Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OIIPCRA Restructuring Proposal V2
OIIPCRA Restructuring Proposal V2
Abstract
31.03.2023
Page 1 of 23
List of Table
Table 1: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation Component 1.1............................................9
Table 2: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation Component 1.2..........................................11
Table 3: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation Component 1.3..........................................11
Table 4: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation.............................................................................12
Table 5: Budget Allocation; Project Design Vs Restructuring Stage..................................................13
Table 6: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation Component 2.............................................15
Table 7: Budget Allocation: Project Design Vs Restructuring Stage..................................................17
Table 8: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation: Component 3............................................18
Table 9: Budget Allocation: Project Design Vs Restructuring Stage..................................................18
Table 10: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation: Component 4..........................................20
Table 11: Budget Allocation: Project Design Vs Restructuring Stage...............................................21
Table 12 (a): Restructuring of Budget by Project Components and Excess Budget.....23
Table 12 (b): Restructuring of Budget by Project Components and Excess Budget.....23
Page 2 of 23
Abbreviations
ABSO Agri-business Support Organization AE
Agri entrepreneur
APC Agriculture Production Commissioner
ATMA Agriculture Technology Management Agency
CAD Command Area Development
CERIP Contingent Emergency Response Implementation Plan CSA
Climate Resilient Agriculture
DOWR Department of Water Resources
ESMF Environment and Social Management Framework
FIAC Farmer’s Information and Advisory Centre
FPC Farmer Producer Company FPO
Farmer Producer Organization GIS
Geographic Information System
GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism HR
Human Resource
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICARDA
International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas
IRRI International Rice Research Institute
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
MIS Management Information System
MTR Mid-Term Review
OCTDMS Odisha Community Tank Development and Management Society
OIIPCRA Odisha Integrated Irrigation Project for Climate Resilient Agriculture OP
Operational Policy
OPPA Odisha Pani Panchayat Act OSSC
Odisha State Seed Corporation
PDO Project Development Objective
PIM Participatory Irrigation Management PP
Pani Panchayat
PPP Public Private Partnership
SHG Self-Help Group
SO Support Organization
WUA Water User Association
Page 3 of 23
DATA SHEET
BASIC INFORMATION
Borrower Country (ies) Republic of India
Project Name Odisha Integrated Irrigation Project for Climate Resilient Agriculture
Responsible Agency Department of Water Resources, Odisha
Project ID Financing Instrument Environmental Assessment Category
P163533 Investment Project Financing B-Partial Assessment
Financing & Implementation Modalities Contingent Emergency Response Component (CERC)
Approval Date Effective Date Expected Closing Date Closing Date Proposed
30-Sep-2019 16-Dec-2019 31-Dec-2025 31-Dec-2026
Proposed Development Objective(s)
The Project Development Objective is to intensify and diversify agricultural production and enhance climate
resilience in selected districts of Odisha.
Components
Component Name Cost (US$, millions)
1. Climate-Smart Intensification and Diversification of Production 74.60
2. Improving Access to Irrigation and Water Productivity 137.90
3. Institutional Capacity Strengthening 9.70
4. Project Management 12.93
5. Contingent Emergency Response 0.00
Summary Status of Financing (in US$, Millions)
Loan/ Credit/TF Net Commitment Surrendered Disbursed Undisbursed
IBRD-90110 164.59 9.00 15.14 140.85
Policy Waiver(s)
Does this restructure trigger the need for any policy waiver(s)? No
Form Type Based on the proposed changes this Restructuring type is
Full Restructuring Paper Financing/ Timeline
Safeguard Policies Triggered by the Project
Environmental Assessment OP/BP 4.01
Natural Habitats OP/BP 4.04
Pest Management OP 4.09
Physical Cultural Resources OP/BP 4.11
Indigenous Peoples OP/BP 4.10
Safety of Dams OP/BP 4.37
Page 4 of 23
1.0 Introduction:
The Department of Water Resources, Government of Odisha has been implementing “Odisha
Integrated Irrigation Project for Climate Resilient Agriculture (OIIPCRA)” with the support of
World Bank. The project expressed its interest in restructuring in view of emerging requirements
and target mass demand. Detail proposal for project restructuring is discussed in subsequent sections.
