These days, it is believed that career satisfaction can be achieved by working a job

consistently from the beginning rather than changing jobs regularly. From my
perspective, I totally agree with the idea for the following justifications:

Firstly, it is irrefutable that long-time employees can gain profound experience, which
has beneficial effects on their work. This is because when workers have been
responsible for the same tasks for many years, they have enough ability to arrange
assignments and solve problems effectively thanks to their previous mistakes.
Therefore, work can be completed quickly and efficiently, enhancing productivity in the
workplace.

Another compelling reason for the idea is that people would benefit from better job
prospects, which include promotion opportunities and pay rises, if they stayed in a job
for the long term. As experience and commitment are both carefully considered when a
company decides who to promote or dismiss, those who work longer for an organization
stand a higher chance of moving up the ladder and earning a lucrative living. This is
particularly true in the case of Korea and Japan, where employees get a fixed career
promotion path based on their working time and loyalty rather than outstanding
performance.

Last but not least, people who stay in the same job may establish a wide and steady
network of partners as well as gain supportive long-term colleagues. Moreover, they
also feel more comfortable and are less likely to suffer from stress than job hoppers,
who have to adapt to new workplaces and face challenging experiences.

In conclusion, I agree that people should be loyal to one organization for the experience
accumulation, professional promotion prospects, and good relationships with colleagues
that would bring them a fulfilling career and secure a better livelihood.