Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecra

How online social ties and product-related risks influence purchase


intentions: A Facebook experiment
Jyun-Cheng Wang a,⇑, Ching-Hui Chang b
a
Institute of Service Science, National Tsing-Hua University, 101 Kuang-Fu Road, Sec. 2, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC
b
Institute of Technology Management, National Tsing-Hua University, 101 Kuang-Fu Road, Sec. 2, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Drawing on information processing theory and the stimulus–organism–response model, we developed
Received 11 January 2012 research hypotheses about consumers’ decision-making processes. Specifically, we examined the effects
Received in revised form 13 March 2013 of online tie strength, perceived diagnosticity, and product-related risks on consumers’ purchase inten-
Accepted 14 March 2013
tions. We conducted a field experiment on Facebook to test these hypotheses. We found that the product
Available online 2 April 2013
information and recommendations provided by friends with whom consumers have strong ties are per-
ceived as having a high level of diagnosticity. The latter increases the probability that the consumers will
Keywords:
purchase the product in question. Product-related risks moderate the effect of tie strength on perceived
Social networking sites
Information diagnosticity
diagnosticity. For high-risk products, the information and recommendations provided by strong-tie con-
Tie strength tacts have a greater effect on purchase intentions than the information and recommendations provided
Purchase intention by weak-tie contacts. However, we did not find this effect for low-risk products. We discuss the implica-
Product-related risks tions of our findings for both theory and practice.
Ó 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction evant to the users, or (3) the users are skeptical about the advertis-
ing message. Marketers have also begun to recognize the potential
Consumers can obtain product information from online sources, of such sites as effective marketing tools. SNSs allow a company to
which are important to their purchasing decisions. Several studies easily identify its target customers and instantly distribute infor-
have discussed the impact of online consumer reviews on the pur- mation to a broad range of people.
chasing process (Chevalier and Mayzlin 2006, Dellarocas et al. Marketers and researchers have realized the importance of so-
2007, Duan et al. 2008a,b, Godes and Mayzlin 2004, Koh et al. cial ties with respect to customers’ decision-making processes
2010, Lee et al. 2008, Liu 2006, Park and Kim 2008, Park et al. (Arndt 1967). The different types of social ties have different im-
2007). As internet social networking sites (SNSs) have become pacts on purchasing decisions. For example, strong ties (friends)
more popular, they have forged connections among internet users exert more influence over a receiver’s decision making than weak
and become important sources of information for users. SNSs have ties (acquaintances) (Brown and Reingen 1987). However, few
been attracting more attention from both researchers and market- scholars have studied SNSs because marketing oriented around so-
ers. In particular, researchers who have recently begun studying cial networking is a relatively new phenomenon. In SNSs, users
this phenomenon regard it as a potential source of interesting interact with one another, share information, gather ideas and
and valuable information. For example, Trusov et al. (2009) studied opinions, and influence one another’s perceptions (Centola 2010).
the effect of word-of-mouth (WOM) marketing on the growth of a The information generated by these interactions is subsequently
social networking site and compared WOM marketing with tradi- dispersed and updated. This information then impacts consumers’
tional marketing techniques. They found that WOM referrals have decision-making processes. SNSs are changing existing marketing
longer carryover effects than traditional marketing techniques. practices on a fundamental level because people are relying more
Kelly et al. (2010) examined the factors that influence advertising on the members of their own networks, such as friends and peers,
avoidance in SNSs. The researchers showed that users are more to guide their decision making instead of relying only on authority
likely to avoid advertising in their online social networking envi- figures, experts, the mainstream media, and mass advertising (Bry-
ronments if the following conditions are true: (1) the users expect mer 2009). This development supports Watts and Dodds’s (2007)
that the experience will be negative, (2) the advertising is not rel- argument that major cascades of influence are not driven by spe-
cific opinion leaders. Therefore, marketers must consider a new
⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +886 3 571 5131x42247; fax: +886 3 561 6345. marketing logic based on the social networking phenomenon.
E-mail address: jcwang@mx.nthu.edu.tw (J.-C. Wang). Scholars should examine how the online social interactions among

1567-4223/$ - see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.03.003
338 J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346