2.2.1.1 Sub-component 1.1: Support to Improved Productivity and Climate Resilience: This
sub-component supports farmer to adopt CSA technologies and practices to increase productivity,
improve resilience to climate shocks and reduce GHG emissions. The sub- component supports
extension service provision, through both public and private sector, to increase farmers’ awareness
and adoption of climate-smart technologies and practices. Agri entrepreneurs are supported to
enhance their capacity in promoting agribusiness activities. To improve farmers’ access to high
yielding and resilient seed varieties, the sub-component supports in creating farmers’ awareness
on resilient seed varieties, accelerate seed multiplication and dissemination, encourage the
private sector in seed supply chain linking to the AE network as well as to the Odisha State Seed
Corporation (OSSC) seed dealer network. This sub-component also finances collaboration /
partnerships with different institutions for the promotion of CRA technologies / practices like
IRRI, ICARDA etc.
Page 5 of 23
2.2.2 Component 2: Improving Access to Irrigation and Water Productivity:
Support under this component goes towards introducing water sector reforms, including piloting
of IWRM, support for the preparation of groundwater regulation, establishment of a PP support
unit in DOWR, piloting of Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in irrigation management, and
investments in selected cascades of irrigation tank systems.
Page 6 of 23
About 4,798 ha. of cultivated area has been provided with improved irrigation along with
adoption of different CRA practices by 2,826 farmers in the tank command and nearby areas.
Share of non-rice commodities in the total agricultural production system observed improving
along with emergence of agribusiness activities. Potential FPOs in the intervention areas have
been identified and they have been strengthened to take up agribusiness and value / supply chain
management.
The project has promoted adoption of CRA practices and crop diversification through
demonstrations of millets (1,247 ha.), promotion of green manure crops (3,572 ha.),
demonstration of oil seeds (2,825 ha.), demonstration of pulses (3,775 ha.) and promotion of 335
organic clusters in 6,700 ha. with the association of 13,982 farmers. Hybrid vegetable has also
been promoted in 2,552 ha. to enhance farmer’s income and support in crop diversification.
Women groups have also been supported for mushroom farming. To improve supply chain of
agricultural and horticultural commodities, individual farmers have been supported with pack
house (130 nos.), preservation units (109 nos.), and onion storage structures (130 no.). Capacity
building on CRA practices has been one of the key thrusts of the project through training,
exposure and hand holding support.
To augment pisciculture in the project area, individuals, and women SHGs have been supported
with required inputs (seed, feed, technology) in feasible tanks. Private hatcheries (28 nos.) have been
supported to enhance fingerling production and need based supply of fingerlings to the
intervention tanks.
Improving irrigation coverage, minimizing gap ayacut and bringing in water use efficiency has been
one of the prime focuses in the project. The project has prepared DPR for all 429 tanks and
identified solutions to improve the irrigation structures and systems. Tank rehabilitation
measures have been completed in 28 tanks with reduction of gap ayacut. Civil works contracts have
been made in 188 tanks and there are 89 tanks in tender stage. The project has also been supportive in
strengthening the PP support unit at State and district level by strengthening its human resource
capacity. The project interventions have been helpful to reorganize and strengthen 450 PPs covering
15 project districts. The project has taken initiatives for the promotion of PPP in irrigation
management along with PIM through PPs.
Capacity building has been an important activity under the project that supports all other components
and sub-components of the project. Based on the designed capacity building framework, the project
has trained 164 engineers covering all the project districts. About 120 personnel of SOs engaged by
the project to facilitate execution of the framed activities have also been trained on project and its
interventions. The project has also in the process of developing different modules/ manuals, as per the
identified needs of the target mass, including Govt. officials of associated Depts.
Page 7 of 23
5.0 Rationale for Project Restructuring:
Impact of COVID Pandemic: Project progress remained disproportionate during the initial project
period, i.e., 2019-20 and 2020-21 owing to the prevalence of COVID-19 pandemic. With
inconsistent physical progress, financial progress also remained lopsided. Hence, realignment of
both physical and financial aspects under all the sub-components seems essential.
