Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alisha Industrial Report
Alisha Industrial Report
BACHELOR OF TECHONOLOGY
COMPUTER SCIENCE ENGINEERING
by
Name: ALISHA
Roll No: 19013001
INTERNSHIP REPORT
ON
DATA LABELLING
(SCIFFER ANALYTICS PRIVATELTD.)
ALISHA
19013001
B.TECH CSE(7TH SEM)
ABOUT THE ORGANIZATION
Computer vision
Machine learning
Collaborative model
Audio and speech analytics
Mixed integer programming based optimizer
ABSTRACT
Computers can also use combined data for semi-supervised learning, which reduces
the need for manually labeled data while providing a large annotated dataset.
Data collection
It all starts with getting the right amount and variety of data that suffice with your
model requirements. And there are several ways you could go here:
Manual data collection:
A large and diverse amount of data guarantees more accurate results compared to a
small amount of data. One real-world example is Tesla collecting large amounts of
data from its vehicle owners. Though using a human resource for data assembly is
not technically feasible for all use cases.
For instance, if you’re developing an NLP model and need reviews of multiple
products from multiple channels/sources as data samples, it might take you days to
find and access the information you need. In this case, it will make more sense to use
a web scraping tool, which can help in automatically finding, collecting, and
updating the information for you.
Open-source datasets:
An alternative option is using open-source datasets. The latter can enable you to
perform training and data analysis at scale. Accessibility and cost-effectiveness are
among the two primary reasons why specialists may opt for open-source datasets.
Besides, incorporating an open-source dataset is a great way for smaller companies
to really capitalize on what is already in reserve for large-sized organizations.
With this in mind, beware that with open-source, your data can be prone to
vulnerability: there’s the risk of the incorrect use of data or potential gaps that will
affect your model performance in the end result. So, it all comes down to identifying
the value open-source brings to your model and calculating tradeoffs to undertake
the ready-made dataset.
Synthetic data generation:
Synthetic data/datasets are both a blessing and a curse, as they can be controlled in
simulated environments by creators. And they are not as costly as they may seem at
the outset. The primary costs associated with synthetic data are the initial simulation
expenses for the most part. Synthetic datasets are commonplace across two broad
categories, computer vision and tabular data (e.q., healthcare and security data).
Autonomous driving companies often happen to be at the forefront of synthetic data
generation consumption, as they come to deal with invisible or occluded objects
more often. Hence, the need for a faster way to recreate data featuring objects that
real-life scenario datasets miss.
Other advantages of using open-source datasets include boundless scalability and the
cover-up for edge cases, where the manual collection would be dangerous (given the
possibility of always generating more data vs. aggregating manually).
Data tagging
Once you have your raw (unlabeled) data up and ready, it’s time to give your objects
a tag. Data tagging consists of human labelers identifying elements in unlabeled data
using a data labeling platform. They can be asked to determine whether an image
contains a person or not or to track a ball in a video. And for all these tasks, the end
result serves as a training dataset for your model.
Now, at this point, you’re probably having concerns about your data security. And
indeed, security is a major concern, especially if you’re dealing with a sensitive
project. To address your deepest concerns about safety, SuperAnnotate complies
with industry regulations.
Bonus: With SuperAnnotate, you’re keeping your data on-premise, which provides
greater control and privacy, as no sensitive information is shared with third parties.
You can connect our platform with any data source, allowing multiple people to
collaborate and create the most accurate annotations in no time. You can also
whitelist IP addresses, adding extra protection to your dataset. Learn how to set it up.
Quality assurance
Model training
To train an ML model, you have to feed the machine learning algorithm with labeled
data that contains the correct answer. With your newly trained model, you can make
accurate predictions on a new set of data. However, there are a number of questions
to ask yourself before and after training to provide prediction/output accuracy:
1) Do I have enough data?
2) Do I get the expected outcomes?
3) How do I monitor and evaluate the model’s performance?
4) What is the ground truth?
5) How do I know if the model misses anything?
6) How do I find these cases?
7) Should I use active learning to find better samples?
8) Which ones should I pick out to label again?
9) How do I decide if the model is successful in the end?
Computer vision
By using high-quality training data (such as image, video, lidar, and DICOM) and
covering intersections of machine learning and AI, computer vision models cover a
wide range of tasks. That includes object detection, image classification, face
recognition, visual relationship detection, instance and semantic segmentation, and
much more.
However, data labeling for computer vision has its own nuances when compared to
that of NLP. The common differences between data labeling for computer vision vs.
