Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Team Communication
Team Communication
Team Communication
Table of Contents
o What is a team?
o The sender
o The message
o Encoding
o Noise
o The channel
o The receiver(s)
o Decoding
o Feedback
o Environment
o Context
o Initiating communication
o Replies
o Be honest
o Listen attentively
Conclusion
Before we explain what team communication is, let’s start with the basics of what
working in a team implies. Here, we’ll talk about the basic definitions of teams,
communication, teamwork, and how team communication connects these terms.
What is a team?
All of this implies that teams need to communicate frequently and effectively.
What is teamwork?
Trust;
Constant collaboration;
Open communication.
After all, the flow of new ideas, recognition meant to highlight your efforts thus
far, feedback meant to inspire you to improve further, or, in gist, everything
beneficial that comes from teamwork, requires constant, proper communication.
The sender;
The message;
Encoding;
Noise;
The channel;
The receiver(s);
Decoding;
Feedback.
The environment;
The context.
The sender
The sender (also often referred to as “the source”) is the foundation of the
communication process, as the sender is the person who initiates communication.
After the sender generates a piece of information they want to transmit, they
encode it in such a way that the receiver is able to understand it.
encouraging feedback
removing communication barriers.
The message
The message is the piece of information (e.g. a thought or idea) the sender wants to
transfer to others. According to Scott McLean, the author of “The Basics of
Interpersonal Communication”, a message in a communication process
represents “the stimulus or meaning produced by the source for the receiver or the
audience”.
In spoken form;
In written form;
As visual information;
As nonverbal cues.
The way in which the sender will transmit the message will depend on the situation
and the type of information the sender wants to convey.
Encoding
Encoding is the process of turning the thought or idea the sender wants to convey
into communication.
The process of encoding may involve the sender choosing the right words in the
right order to “describe” the thought or idea (or selecting a suitable visual aid for
this purpose) and then placing the message into an appropriate channel.
Noise
1. Physiological noisei.e. the factors that affect how we feel and think (e.g.
hunger, headaches, fatigue, etc.);
2. Physical noisei.e. the interferences in our environment (e.g. cold offices,
music on the radio, people talking loudly nearby, etc.);
3. Psychological noisei.e. our qualities that affect how we communicate with
others (e.g. personal worries, relationship problems, etc.);
4. Semantic noisei.e. when communicators don’t understand each other (e.g.
due to jargon or technical language).
The channel
The receiver(s)
According to McLean, “the receiver receives the message from the source,
analyzing and interpreting the message in ways both intended and unintended by
the source.”
The receiver(s) (sometimes also referred to as “the audience”) may listen, read,
view, or otherwise experience the message.
Decoding
The process of decoding involves the receiver interpreting the message (e.g. a
thought or idea disclosed by the sender), and trying to understand it in the best way
possible.
Feedback
Environment
“The environment is the atmosphere, physical and psychological, where you send
and receive messages.”
For example, the environment in the communication process may refer to the room
where a conversation is taking place (e.g. smaller rooms require you don’t speak
loudly, as your receivers are likely standing right next to you).
But, it also refers to the appearance of the communicators (e.g. formal dress
implies that the conversation is formal and professional).
Context
According to McLean, context includes “the setting, scene, and expectations of the
individuals involved.”
So, now that we’ve understood the communication process in general, it’s time to
see how this process applies to communication in a team:
Well, in gist, the team communication process involves the same listed
elements in its process.
Imagine Rose, who writes articles for a blog, and Thomas, who creates illustrations
for that blog.
Initiating communication
Rose (the sender) wants Thomas to create a graph for her future blog post.
So she encodes her process of thought that led to the idea of creating a graph into
written form, where she explains how she wants the graph to look.
She manages to convey her idea for the graph clearly and concisely, despite being
distracted by her dog loudly barking at the front door of her home office (physical
noise).
She sends her request to Thomas (the receiver) as a direct message in a chat app,
such as Pumble (the channel of communication).
Rose also adds a reference image for the graph, just to make sure that Thomas
understands what elements this particular graph is supposed to have:
Rose Tennant: Hey Thomas! I’ve just finished a new blog post titled “Fun facts
and statistics about time zones”.
I’m sending you a link to the draft – https://docs.google.com/document/d/example
At one point in the text, I talk about the top 5 countries with the largest number of
time zones, and I wanted to create a graph for this data. The data I want you to
create a graph for is in the draft, I’ve highlighted it for you.
I was thinking that we could create a graph that involves a horizontal bar graph
and an appropriate illustration above it.
So, the title of the graph should be “5 countries with the largest number of time
zones” and it should be at the top.
The accompanying illustration should be below it. And, the actual horizontal bar
graph should be below the illustration.
The footnote should read:
France spans across 12 different time zones, despite being only 42. on the list of
the largest countries by total area. Source: United Nations Statistics Division
The illustration above the data and below the title could be a map of the world,
with the mentioned countries highlighted.
Conversation in Pumble
Replies
Thomas (the receiver) receives this written message and the reference image,
and decodes everything in such a way that he understands clearly what Rose has
envisioned for the graph. He manages to do so, despite being quite
hungry (physiological noise).