SNS users affect purchase decision making and whether theories ties are important to individuals’ decision-making processes
about the influence of social ties in the offline context are applica- (Arndt 1967). Social ties can be divided into different types. Grano-
ble to SNSs. vetter (1973) introduced the concept of tie strength, which refers
We develop research hypotheses about the effect of online tie to the closeness of the relationships among people. Tie strength
strength in SNSs on consumers’ purchase intentions. According to ranges from weak to strong. If a relationship is defined as a weak
the information processing model and the stimulus–organism–re- tie, then the individuals are only acquaintances and do not know
sponse (S–O–R) model, after consumers receive information about each other well. If the tie is defined as a strong tie, then the individ-
a product, they first process the information before purchasing the uals are friends who know each other well.
product (Bettman 1979, Hoyer and MacInnis 2004, Mehrabian and Several studies have examined the effects of tie strength on
Russell 1975). We argue that the effect of online tie strength on consumer behavior. Brown and Reingen (1987) used retrospective
consumers’ purchase intentions is mediated by their information- data collected exclusively from successful referrals to analyze
processing behavior. Perceived diagnosticity is adopted in this WOM-referral behavior. They found that weak and strong social
study as a mediator. Perceived diagnosticity represents consumers’ ties played different roles. Consumers generally perceived strong
perceptions of their information sources’ capacity to assist them in ties to be more influential than weak ties in their decision-making
evaluating the quality of products (Jiang and Benbasat 2005, Kempf processes. Frenzen and Nakamoto (1993) studied the impacts of
and Smith 1998, Mudambi and Schuff 2010). Information sources consumer decisions to transmit or withhold word-of-mouth infor-
are a criterion for evaluating the product information. Therefore, mation on the flow of information in a market. They demonstrated
in our model, we contend that if consumers receive product infor- that consumers are likely to share all types of information with
mation, they first evaluate the information source to help under- strong-tie contacts.
stand the product’s quality and then decide whether to buy it. In Duhan et al. (1997) studied the factors that influence the likeli-
addition, product-related risks are important factors that influence hood that a consumer will use recommendations from strong-tie
how consumers evaluate products and the information sources sources and weak-tie sources. The researchers found that consum-
(Dowling 1999). We believe that online tie strength may interact ers rely on both types of sources during the decision-making pro-
with product-related risks. Therefore, the objective of this study cess. That is, consumers rely on strong-tie sources if the perceived
is to understand how online tie strength, perceived diagnosticity, difficulty of the task is high. Conversely, consumers tend to rely on
and product-related risks affect consumers’ intentions to purchase weak-tie sources if the product is more technical. Bruyn and Lilien
a product. We conducted a field experiment on Facebook, one of (2008) observed the reactions of 1100 individuals to receiving an
the most popular SNSs, to investigate the following three ques- unsolicited e-mail invitation from one of their acquaintances to
tions. Are the recommendations and information provided by dif- participate in a survey. The researchers found that, although the
ferent social ties perceived as having different levels of characteristics of the social ties influenced the recipients’ behav-
diagnosticity? Do product-related risks moderate the relationship iors, these ties had different effects at different stages of the deci-
between online tie strength and perceived diagnosticity? Does per- sion-making process. For example, tie strength had a positive effect
ceived diagnosticity have a positive effect on purchase intentions? on awareness only during the decision-making process and trig-
In addition, the SNSs’ databases can accurately record the interac- gered the recipients’ interest afterward.
tions among SNS users and thereby create a valuable source of data Wen et al. (2009) conducted an experiment using SNS pages to
for social network analysis. In conducting our analysis, we attempt investigate the effects of tie strength, endorser expertise, and prod-
to take advantage of the online interaction data collected from uct type on advertising effectiveness. They found that strong-tie
websites as the basis for tie strength. Our work differs from previ- endorsers are more effective than weak-tie endorsers at recom-
ous studies, which used self-reported data gathered by surveys to mending products with primarily hedonic value, regardless of the
measure the strength of social ties (Brown and Reingen 1987, Du- strong-tie contacts’ expertise in the endorsed products. However,
han et al. 1997, Frenzen and Nakamoto 1993, Wen et al. 2009), in for products with primarily utilitarian value, the high-expertise
that our survey alleviates concerns about the accuracy of the infor- endorsers had a stronger positive effect on the consumers’ pur-
mants’ retrospective reports (Bernard et al. 1984, Marsden 1990). chase intentions than the other endorsers, regardless of the tie
This paper provides evidence regarding the effect of online tie strength.
strength on purchase intentions. Our methodology used data on There is ample evidence that tie strength influences consumer
online interactions to measure the strength of social ties. By using behavior. Strong ties and weak ties have different effects on con-
these online interaction data, we took an alternative perspective in sumers’ decision-making processes in different situations. How-
defining tie strength, which allows us to first examine the relation- ever, because SNS-oriented marketing is a relatively new
ships between online tie strength and the behavior variables. Our phenomenon, few of these studies have investigated SNSs.
work also demonstrates that the data collected from websites Although scholars such as Wen et al. (2009) have recently shown
can be useful to marketing companies. We developed theoretical greater interest in studying SNSs, their studies have not examined
hypotheses regarding the underlying mechanisms of consumers’ the relationship between SNSs and consumers’ decision-making
decision-making processes within the context of SNSs. Using processes in detail. For example, Wen et al. (2009) did not examine
empirical evidence, we argue that online tie strength, perceived how the consumers’ decision-making processes involve their cog-
diagnosticity, and product-related risks play significant roles in nitive systems in processing product information and evaluating
the decision-making process. This research is also important from its sources. Additionally, the study did not consider the effect of
a managerial perspective because it shows that product-related product-related risks, which are important factors that influence
risks can be used as a practical criterion for users attempting to consumers’ decision making (Dowling 1999).
determine from which contacts they should solicit product Prior research has seldom used empirical data sources to assess
recommendations. online social relationships. The data sources used to measure the
strength of social ties were essentially self-reported surveys. In
2. Theoretical background Table 1, we summarize previous studies with regard to the sources
of data on social ties. We believe that empirical data on online so-
A social tie is defined as the set of social interactions between cial relationships are particularly important to understanding the
two or more individuals. Previous studies have found that social processes underlying e-WOM. We measured tie strength with on-
line data, including friend lists and rich interaction histories. One
J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346 339

Table 1
Previous studies and sources of social ties.

Topics Source of data on social ties References


Word-of-mouth referral behavior  Offline environment Brown and Reingen (1987)
 Piano classes
 Self-reported surveys
Impact of tie strength on individual transmission information decisions  Offline environment Frenzen and Nakamoto (1993)
 Discount scenario
 Self-reported surveys
The factors that influence the likelihood of consumers using recommendation sources  Offline environment Duhan et al. (1997)
 Medical services
 Inferences from self-reported surveys
Multistage model of word-of-mouth influence  Online environment Bruyn and Lilien (2008)
 Survey invitation message by e-mail
 E-mails
Advertising effectiveness on social network sites  Online environment Wen et al. (2009)
 Product endorsement message on Facebook
 Self-reported surveys

characteristic of our study is the use of online interaction data as we hypothesize that after consumers receive product information,
the basis of measuring tie strength. Our methods of examining so- they first use this information to understand and evaluate the qual-
cial ties on SNSs can help address some of the limitations of previ- ity and characteristics of the products. Afterward, depending on
ous research by utilizing readily available data to track online their evaluations, the consumers develop different levels of pur-
interactions. In this way, our work also alleviates concerns about chase intentions.
the accuracy of the informants’ retrospective reports (Bernard More specifically, we operationalize the ‘‘information’’ as prod-
et al. 1984, Marsden 1990). uct information recommended by different social ties and product-
related risks, the ‘‘cognition’’ as perceived diagnosticity, and the
3. Research model and hypotheses ‘‘intention’’ as the purchase intentions of consumers (Fig. 1).