NLP mostly pertain to the applied annotation techniques. In computer vision
applications, for example, you will encounter polygons, polylines, semantic and
instance segmentation, which are not typical for NLP.
Now, NLP is where computational linguistics, machine learning, and deep learning
meet to easily extract insights from textual data. Data labeling for NLP is a bit
different in that here, you’re either adding a tag to the file or using bounding
boxes to outline the part of the text you intend to label (you can typically annotate
files in pdf, txt, html formats). There are different approaches to data labeling for
NLP, often broken down into syntactic and semantic groups. More on that in our
post.
You can also check our data-driven list of medical data annotation tools to find the
option that best suits your business needs.
Open source data labeling platforms allow companies to customize existing data
tagging solutions without having to develop software from scratch. They are
completely free, and since the code is available to anyone, it can be modified to meet
the needs of the business.
Closed source
Closed source data labeling software is another cost-friendly option compared to in-
house. The difference between closed and open-source software is that you need to
purchase a key license to use the service. Even though there is an annual cost for the
closed source data labeling software, the team behind the tool will help you set it up
and use it for your business. They are also responsible for any necessary updates.
Therefore, less IT staff is needed in your company than with open-source software.
Function-based categorization
Data labeling for computer vision training
Image annotation is the process behind the training of computer vision models.
Annotated image data powers ML applications like self-driving cars, ML-guided
disease detection, autonomous vehicles, and so on. There are tools that specialize in
image annotation.
Data labeling for NLP training
Text annotation is the process behind training NLP models. NLP models help
organizations derive the meanings behind text data and interpret it for their own
benefit. There are tools that specialize in-text annotation.
2) Label Studio
Label Studio is a web application platform with a data labeling service, and
exploration for multiple data types. It’s built using a combination of React and MST
as the frontend, and Python as the backend.
It offers data labeling for every possible data type: text, images, video, audio, time
series, multi-domain data types, etc. Resulting datasets have high accuracy, and can
easily be used in ML applications. The tool is accessible from any browser. It’s
distributed as precompiled js/CSS scripts that run on every browser. There’s also a
feature to embed Label Studio UI into your applications.
In order to perform accurate labeling and create optimized datasets, this tool:
Takes in data from various APIs, files, Web UI, audio URL, HTML markup, etc.
Pipelines the data to a labeling configuration that has three major sub-processes:
Task that takes in data of different types from various sources.
The completion process provides the result of labeling in JSON format.
The prediction process provides optional labeling results in JSON format.
The machine learning backend adds the popular and efficient ML frameworks to
create accurate datasets automatically.
The benefits are:
Supports labeling of data of different types.
Easy to use and automatic.
Accessible in any web browser and also can be embedded in personal applications.
Generates high-level dataset with precise labeling workflow.
3) Sloth
Sloth is an open-source data labeling tool mainly built for labeling image and video
data for computer vision research. It offers dynamic tools for data labeling in
computer vision.
This tool can be considered as a framework, or a set of standard components to
quickly configure a label tool specifically tailored to your needs. Sloth lets you write
your own custom configurations, or use default configurations to label the data.
It lets you write and factorize your own visualisation items. You can handle the
complete process from installation to labeling, and creating properly documented
visualization datasets. Sloth is pretty easy to use.
The benefits are:
It simplifies image and video data labeling.
Specialized tool to create accurate datasets for computer vision.
You can customize default configurations to create your own labeling workflow.
4) Labelbox
LabelBox is a popular data labeling tool that offers an iterate workflow process for
accurate data labeling and creating optimized datasets. The platform interface
provides a collaborative environment for machine learning teams, so that they can
communicate and devise datasets easily and efficiently. The tool offers a command
center to control and perform data labeling, data management, and data analysis
tasks.
The overall process involves:
Management of external labeling service, workforce and machine labels.
Optimization for different data types.
Analytical and automatic iterative process for training and labeling data and making
predictions, along with active learning.
The benefits are:
Centralized command center for ML teams to collaborate.
Easy to perform tasks with complete communication.
Iterate your process with active learning to perform highly accurate labeling and
create improved datasets.
5) Tagtog
Tagtog is a data labeling tool for text-based labeling. The labeling process is
optimized for text formats and text-based operations, to create specialized datasets
for text-based AI.
At its core, the tool is a Natural Language Processing (NPL) text annotation tool. It
also provides a platform to manage the work of labeling the text manually, take in
machine learning models to optimize the task, and more.
With this tool, you can automatically get relevant insights from text. It helps to
discover patterns, identify challenges, and realize solutions. The platform has
support for ML and dictionary annotations, multiple languages, multiple formats,
secure Cloud storage, team collaboration and quality management.
