Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

ADVISORY SERVICE

ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW


____________________________________

1980 Convention on
Certain Conventional Weapons

The Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May be Deemed to be Excessively
Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects applies two general customary rules of international humanitarian law to specific weapons.
These customary rules are (1) the prohibition on the use of weapons that are indiscriminate and (2) the prohibition on the use of
weapons of a nature to cause unnecessary suffering or superfluous injury. The Convention is comprised of a framework instrument and
five individual protocols that regulate specific categories of weapons. Although it contains detailed rules for specific weapons that raise
humanitarian concerns, the Convention does not lessen the obligation of States to refrain from using weapons not covered by the
Convention, but which would nonetheless violate customary rules of international humanitarian law.

The Convention force to non-international armed presence, or contact of a person and


conflicts. Today, the Convention's rules that will incapacitate, injure or kill a
The Convention seeks to protect civilians apply in all situations of armed conflict. person (Anti-personnel mines are
from the effects of weapons used in an further regulated by the 1997
armed conflict and to protect combatants Although most of its rules regulate Convention on the Prohibition of Anti-
from suffering in excess of that behaviour during armed conflict, the personnel Mines, which prohibits the
necessary to achieve a legitimate military CCW also requires action after the end use, production, stockpiling and
objective. of active hostilities. In particular, Protocol transfer of such weapons for States
II as amended and Protocol V require the that are party to the instrument);
One of the Convention's important parties to a conflict to take specific • booby-trap: any device designed or
features is that it can be expanded in measures in the post-conflict setting to adapted to kill or injure, and which
response to the development of new minimize the dangers posed by mines, functions unexpectedly when a person
weapons or changes in the conduct of booby traps and other forms of disturbs or approaches an apparently
warfare. When it was concluded in 1980 unexploded and abandoned ordnance. harmless object (e.g. opens a door);
the Convention contained three protocols • other devices: manually emplaced
(Protocols I-III). States Parties Protocol I: Non-detectable fragments munitions and devices, including
subsequently adopted new protocols in improvised explosive devices, which
1995 (Protocol IV on Blinding Laser Protocol I prohibits the use of any are designed to kill or injure and which
Weapons) and in 2003 (Protocol V on weapon, the primary effect of which is to are actuated manually, by remote
Explosive Remnants of War). injure by fragments that are not control or automatically after a lapse of
detectable in the human body by X-rays. time.
The Convention's scope of application
has also been broadened so that it Protocol II: Mines, booby-traps and Although they are not defined in the
applies to all types of armed conflicts. other devices Protocol, anti-vehicle mines are
When adopted in 1980, the Convention regulated by the Protocol's general rules
Protocols I-III applied only to Protocol II, as amended in 1996, (Art. 3) and a specific rule in Art. 6 para.
international armed conflicts. However, prohibits or restricts the use of landmines 3.
in 1996, at the First Review Conference (both anti-personnel and anti-vehicle),
of States Parties, Protocol II (on Mines, booby-traps and certain other explosive General rules
Booby Traps and Other Devices) was devices. These are defined as follows
amended to apply also to non- (Art. 2). The following acts are prohibited:
international armed conflicts. Similarly, in
2001, the Second Review Conference • anti-personnel mine: a mine primarily • using mines, booby traps and other
extended the remaining Protocols in designed to be exploded by the devices if they are of a nature to cause
unnecessary suffering or superfluous States that are not bound by the dangers posed by explosive remnants of
injury (Art. 3, para. 3); Protocol, unless the recipient State war.
• using these weapons if they are agrees to apply it (Art. 8).
designed to explode when detected by Explosive remnants of war (ERW) are
mine-detection equipment (Art. 3, (2) Booby-traps and other devices defined as explosive ordnance that have
para. 5); been used or fired but have failed to
• directing these weapons against Booby-traps and other devices cannot explode as intended (unexploded
civilians or civilian objects (Art. 3, para. (Art. 7): ordnance) and stocks of explosive
7); ordnance left behind on the battlefield
• using these weapons indiscriminately • take the form of any apparently (abandoned ordnance). Such weapons
(Art. 3, para. 8). harmless portable object; include artillery shells, mortar shells,
• be used in an area containing a hand grenades, submunitions and other
Parties to the conflict which use mines, concentration of civilians and in similar weapons. The Protocol does not
booby traps and other devices must: which combat is not taking place; apply to the weapons covered by
• be attached to or associated with a Protocol II as amended (mines, booby
• remove them following the end of range of items, including: recognized traps and other devices).
active hostilities (Art. 3, para. 2 and protective emblems or signs; sick,
Art. 10); wounded or dead persons; medical The Protocol requires each party to an
• take all feasible precautions to protect equipment; toys; food or historic armed conflict to:
civilians from their effects (Art. 3, para. monuments.
10); • mark and clear ERW in territory they