Revisiting and Reframing Interventions: The activities that were framed during the design
stage was revisited during MTR. Revisiting the activities covered intervention approach, strategy of
execution, physical targets, and financials. Consultation with different stakeholders revealed
that while some framed interventions are required to be modified, some activities required change
in execution strategy. It is also recognized that the set physical target require modification,
looking at executional gap in the initial phases of the project. As revision of physical target will
induce financial revision and will have impact on the result indicators, restructuring can help to
make the intervention more realistic and achievable.
Mobilization of Executing Agencies: As per the design of the project, SOs play a vital role in
facilitating and execution of project activities across the sub-components. On-boarding of SOs
and their full-fledged association consumed major part of the initial project period. During this
initial phase, progress of preparatory activities remained slow which impacted upon
implementation of other activities that require community association, selection of target
beneficiaries etc. So, the time lapsed in preparatory work and slow progress of different other
activities during that period requires to be adjusted with the overall project life cycle and
accordingly the achievement targets. Hence, restructuring can be supportive in realignment of
both physical and financial aspects of project components / sub- components in a more realistic
and judicious manner. Further, placement of HR in the project and onboarding of SST / ABSO /
UNDP supported hands was time consuming. Mobilization of contractors through tender process
also consumed significant time and impacted on project progress.
Status of PP: It was observed in majority of the tanks that the existing PPs required to be
reorganized or reformed for their effective association in project activities. As project framed
activities, more specifically component II requires association of PP in the overall process, their
strengthening was given priority, so that related other activities can be taken up. After the association
of SOs, PP strengthening measures were taken up to prepare them to take up PIM and participate in
the project activities. Reorganization/ reformation of the PPs, as per the OPPA, consumed significant
part of the project duration and slowdown the physical progress of other activities that is based on
community organizations.
Achievements as per the Result Framework: The slowdown of activity execution further
retarded the realization of the result indicators and targets there by. During MTR, it is also
realized that some indicators required to be revisited and reframed along with the targets
Page 8 of 23
that are SMART and in consideration to the lapsed project cycle. So, along with physical and
financial reexamination and restructuring, reexamination of the result indicators and required
revision is to be taken up for which restructuring of the project seems a requirement.
Savings from Currency Exchange Rate: The project has accrued exchange rate gains due to
appreciation of dollar value over a period of three years of the project cycle. Submission of till
date exchange rate savings is mutually agreed between Government of Odisha and the World Bank
during the Mid Term Review. The generated savings, which was planned to be a part of the overall
project finance, apart from the actual budget allocation, requires to be excluded from the future
provision and realignment of project finances accordingly. Hence, for financial realignment,
excluding such savings, is to be made and restructuring of the project can make it feasible.
Page 9 of 23
1.1 B Engagement 56.056 55.832 -0.22 The project has collaborated with
with Partner different ICAR institutions for the
agencies promotion of climate resilient
practices in project districts. Based on
the current engagement pattern and
project support norms,
allocation marginally reduced by INR
0.22 Cr.
1.1C Crop 145.324 170.500 25.176 The project has taken up
Diversification demonstrations in different project
and districts to promote climate resilient
Demonstration practices. The associated ICAR
institutions have also taken up
demonstrations for specific crops
and budget allocation is raised by
INR 25.176 Cr.
1.1D Capacity 11.507 15.298 3.791 Allocation raised by INR 3.791 Cr.
Building of considering additional capacity
Farmers/ building measures for training of
Producers/ Lead farmers including Krushak
Officers Sathi, Exposure Visit and training of
Officers (Outside State/ Country).
1.1E Project 2.184 6.500 4.32 Additional provision of INR 4.32 Cr. is
Management proposed to accommodate increase
in cost norms in project management
and documentation of project
activities.
Sub-Comp-1.1 229.385 264.027 34.642 Overall, a rise in the plan for INR
34.642 Cr. is proposed from the
earlier allocation, based on the
activities that are already taken up and
additional capacity building
measures proposed under the
project, revision in cost norms of
the activities.
