Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEALYBUGS. Final Paper
MEALYBUGS. Final Paper
Description
Mealybug bodies are distinctly segmented and usually covered with wax. Older individuals
may have wax filaments around their body margins. In some species the filaments are longer
in the rear and can be used to help distinguish between different species.
Mealybugs are usually found feeding in colonies in somewhat protected areas such as
between two touching fruits, in the crown of a plant, in branch crotches, on stems near soil, or
between the stem and touching leaves. A few mealybugs species feed on roots.
While adult females are wingless and similar in shape to nymphs, adult male mealybugs,
which are rarely seen, are tiny two-winged insects with two long tail filaments. Many mealybug
species can reproduce asexually without mating. Life cycles vary somewhat by species. Adult
females of most mealybugs lay 100-200 or more eggs in cottony egg sacs over a 10- to 20-day
period. Egg sacs may be attached to crowns, leaves, bark, fruit or twigs. An exception is the
long-tailed mealybug, which produces eggs that remain within the female until they hatch.
Newly hatched mealybug nymphs (called crawlers) are yellow to orangish or pink, lack wax,
and are quite mobile, but they begin to excrete a waxy covering soon after settling down to
feed (Figure 3). Although older nymphs and adults have legs and can move, they don’t move
very far or very rapidly. Nymphs molt through several instars before becoming adults.
Depending on species and environment, mealybugs may have two to six generations a year.
Where climates are warm or plants are growing indoors, all stages may be present throughout
the year. On deciduous plants such as grapevines, mealybugs may overwinter on or under
bark as eggs (within egg sacs) or as first-stage nymphs.
Mealybugs are sometimes confused with other pests that produce waxy coatings, honeydew,
and black sooty mold, including the cottony cushion scale, woolly aphids, and even some soft
scales and whiteflies. Be sure to carefully examine the insect beneath the wax to identify it
properly.
PHILIPPINE MEALYBUGS
DESCRIPTION. Live specimens with moderately thin covering of white powdery secretion;
occurring on young prop roots of host plant, usually at or near apex.
Adult female (slide-mounted, elongate-oval, 2.20 mm long, 1.10 mm wide. Dorsum. With 17
pairs of cerarii; anal lobe pair each with two large coni- cal setae, 2-4 slender auxiliary setae
and a cluster of closely spaced trilocular pores, all borne upon a more or less oblong, strongly
sclerotized area. Penultimate cerarii each with 2 conical setae that are slightly larger than
those of anterior cerarii, 4-5 slender auxiliary setae, a similar cluster of trilocular pores, all
borne upon a more or less rounded sclerotized area. Other cerarii each with two conical setae
that are smalle than those of the anal lobe pair, except for the cephalic and anterior
metathoracic pairs which may have 3 or 4; several auxiliary setae; a cluster of trilocular pores
and more or less circular sclerotized surrounding areas.
Two pairs of ostioles present. Trilocular pores numerous. Oral-rim tubular ducts present, one
each in the following: just posterior to the frontal cerarii, near the first mesothoracic cerarii and
near the first four pairs of abdominal cerarii. Apparently lacking on other parts of dorsum. A few
oral- collars on setae small, flagellate, scattered over. Anal ring rather large, apical, with 6
setae that are twice as long as diameter of ring.
The specific epithet is derived from the Filipino (Tagalog) common name of the type of host
pant “Balite”.
This species was redescribed and illustrated by Ferris (In Zimmerman,1948). It is similar to
Pseudococcus comstocki by the absence of discoidal pores near the eyes and the presence of
translucent pores on the hind coxae. It differs, however, in having longer body setae on the
posterior marginof the anterior dorsal ostioles and mediodorsum of thorax. Capco (1959) first
reported its occurrence in the Philippines.