He sends her a reply that he will send her a sketch of the graph by 2 pm today, and
finish everything by tomorrow morning, 10 am at the latest (the
feedback/response).
Rose thanks him, and makes it clear that she is available for any further questions.
This communication process may repeat several times in the future, as Rose and
Thomas talk more about the graph, in which case the messages and feedback they
want to convey, their roles in the communication process, and even the noise that
obstructs their communication, may change.
Thomas Clark: OK, Rose, I’ve looked into everything and I understand what
you’re looking for. I’ll have a sketch for you by 2 pm today. Once you approve the
sketch, I’ll finish everything by tomorrow morning, at 10 am at the latest.
Rose Tennant: Thank you, Thomas! Let me know if I’ve left anything unclear or if
you have any further questions, so we’ll discuss the graph more.
“
Conversation in Pumble
Rose, as the sender, was successful at encoding her idea into a piece of
information. She explained everything she wanted the graph to contain, and she
was clear, precise, and concise while doing so. She sent Thomas a link to the draft
that contains the data, so he can take in a larger context of the data for the graph, if
needed. In the end, she made it clear that she’s available for further questions.
The chat app they used proved to be a great channel of communication for this
conversation, as it allowed Rose to attach a reference image to clarify her request.
Plus, considering that the conversation was realized in written form, Thomas can
use Rose’s description of the graph as a reference whenever he needs a reminder of
the points they’ve discussed.
Both Rose and Thomas were attentive when reading each other’s replies.
Both Rose and Thomas managed to overcome the noise (i.e. the barking dog and
the feeling of hunger) threatening to disrupt the effectiveness of their
communication process.
The atmosphere the two communicators built while communicating was pleasant,
and Rose did not let her dog (who was a part of that environment, at least on
Rose’s part) disrupt her line of thought at the time.
However, the course of this particular instance of the communication process could
have gone in a completely different direction:
The dog barking in front of Rose’s door could have led her to forget to highlight
important elements of the graph in her written message. Moreover, Thomas’s
feeling of hunger could have led him to misinterpret the type of graph Rose wants
him to create, even if she was clear about this in her written message. Thomas also
could have been distracted by his other assignments, meaning that he may have not
been paying sufficient attention to understand what Rose is requesting.
Rose could have also been vague in her request, meaning that Thomas may not
have understood what type of graph he needs to create. Thomas could have been
vague about when he’ll get back to Rose about her request. In addition, Rose could
have paid less attention to the formatting of her written request, which means that
Thomas could have had a harder time distinguishing where Rose’s written request
ends and where the data she wants to include in the graph starts.
There could have been technical issues
Thomas could have received the message later than it would have been ideal, due
to problems with his internet connection he wasn’t even aware of, considering he
usually creates illustrations in an offline app.
Rose Tennant: Hey Thomas! I’ve just finished a new blog post titled “Fun facts
and statistics about time zones”. At one point in the text, I talk about the top 5
countries with the largest number of time zones, and I wanted to create a graph for
this data: France – 12; The US and Russia – 11; The UK – 9; Australia – 8;
Canada – 6. Something simple, but elegant.
Thomas Clark: OK, Rose, sounds great. I’ll get back to you about this today or
tomorrow.
Why good team communication is important (a.k.a the benefits of team communication)
From better understanding, easier collaboration, increased productivity, to
improved creativity, easier problem solving, and a lower chance for conflict, here
are all the benefits of good team communication that highlight why you should
pursue it, for the sake of great teamwork.
But, teammates and managers who communicate with each other are more likely to
understand each other and overcome a number of obstacles in their work.
If you have a question, problem, or any concern, simply reach out to your
colleagues, managers, or employees for answers.
If you’re clear, concise, precise, but also attentive on your own end when
conversing with someone, you’ll increase the chances of understanding what has
been communicated, for both parties in the communication process.
As a result, business processes will run more smoothly and all obstacles in work
will be noticed and addressed in a timely manner.
For in-depth information about collaboration among teams, visit our Team
Collaboration Hub.
All teams strive for productivity. But, productivity is only possible if everyone
understands their roles in a team, the roles of their teammates, as well as the
expectations for their work:
“What is my deadline?”
Answers to these and similar questions bring clarity, and such clarity only comes
with investing an effort when communicating. As a direct result, everyone can
fully focus on pursuing the roles they play in the expectations for the common
goals of the team.
Moreover, good communication and better productivity are also
connected indirectly. When you communicate more frequently, you decrease the
chance for misunderstandings, which helps you work faster, and with better
quality.
It’s often said that two minds think better than one. And, according to another
article by the Harvard Business Review, communication that occurs between team
members (i.e. internal communication) and communication that occurs with people
outside of your team (i.e. external communication) both promote innovations, as
they enable you to learn from others and work with a larger pool of information.
So, once you have a particular idea, it’s a great practice to further discuss it with
other people. They can share their own knowledge and experience on the subject,
and contribute to your original idea with their own suggestions and alternative
solutions.
When everyone is aware of what benefits certain changes may mean for the future
of the team, a project they are working on, and maybe even the entire company,
these changes become much easier to accept.