Page 10 of 23
Table 2: Change in Proposed Budgetary Allocation Component 1.2
Sl. No. Project Initial Revised Difference Remarks
Components / Allocation Allocation
Activities
Sub-Component 1.2
1.2 Support to 40.732 43.650 2.918 Based on existing situation and after
Aquaculture careful assessment of the emerging
needs, some innovative and additional
interventions are planned under this
sub-component for pisciculture
promotion. It includes promotion of
Bio Floc, fishing drag net support to
fishers, engagement of a third-party
agency for capacity building of
fishers and technology demonstration
for climate resilient fish farming.
Additional INR 2.918 Cr. is proposed
to accommodate the revised plan.
1.3B Training and 14.776 2.019 -12.76 Building capacity of the farmers and
Capacity their groups has been one of the
focuses under the sub-component.
Sl. No. Project Initial Revised Difference Remarks
Components / Allocation Allocation
Page 11 of 23
Activities
building of The project has already taken measures
Farmer Groups in this regard with experience of costs
associated with each event. Hence, cost
norm is realigned, and budget
allocation is proposed to be reduced
by INR
12.76 Cr.
1.3C Business Plan 202.697 292.221 89.524 As commodity specific supply chain and
Financing in value chain development is the thrust of
Prioritised this component, earlier budget
categories provision found inadequate to cater to
the emerging needs of the farmers and
their groups. The project is
suggesting additional measures to
support the farmers and their groups
with preservation and processing
facilities and hence additional budget
of INR 89.524 Cr.
is proposed.
Sub-Component 262.973 304.089 41.11 Looking at the emerging perspective in
1.3 agribusiness and investment
requirement, the project has proposed
to increase the overall budget of sub-
component 1.3 by INR
41.11 Cr.
Sub-Component 1.2
1.2 Support to Aquaculture 40.732 43.650 2.92
Sub-Component 1.3
1.3A Produce Marketing Support 45.500 9.850 -35.65
1.3B Training and Capacity building of Farmer Groups 14.776 2.019 -12.76
1.3C Business Plan Financing in Prioritised categories 202.697 292.221 89.52
Sub-Total Component 1.3 262.973 304.089 41.11
Grand Total Component-1 533.094 611.774 78.68
Page 12 of 23
Table 5: Budget Allocation; Project Design Vs Restructuring Stage
Sl. No. Project Components / Activities (Component 1) Initial Revised IBRD
Allocation Allocation Share
(70%)
1.1. A Strengthening Extension Delivery System
1.1 A 1 AE Network Development for 500 AEs
Selection of AEs 10.350 0.052 0.036
Training of AEs 5.910 4.137
Incubation of AEs (Cumulative) 3.000 2.100
Procurement of tablets for AEs 0.600 0.420
IT support cost to AE 0.100 0.070
Partner agency cost to PRADAN 0.572 0.400
PMU cost to WASSAN 0.655 0.459
Construction of AE incubation centre 0.830 0.581
Admin expenses 0.550 0.385
Sub-Total (1.1 A.1) 10.350 12.270 8.589
1.1 A 2 Strengthening existing extension system through 3.964 3.627 2.539
ATMA/FIAC
Sub-Total (1.1 A. 2) 3.964 3.627 2.539
1.1 B Engagement with Partner agencies -
Engagement with Partners agencies NRRI, IRRI, ICRISAT, 56.056 55.832 39.082
ICARDA and CIWA)
Sub-Total (1.1 B) 56.056 55.832 39.082
1.1C Crop Diversification and Demonstration -
Integrated Farming System (IFS) 145.324 9.870 6.909
Millet Promotion 10.056 7.039
Demonstration of Climate Resilient Crop Varieties (Pulses) 24.825 17.378
Demonstration of Climate Resilient Crop Varieties (Oil Seed) 12.248 8.574
Page 13 of 23
Biofloc unit inside the Ayacut area (Ayacut village with revenue 6.000 4.200
boundaries as unit)
Small feed mixing plant/ pelletiser to local community 3.000 2.100
organisations / individual
Demonstration of freshwater prawn nurseries for production of 1.000 0.700
juveniles from PL