P. elisae has the following distinguishing characters: without multilocular disc pores on the
dorsal surface of the body; with six to eight discoidal pores near the eyes; oral-rim tubular
("mushroom-shaped") ducts with two discoidal micropores and one or two body setae; with
irregular discoidal pores; body setae along a median dorsal line on thorax up to 0.030 mm
long, those along posterior margin of anterior ostioles up to 0.022 mm long; and hind coxae
without translucent pores. He also mentioned that this Colombian spe- cies was found on
bananas.
4. Pseudococcus longispinus (Targioni- Tozzetti)
The distinguishing features of this species are the presence of groups of three, dorsal oral-rim
ducts (one large and two small ones), next to most cerari; the few ventral multilocular disc
pores that are confined to areas around the vulva; the sclerotized bases of the penultimate and
anal lobe cerarii; and the presence of 60-80 translucent dots on the hind tibiae and a circulus.
Specimens collected from Salacca leaves agree with the characters of this species except that
only one large and one small dorsal oral-rim ducts are present near most cerari and there are
less than 10 translucent dots on the hind tibiae, in addition to the relatively small size. They
look like miniature individuals of P. longispinus. This species is a new record for the
Philippines.
Williams (1970) redescribed and illustrated this species. Unlike other Phil- ippine species of
Pseudococcus which have 17 pairs of cerarii, P. saccharicola has at most only 16 pairs, each
with only one oral-rim tubular duct nearby, when present.
Material at hand collected from the underground portion near the roots of Saccharum
spontaneum agrees well with Takahashi's and Williams' descrip- tions except for the apparent
lack of a circulus and an oral-rim tubular duct immediately posterior to each frontal cerarius.
Lit (1992) described this species as close to P. pandanicola Takahashi in having all the cerarii
borne on well-defined sclerotized areas but differs mainly in lacking a row of three or four
moderately large oral-rim tubular ducts on each side along the posterior margin on the venter
of the seventh abdominal segment. Furthermore, the basal segment of each antenna of P
spathoglottidis is not notched or incised on its inner face near the base.
MODE OF DAMAGE
Feeding may occur on all plant parts. High populations slow plant growth and cause premature
leaf or fruit drop and twig dieback. At first, plants may appear to lack vigour, leaves then yellow
and may drop. Feeding on growing tips and buds can cause distorted growth as they inject
toxins into the plant. At high populations plants can completely wilt and die. The white fluffy
growth can also cause plants to be cosmetically unsaleable. Furthermore, mealybugs produce
honeydew, a sticky, sugary solution, on which black sooty mould grows and can be
unattractive. Ants often attend mealybugs to harvest the honeydew. This may cause mealybug
infestations to be even more troublesome as it may reduce predation and parasitism by natural
enemies.
Mealybugs are known vectors of several plant viruses, including Banana streak virus,
Grapevine leafroll associated virus and Pineapple mealybug-wilt associated virus, all of which
occur in Australia. Other viruses vectored by mealybugs also occur overseas. They are not
particularly good vectors as they crawl, rather than fly, from plant to plant, unless they are
distributed by wind currents or ants. Consequently, spread of virus from mealybugs tends to be
slow; these viruses can be spread through other means.
Host range
As a group mealybug attack a very broad range of plants including fruits and vegetables,
indoor plants and outdoor ornamentals like annuals, perennials, shrubs, palms, grasses and
trees. In other words, almost all plant species present in a nursery can be fed upon by at least
one mealybug species. Some mealybug species have a very wide host range and are more
likely to be encountered in a production nursery. For example, citrus mealybug has been
reported across plants from about 50 plant families and can be a pest on 4 begonia, boronia,
cactus, calathea, canna lily, citrus, coleus, croton, cycads, cyclamen, dahlia, eriostemon,
narcissus, tulip and many other plant species. Long tailed mealybug is reported from about 30
plant families and can be a pest of bromeliad, bulbs, citrus, custard apple, fern, fuschia,
grapefruit, grape, hibiscus, Japanese maple, olive, orchid, palm, passionfruit, pine, pomefruit,
stonefruit, Zamia and many other species. Fortunately, not all mealybugs have a very wide
host range. For example, M. albizziae has only been reported feeding on Acacia spp. and
banana. As stated earlier, it is important to have mealybugs identified. This will allow you to
investigate the host range of the species, its biology and information known on specific
management of the pest.