In the information processing model, consumers’ decision-mak- 3.1. Tie strength and perceived diagnosticity
ing processes involve cognitive behavior (Bettman 1979, Hoyer and
MacInnis 2004). Consumers are no longer passive learners who Measuring perceived diagnosticity is a particularly important
produce stimulus response reactions. Instead, the model focuses objective of the present study because helping consumers evaluate
on how inputs from the decision environment are processed products is an important goal that affects the purchasing process
through consumers’ cognitive systems and how they lead to final for marketers. Perceived diagnosticity is defined as the extent to
response. These processes are similar to the S–O–R model. The S– which consumers consider particular aspects of their shopping
O–R model posits that environmental and informational cues act experiences to be helpful in evaluating products (Kempf and Smith
as stimuli that affect an individual’s cognitive and affective reac- 1998). Jiang and Benbasat (2005) extended this concept by show-
tions, which, in turn, affect behavioral intentions (Mehrabian and ing that perceived diagnosticity can describe the perceived ability
Russell 1975). Stimuli (S) may appear in different formats (Jacoby of a Web interface to convey product information that helps cus-
2002). Past works have said that website features are important tomers evaluate the quality and performance of products. Mudam-
stimuli for the online purchase process (Eroglu et al. 2003, Jiang bi and Schuff (2010) applied the concept to the context of online
et al. 2010, Koufaris 2002, Parboteeah et al. 2009). The organism product reviews and found that depending on the type of product,
(O) refers to an individual’s cognitive systems, including the cogni- the characteristics of product reviews, review rating, and review
tive network and schema. The response (R) represents the psycho- length have different effects on their perceived diagnosticity. How-
logical reactions such as attitudinal and behavioral reactions. ever, Mudambi and Schuff (2010) did not study other characteris-
Based on the concepts discussed above, we proposed the theo- tics of the reviews, such as product information sources. Source
retical framework, which we called the information–cognition– credibility theory suggests that people are more likely to be per-
intention model. Information is shown as an input for consumers. suaded if the source is considered to be credible (Hovland et al.
Product information recommended by friends is a constituent of 1953, Ohanian 1990). According to this theory, information sources
this input. Before such information can affect behavioral inten- seem to be a criterion for evaluating the truthfulness of the infor-
tions, it must have some mental effect. Cognition is represented mation. We argue that different information sources could have
as one of the major intermediate recommendation effects. The different effects on perceived diagnosticity.
mediating processes can be considered to be filters of the initial Rogers (1995) argues that strong-tie sources are perceived as
information input. The behavioral intentions are consequently more credible and trustworthy than weak-tie sources. In other
generated. Following the information–cognition–intention routes, words, the information derived from strong-tie sources carries less
risk. Social exchange theory has shown that strong-tie sources are
likely to transmit information of higher economic value than weak-
tie sources (Frenzen and Nakamoto 1993, Sahlins 1972). Informa-
Product-related risk
tion is more likely to be considered useful if it comes from close
(high vs. low)
sources, whereas the information from acquaintances is more
H2 likely to be seen as less valuable or more suspicious. Consumers
Tie strength Perceived Purchase can more easily evaluate products if the information about these
(strong vs. weak) H1 diagnosticity H3 intentions products is provided by strong-tie sources because consumers
trust these sources and the value of the information provided by
Information Cognition Intention
these sources. In other words, consumers believe that a strong-
Fig. 1. Theoretical framework. tie source can help them evaluate the quality and performances
340 J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346

of products. Based on these arguments, we hypothesize that per- Hypothesis 3. For positive recommendations, higher perceived
ceived diagnosticity is higher for the recommendations and infor- diagnosticity will lead to higher purchase intentions.
mation provided by strong-tie sources.

Hypothesis 1. The recommendations and information provided 4. Research method


by strong-tie sources will have a higher level of perceived
diagnosticity. This study investigates the effects of online tie strength, per-
ceived diagnosticity, and product-related risks on consumers’ pur-
chase intentions. We conducted a field experiment on Facebook to
3.2. Product-related risks test our hypotheses. Founded in 2004, Facebook has become the
most popular SNS. Facebook held an initial public offering (IPO)
The more that consumers have to pay for a product, the higher the on May 17, 2012. There are now more than a billion monthly active
perceived risk of purchasing the product will be (Bettman 1973, users worldwide and more than half of whom use Facebook on a
Dowling 1999). Therefore, choosing a helpful source is an important mobile device. Facebook features an application platform that al-
concern for customers. Consumers collect and consider more infor- lows developers to implement applications and integrate them
mation about the sources’ trustworthiness if the product risks are into the site. The popularity of these Facebook applications allowed
relatively high. Previous studies have noted that the distinction be- us to pursue our research in a realistic setting. We used a Facebook
tween high-risk products and low-risk products causes consumers application as the platform for this study. This Facebook applica-
to utilize different psychological processes while evaluating a prod- tion offered several advantages. We could quickly and accurately
uct (Dowling and Staelin 1994, Payne et al. 1993). Because the eval- access information about the interactions among users on Face-
uation process for high-risk products tends to be more careful, book. In addition, we were able to recruit a relatively large sample
consumers focus on their sources’ trustworthiness in these situa- population in a short period of time.
tions. In contrast, consumers are less likely to carefully evaluate We used a 2  2 between-subjects design to investigate the ef-
low-risk products. In these cases, consumers pay less attention to fects of strong vs. weak ties and high vs. low risks. Table 2 shows
the trustworthiness of their sources. This finding suggests that the that there were four possible combinations: strong tie and high
impact of tie strength on perceived diagnosticity is likely to differ risks, strong tie and low risks, weak tie and high risks, and weak
across product risk levels (i.e., source and product risks interact with tie and low risks.
one another). If a product’s risks are high, then the information pro-
vided by strong-tie sources has higher perceived diagnosticity than 4.1. Online tie strength
that provided by weak-tie sources. If a product’s risks are low, then
the information provided by strong-tie and weak-tie sources do not One critical aspect of our study was the procedure we used to
have significantly different diagnosticity. quantify the strength of the social ties between the individuals
who participated in our experiment and their friends. Previous stud-
Hypothesis 2. Product-related risks moderate the relationship ies have measured tie strength by using many different metrics.
between online tie strength and perceived diagnosticity. Sometimes the measures have included recency of contact (Lin
et al. 1978). Other scholars have used frequency of interactions as
3.3. Perceived diagnosticity and purchase intentions a surrogate for tie strength (Gilbert et al. 2008, Granovetter 1973).
In the present research, we defined tie strength as the frequency of
From the businesses’ point of view, the ultimate goal of market- interactions among contacts on SNSs. We used a measure that we
ing is persuasion (Braun-Latour and Zaltman 2006). Both market- called ‘‘interaction frequency’’, which we defined as the number of
ers and academic researchers believe that purchase intentions wall posts exchanged between two people. Our Facebook applica-
provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of marketing. tion allowed us to access these data, which we used to estimate
Therefore, we chose purchase intentions as the dependent variable, the strength of the social ties between each pair of friends. We de-
which we used to measure the effectiveness of recommendations fined strong-tie friends as the three people with whom a participant
derived through SNSs. Previous studies have shown that perceived had interacted most frequently during the past three months and
diagnosticity can alleviate information asymmetry through the sig- weak-tie friends as the three people with whom the participant
nals and incentives, prevent customers to purchase low-quality had interacted least during the same period. Because of system lim-
products (Pavlou et al. 2007), and strengthen customers’ confi- itations, we were only able to retrieve Facebook’s interaction data
dence in their purchase decisions (Kempf and Smith 1998). If cus- from the three months prior to the experiment.
tomers feel that the product information is diagnostic, they are
certain about estimating product quality, and more confident 4.2. Products described in the experiment
about their purchase decisions (Kempf and Smith 1998). Higher
perceived diagnosticity, which enables consumers to understand We chose snacks as the product analyzed in our experiment be-
the product more thoroughly, improves customers’ cognitive eval- cause the use of snacks reduces the need to measure the expertise
uations of the product. We suggest that if the product information level of the information source. In addition, information about
is positive and diagnostic, customers will be convinced that the snacks is often found on Facebook, and most people are potential
quality of the product is high, and then their purchase intentions
will likely be more positive. Therefore, for positive product infor-
mation, these improved evaluations lead them to develop higher Table 2
levels of purchase intentions. If the product information is negative The four experimental treatments.