Fishing drag net (300’X 18’) 1.000 0.700
Water testing kit 0.500 0.350
Fish marketing infrastructure 1.600 1.120
Innovative fisheries technology demonstration 2.000 1.400
Capacity building (trainings & exposure visits) and monitoring 5.000 3.500
& evaluation through technical collaboration with WorldFish
international CGIAR organization
(Consultancy Charges to WorldFish)
Project Management (State Level) Mobility Expenses 0.750 0.525
Project Management (State Level) IT and Communication 0.200 0.140
equipment
Sub-Total Comp-1.2 40.732 43.650 30.555
1.3A Produce Marketing Support -
Hiring of ABSO 15.000 9.850 6.895
Hiring an agency for thematic studies 9.000 - -
Technical Assistance OSAM Board 21.500 - -
Sub-Total Comp-1.3A 45.500 9.850 6.895
1.3B Training and Capacity building of Farmer Groups -
1.3. B.1 Training -
FG Organisation and Governance 0.292 0.292 0.204
Business Management and Marketing skills 0.292 0.292 0.204
Statuary (Financial Management/ Book Keeping/ Documentation) 0.292 0.292 0.204
Page 14 of 23
Sub-Total Component 1.3 262.973 304.089 212.862
Grand Total Component-1 533.094 611.774 428.242
Activities under the component proposed, in line with the PDO, are rehabilitation and
modernization of tanks, desilting of selected tanks based on the hydrological assessment, CAD
works to improve irrigation coverage and efficiency improvement, LIDAR based survey of the
identified / selected tanks for desilting, IWRM piloting in selected tank etc. Suggested activities and
revised budget are presented in the matrix.
Page 15 of 23
and large-scale tanks & Irrigation
Automation pilot (W)
iii. Support for the preparation of ground 6.00 - -6.00 The provision of Rs. 6.00 Cr is
water regulation (C/S) dropped as govt. has made
favourable policy framework for
ground water use for
irrigation in tank command.
Sub Total (B) 22.87 13.62 -9.25
D Support To Water User/PP Members 2.100 - -2.10 No budget is allocated to this
intervention as it was shifted
to Component-3 with
appropriateness of budget
E Training 13.694 - -13.69 Engagement of SO, and their
training, including baseline
development are already
completed. Training of PP /
WUA is shifted to Component-
3 along with PP monitoring and
learning meetings. Hence no
budgetary provision is
made under this head.
F Exposure and Learning Visit for PP 2.970 - -2.97 Looking at the nature, this
members activity is aligned with
Component-3 and hence no
budget is proposed
Pani Panchayat Sub Total (4+5) 16.664 - -16.66 As all PP / WUA related
activities shifted to
Component-3, no budget is
allocated in this sub-
component. So, there is
reduction of INR 16.66 Cr.
from the previous sanctioned
budget.
Grand Total 985.43 792.69 -192.74
3 1
Notes on activity restructure:
Overall, total budget allocation under the component is reduced by INR 192.74 Cr. due to reduction of number of tanks
under civil works, realignment of activities with other project components and appropriateness of cost based on
experience in project execution.
Civil Works: 70 tanks out of 537 tanks considered under project does not require tank improvement except CAD
& Tank desilting etc.
Quality Control: Provision of Rs.6.00 Cr for this consulting work has been reduced to Rs. 4.95 Cr as per the
contract.
Catchment treatment and Cascade Level Organization provision while implementing cascade plan (W): The
provision of Rs.105.0 Cr have been reduced to Rs. 23.26 Cr. The number of PP under Cascade Level Organization
plan will be carried in 25% of the area.
IWRM Pilot: Provision of Rs.4.00 Cr for this consulting work has been reduced to Rs. 0.89 Cr as per contract. Support
for the preparation of ground water regulation: The provision of Rs. 6.00 Cr is dropped as govt. has made
favorable policy framework for ground water use for irrigation in tank command.