SPECIES DESCRIPTION SPECIES DESCRIPTION
Longtailed mealybug Two tail filaments Cypress bark mealybug Round, bright
Pseudococcus longispinus that are longer Ehrhornia cupressi orange or red and
than its body. surrounded with a
Gives birth to live ring of wax.
nymphs and Found beneath
produces no egg bark plates.
masses.
Citrus mealybug Short, equal- Pink Pineapple mealybugs very small, about 1
Planococcus citri length waxy Dysmicoccus brevipes mm wide, but are
filaments around visible to the naked
the body. A dark eye. They appear
stripe may be fuzzy with white
visible down its wax, with a pink or
back. pink-orange hue
underneath the
wax. They are oval
and appear
humped. The
ventral surface of
the adult mealybug
has 17 pairs of wax
filaments along the
edge.
Host: Coconut
Pest and Disease Management
This illustration shows the methods promoted on infonet-biovision. The methods shown at the top have
a long-term effect, while methods shown at the bottom have a short-term effect. In organic farming
systems, methods with a long-term effect are the basis of crop production and should be of preference.
On the other hand, methods with a short-term effect should be used in emergencies only. On infonet we
do not promote synthetic pesticides.
Further below you find concrete preventive and curative methods against Mealybugs.
Cultural practices
Monitoring
Early detection of mealybugs is necessary for effective control. Check plants for crawlers; pay special
attention to the new growth (tender issues), the undersides of leaves and around leaf joints.
Cultural management practices minimise infestations by mealybugs (and other scale insects).
Always inspect new stock carefully, particularly host plant species that are prone to attack from
mealybugs (and other pests and diseases). Inspect all plant parts, including roots for any signs of
pests.
Monitor plants regularly, including roots. Plant species that are prone to mealybugs (or other pests)
should be monitored more consistently. Refer to monitoring section.
Remove plants with heavy infestations, taking care to reduce spread of mealybugs while doing so. If
infestations are limited to a particular branch and it can be pruned, remove this plant material and
monitor closely to ensure the rest of the plant is clean.
Remove crop debris and disinfest the growing area after removing a consignment of plants that have
had mealybugs with a suitable product, e.g. farmcleanse, bleach or similar product. Mealybugs can
survive for weeks on crop debris and in egg masses that have fallen off plants. This practice will also
reduce other pests and diseases that may be lingering from previous crop cycles.
When only a small number of plants are present with a low rate of infection, squash mealybugs and
egg batches. Squashing large numbers of mealybugs may irritate skin, but can be avoided by using
rubber gloves. The presence of a small number of individuals should prompt regular and rigorous
inspections of the consignment.
Avoid staff movement in areas known to be infested with mealybugs and other pests. If necessary,
disinfest clothing and equipment after working in such areas.
Provide an optimal growing environment, including appropriate nutrition, water, growing media and
other conditions; weak plants are more susceptible to damage at lower populations of pests.
Control ants as they spread crawlers and protect mealybugs from natural enemies.
Thoroughly disinfest recycled pots to avoid transferring eggs and nymphs from crop to crop.
Only propagate from clean mother stock plants. In other words, do not take cuttings from plants that
have mealybugs (or other pests) present. Even one crawler on a cutting (which is virtually impossible to
detect) will multiply the problem significantly.
Removing mealybugs by rubbing or picking mealybugs from affected plants. This is practicable
when infestation is low
Pruning and destroying affected parts. This is particularly useful at the initial stage of infestation.
Spraying a steady stream of water (reasonably high pressure) on the host plant to knock-off
mealybugs. Once on the ground, the fallen ones will be available to ground predators and this
will also make their return to the plant difficult. Make sure that there are no ants tending
mealybugs, otherwise they will be brought back to the host plants.
Ensuring soil fertility. In most cases healthy plants are able to withstand some mealybug attack.