The process is simple:
Import text-based data in any file formats.
Perform labeling automatically or manually.
Export accurate datasets with API format.
The benefits are:
It’s easy to use and highly accessible to all.
It’s flexible, you can integrate it in your own application with personalized workflow
and workforce.
It’s time- and cost-efficient.
6) Playment
Playment is a multi-featured data labeling platform that offers customized and secure
workflows to build high-quality training datasets with ML-assisted tools and
sophisticated project management software.
It offers annotations for various use cases, such as image annotation, video
annotation, and sensor fusion annotation. The platform supports end-to-end project
management with a labeling platform and auto-scaling workforce to optimize the
machine learning pipeline with high-quality datasets.
It has features like workflow customization, automated labeling, centralized project
management, workforce collaboration, built-in quality control tools, dynamic
business-based scaling, secure cloud storage, and more. It’s an awesome tool to label
your dataset and produce high-quality accurate datasets for ML applications.
The benefits are:
All-in-one tool with a centralized project management center.
Collaboration platform for ML teams to seamlessly participate.
Easy to use and automated with built-in automated tools.
Big emphasis on quality control.
7) Dataturk
Dataturk is an open-source online tool that provides services primarily for labeling
text, image, and video data. It simplifies the whole process by letting you upload
data, collaborate with the workforce, and start tagging the data. This lets you build
accurate datasets within a few hours.
It supports various data annotation requirements such as Image Bounding Boxes,
NER tagging in documents, Image Segmentation, POS tagging, and more. Easy and
simple UI for workforce collaborations.
The overall process is simple:
Create a project based on required annotation.
Upload the required data in any related format.
Bring the workforce in and start tagging/labeling.
The benefits are:
Open-source tool so the services are accessible to all.
Simple UI platform for coordination between team and labeling.
Highly simplified labeling process to create datasets in a short period of time.
8) LightTag
LightTag is another text-labeling tool designed to create accurate datasets for NLP.
The tool is configured to run in a collaborative workflow with ML teams. It offers a
highly simplified UI experience to manage the workforce and make annotations
easy. The tool also delivers high-quality control features for accurate labeling and
optimized dataset creation.
The benefits are:
Super simplified UI platform for easy labeling process and team management.
Faster and efficient data labeling without any complex feature hassles.
Reduces time and project management cost.
9) Superannotate
Superannotate is the fastest data annotation tool specially designed as a complete
solution for computer vision products. It offers an end-to-end platform to label, train,
and automate the computer vision pipeline. It supports multi-level quality
management and effective collaboration to boost model performance.
It can integrate easily with any platform to create a seamless workflow. The platform
can handle labeling for image, video, LiDar, text/NLP, and audio data. With
performant tools, automated predictions, and quality control, this tool can speed up
the annotation process with utmost accuracy.
The benefits are:
The platform supports smart predictions and active learning to create more accurate
datasets.
It utilizes transfer learning methods to improve the efficiency of overall training.
It supports manual as well as automatic labeling with proper quality assurance
structure.
10) CVAT
Benefits
Data labeling provides users, teams and companies with greater context, quality and
usability. More specifically, you can expect:
Data labeling is not without its challenges. In particular, some of the most common
challenges are:
You want your data to be as diverse as possible to minimize dataset bias. Suppose
you want to train a model for autonomous vehicles. If the training data was collected
in a city, then the car will have trouble navigating in the mountains. Or take another
case; your model simply won’t detect obstacles at night if your training data was
collected during the day. For this reason, make sure you get images and videos from
different angles and lighting conditions.
Depending on the characteristics of your data, you can prevent bias in different
ways. So, if you’re collecting data for natural language processing, you may happen
to be dealing with assessment and measurement, which in turn can introduce bias.
For instance, you cannot attribute a higher possibility of heinous crime commitment
to minority group representatives just by taking the number of arrest rates within
their population. So, eliminating bias from your collected data right off is a critical
pre-processing step that precedes data annotation.
Collect specific/representative data
Feeding the model with the exact information it needs to operate successfully is a
game-changer. Your collected data has to be as specific as you want your prediction
results to be. Now, you may counter this entire section by questioning the context of
what we call “specific data”. To clear things up, if you’re training a model for a
robot waiter, use data that was collected in restaurants. Feeding the model with
training data collected in a mall, airport, or hospital will cause unnecessary
confusion.
Establish a QA process
Integrate a QA method into your project pipeline to assess the quality of the labels
and guarantee successful project results. There are a few ways you can do that:
Audit tasks: Include “audit” tasks among regular tasks to test the human
laborer's work quality. “Audit” tasks should not differ from other work items
to avoid bias.