and diagnostic, customers will be convinced that the quality of the Online tie strength Product-related risks
product is low, and then their purchase intentions will likely be re- High risks Low risks
duced. The purpose of this study is to create new marketing oppor-
Strong tie Treatment 1 Treatment 2
tunities based on the social networking phenomenon. We only Weak tie Treatment 3 Treatment 4
consider the effects of positive recommendations.
J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346 341

consumers of snacks. Our study examined snack products at differ- ments involved the phrasing of the questions and the design of
ent price levels (i.e., low-priced and high-priced products). Several the Facebook application.
studies have shown that product price influences consumer behav-
ior. For example, customers tend to search for more information if 4.6. Participants and procedures
the price of a product is relatively high (Beatty and Smith 1987). Be-
cause product price is a stimulus for customer thinking, high-priced We advertised the Facebook application by using Facebook’s
products lead customers to think harder about their purchase inten- application–distribution mechanism, which introduced random
tions (Wathieu and Bertini 2007). Product price is related to per- exogenous variation through the participants. We awarded prizes
ceived risk, to the customers’ perceptions of the probability of an to the respondents as an incentive for completing the experiment.
uncertain outcome and the potentially adverse consequences of Each Facebook user who chose to participate in the experiment
purchasing a product (Dowling and Staelin 1994). Higher value was randomly assigned to one of the four experimental groups.
products are perceived as riskier than products that have fewer such After the Facebook users signed up to use our Facebook applica-
characteristics. We operationalize low-priced products as less risky tion, we provided them with instructions that explained the proce-
products and high-priced products as risky products. dures. Next, we asked the subjects to provide their demographic
We asked some people who did not participate in the main information and explained the hypothetical task. Then, the applica-
experiment to evaluate the snack products. Based on the results, tion showed them a customized wall post. Finally, we asked the
we selected three existing snack products for each price group. subjects to complete a questionnaire.
The low-priced snacks ranged from US $2 to $4, and the high-
priced snacks ranged from US $30 to $50. Within each group, we 5. Data analysis and results
chose products that were similar in popularity and flavor and that
used similar recommendation words to eliminate possible con- We conducted a field experiment by inviting randomly selected
founding effects. Each recommendation post contained a message users on Facebook to participate in a Facebook application created
from the friend, a photo of the product, the price, and the product’s for this experiment. We recruited the 420 subjects by using Face-
description. The recommendation messages were all positive. book. Among the subjects, 216 (51.4%) were female, and 204
(48.6%) were male. Most of the participants (78.5%) were between
4.3. Experimental design 21 and 30 years old. Most had been using Facebook for more than a
year (74.5%), and a majority (68.1%) checked their Facebook wall
We asked the subjects in each group to imagine a scenario in messages at least once a day.
which a friend invited them to a party and asked them to bring
some snacks. While they were pondering which snacks to buy, they 5.1. Manipulation checks
noticed that their Facebook wall posts contained relevant informa-
tion. We used two types of information to construct the wall posts. To assess our operational definitions of online tie strength and
First, we replicated the 10 most recent posts on the subject’s actual product-related risks, we asked the following two questions in
Facebook wall on the day before he or she participated in the the questionnaire: ‘‘Do you think you interact often on Facebook
experiment. Second, we added three posts containing product rec- with the friends who provided recommendations?’’ and ‘‘Do you
ommendations (e.g., the snack is delicious.). The contents of the think the price you saw for the snack product is high?’’ The sub-
three recommendations were quite similar for all of the subject jects’ answers were similar to our operational definitions. Table 3
groups. The differences lay in the type of contact who had suppos- shows the levels of agreement. Our manipulation of online tie
edly posted the recommendation and in the price of the product. strength and product-related risks appears to have been successful.
For example, for the strong-tie and high-risk group, strong-tie
friends recommended products with high prices (see Fig. 2). 5.2. Validity of the measurement instrument

4.4. Questionnaire items We conducted a factor analysis and varimax rotation for the
eight items in the two constructs. We performed a Kasier–
We measured two key constructs by using questionnaire items Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test to determine whether the data were suit-
with responses on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from able for factor analysis. A KMO value higher than 0.5 is generally
‘‘strongly disagree’’ to ‘‘strongly agree’’. To measure the perceived considered sufficient (Hinton et al. 2004). The KMO value for the
diagnosticity, we adopted the questionnaire items developed by combined construct was 0.88. The factor loading scores for all of
Kempf and Smith (1998) and Jiang and Benbasat (2005, 2007) the questionnaire items were above 0.6, which indicates that the
and modified these items to fit the context of our study. In addi- constructs were valid (Hair et al. 1998).
tion, the questionnaire items from Coyle and Thorson (2001) were We adopted a Cronbach’s a coefficient between 0.70 and 0.90 as
adopted to measure the participants’ purchase intentions. These our criterion for internal consistency (Nunnally et al. 1967). The
questions focused mainly on the subjects’ willingness to purchase, Cronbach’s a values for both of the constructs were more than 0.8
the likelihood of purchasing, and their interest in purchasing the (i.e., Purchase intentions: 0.870 and Perceived diagnosticity:
product. The questionnaire items are listed in full in Appendix A. 0.914), which indicates that each item was related to its respective
construct.
4.5. Pilot test
5.3. Hypothesis testing
We conducted a pilot test with 120 participants to check for
confounding effects and other problems that could occur during We performed a univariate analysis by using ANOVA to deter-
the actual experiment. The respondents were asked to view exper- mine the effects of online tie strength and product-related risks
imental Facebook pages and to complete a final questionnaire. We on the perceived diagnosticity. The results are shown in Table 4.
obtained feedback and suggestions from the subjects after they We found that online tie strength had a significant effect
had completed the pilot test. In general, the respondents in all four (F = 6.856, p < 0.01). We then conducted a t-test to compare the
groups thought the experimental procedure had been successfully levels of perceived diagnosticity of information from strong- and
performed. Their major suggestions and recommended adjust- weak-tie sources. We found that strong ties result in higher levels
342 J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346

