Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Relationships Between Fibre Distribution, Workability and The Mechanical
Relationships Between Fibre Distribution, Workability and The Mechanical
net/publication/225743929
CITATIONS READS
155 469
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Hybrid solution (FRC+GFRP) for tunnel and structural applications View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Alberto Meda on 30 October 2014.
Abstract A series of 40 precast prestressed roof el- dalles ont etés aussi mise en ouvre et essaies en flexion
ements was cast, employing a self-compacting steel 4 points au fin d’étudier les liaisons entre la distribu-
fibre reinforced concrete (SCSFRC). They are being tion des fibres e les proprietès mecaniques (indices de
used in an industrial building. The fibre distribution ténacité) du beton renforcés par elles. Ce travail donc
within the roof elements was investigated by means analyse ces liasons entre la distribution des fibres, la
of a suitable test procedure and correlated with results maniabilité et le comportement mécanique des betons
obtained from cube samples drawn from the batches renforcés des fibres, au fin d’optimiser ses proprietés
and tested in the fresh state. Companion slabs were aux etats frais et endurci dans le cadre de la fabrication
also cast and tested under four point bending, in order des éléments des couverture préfabriquées.
to study the correlation between fibre distribution and
the mechanical properties of the composite. The work
presented here analyses the correlation between fibre 1. Introduction
distribution, workability and mechanical properties of
steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC) with the aim of A large amount of experimental and theoretical re-
optimising both its fresh- and hardened-state properties search work has been done over the last decades, dat-
for a series production of precast SFRC roof elements. ing back to 1972 [1], focusing on the possibility of
replacing conventional shear reinforcement with steel
Résumé 40 éléments préfabriquées précontraintes ont fibres in reinforced and prestressed concrete elements.
été fabriqués avec un béton auto-plaçant renforcés des Among the several well known advantages which may
fibres pour la couverture d’un bâtiment industriel. La come from such a replacement, what was quite early
distribution des fibres au sein de chaque élément a été recognised was the possibility of having, within a struc-
étudiée par une methode d’essai specialement conçue, ture, randomly oriented wirelike reinforcing elements,
et mise en correlation avec les résultats obtenus par des homogeneously spaced closer than the minimum dis-
cubes préleves des couleés et essaies a l’etat frais. Des tance obtainable with the smallest stirrups. In these last
few years a wide research project has been completed
Liberato Ferrara in Italy, aimed at assessing the reliability of steel fibres
Department of Structural Engineering, Politecnico di when used as the only shear reinforcement in precast
Milano, Italy prestressed thin-web roof elements [2]. These experi-
ences, and similar ones on SFRC hollow-core slabs [3],
Alberto Meda
Department of Engineering Technologies and Design, have shown that the achievement within a structural
University of Bergamo, Italy element of a homogeneous distribution of randomly
412 Materials and Structures (2006) 39:411–420
oriented fibres, is a crucial point in respect of guaran- has been investigated by means of the proposed method
teeing the structural performance with a suitable degree and checked by X-ray inspections, further attempting a
of repeatability, in the framework of a series production. correlation with mechanical properties of the hardened
The correlation between fibre distribution, and fresh- composite. The results stand as an interesting exam-
and hardened-state properties of SFRCs also deserves ple showing how far the precast industry can exploit
deeper investigation, in regard to designing enhanced the advantages coming from the SCSFRC technology,
cement composites “tailored” for specific structural ap- mainly with reference to the connection between fibre
plications [4]. distribution, and the fresh- and hardened-state proper-
The unfavourable effects of steel fibres on the work- ties of high performance concretes.
ability and rheology of fresh concrete have been widely
discussed [5] and likewise the remedies which can be
adopted to avoid such drawbacks are well known [6]. 2. Description of the test method
Nevertheless, whenever the homogeneous distribution
and random orientation of fibres can be guaranteed The proposed method for the evaluation of fibre distri-
within a fresh concrete mass when poured out of the bution in SFRC elements is based on the determination
mixer, the casting into formworks and the compaction of the fibre content from cores drilled in the structures.
by vibration lead fibres to be oriented along preferential After crushing the specimen (placed in a steel box in
directions [7], with a not negligible tendency to segre- order to avoid loss of the material) by means of a com-
gation. Barragàn [8] has shown that deviations from pression machine (Fig. 1), the fibres are carefully ex-
homogeneous distribution of fibres may strongly influ- tracted from the crushed concrete by means of a magnet
ence the “material” properties, as measured at the lab- and their weight, determined to the nearest 0.1 g, is then
specimen scale, even outweighing the effects of other referred to the previously measured volume of the core.
relevant factors, such as specimen size and notch depth. In order to perform lightly-destructive tests and ob-
As far the roof elements this paper deals with, where tain meaningful results, it is important to determine
fibres have to be the only reinforcement against shear the optimal core diameter. A core-diameter less than
and transverse flexure, the lack of homogeneity in fi- 15 mm allows monitoring of only a small part of the
bre distribution may explain unforeseen failure mech- structure, with a high dispersion in the results, and re-
anisms, occurring even well before the attainment of quires a large amount of cores in order to have av-
anticipated strength and ductility limits [2]. erage data close to the actual fibre content. On the
The research work presented in this paper developed other hand, with an excessively large diameter (more
along two parallel directions, both concurring with the than 150 mm), the structures can sustain damage which
aim of implementing SFRC technology in production is not easily repairable and zones with an insufficient
processes of a precast factory. On one hand a suitable number of fibres can be hidden.
non- or lightly- destructive test method to measure the
distribution of fibres in a structural element was cali-
brated [9]. On the other, an “optimum” mix-design was
looked for, coupling enhanced hardened state proper-
ties with fresh-state requisites of rheological stability
and high flowability [10]. In this way the effects of cast-
ing and compaction on the distribution of fibres could
be mitigated, thus reducing the possibility of struc-
tural defects from spots with a lesser or nil amount
of fibres. This led to the use of a fibre reinforced self-
compacting concrete (SCSFRC), the benefits of which
for the precast industry have been recognised in sev-
eral applications [11–13]. The reliability of this choice
was first assessed on a few reference prototypes and
further verified over a wide series of precast roof ele-
ments. The distribution of fibres within each of them Fig. 1 Concrete core under compression machine.
Materials and Structures (2006) 39:411–420 413
Table 3 Material properties for SFRC and SCSFRC (mean values and coefficients of variation)
Mix n◦ of tests fcc (MPa) fIf (MPa) feq0−0.6 mm (MPa) feq0.6−3 mm (MPa)
Table 4 Field variation of fibre content mechanical properties. The differences between SCS-
along longitudinal axis of prototypes FRC companion and core specimens may be attributed
Fiber content (kg/m3 ) to the orientation of fibres, which is likely to be random
in companion slabs and is influenced, in cores, by the
Cores SFRC SCSFRC
flow direction of the fresh mix.
11-16 56.24 (10%) 54.76 (4%)
21-26 45.41 (14%) 48.16 (10%)
31-36 43.17 (15%) 47.36 (8%) 4. Mix design and fibre dispersion: check on
41-42 59.77 (±2.5%)
reference prototypes
51-54 54.7 (11%)
Table 5 Fibre content in fresh mix wide specimens were cut and tested under 4 point bend-
(54 cubes) ing, both going with (type A - one test per each day of
Mean value (kg/m3 ) 50,2 casting) and going against casting direction (type B
Standard deviation (kg/m3 ) 4 - one test each third day). These “structural” charac-
Coefficient of variation 0,08 terisation tests were meant to reproduce as closely as
possible in the specimen the stress field occurring in the
elements, and also to interact with fibre distribution and
alignment determined by structure geometry and cast-
ing procedures. Results from tests on notched prisms
were processed as explained in the previous chapter
(Table 6; refer also to Table 3). As far the tests on slab
specimens are concerned (Table 7), in addition to the
first cracking strength, fIf , corresponding to the max-
imum load in the crack opening range 0–0.1 mm (see
previous section for measurement details), the follow-
ing quantities were computed as indices of the material
toughness:
roof element 1 4 7 10 2 5 8 11 3 6 9 12
1 (12/06) 49.39 54.59 65.95 53.48 54.23 47.93 44.26 33.65 60.28 44.8 12.25 54.75
2 (13/06) 51.08 57.32 49.92 52.32 30.07 63.73 43.41 46.99 49.81 58.00 57.26 46.05
3 (17/06) 42.34 44.22 56.02 45.64 44.93 44.01 41.88 44.43 39.36 34.80 48.88 54.51
4 /3/7) 46.18 43.06 45.39 88.69 55.61 2.45 20.00 29.54 59.64 18.88 49.09 56.71
5 (7/7) 46.07 52.32 51.39 47.24 20.93 10.41 5.63 15.99 47.85 60.23 46.84 40.68
6 (9/7) 102.72 62.87 59.04 48.07 73.44 30.88 31.61 25.35 49.14 43.14 52.93 38.30
7 (11/7) 54.55 43.55 54.90 48.87 60.58 15.32 46.64 39.17 55.14 54.20 50.48 61.83
Fibre Average
Date of content fibre standard
batching Core (kg/m3 ) (kg/m3 ) deviation
the precast industry could develop, exploiting the above 7. Edgington J, Hannant DJ (1972) Steel fibre reinforced con-
relationships both to currently check and to further im- crete: the effect on fibre orientation of compaction by vibra-
tion. Materiaux et Constructions, 5:41–44.