• give effective advance warning of any Among their general obligations, States control after a conflict (Art. 3, para.
emplacement of these weapons that Parties must take all appropriate steps, 2);
may affect the civilian population (Art. including legislative and other measures, • provide technical, material and
3, para. 11); to prevent and suppress violations of the financial assistance to facilitate the
• maintain records on the locations of Protocol by persons or on territory under removal of ERW that result from its
such weapons (Art. 9) ; its jurisdiction or control (Art. 14). operations and which are located in
• take measures to protect missions of areas it does not control. This
the United Nations, the ICRC and Protocol III: assistance can be provided directly
other humanitarian organizations Incendiary weapons to the party in control of the territory
against the effects of these weapons or through a third party such as the
(Art. 12). Incendiary weapons are those that are UN, international agencies or non-
primarily designed to set fire to objects or governmental organizations. (Art. 3,
Specific rules to burn persons through the action of para. 1);
flame or heat, such as napalm and flame • take all feasible precautions to
(1) Mines throwers (Art. 1). protect civilians from the effects of
ERW. This may include the fencing
• All anti-personnel mines must be It is prohibited in all circumstances to use and monitoring of territory affected
detectable using commonly available them against civilians. It is also by ERW, and the provision of
mine-detection equipment (Art. 4 and prohibited to make any military objective warnings and risk education (Art. 5);
the Technical Annex). located within a concentration of civilians • record information on the explosive
• anti-personnel mines other than the object of attack by air-delivered ordnance employed by its armed
those delivered remotely must be incendiary weapons. forces and, after the end of active
equipped with self-destruction and hostilities, share that information
self-deactivation mechanisms as Finally, it is prohibited to make forests or with the other parties to the conflict
specified in the Technical Annex other kinds of plant cover the object of and organizations engaged in ERW
unless they are (Art. 5): attack by incendiary weapons unless clearance or programs to warn
a) placed within a perimeter- they are being used to conceal civilians of the dangers of these
marked area monitored by combatants or other military objectives devices (Art. 4).
military personnel and (Art. 2).
protected by fencing or other In addition to the obligations placed upon
means, to ensure the effective Protocol IV: the parties to a conflict, all States Parties
Blinding laser weapons in a position to do so must provide
exclusion of civilians from the
area; and assistance for the marking and clearance
b) cleared before the area is Protocol IV prohibits the use of laser of ERW, risk education, and assistance
abandoned. weapons specifically designed to cause for the care, rehabilitation and socio-
permanent blindness, and the transfer of economic reintegration of ERW victims.
• Remotely-delivered anti-
such weapons to any State or non-State
personnel mines must comply with
entity (Art. 1). The Protocol's obligations are not
the provisions on self-destruction
and self-deactivation (Art. 6, para. absolute. Nevertheless, they provide a
When using laser systems, all feasible clear and agreed framework to facilitate
2).
precautions must be taken to avoid a rapid response to ERW and, if
• Remotely-delivered anti-vehicle
permanent blindness. These precautions implemented in good faith, can go far in
mines must, to the extent feasible,
must include training of armed forces addressing the problem.
be equipped with an effective self-
and other practical measures (Art. 2).
destruction or self-neutralization
Although the Protocol's rules apply only
mechanism and have a back-up self-
Protocol V: to conflicts that occur after the Protocol’s
deactivation feature (Art. 6, para. 3).
Explosive remnants of war entry into force, States already affected
• Mines prohibited by the Protocol
by ERW when they become a party are
cannot be transferred. No mine may Protocol V requires the parties to a accorded "the right to seek and receive
be transferred to an entity other than conflict to take measures to reduce the assistance" from other States Parties to
a State, and it is prohibited to
address their ERW problem. In parallel,
transfer anti-personnel mines to
States Parties, in a position to do so, are
obliged to provide assistance to help
ERW affected States Parties reduce the
threats posed by the weapons.

Review and implementation


machinery

States Parties meet annually to review


the status and operation of the
Convention and its protocols. In addition,
there are regular meetings of
governmental experts to help further the
implementation of these instruments.
These expert meetings also consider
new issues that may be appropriate for
regulation under the CCW. Meetings of
governmental experts have, for example,
discussed new rules on anti-vehicle
mines and cluster munitions, although
new regulations for these weapons were
not subsequently adopted.

In 2006, States Parties established a


“compliance mechanism” for the
Convention. This allows States Parties to
convene, as necessary, meetings on
compliance issues. It also requires
States Parties to take legislative and
other measures to prevent and supress
violations of the Convention and its
Protocols, as well as to instruct their
armed forces in the Convention’s
requirements. The mechanism also
established a pool of experts to provide
assistance to States in relation to their
obligations under the Convention.

States Parties have also created an


Implementation Support Unit to act as
secretariat for all CCW meetings and to
support States in the implementation of
the Convention. The ISU has been fully
operational since 2011.

03/2014

03/2014

You might also like