The post on the subject’s actual Facebook wall

The post on the subject’s actual Facebook wall

A message from the friend on Facebook1

A photo The product’s description and the price1

The post on the subject’s actual Facebook wall

The post on the subject’s actual Facebook wall

A message from the friend on Facebook1

A photo The product’s description and the price1

The post on the subject’s actual Facebook wall

The post on the subject’s actual Facebook wall

Fig. 2. An example of Facebook wall posts customized by this study. (In the strong-tie and high-risk treatment, the subjects saw that products with high prices were
recommended by their strong-tie friends. In the strong-tie and low-risk treatment, the subjects saw that products with low prices were recommended by their strong-tie
friends. In the weak-tie and high-risk treatment, the subjects saw that products with high prices were recommended by their weak-tie friends. In the weak-tie and low-risk
treatment, the subjects saw that products with low prices were recommended by their weak-tie friends.)

of perceived diagnosticity (Mstrong = 5.22 vs. Mweak = 4.96, p < 0.05). to test H3. Table 6 summarizes the results, which show that per-
This finding confirms hypothesis H1. ceived diagnosticity was positively correlated with purchase inten-
In addition, the interaction between online tie strength and tions (b = 0.596, p < 0.01), fully mediated the relationship between
product-related risks had a significant effect (F = 4.677, p < 0.05). online tie strength and purchase intentions, and explained 36.3% of
Table 5 shows the mean and standard deviation for perceived diag- the variance in purchase intentions. This finding supports hypoth-
nosticity, and Fig. 3 is a graphical representation of the results esis H3.
regarding online tie strength and product-related risks. When the
product’s risk was high, the level of perceived diagnosticity was 6. Discussion and conclusions
higher when the product was recommended by a strong-tie source
than when the product was recommended by a weak-tie source SNSs can provide a marketing opportunity. Using the informa-
(Mstrong = 5.31 vs. Mweak = 4.84, p < 0.01). In contrast, when the tion processing theory of consumer behavior, we conducted an
product’s risk was low, the difference between the strong-tie and experiment on Facebook to investigate the effects of online tie
weak-tie recommendations was not significant (Mstrong = 5.13 vs. strength, perceived diagnosticity, and product-related risks on con-
Mweak = 5.09, p = 0.746). This finding supports hypothesis H2. sumers’ purchase intentions. Our hypotheses were supported by
We analyzed the effects of online tie strength and perceived three experimental results. First, online tie strength is an
diagnosticity on purchase intentions by using a regression analysis important factor in consumer decision making. Consumers tend
J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346 343

to perceive the diagnosticity of product information and recom- with his or her father. We used the frequency of interactions
mendations to be higher if this information is provided by among friends as an objective measure of tie strength because
strong-tie sources. Consumers believe that a strong-tie source doing so allowed us to obtain objective online data. Examining on-
can help them understand and evaluate the quality and perfor- line social relationships through SNSs can help address some of the
mances of products. This finding is consistent with those of previ- limitations in previous studies by utilizing readily available data to
ous studies. For example, Brown and Reingen (1987) and Rogers track online interactions. This study provides empirical evidence
(1995) found that strong ties were more influential than weak ties. suggesting that online social relationship data are important and
In contrast with previous studies, we used the frequency of provide an effective means of analyzing consumer behavior. Addi-
interactions between pairs of people on Facebook to measure the tionally, the evidence indicates that theories about the impact of
strength of their social ties, whereas previous studies have mostly social relationships on traditional WOM communication may be
used self-reports collected through surveys (Brown and Reingen applicable to SNSs.
1987, Duhan et al. 1997, Frenzen and Nakamoto 1993, Wen et al. Second, we found that product-related risks moderate the
2009). We did so because, although a subject may, for example, an- relationship between online tie strength and perceived diagnos-
swer ‘‘Father’’ in response to a question about strong ties on a self- ticity. A moderation effect is often sought if a causal relationship
administered survey, he or she may not have a strong online tie between an independent variable and a dependent variable is
weak or not found empirically (Baron and Kenny 1986, Bennett
2000, Chaplin 1991, Frazier et al. 2004). Results in Table 4 show
Table 3 that the main effect of product-related risks was not significant
Results of the manipulation checks. (F = 0.136, p = 0.713), and the interaction term was significant
Variable Types Percent agreement
(F = 4.677, p < 0.05). Such results reinforce our argument regard-
ing moderation effect of product-related risks. Therefore, prod-
Online tie strength Strong 87.3%
uct-related risks should be considered for studies examining
Weak 76.0%
the effects of social relationships on consumer behavior. Prod-
Product-related risks High 78.9%
uct-related risks affect how consumers search for and evaluate
Low 73.9%
information. Overall, although a strong tie is considered as more
effective than a weak tie, product-related risks matter. If a prod-
uct’s risk is high, then the information and recommendations
Table 4
ANOVA test results for perceived diagnosticity. provided by strong-tie sources have a more significant effect
than the information and recommendations provided by weak-
Source F Sig.
tie sources. However, we did not find this effect when the con-
Online tie strength 6.856 .009** sumers considered low-risk products. As we expected, when the
Product-related risks .136 .713
consumers evaluated products in different risk ranges, they
Online tie strength  Product-related risks 4.677 .031*
underwent different psychological processes (Dowling and Sta-
*
p < 0.05. elin 1994, Payne et al. 1993). Extant researches suggested that
**
p < 0.01.
as risk increases, consumers search for more and more informa-
tion such as word of mouth, advertising, and interpersonal
Table 5 sources to reduce the degree of uncertainty (Dowling and Staelin
Descriptive statistics for perceived diagnosticity. 1994, Garner 1986, Gemiinden 1985). Thus, in a high-risk situa-
tion consumers will be more prone to carefully analyze all the
Mean (N, SD) Online tie strength
information and, as a result, sources’ trustworthiness may help
Strong Weak
overcome these fears and form a more confident opinion about
Product-related risks products (Zhang and Li 2006). In turn, when risk is low, consum-
High 5.31 4.84
ers will be less influenced by sources since they do not need
(107, 0.86) (102, 1.17)
these reinforcements to overcome worry about the possibility
Low 5.13 5.09
of non-desired outcomes (Lian and Lin 2008). This result sheds
(105, 1.05) (106, 0.98)
new light on previous research on tie strength (Wen et al.
2009) because previous studies did not consider the effect of
product risks. The present study shows that product risks mod-
erate the effect of online tie strength on perceived diagnosticity.
Third, the mediators of perceived diagnosticity appeared to be
powerful elements in explaining purchase intentions based on rec-
ommendation sources. Recommendation sources can influence
perceived diagnosticity by determining whether a consumer will
purchase a product. If consumers perceive the diagnosticity of
the positive information that they have about a product to be high,
then their purchase intentions are high. Previous studies have
shown that perceived diagnosticity influences consumer attitudes,
which then lead to purchase intentions (Jiang and Benbasat 2007).
In this study, we did not consider the attitudinal variables and fo-
cused on the direct impact of perceived diagnosticity on purchase
intentions. Indeed, we found that perceived diagnosticity directly
influences purchase intentions. This result supports Fang’s (2012)
findings, which found that perceived diagnosticity directly influ-
ences customers’ transaction intention with a specific seller from
Fig. 3. The interaction between online tie strength and product-related risks.
a website.
344 J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346