Moreover, improvement of soil fertility can enhance biological control activity as shown in the
case of the cassava mealybug. It was observed that cassava grown in poor soils (pure sand and
no mulch cover) had high mealybug infestations even after the release of the parasitic
wasp Apoanagyrus lopezi. In experiments conducted in Benin use of manure or other fertilisers
resulted in a reduction in the cassava mealybug population. Improved plant nutrition resulted in
the production of larger mealybugs, which in turn resulted in a higher proportion of female
parasitic wasps with higher fertility levels. Mulch and fertiliser use also enhanced the antibiotic
properties of cassava against mealybug infestation (Schulthess, et al., 1997; Neuenschwander,
2003).
Natural enemies
Mealybugs are attacked by numerous natural enemies, which usually keep them under control. Most
common natural enemies include parasitic wasps, ladybird beetles, hover
flies and lacewings. However, if many ants are present, or when broad-spectrum pesticides are used,
they kill the natural enemies, mealybugs become a problem.
Mealybugs can also cause severe damage when introduced to new areas where efficient natural
enemies are absent. In this case, importation of natural enemies associated with the mealybugs in the
area of origin (classical biological control), have usually given satisfactory control. Thus, several natural
enemies, mainly parasitic wasps and ladybird beetles, were introduced from South America into Africa
for control of the cassava mealybug. The most effective has been the parasitic
wasp (Apoanagyrus (=Epidinocarsis) lopezi), which has kept this mealybug at low levels, resulting on a
significant reduction of yield losses in most areas in Africa.
Another example is the mango mealybug Rastrococcus invadens, which was brought under control in
West and Central Africa by two parasitic wasps (Gyranusoidea tebygi and Anagyrus mangicola)
introduced from India. Another mango mealybug Rastrococcus iceryoides is a major pest of mango in
East Africa, mainly Tanzania and coastal Kenya. Although several natural enemies are known to attack
this mealybug in its aboriginal home of southern Asia none have been introduced so far into East Africa.
The Kenya mealybug, which was a major pest of Arabica coffee in the East Rift Area of Kenya
between 1923 and 1939, has been reduced to a minor pest after the release of natural enemies from
Uganda in 1938.
Originally from South America, this small brown wasp (about 3mm
long) has distinctive, long antennae, similar in length to the rest of
its body. It is a parasitoid wasp, laying its eggs in citrus mealybug
only. This species is extremely efficient in finding and parasitising
citrus mealybug, even at low densities, but will not attack other
species of mealybugs.
Adults live for about a month and can lay about 80 eggs over her
lifetime. Females lay their eggs in large mealybug nymphs or adults that have not started to lay eggs.
Larvae develop inside mealybugs, which probably stop feeding and will not lay eggs to be laid once
parasitised. Eventually, the mealybug changes to a ‘mummy’, being oval, bloated and legless. Adults’
wasps emerge from mealybugs after about 2-3 weeks, starting their life cycle over again. This species
is available commercially from Bugs for Bugs.
Conservation of natural enemies is important to reduce mealybug outbreaks. This can be done by:
Limiting insecticidal sprays against other mealybugs or/and other pests and diseases, and
avoiding use of broad-spectrum pesticides.
Controlling ants to facilitate build-up of natural enemies. Ant control may be either indirect, by
excluding ants from the tree (for example, by applying a barrier around the stems or trunks of
the trees) or direct, by destroying the ant nests. However, it should also be taken into
consideration that some ants may be beneficial as predators by deterring pests such as plant-
feeding bugs.
Keeping flowering plants at the boarder of the crops or as companion plant within the crops may
help to attract natural enemies.
Neem
Neem products have a repellent effect on some mealybugs (Saxena, 2002). For example, a 1% hexane
extract of neem seeds repelled the citrus mealybug in a choice test (Jacobson et al., 1978).
Young cassava mealybugs are sensitive to neem kernel water extract (NKWE). Thus, crawlers
(first instar nymphs) of the cassava mealybug were repelled by leaves treated with a 10% neem kernel
water extract, and those that settled and started feeding died in the second instar. Treatment of
cassava plants with neem extracts (NKWE) at concentration of between one and 25% provided good
protection against the cassava mealybug. However, some phytotoxicity manifested as yellow spots on
the leaves, was observed on plants treated with neem extracts. Phytotoxic damage was slight in plants
treated with lower concentrations (1% and 10%), but plants treated with neem extracts at 25% showed
severe phytotoxic symptoms on some of the leaves (Mourier 1997).
Soap spray
When necessary, spray with soapy solutions (1 to 2%) or insecticidal soaps. Spraying with a soap and
water solution is reported to control mealybugs. Whenever possible, spray only infested plants (spot
spraying).
Oils
Oils such as vegetable oils (e. g. rape oil) neem oil and mineral oils are useful for control of mealybugs.
Application of soap and oil: Good spray coverage and good timing is important when using soapy
solutions and oils. To be effective they must come in contact with the mealybugs. Crawlers are the
easiest to kill, since they are more susceptible and are more exposed than eggs, older nymphs and
adults. As they grow, the wax covering their bodies becomes thicker, rendering them more resistant to
insecticides. Use with caution soapy solutions and oils. These products may be toxic to some plants
causing discolouration or burning of foliage. Prior to applying them extensively, apply to a small,
inconspicuous branch or to a few plants and after 48 hours check for adverse reactions. Apply them
when the air temperature is cool. Make sure your plants were watered well the day before you apply
your control - never spray wilted plants.
References:
BEARDSLEY, J.W. JR. 1986. Taxonomic notes on Pseudococcus elisae Borchsenius, a mealybug new to the
Hawaiian fauna (Homoptera, Pseudococcidae). Proc. Hawaii. Ent. Soc. 26: 31-34.
Bettiga, L. J. (editor). 2013. Grape Pest Management. UCANR Publication 3343. Richmond, CA. (See chapters
37-42 for information on mealybugs on grapes).
BREWBAKER, J.L. 1986. Leucaena Psyllids - Problems and Proposed Solutions. University of Hawaii at Manoa,
College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources.
CABI. (2005). Crop Protection Compendium, 2005 Edition. © CAB International Publishing. Wallingford, UK.
www.cabi.org
Cloyd, R. A. 2011. Mealybug Management in Greenhouses and Interiorscapes (PDF). Kansas State University
AES and CE Bulletin MF3001. 4pp.
Dick J., (1969). The mealybugs of sugar cane. In: Williams J.R.Metcalfe JR, Mungomery R.W., Mathes R, eds.
Pests of Sugar Cane. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 343-365.
Donahue, J. D. and Brewer. M. J .(1998). Scales and Mealybugs. Cooperative Extension Service. College of
Agriculture. University of Wyoming.ces.uwyo.edu
Dreistadt, S. H. 2001. Integrated Pest Management for Floriculture and Nurseries. UC ANR Publication 3402,
Oakland, CA.
Dreistadt, S. H. 2016. Pests of Landscape Trees and Shrubs: An Integrated Pest Management Guide, 3rd edition.
UC ANR Publication 3359, Oakland, CA.
Godfrey, K. E., K. M. Daane, W. J. Bentley, R. J. Gill, and R. Malakar-Kuenen. 2002. Mealybugs in California
Vineyards. UCANR Publication 21612, Oakland, CA.
Hill, S. D. (1983). Agricultural insect pests of the tropics and their control. Second edition. Cambridge University
Press. ISBN: 0-521-24638-5.
Jacobson, M., Reed, D.K., Crystal, M. M., Moreno, D. S., and Soderstrom, E. L. (1978). Chemistry and biological
activity of insect feeding deterrents from certain weed or crop plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24, 248-257.
KARI (1984). Horticultural crops protection handbook. National Horticultural Research Station, Thika. Ministry
of Agriculture and Livestock Development. Republic of Kenya.