Targeted QA: Prioritize work items that contain disagreements between
annotators for review.
Random QA: Regularly check a random sample of work items for each
annotator to test the quality of their work.
Apply these methods and use the findings to improve your guidelines or train your
annotators.
Find the most suitable annotation pipeline
Implement an annotation pipeline that fits your project needs to maximize efficiency
and minimize delivery time. For example, you can set the most popular label at the
top of the list so that annotators don’t waste time trying to find it. You can also set
up an annotation workflow at SuperAnnotate to define the annotation steps and
automate the class and tool selection process.
Keeping in touch with managed data labeling teams can be tough. Especially if the
team is remote, there is more room for miscommunication or keeping important
stakeholders out of the loop. Productivity and project efficiency will come with
establishing a solid and easy-to-use line of communication with the workforce. Set
up regular meetings and create group channels to exchange critical insights in
minutes.
Provide regular feedback
Communicate annotation errors in labeled data with your workforce for a more
streamlined QA process. Regular feedback helps them get a better understanding of
the guidelines and ultimately deliver high-quality data labeling. Make sure your
feedback is consistent with the provided annotation guidelines. If you encounter an
error that was not clarified in the guideline, consider updating it and communicating
the change with the team.
Always test the waters before jumping in. Put your workforce, annotation guidelines,
and project processes to test by running a pilot project. This will help you determine
the completion time, evaluate the performance of your labelers and QAs, and
improve your guidelines and processes before starting your project. Once your pilot
is complete, use performance results to set up reasonable targets for the workforce as
your project progresses.
Note: Task complexity is a huge indicator of whether or not you should run a pilot
project. Though oftentimes, complex projects benefit more from a pilot project as
you get to measure the success of your project on a budget. Run a free pilot project
with SuperAnnotate and get to label data 10x faster.
Inclusive tools
Before looking for a data labeling platform, think about the tools that fit your use
case. Maybe you need the polygon tool to label cars or perhaps a rotating bounding
box to label containers. Make sure the platform you choose contains the tools you
need to create the highest quality labels.
Think about a couple of steps ahead and consider the labeling tools you might need
in the future, too. Why invest time and resources in a labeling platform that you
won’t be able to use for future projects? Training employees on a new platform costs
time and money, so being a couple of steps ahead will save you a headache.
Effective management is the building block of a successful data labeling project. For
this reason, the selected data labeling platform should contain an integrated
management system to manage projects, data, and users. A robust data labeling
platform should also enable project managers to track project progress and user
productivity, communicate with annotators regarding mislabeled data, implement an
annotation workflow, review and edit labels, and monitor quality assurance.
Powerful project management features contribute to the delivery of just as powerful
prediction results. Some of the typical features of successful project management
systems include advanced filtering and real-time analytics that you should be
mindful of when selecting a platform.
The accuracy of your data determines the quality of your machine learning model.
Make sure that the labeling platform you choose features a quality assurance
process that lets the project manager control the quality of the labeled data. Note that
in addition to a sturdy quality assurance system, the data annotation services that you
choose should be trained, vetted, and professionally managed to help you achieve
top performance.
Guaranteed privacy and security
The privacy of your data should be your utmost priority. Choose a secure labeling
platform that you can trust with your data. If your data is extremely niche-specific,
request a workforce that knows how to handle your project needs, eliminating
concerns for mislabeling or leakage. It’s also a good idea to check out the security
standards and regulations your platform of interest complies with. Other questions to
ask for guaranteed security include but are not limited to:
1) How is data access controlled?
2) How are passwords and credentials stored on the platform?
3) Where is the data hosted on the platform?
Ensure the data annotation platform you choose provides technical support
through complete and updated documentation and an active support team to guide
you throughout the data labeling process. Technical issues may arise, and you want
the support team to be available to address the issues to minimize disruption.
Consider asking the support team how they provide troubleshooting assistance
before subscribing to the platform.
CONCLUSION
Data annotation or labeling has always been an essential component in the field of
machine learning and AI. Before labeling tools existed, the manual effort that was
needed to label each data point in the dataset was tremendously inefficient, error-
prone, and difficult.
Now, with the state-of-the-art tools above, the process is much easier thanks to
automation, team management, prediction analysis, and iterative learning. In
consequence, datasets are much more accurate and optimized with different variable
changes.
These tools have made work easier for data scientists and ML developers. Datasets
for different applications are readily available. With the ability to pipeline labeled
datasets to machine learning models, the overall AI-based work and model creation
has become easier, more accurate, and optimized.