Table 6
Regression and mediation analysis for purchase intentions.

IV on DV IV on mediators IV on DV with proposed mediators


Purchase intention = a + b Online tie strength Perceived diagnosticity = a + b Online tie strength Purchase intention = a + b1 Online tie strength + b2 Percevied diagnosticity
Online tie strength Perceived diagnosticity
Beta Beta Beta Beta
.125* .126* .050 .596**

Note: IV = Independent Variable; DV = Dependent Variable.


*
p < 0.05.
**
p < 0.01.

6.1. Contributions decision making. Companies can choose appropriate users to rec-
ommend a specific product to their friends. In doing so, it is hoped
6.1.1. Theoretical Implications that these users enhance their friends’ purchase intentions. For
In this study, we developed a model for investigating the mech- example, companies can give their new product to the target con-
anisms underlying consumer decision making in the context of sumers’ strong-tie friends and require them to recommend the
Facebook. We provide empirical evidence showing that online tie product to their friends. In this way, the company can help con-
strength, perceived diagnosticity, and product risks play significant sumers to evaluate the product and create interest among poten-
roles in the decision to accept recommendations. Past studies have tial users. In many cases, offering free products to the right group
examined the effects of tie strength on consumer decision making. of people may be less expensive than traditional advertising. Our
We build on Wen et al.’s (2009) study on the effects of tie strength, results also suggest that marketers should consider different strat-
endorser expertise, and product type on purchase intentions. The egies, depending on whether a product’s risks are high or low. For
results of their study showed that depending on the type of prod- high-risk products, companies should invite individuals who have
uct being considered, tie strength and endorser expertise have strong ties with the targeted consumers to recommend the compa-
varying effects on purchase intentions. However, their study did nies’ products to these consumers. For low-risk products, social
not investigate the psychological dimensions of consumers’ infor- relationships have less influence on consumer purchasing deci-
mation processing behaviors. In contrast, we examined the mediat- sions. The recommendations from a weak-tie friend are just as
ing effects of perceived diagnosticity on the consumer decision- influential as from a strong-tie friend. Furthermore, we found that
making process. The resulting model is more descriptive than pre- for low-risk products, perceived diagnosticity of the information
vious models because we consider how a consumer’s decision- from both strong-tie and weak-tie friends is high (mean > 5).
making process involves his or her cognitive system while he or According to such results, it would seem that SNSs are the excel-
she processes information about the products and sources of prod- lent platforms to promote low-risk products because the majority
uct information (Bettman 1979, Hoyer and MacInnis 2004). of SNSs’ friends are weak-tie friends rather than strong-tie friends.
In addition, the results also contribute to the perceived diag- Marketers can use SNS platforms to promote low-risk products.
nosticity literature. We used the concept of perceived diagnostic- For SNSs, our results show that social information is valuable
ity, which represents the extent to which consumers consider data. Social information is important and provides an effective
particular shopping experiences as helpful for evaluating prod- way to analyze consumer behavior. Using such information, com-
ucts (Kempf and Smith 1998). This concept was extended from panies can make highly targeted, relevant, and social marketing
the concept of Jiang and Benbasat (2005). They noted that per- strategies. We suggest that SNSs can gather data on social relation-
ceived diagnosticity reflects the perceived ability of a Web inter- ships, such as friend lists and interaction histories, to create social
face to convey product information to customers that helps them information-based products. Besides, SNSs can also position them-
understand and evaluate the quality and performance of prod- selves as a platform for social commerce, allowing it to facilitate
ucts. Because Mudambi and Schuff (2010) found that the charac- social buying on a level never before seen. This could generate
teristics of the review have different effects on the information money for the company while making the buying process easier
diagnosticity of that review, they link the concept of information for consumers and sellers. Facebook opened its IPO in May, 2012.
diagnosticity to online reviews. Previous studies have only ap- However, the earnings of Facebook are not as expected so the stock
plied the concept of perceived diagnosticity to the information price quickly fell. Analysts worried that too many users are access-
derived from sellers’ Web interfaces and online reviews (Jiang ing Facebook on mobile devices now, resulting in lower growth
and Benbasat 2005, Mudambi and Schuff 2010). Our findings ex- rates for ad revenues as well as reduced operating profits. There
tend the literature (Jiang and Benbasat 2005, Kempf and Smith are a lot of questions about the efficacy and future of Facebook’s
1998, Mudambi and Schuff 2010) on information diagnosticity ad-dominant revenue model. Facebook should monetize through
by applying the concepts to recommendations and information another business model apart from advertising. According to our
provided by SNS contacts that differ from the information exam- results, Facebook has plenty of revenue options beyond advertis-
ined by existing studies. ing. Facebook has access to more information about consumers’
demographics, interests, and social networks than any other com-
6.1.2. Managerial implications panies. It could create the social commerce platform and sell data
Our findings will increase the companies’ understanding of the analytics products. It is a challenge and an opportunity as well for
role that social ties play in consumers’ decision-making processes. Facebook in identifying effective ways to generate more revenue
This study found that social connections on SNSs can influence streams. In addition, as people are increasingly daunted by the
consumer purchasing decisions. Social ties help increase the per- sheer amount of data available on the Facebook, the term ‘‘Face-
ceived diagnosticity of information. The results of this study can book fatigue’’ is being mentioned. SNSs should continue to address
be used to develop guidelines for creating more effective market- the issue of information overload that some people sometimes
ing strategies. experience. According to our findings, recommendation informa-
For marketing companies, our results imply that a message tion issued from a strong-tie friend carries more weight than
from a strong-tie friend has a powerful influence on consumer from a weak-tie friend. We suggest that SNSs should create a
J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346 345

