perfectly discriminating monopolist’s marginal
revenue curve identical to the demand curve it faces?
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Chapter 9 Monopoly 113
The perfectly discriminating monopolist can charge a different price for each unit as output
expands. By increasing output by one unit, the perfectly discriminating monopolist loses no
revenue from previous output since the prices attached to previous units do not change. The
gain in revenue is therefore just the price charged on the marginal unit.
a. It will produce 100 units of output and sell them at a price of $10 each
b. Total cost of approximately $750; total revenue of $1,000
c. Economic profit of approximately $250
16. (Monopoly) Suppose that a certain manufacturer has a monopoly on the sorority and fraternity
ring business (a constant-cost industry) because he has persuaded the “Greeks” to give it
exclusive rights to their insignia.
a. Using demand and cost curves, draw a diagram depicting the firm’s profit-maximizing price
and output level.
b. Why is marginal revenue less than price for this firm?
c. On your diagram, show the deadweight loss that occurs because the output level is
determined by a monopoly rather than by a competitive market.
d. What would happen if the Greeks decided to charge the manufacturer a royalty fee of $3
per ring?
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use
as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for class-
room use.
114 Chapter 9 Monopoly
a.
17. (Global Economic Watch) Go to the Global Economic Crisis Resource Center. Select Global Issues
in Context. In the Basic Search box at the top of the page, enter the phrase "Google monopoly." On
the Results page, go to the Global Viewpoints section. Click on the link for the February 19, 2010,
article "Is Google Gaining a Monopoly on the World's Information?" Does Google enjoy a barrier to
entry? What is the source of that barrier, if any?
Although the article was not explicit, Google appears to benefit from a barrier to entry based on
economies of scale. Technology firms often have high fixed costs, but low marginal costs. Therefore,
the first firm to grow large enough, enjoys very low average cost per unit. This cost advantage be-
comes a barrier to entry.
18. (Global Economic Watch) Go to the Global Economic Crisis Resource Center. Select Global Issues
in Context. In the Basic Search box at the top of the page, enter the term "price discrimination."
Write a paragraph about one example of an organization practicing price discrimination.
Student answers will vary. Make sure the examples demonstrate organizations increasing profit by
charging different groups of consumers different prices for the same product.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.