Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foundation and Inorganic Chem
Foundation and Inorganic Chem
Foundation and Inorganic Chem
o Hund’s Rule: Degenerate orbitals must be all have 1 electron before an orbital
will have 2 orbitals
The analogy is: on a bus, you would rather sit in an empty row of those
2 seat thingies that next to another person
o Pauli Exclusion Principle: If an orbital has two electrons,
they must have opposite spins (represented with 2 arrows in
opposite directions)
Application: Electronic Configuration
o 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s2 …
o The superscript (power) represents the number of electrons in that subshell
[you need to find the number of electrons and split them up to get the correct
orbital to stop at etc.]
o Note, the number of electrons in an atoms is basically your proton number.
o This will apply to cations and anions as well, just remove/add electrons
respectively as per the three rules above
o EXCEPTIONS: Chromium and Copper
Cr: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d5 4s1 (NOT 3d4 4s2)
Cu: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d10 4s1 (NOT 3d9 4s2)
Why? Having a fully filled/half filled d subshell is more stable + the 3d
and 4s subshells have very similar energy levels, the chemistry
between those two is very weird :(
o “Blocks” in your Periodic Table
o A transition metal is a d-block element that forms one or more stable ions with
a partially filled d-subshell. | FRIENDLY REMINDER AGAIN, THAT
ELECTRONS ARE REMOVED FROM THE 4s SUBSHELL FIRST!!!
The three besties when writing answers for periodic trends:
o Number of quantum shells determines distance of outer electron from the
nucleus | greater distance, weaker attraction
o Effective Nuclear Charge (knows as Zeff) combines:
Nuclear Charge Z (dependent on number of protons)
Shielding effect S: presence of inner-shell electrons repel outer shell
electrons, reducing net electrostatic force of attraction between outer
electrons and nucleus.
Zeff = Z – S
Trend in Atomic Radius
o Increases down the group
Number of quantum shells increases
Outer electrons further away
As both nuclear charge and shielding effect both increase down a
group, the effective nuclear charge stays relatively constant
o Decreases across a period (except for noble gases, because their “atomic
radius” is a different type of atomic radius, cannot be used for comparison)
Number of quantum shells the same
Nuclear charge increases (more protons)
Shielding effect remains relatively constant
Outermost electrons are attracted more strongly and pulled closer to
the nucleus
o Ionic radius
Note that in a period, the cations are isoelectronic with each other (and
so are the anions with each other), so shielding effect is THE SAME
From cations to anions, the atomic radius will increase as the anions
have an extra quantum shell
Beyond that, it’s business as usual with atomic radius decreasing down
the group
Trends in Ionisation Energy (definition in chapter 5)
o Across the same atom, it will increase
Effective nuclear charge will increase as electrons are lost
Reduced shielding effect
Also harder to remove a negatively charged electron from a positively
charged atom
A small shift indicates a change in subshell (e.g. p -> s electron)
A large shift indicates a change in quantum shell
The number of electrons lost BEFORE the big change shows the
number of electrons in the outer shell (because the very large IE value
comes from the inner shell)
o Decreases down the group
More quantum shells, electron is further from the nucleus –> weaker
electrostatic forces of attraction
Both nuclear charge and shielding effect will increase down the group
-> effective nuclear charge will remain relatively constant
o Increases across a period
Nuclear charge increases, shielding effect relatively constant ->
effective nuclear charge increases
o ANOMALIES!
S has lower first IE than P, because of inter-electronic repulsion in the
full filled 3p orbital of P (think: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p4)
IE remains relatively constant across transition elements:
Electrons are filled into 3d subshell, shielding effect increases
Nuclear charge also increases
Effective nuclear charge remains relatively constant
Electrons are removed from the 4s subshell in transition
elements (i.e. the number of quantum shells are the same)
Chapter 2 – Chemical Bonding
Note that all chemical bonds are electrostatic in nature.
Summary of the types of chemical bonds/interactions:
o Ionic
o Covalent
o Metallic
o Hydrogen Bonding
o Permanent dipole – permanent dipole (pd-pd)
o Permanent dipole – induced dipole (pd-id)
o Induced dipole - induced dipole (id-id), known as Van der Waals’ dispersion
forces
Note: you break bonds but overcome intermolecular forces!
Electronegativity: the measure of an atom’s ability to attract the electrons in a
covalent bond towards itself
o Increases across the group
o Decreases down the period
[think: your Zeff and number of quantum shell stuff, this is just like
I.E.]