prove the quality of its products. The use of a non-
8. Barragàn B (2002) Failure and toughness of steel fiber re-
destructive technique to identify fibre content and dis- inforced concrete under tension and shear. Doctoral Thesis,
tribution within structural elements, based on X-rays UPC Barcelona 151+appendices.
has been also addressed, its full development and ap- 9. Meda A, Plizzari G, Sonzogni F, Lamperti T (November,
2002) Fibre distribution in fibre-reinforced structural ele-
plication for quality control in precast industry still de-
ments. Proc. CTE Conf., Mantova, pp. 247–256 (in Italian).
serving further work. 10. Ferrara L (2003) The use of viscosity enhancing admixtures
to improve the homogeneity of fibre distribution in steel fibre
Acknowledgements The authors thank Magnetti-Larco Build- reinforced concretes. Proc. BMC-7, Warszawa, October, A.
ing, and in particular Mr. Claudio Failla, Mr. Francesco Sonzogni Brandt et al. eds., Woodhead Pub. Ltd., pp. 287–300.
and Ms. Flavia Pasini, for the experimental results. The X-ray 11. Groth P, Nemegeer D (1999) The use of steel fibres in
investigation was performed at the Department of Aeronautics of self-compacting concrete. Proceedings 1st Int. Rilem Symp.
Politecnico di Milano and the kind availability of prof. Giuseppe on Self-Compacting Concrete, Stockholm, September, A.
Sala and his technicians is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks to Skarendahl and Ö Petersson eds., Rilem, pp. 497–507.
professors Marco di Prisco and Giovanni Plizzari for their sup- 12. Grünewald S, Walraven JC, Obladen B, Zegwaard JW, Lang-
port. broek M, Nemegeer D (2003) Tunnel segments of self-
compacting steel fibre reinforced concrete. Proc. 3rd Int.
Rilem Symp. on SCC, Reykiavik, August, O. Wallevik and
I. Nielsson eds., Rilem Pubs.
References
13. Lappa ES, van der Veen C, Walraven JC (2003) Self-
compacting, high-strength steel fibre-reinforced mortar for
1. Batson G, Jenkins E, Spatney R (1972) Steel fibers as shear precast sheet piles. Proc. 3rd Int. Rilem Symp. on SCC,
reinforcement in beams. ACI Journal 69: 640–644. Reykiavik, August, O. Wallevik and I. Nielsson eds., Rilem
2. di Prisco M, Iorio F, Plizzari G (2003) HPSFRC pre- Pubs.
stressed roof elements. Proc. Int. Rilem Workshop on 14. Khayat KH, Roussel Y (1997) Use of viscosity-modifying
“Test and Design Methods for Steel Fibre Reinforced admixtures to enhance stability of fluid concrete. ACI Ma-
Concrete—Background and Experiences”, Bochum, March, terials Journal, 94:332–340.
B. Schnütgen and L. Vandewalle, Rilem Pubs. pp. 161–188. 15. UNI 11039 (2003) Steel fibre reinforced concrete—Part I:
3. Elliot KS, Peaston CH, Paine KA (2002) Experimental and Definitions, classification specification and conformity—
theoretical investigation of the shear resistance of steel fibre Part II: test method for measuring first crack strength and
reinforced prestressed concrete X-beams—Part I and Part II. ductility indexes. Italian National Board for Standardization.
Materials and Structures, 35:519–535. 16. Markovich I, Grünewald S, Walraven JC (2002) Char-
4. Bui VK, Geiker MR, Shah SP (June, 2003) Rheology of fiber- acterization of bond between steel fibres and concrete—
reinforced cementitious materials. Proc. HPFRCC4 Work- conventional fibre reinforced versus self-compacting fibre
shop, Ann Arbor, USA, A. E. Naaman and H.W. Reinhardt reinforced concrete. Proc. Bond in Concrete—from research
eds., Rilem Pubs. pp. 221–231. to standards, Budapest, November, G. Balazs et al. eds., pp.
5. Bayasi MZ, Soroushian P (1992) Effect of steel fiber rein- 520–528
forcement on fresh mix properties of concrete. ACI Materials 17. Ferrara L, Toniolo G (May, 2002) Continuing statistical con-
Journal, 89:369–374. trol of concrete production: reliability and safety factors.
6. Ramakrishnan V, Brandshaug T, Coyle W, Schrader EK Proc. BIBM 2002, Istanbul, (Cdrom).
(1980) A comparative evaluation of concrete reinforced with 18. Soroushian P, Lee CD (1990) Tensile strength of steel fiber
straight fibers and fibers with deformed ends glued together reinforced concrete: correlation with some measures of fiber
into bundles. ACI Journal, 77(3):135–143. spacing. ACI Materials Journal, 87(6):541–546.