Support to the PP Cell at State and provisions related to capacity building: The cost under these activities has
been relocated under Component-3
Page 16 of 23
Table 7: Budget Allocation: Project Design Vs Restructuring Stage
Sl. Project Components / Activities Initial Revised IBRD Share
No Allocatio Allocation (70%)
. n
A. Improving access to Irrigation and Water productivity -
Tank System Improvement
1 Civil Works (W) 832.797 744.854 521.398
2 Quality Control (C/S) 6.000 4.956 3.469
3 Catchment treatment and Cascade Level Organization 105.000 23.258 16.280
provision while implementing cascade plan (W)
Sub-Total (1) 943.797 773.068 541.148
B. Consultancies
1 Cascade Planning, Preparation of DPR and PP -
mobilisation/a5
i. Contour Survey of Tanks (C/S) 1.020 1.015 0.711
ii. Hydrologic Assessment of tanks in cascade (C/S) 1.240 1.231 0.861
iii. DPR Preparation (C/S) 1.740 1.850 1.295
iv. LIDAR survey of tank & command (C/S) - 6.920 4.844
2 IWRM Pilot (C/S) 4.000 0.887 0.621
3 Improving Service delivery through PPP model in medium and 7.000 7.000 4.900
large-scale tanks & Irrigation Automation pilot (W)
4 Support to State Dam Safety Expert Panel (C/S) 1.872 0.720 0.504
5 Support for the preparation of ground water regulation (C/S) 6.000 - -
Sub-Total (2) 22.872 19.623 13.736
D SUPPORT TO WATER USER/PANI PANCHAYAT Members
Support to the PP Cell at State (C/S) 2.100 - -
Sub-Total (3) 2.100 - -
E Training - -
Training of SO for Baseline preparation (4 day)/a2 0.064 - -
Development of baseline & PP/WUA of the 538 tanks by SO 0.161 - -
Training need Assessment by SO with technical support from 0.269 - -
Commission of modules (ToT/ development of training - -
calendar) -
Training of PP/WUA/ a 11.880 - -
Monitoring and Learning meeting at PP/WUA/a.3 1.320 - -
Sub-Total (4) 13.694 - -
F Exposure and Learning Visit for PP members/a.4 2.970 - -
Sub-Total (5) 2.970 - -
Pani Panchayat Sub Total (4+5) 16.664 - -
Grand Total 985.433 792.691 554.883
Page 17 of 23
Some of the activities which are already completed, are excluded from the intervention frame
of this component while, based on the emerging needs, additional activities are suggested for
the remaining period of the project. A comparative of activities proposed during design stage
and the activities that are to be continued after restructuring is presented in the matrix.
Page 18 of 23
Sub-Total (A) 1.800 20.857 14.60
B. Departmental Staff Training on Project Management -
Development Programme
1 Senior Level Staffs (Agri/ Horti/ Fish/ MI) 0.290 0.080 0.06
i. Middle Level Staffs (Agri/ Horti/ Fish/ MI) - 0.152 0.11
ii. Field Level Staffs (Agri/ Horti/ Fish/ MI) - 0.450 0.32
iii. District Level Project Monitoring Team Meeting (Monthly 0.090 0.007 0.01
Once)
iv. Advanced Technical trainings in Hydrology/related 7.500 7.500 5.25
discipline of the Engineers (Training at Best institution,
departmental institutions or any other
identified agencies).
2 E-Module Development for PP Members 0.400 1.600 1.12
3 Development of Training Materials 1.320 1.000 0.70
4 Digital communication. (Local Level/ National Level/ 1.000 1.000 0.70
International Level)
5 Training of Field Level Officials/ SPMU Experts/ - 0.305 0.21
Dept. Cell Experts
6 Printing of posters/wall paintings etc. 0.600 - -
7 Training of project officials (3 days) 0.279 - -
8 Development of CB framework 0.100 - -
9 Exposure Visit - - -
i Within state (Field Level Officials from Agri, Horti, 0.640 0.150 0.11
Fisheries, SOPMT & CFT)
ii Outside state (Middle Level Officials from Agri, 1.800 2.100 1.47
Horti, Fisheries, SOPMT
iii Outside India Senior Level Officials from Agri, Horti, 3.395 2.400 1.68
Fisheries)
iv. National Level Exposure Visit/ Seminars/ Workshop - 0.813 0.57
etc.
v Overseas Exposure of Experts / Officials (SPMU/S- SPU) - 0.750 0.53
Page 19 of 23
6.3.1 Budget Allocation:
Total budget allocated to Component 3 prior to restructuring was INR 69.320 Cr. (USD 9.70 million).