o The “Big 7” of electronegative atoms: N/O/F/Cl/Br/I [with F being the most
EN]
o similar EN -> electron sharing -> covalent bonding
o large EN difference -> electron transfer -> ionic bonding
Metallic Bonding
o What is it? [Giant ionic]
Giant metallic lattice comprising of
Regularly arranged metal cations surrounded by
Sea of delocalised electrons
Strong electrostatic forces of attraction between positively charged
metal cations and negatively charged electrons
o Drawing metallic bonding:
Remember that ionic bonding involves ions & the transfer of electrons
The cation will just be the chemical symbol and the respective charge
Charge is put outside a square bracket
The anion will have (symbol) as its own valence electrons and (another
symbol) as the valence electrons
For distributing the valence electrons around the anion:
Application of Hund’s “bus seats” rule: You need to go around
the atom with valence electrons -> in other words, the accepted
electrons CANNOT be next to each other
This sometimes will mean that there’ll be a lone electron on
one side, leave it be
o Covalent Compounds: TBH Lewis and dot-and-cross diagrams are rather
interchangeable for these
Helps to start by drawing the Lewis structure first before throwing
1001 dots/crosses all over the place
Choose the central atom; often of the lowest EN
If there are negative charges, put it on the EN element
If there are positive charges, put it on the less EN element
Write a square bracket with a superscript for the charge [like this]+ (if
applicable)
Make the terminal atoms achieve octet by adding single/double/triple
bonds
Valency (number of additional electrons required per element
to achieve octet) very helpful here
e.g Carbon has a valency of 4
Account for non-bonding electrons in the central atom – VERY
important for geometry!!! [there’ll be example of Lewis structures in
VSEPR]
Dative bonds:
If the central atom cannot expand octet (Period 2) change a
double bond to a dative bond (represented by arrow)
[for dot and cross] Draw out the remaining valence electrons using
Hund’s rule
VSEPR Geometry
o Electron pairs arrange themselves are far apart as possible to reduce repulsion
o Lone pairs should generally be as far apart as possible
o Lone Pair – LP repulsion > LP – Bond Pair > BP – BP
o Deducing structure:
See number of electron domains (bond pair/lone pair/double or triple
bond)(all counted as one each)
[See table below]
If more than 1 central atom exists, we state the shape (and
hybridisation state) with respect to the atom
e.g. trigonal planar sp2 hybridised carbonyl carbon
o Patterns:
Angle of trigonal pyramidal < Angle of tetrahedral because BP – LP
repulsion is greater
Ceteris paribus, bond angle of a more electronegative central atom will
be greater (applies to non-spherical geometries only)
E.G. H2O vs H2S
Bond pairs are closer to the EN atom in O
Greater BP – BP repulsion, greater bond angle
NOTE this doesn’t work for spherical geometries:
If you compare between CCl4 vs SiCl4, because the repulsions,
while different across compounds, are identical across a single
compound -> bond angle still 109.5º
Larger terminal atom -> increases steric hindrance (BP - BP repulsion)
Hybridisation
o Remember that is the GEOMETRY of the molecules that allows us to deduce
the hybridisation state and NOT!!! the other way around
o Required to explain non-“boxy” geometries (because p orbitals are
perpendicular to each other) + accounting for number of bonds formed
o Geometry: H2O has a bond angle of 104.5º but the 2 orbitals in unhybridised O
are p orbitals [giving bond angle of 90º]
o Number of bonds formed: Carbon is 1s2 2s2 2p2
o That leaves 2 singly filled orbitals to form bonds, but CH4 has 4 C – H
bonds???
o s & p orbitals mix to form new orbitals called hybrid orbitals
o Hydrogen Bonding
Stronger than both id-id & pd-pd
Occurs when H is bonded to N/O/F
EN atom pulls bond pair electrons to itself, creating highly electron
deficient H atom
There must be an atom with a lone pair of electrons (like N/O/F)
Drawing:
Must have partial charges δ+ and δ-
Draw the lone pair of electrons involved
Label the H-bond
Factors affecting H-bonding:
Higher the EN of atom, more polarisation
of bond, stronger bonding
Extent of H-bonding: depends on number of H atoms & lone
pairs present (how many H bonds can 1 molecule form?) H2O –
2, HF/NH3 – 1 only | greater extent of bonding = stronger
o Further applications of Hydrogen bonding:
Intramolecular H-bonding
Dimerisation of Carboxylic acids in non-polar solvent
Ice & Water
Simple molecular covalent lattices & physical properties
o Diamond
Each sp3 hybridised C atom is bonded to 4 other C atoms
High melting & boiling point because of strong covalent bonds
between atoms that require large amount of energy to break
Hard, strong & not malleable because of strong covalent bonds
Unable to conduct electricity; no mobile charge carriers
o Graphite
Each sp2 hybridised C atom is bonded to 3 other C atoms
Each C atom contains unhybridised 2p orbital to form π bonding
system (basically benzene but in a chain) with a sea of delocalised
electrons
Strong covalent bonds within each carbon layer
(significant) id-id forces between layers (due to large surface area)
High melting & boiling point because of strong covalent bonds
between atoms that require large amount of energy to break
Good conductor of electricity as delocalised sea of electrons are free to
move within each layer -> by extension, electrons cannot cross
between layers -> graphite does not conduct electricity placed
perpendicularly to the layers
Soft & slippery as the layers can slide over one another as the id-id
forces between them are weak
Application of Chem Bonding: Solubility
o A solute is soluble in a solvent if: the energy released from (solute-solvent
interactions, bond forming) is greater than or comparable to the energy needed
to overcome (solute-solute interactions) and (solvent-solvent interactions)
[bond breaking]
o must state the which species the interactions are between
o Hence, factors explaining solubility:
type of interactions holding solute particles together,
type of interactions holding solvent particles together,
type of interaction that can occur between the solute and the solvent
particles,
compare the strength of the new interactions (solute-solvent) with the
existing interactions (solute-solute and solvent-solvent)
Hydrogen Bond H bonded to N/O/F [the lone pair can just come from N/O/F]
Pd – