Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Polity 14 - Daily Class Notes - UPSC Prahar 2024 (Hinglish)
Polity 14 - Daily Class Notes - UPSC Prahar 2024 (Hinglish)
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Indian Polity
Lecture – 14
Article 14, Article 15,
Article 16, Article 17
2
NOTE:
In the P.A. Inamdar vs State of Maharashtra Case (2005), Supreme Court stated that the State cannot impose
the policy of reservation on unaided educational institutions.
The Supreme Court upheld the Constitutional validity of the 93rd Constitutional Amendment Act in the Ashok
Thakur vs Union of India Case.
3
Article 15 (6)
It empowers the State to make special provisions for economically weaker sections of citizens.
The State is empowered to provide 10% of the reservation of seats for the EWS (Economically weaker
section) category for admission into educational institutions – both aided and unaided educational
institutions except minority institutions.
The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 2019 provides 10% reservation Economically Weaker
Sections (EWS) of society for admission to the center of government and private educational institutions.
NOTE: In order to identify the EWS category (for up to 10% reservation) following criteria will be used:
1. Family income
2. Economic disadvantage indices, etc.
Article 16:
Article 16 (1):
It provides for equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.
Article 16 (2):
It prohibits the State from discriminating against citizens in matters of public employment only on
the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth, residence, descent and any of them.
Article 16 (3):
It empowers the Parliament to prescribe residents on grounds of qualification in case of certain classes
of employment of the State.
Mulk/Mulkhi rule which was formulated by the Nizam of Hyderabad before independence reserved Class
3 and Class 4 jobs in the State only for the local people because of the precarious socio-economic
conditions prevalent in the State of Hyderabad.
After independence and enactment of the Constitution Mulk rule was violating Article 16 (2).
Therefore the Parliament under Article 16 (3) gave a legal basis to the provision of Mulk rule, which
operated in the present-day Telangana region of Andhra Pradesh for some period (10 years).