The revised allocation for this component is INR. 99.812 Cr. (USD 13.97 million) for the balance
project period. After relocation, there will be an increment of INR 30.492 Cr. (USD 4.27 million)
under the sub-component which is adjusted from the available funds under other components/ sub-
components.
Page 20 of 23
No. Activities Allocation Allocation
(Awareness through
Electronic Media, A/V,
etc.)
I ESMF Implementation 12.000 8.304 -3.696 Budget for ESMF implementation
reduced by INR 3.696 Cr. looking at
remaining project period and till
date progress under this head.
Grand Total 92.403 67.890 -24.513 Overall, the budget under Component
4 is reduced by INR
24.513 Cr. with realignment of
activities and associated cost. The
appropriation of costs under different
budget heads / sub-heads is also made
taking in to account the cost of
services, equipment, and
office management requirements.
Page 21 of 23
Sl. Project Components / Activities Initial Revised IBRD
No. Allocation Allocation Share
(70%)
1 Training of Field Level Officials / SPMU Experts/Dept Cell Experts 0.315 - -
/a.3
2 National Level Exposure Visit/Seminars/Workshops etc 0.850 - -
3 Overseas Exposure of Experts / Officials (SPMU/S-SPU) 0.750 - -
Sub-Total (E) 1.915 - -
F Project Management (Review & Monitoring)
1 Monthly and Quarterly Review Meeting (SPMU/ Dept-Cell/ 0.240 0.240 0.168
District)
2 Quarterly Monitoring (SPMU/ Dept-Cell) 0.180 0.180 0.126
3 Annual State level Review Meeting 0.300 0.300 0.210
Sub-Total (F) 0.720 0.720 0.504
G MIS / GIS GIS Equipment and Software 3.750 3.750 2.625
Sub-Total (G) 3.750 3.750 2.625
H Documentation & Dissemination (Awareness through
Electronic Media, A/V etc.)
1 Documentation of Success Stories 0.300 - -
2 Audio-Visual Documentation 0.900 - -
3 Dissemination Workshops 0.250 - -
4 Awareness through Electronic Media 2.536 - -
Sub-Total (H) 3.986 - -
I ESMF Implementation 12.000 8.304 5.813
Sub-Total (I) 12.000 8.304 5.813
Grand Total 92.403 67.890 47.523
7.0 Conclusion:
The individual cost under the four project components of OIIPCRA is prepared with inter-
component adjustment of the savings or excess. Some of the components have been planned with
some new activities or continued with cost revision to the existing ones. The activity plans are
provided with detailed narrations where such modifications in the activities are made from the
original PIP provisions. The outcome of the restructure has been explained as follows:
Rupee and Dollar exchange rates considered: The US Dollar exchange rate @ INR 71.46 had
been considered at the time of project agreement. The project has previously surrendered an
amount to the tune of USD 9.00 Million during FY 2021-22. The estimated balance cost of the
activities remained for implementation comes to INR has been considered with the current
exchange rate of US Dollar @ INR 82.16.
Costs saved due to restructuring of the activities: The component-wise abstract of costs
were planned at INR 1,680.24 Cr and the cost now estimated after restructure comes to INR
1,572.17 Cr with an overall savings of INR 108.07 Cr (Table 12.a).
Costs saved due to Rupee gain on Dollar exchange rates: There is an undisbursed amount
of IBRD share of USD 140.85 Million as on January 2023. The balance cost required for
Page 22 of 23
implementation of the remaining activities as per restructure computed to the tune of USD
171.67 Million (INR 1410.45 Cr) and IBRD Loan share for USD 120.17 Million @ 70%. Hence,
there would be a surplus of IBRD share to the tune of USD 20.68 Million proposed for surrender
(Table 12.b).
*****
Page 23 of 23