mechanism to help consumers filter the usefulness of information purchase a product due to homophily, companies would just seg-
and to identify interesting messages from their social circles. Be- ment the market based on observable preferences. Future studies
cause thousands of messages appear on users’ review pages, most could emphasize in distinguishing the effect of influence and hom-
of the messages may be ignored. By using social tie data and filter ophily on purchase intentions.
mechanisms, consumers can find the interesting messages quickly,
and companies can easily find their target customers. Appendix A. Questionnaire items in constructs

6.1.3. Methodological implications


Prior research has more often used self-reported surveys in- Construct Sources Measurement items
stead of real interaction data to measure the strength of social ties Perceived Kempf and  The recommendations
(Brown and Reingen 1987, Duhan et al. 1997, Frenzen and Nakam- diagnosticity Smith (1998) helped me evaluate the
oto 1993, Wen et al. 2009). This study provides a new approach to and Jiang and products.
measuring online tie strength by collecting users’ interaction data Benbasat  The recommendations
from SNSs. SNSs allow companies to easily identify target custom- (2005, 2007) helped me judge the
ers and gather large quantities of information about these consum- quality of the products.
ers (e.g., sex, education level, and age). This method provides new  The recommendations
research opportunities (Lewis et al. 2008), allows us to bypass the helped me assess the
problem of accuracy that emerges while using retrospective infor- performances of the
mation provided by informants (Bernard et al. 1984, Marsden products.
1990), and demonstrates that data collected through websites Purchase Coyle and  It is likely that I will buy
can be useful to marketing companies. In addition, because we intentions Thorson the recommended
pursued our study in a realistic Facebook environment, we were (2001) products.
better able to gauge the consumers’ actual reactions and opinions.  I will purchase the
recommended products
6.2. Limitations and future research the next time I need
snacks.
This study was somewhat limited by its experimental design.  If a friend called me to
The mental processes involved in assessing information diagnos- get my advice about
ticity are part of an overall experience. Consumer decision making which snacks to buy, I
may be affected by various factors, such as prior experience, prior would advise them to buy
attitudes, product preferences, new product information and eval- the recommended
uations of the sources of this information. Future studies should products.
consider the effects of individual characteristics, such as product  I will definitely buy the
preferences, product knowledge, and personal involvement. This recommended products.
study demonstrates that perceived diagnosticity has a direct effect  I have strong intentions
on purchase intentions. Future research is encouraged to investi- to purchase the
gate other possible mediators such as attitudes toward products recommended products.
that may enhance the association between perceived diagnosticity
and purchase intention.
Additionally, this study did not examine the effects of negative
recommendations and information. Studying the effects of nega- References
tive recommendations and information would likely provide addi- Aral, S., Muchnika, L., and Sundararajana, A. Distinguishing influence-based
tional insights. For example, previous studies have shown that contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings
positive and negative information exerts distinct effects on con- of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 2009, 21544–21549.
Arndt, J. Word of Mouth Advertising: A Review of the Literature. Advertising Research
sumers’ behaviors (Charlett et al. 1995, Dellarocas 2003). More
Foundation, New York, 1967.
studies are needed to explore the effect of different recommenda- Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social
tions on decision-making processes within the context of SNSs. In psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1986, 1173–1182.
addition, we only examine the financial risks for product-related
Beatty, S. E., and Smith, S. M. External search effort: an investigation across several
risks. We did not examine the effects on other types of risks, such product categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 1987, 83–95.
as psychological risks, social risks, performance risks, and physical Bennett, J. A. Mediator and moderator variables in nursing research: conceptual and
risks (Hirunyawipada and Paswan 2006, Jacoby et al. 1974). Future statistical differences. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 2000, 415–420.
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., and Sailer, L. The problem of informant
studies could choose different product-related risks to confirm that accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13,
the results hold. 1984, 495–517.
Finally, we did not distinguish whether the impacts of recom- Bettman, J. R. Perceived risk and its components: a model and empirical test. Journal
of Marketing Research, 10, 1973, 184–190.
mendation on purchase intentions are derived from influence Bettman, J. R. An Iinformation Processing Theory of Consumer Choice. Addison-Wesley,
(friends induce to purchase) or homophily (friends have similar Reading, MA, 1979.
backgrounds and tastes). This study focused on the effect of the en- Braun-Latour, K. A., and Zaltman, G. Memory change: an intimate measure of
persuasion. Journal of Advertising Research, 46, 2006, 57–72.
tirety of the information, including friends’ influence, recommen- Brown, J. J., and Reingen, P. H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior.
dations, and homophily. Some studies have developed a dynamic Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 1987, 350–362.
matched sample estimation framework to identify peer effects by Bruyn, A. D., and Lilien, G. L. A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence
through viral marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 2008,
further distinguishing influence and homophily effects in dynamic
151–163.
networks (Aral et al. 2009). There are important implications for Brymer, C. The Nature of Marketing: Marketing to the Swarm as Well as the Herd.
distinguishing influence and homophily. Companies need to devel- Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, Great Britain, 2009.
Centola, D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science,
op different marketing strategies in responding to either situation.
329, 2010, 1194–1197.
For example, if consumers purchase a product due to influence, Chaplin, W. F. The next generation in moderation research in personality
companies might adopt friend to friend methods. If consumers psychology. Journal of Personality, 59, 1991, 143–178.
346 J.-C. Wang, C.-H. Chang / Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 12 (2013) 337–346