Working on a project usually comes with its fair share of problems — problems
that may require some difficult decisions. And, according to the consulting
firm McKinsey, as many as 73% of senior executives believe their companies
make bad decisions more often than good decisions.
But, consulting with others makes difficult decisions easier, as you get a more
diverse set of opinions and solutions to choose from. This applies both when trying
to solve problems plaguing your individual tasks and your team’s project on the
whole.
But, teammates who communicate with each other, and aim to communicate
honestly, connect with each other better.
Moreover, if managers communicate with their teams more, they may better
understand individual team member’s skills and talents, and then use this
knowledge to assign the right tasks to the right people.
Diverse teams have teammates with different opinions, and such different opinions
may result in occasional conflicts. After all, the report “Workplace Conflict and
How Businesses Can Harness It to Thrive” shows that as many as 85% of
employees have conflicts to deal with, at least on some level. These conflicts may
stem from misunderstandings or the feeling that you’re disrespected, taken
advantage of, or disregarded in any way.
Good communication helps people voice their concerns, better understand each
other’s behaviors and thought processes, and then respond to differences in opinion
with a more open mind — thus easing or even preventing conflict.
On the other hand, when communication in teams is open and coworkers resolve
conflicts in a professional and mature way, people feel safe and at ease, which
allows them to work without any psychological and emotional impediments.
If you are able to listen attentively and convey your own messages with clarity, as
well as accept other people’s ideas and opinions, you help build the trust that
everyone understands their responsibilities and duties. More importantly, you help
build the trust that everyone means to carry out their work as expected.
It’s true that a group is only as strong as its weakest link, which is why it is vital to
build each individual in a team up and help them boost their self-esteem. Effective
group communication can do just that — help everyone feel their best to strengthen
the team as a whole.
Every time the team listens, respects, and maybe even accepts a new idea or
opinion, it paves the road for more diverse and useful input from other colleagues,
across the entire team, in future interactions.
An organization can’t foster great relationships with its clients and other external
parties if its internal communication is amiss.
When you need to communicate with the outside world, you do so as a whole.
When a representative talks to a prospective client, they do so on behalf of their
entire organization, so they need to be well aware of its internal processes.
However, it’s not just about your reputation in terms of how potential clients see
you — it’s also about building your employer brand.
Poor communication happens when the sender and receiver have a different take
on the message for one reason or another. In teams, this problem can occur on a 1-
to-1 level of interaction among teammates, between management and employees,
as well as within a team as a whole.
Acquiring strong team communication skills can do wonders for you and your
coworkers. But what makes effective communication in groups and teams?
Be honest
What’s more, when a team member expresses their disagreement with the general
idea, they provide a different perspective that could benefit everyone.
For example, a member of the marketing team is the only one who notices that the
new slogan could be misinterpreted. If they decide to keep quiet only because
everyone else agrees the slogan is great, this could seriously damage the brand.
As demonstrated in the example above with Rose and Thomas, one of the most
important components of successful team communication is being able to convey
the message clearly and precisely.
So think before you speak and try to get your point across as effectively as
possible.
Miscommunication leads to misunderstandings, and the latter can cause all sorts of
problems within your team, such as missed deadlines, errors, bottlenecks in the
workflow, and even conflict.
Respect your teammates’ time and energy and be careful not to overburden them.
If you want to delegate a task to someone, first check if they have the time and are
willing to do it. If someone is on a break and doing nothing, it doesn’t mean they
are available for work.
Being considerate can also mean offering help if you see that someone is
struggling or even bringing a cup of tea to a stressed-out colleague.
Seemingly little things can go a long way and truly strengthen your relationships
within the team.
Effective and efficient communication also depends on the team’s smart use of
different communication channels.
But even in the office, face-to-face communication is often not the best option. For
example, you won’t go from person to person delegating tasks if you can do that
through a project management platform. The latter option is much better organized
and time-saving.
Likewise, when remote workers need to consult their colleagues on a problem, it’s
much more practical to discuss it in a team chat app, such as Pumble, than send
emails back and forth.
Listen attentively
Getting your message across successfully is only part of the work. Great team
communication is also about active listening. This is a skill you can practice by
being attentive to what your colleagues are saying and truly understanding their
point of view.
You can encourage your interlocutor as they speak and respond appropriately.
This way, you’ll not only improve your overall team communication and
collaboration, but you will also show respect for the other team members and their
opinions.
No one is immune to mistakes, and we often can’t see our own errors. That’s why
we should value constructive criticism coming from our colleagues, as it can help
us learn, grow, and stay engaged.
In fact, 43% of highly engaged employees get feedback at least once a week.
Even if you don’t agree with the feedback you receive, take it with grace and don’t
get offended. Simply explain your perspective and try to find common ground.
Where there’s room for feedback, there’s room for improvement.
Being open to constructive criticism means allowing your team members to prompt
you to always strive to become better at what you do.
When left unaddressed, even small issues tend to create frustrations that eventually
lead to major problems in the team. So if something is bothering you, be sure to
communicate it in a respectful, neutral tone and try to deal with it right away.
Conclusion