KOSZTARAB, M. and M.P. KOSZTARAB. 1988. A Selected Bibliography of the Coccoidea (Homoptera), Third
Supplement (1970-1985). Studies on the Morphology and Systematics of Scale Insects no. 14. Va. Polytech. Inst.
& Sta. Bul. 88-1: 252.
Le Pelley R.H. (1968). Pests of coffee. London and Harlow, UK: Longmans, Green and Co Ltd.
LIT, L. JR. L. 1083. Mealybugs (Pseudococcidae, Coccoidea, Hemiptera) of Mount Makiling and Environs,
Laguna, Philippines. B.S.A. thesis. Dept. of Entom., UPLB. xiv + 165 p. Unpublished.
LIT, I. JR. L. 1992. A new genus and ten new species of Philippine mealybugs (Pseudococcidae, Coccoidea,
Hemiptera). Philipp. Ent. 8(5): 1158-1181, 10 figs.
Lit IL Jr, Calilung VJ, 1994. Philippine mealybugs of the genus Pseudococcus (Pseudococcidae, Coccoidea,
Hemiptera). Philippine Entomologist, 9(3):254-267
LIT. 1. JR. LV.J. CALILUNG and L.T. VILLACARLOS, 1990. Notes on scale insects and mealybugs (Coccoidea,
Hemiptera) of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Philipp. Ent. 8(1): 707-708.
MEDINA, C.P. 1987. Biology and ecology of the spiraling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Homoptera:
Aleyrodidae) and its natural enemies in the Philippines. M.S, thesis. Depart ment of Entomology, UPLB. i-xii+ 79
p. Unpublished.
MORRISON, H. and A. V. RENK. 1957. A Selected Bibliography of the Coccoidea. U.S.D.A. Misc. Publ. 734: 1-
222.
MORRISON, H. and A.V. RENK. 1957. A Selected Bibliography of the Coccoidea. First Supplement. USDA.
Misc. Publ. 987: 1-44.
Mourier, M. (1997). Effects of neem (Azadirachta indica) kernel water extracts on cassava mealybug,
Phenacoccus manihoti (Hom.,Pseudococcidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 121(4):231-236.
Neuenschwander, P. (2003). Biological control of cassava and mango mealybugs. In Biological Control in IPM
Systems in Africa. Neuenschwander, P., Borgemeister, C and Langewald. J. (Editors). CABI Publishing in
association with the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) and the Swiss
Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC). pp. 45-59. ISBN: 0-85199-639-6.
OISAT (Online Information Service for Non-Chemical Pest Management in the Tropics) www.oisat.org
RUSSELL, L.M., KOSZTARAB, M. and M.P. KOSZTARAB. 1974. A Selected Bibliography of the Coccoides.
Second Supplement, U.S.D.A. Misc. Publ. 1281: 1-122.
Schulthess, F., Neuenschwander, P., and Gounou, S. (1997). Multi-trophic interactions in cassava, Manihot
esculenta, cropping systems in the subhumid tropics of West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 66
(3): 211-222.
Sugimoto S, 1994. Scale insects intercepted on banana fruits from Mindanao Is., the Philippines (Coccoidea:
Homoptera). Research Bulletin of the Plant Protection Service, Japan, No. 30:115-121; 19 ref.
Varela, A. M., Seif, A. and Nyambo, B. ( 2006). A Guide to IPM in Mango Production in Kenya. Icipe Science
Press. ISBN: 92-9064-176-2.www.icipe.org
WILLIAMS, DJ. 1988. The distribution of the Neotropical mealybug Pseudococcus elisue Borchsenius in the
Pacific Region and Southern Asia. Ent. Mon. Mag. 124: 1488-1491.
Williams D.J., Granara de Willink, M.C. 1992. Mealybugs of Central and South America. CAB International,
London, England. 635 pp.