Charlett, D., Garland, R., and Marr, N. How damaging is negative word of mouth? Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. C. Y., and Chua, W. S. Effects of interactivity on website
Marketing Bulletin, 6, 1995, 42–50. involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association for Information
Chevalier, J. A., and Mayzlin, D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book Systems, 11, 2010, 34–59.
reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 2006, 345–354. Kelly, L., Kerr, G., and Grennan, J. Avoidance of advertising in social networking
Coyle, J. R., and Thorson, E. The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and sites: the teenage perspective. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10, 2010, 16–27.
vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30, 2001, 65–77. Kempf, D. S., and Smith, R. E. Consumer processing of product trial and the influence
Dellarocas, C. The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online of prior advertising: a structural modeling approach. Journal of Marketing
feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49, 2003, 1407–1424. Research, 35, 1998, 325–337.
Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X., and Awad, N. F. Exploring the value of online product Koh, N. S., Hu, N., and Clemons, E. K. Do online reviews reflect a product’s true
reviews in forecasting sales: the case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures.
Marketing, 21, 2007, 23–45. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 2010, 374–385.
Dowling, G. R. Perceived risk. In P. E. Earl and S. Kemp (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Koufaris, M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online
Consumer Research and Economic Psychology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13, 2002, 205–223.
1999, 419–424. Lee, J., Park, D.-H., and Han, I. The effect of negative online consumer reviews on
Dowling, G. R., and Staelin, R. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling product attitude: an information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research
activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1994, 119–134. and Applications, 7, 2008, 341–352.
Duan, W., Gub, B., and Whinston, A. B. Do online reviews matter? An empirical Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., and Christakis, N. Tastes, ties, and
investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45, 2008, 1007–1016. time: a new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30,
Duan, W., Gub, B., and Whinston, A. B. The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and 2008, 330–342.
product sales—an empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Lian, J. W., and Lin, T. M. Effects of consumer characteristics on their acceptance of
Retailing, 84, 2008, 233–242. online shopping: comparisons among different product type. Computers in
Duhan, D. F., Johnson, S. D., Wilcox, J. B., and Harrell, G. D. Influences on consumer Human Behavior, 24, 2008, 48–65.
use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources. Journal of the Academy of Lin, N., Dayton, P. W., and Greenwald, P. Analyzing the instrumental use of relations
Marketing Science, 25, 1997, 283–295. in the context of social structure. Sociological Methods and Research, 7, 1978,
Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., and Davis, L. M. Empirical testing of a model of online 149–166.
store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 2003, Liu, Y. Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue.
139–150. Journal of Marketing Research, 70, 2006, 74–89.
Fang, Y.-H. Does online interactivity matter? Exploring the role of interactivity Marsden, P. V. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16,
strategies in consumer decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1990, 435–463.
2012, 1790–1804. Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J. A. Environmental effects on affiliation among
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., and Baron, K. E. Testing moderator and mediator effects in strangers. Humanitas, 11, 1975, 219–230.
counselling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 2004, 115–134. Mudambi, S. M., and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful online review? A study of
Frenzen, J., and Nakamoto, K. Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 2010, 185–200.
information. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 1993, 360–375. Nunnally, J., Bernstein, I., and Berge, J. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York,
Garner, S. J. Perceived risk and information sources in services purchasing. The Mid- 1967.
Atlantic Journal of Business, 24, 1986, 49–59. Ohanian, R. Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’
Gemiinden, H. G. Perceived risk and information search: a systematic meta-analysis perceived expertise, trustworthiness and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising,
of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2, 1985, 19, 1990, 39–52.
79–100. Parboteeah, D. V., Valacich, J. S., and Wells, J. C. The influence of website
Gilbert, E., Karahalios, K., and Sandvig, C. The network in the garden: an empirical characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems
analysis of social media in rural life. In 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Research, 20, 2009, 60–78.
Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, ACM Press, New York, 2008, 1603– Park, D.-H., and Kim, S. The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing
1612. of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce
Godes, D., and Mayzlin, D. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth Research and Applications, 7, 2008, 399–410.
communication. Marketing Science, 23, 2004, 545–560. Park, D.-H., Lee, J., and Han, I. The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer
Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, purchasing intention: the moderating role of involvement. International Journal
1973, 1360–1380. of Electronic Commerce, 11, 2007, 125–148.
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., and Black, W. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice- Pavlou, P. A., Liang, H., and Xue, Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in
Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998. online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31,
Hinton, P., Brownlow, C., and McMurray, I. SPSS Explained. Routledge, New York, 2007, 105–136.
2004. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge
Hirunyawipada, T., and Paswan, A. K. Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of Consumer Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, 1995.
Marketing, 23, 2006, 182–198. Sahlins, M. Stone Age Economics. Aldine Atherton, Chicago, 1972.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., and Kelley, H. H. Communication and Persuasion. Yale Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., and Pauwels, K. Effects of word-of-mouth versus
University Press, New Haven, CT, 1953. traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site.
Hoyer, W., and MacInnis, D. Consumer Behavior. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 2004. Journal of Marketing, 73, 2009, 90–102.
Jacoby, J. Stimulus–organism–response reconsidered: an evolutionary step in Wathieu, L., and Bertini, M. Price as a stimulus to think: the case for willful
modeling (consumer) behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 2002, 51– overpricing. Marketing Science, 26, 2007, 118–129.
57. Watts, D., and Dodds’s, P. S. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation.
Jacoby, J., Kaplan, L. B., and Szybillo, G. J. Components of perceived risk in product Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 2007, 441–458.
purchase. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 1974, 287–291. Wen, C., Tan, B. C. Y., and Chang, K. T.-T. Advertising effectiveness on social network
Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. Virtual product experience: effects of visual and functional sites: An investigation of tie strength, endorser expertise and product type on
control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. consumer purchase intention. In 30th International Conference on Information
Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 2005, 111–147. Systems, Phoenix, Arizona, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, 2009.
Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. Investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms Paper 151.
of online product presentations. Information Systems Research, 18, 2007, 454– Zhang, H., and Li, H. Factors affecting payment choices in online auctions: a study of
470. eBay traders. Decision Support Systems, 42, 2006, 1078–1088.

You might also like