Watson G. (July 2007). Invasive Insect Report 2004.06. Coconut mealybug Nipaecoccus nipae (Homoptera:
Pseudococcidae). University of Guam Cooperative Extension Service Knowledgebase Wiki.
http://guaminsects.net/uogces/kbwiki/index.php?title=IRR2004.06 (4 May 2009). Retrieved from:
https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN815 (September 14,2023)
Williams D. J., Watson G. W. The scale insects of the tropical South Pacific region. Part 2. The mealybugs
(Pseudococcidae) CAB International; Wallingford: 1988. 260. Retrieved from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030212/ (September 14, 2023
SUPPORTING LINKS:
http://ephytia.inra.fr/en/C/7438/Eggplant-Mealybugs#:~:text=Adults%2C%20small%20winged%20midges
%20whose,masked%20by%20white%20mealy%20wax.
https://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/PESTNOTES/pn74174.htm
file:///C:/Users/TOSHIBA/OneDrive/Documents/chona2023/CROP%20PROT/Mealybugs/pnmealybugs.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/mealybug
https://www.google.com/search?
sca_esv=564995893&rlz=1C1GCEA_enPH1012PH1012&sxsrf=AM9HkKlBgFSx9JTBl1jXAUe7aU72UkX4WA:169460
9064381&q=mealybugs&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjeu8LazqeBAxW0fGwGHRHKCH0Q0pQJe
gQIDRAB&biw=1280&bih=603&dpr=1.5#imgrc=sJQmPybUjSI8XM
https://thephilippineentomologist.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Lit-et-al.pdf
https://thephilippineentomologist.org/2022/03/17/philippine-mealybugs-of-the-genus-pseudococcus-
pseudococcidae-coccoidea-hemiptera/
https://thephilippineentomologist.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Lit-and-Calilung.pdf
https://extension.umd.edu/resource/mealybugs-indoor-plants
https://www.horticulture.com.au/globalassets/hort-innovation/resource-assets/ny11001-mealy-bugs.pdf?
fbclid=IwAR1DpjAb-K1-sZpP4nfsRs5lmcBCzDDkWI6VbQ2qdr7ZKxmteIXFabQ9q-o
https://www.fruitnet.com/asiafruit/mealybugs-attack-bananas-in-philippines/1878.article
https://www.google.com/search?
q=buff+coconut+mealybugs+pictures&rlz=1C1GCEA_enPH1012PH1012&oq=buff+coconut+mealybug&aqs=chro
me.1.69i57j33i160l2.4416j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#vhid=8EJ5AlwAAtjWmM&vssid=l
https://www.pcaarrd.dost.gov.ph/index.php/quick-information-dispatch-qid-articles/dost-project-identified-
potential-biocontrol-agents-against-queen-pineapple-pests
https://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/FRUIT/MEALYBUGS/pineapple_mealybug.htm#:~:text=Adult
%20pineapple%20mealybugs%20are%20very,wax%20filaments%20along%20the%20edge.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030212/
https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/IN815
https://www.infonet-biovision.org/PlantHealth/Pests/mealybugs#:~:text=Mealybugs%20damage%20plants
%20by%20sucking,and%20shedding%20of%20young%20fruit.
https://www.google.com/search?q=green
%20lacewing&tbm=isch&rlz=1C1GCEA_enPH1012PH1012&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB4QtI8BKAFqFwoTCPjbvYH0qIE
DFQAAAAAdAAAAABAX&biw=1263&bih=603
https://www.google.com/search?
q=brown+wasp+hunting+mealybugs&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwiH2_WK9qiBAxVr2zgGHYg7CqAQ2-
cCegQIABAA&oq=brown+wasp+hunting+mealybugs&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQAzoECCMQJ1CmCFicImC6JGgAcAB4AoA
BpgSIAcsSkgELMC4zLjIuMy4wLjGYAQCgAQGqAQtnd3Mtd2l6LWltZ8ABAQ&sclient=img&ei=Kl4CZYeeJOu24-
EPiPeogAo&bih=603&biw=925&rlz=1C1GCEA_enPH1012PH1012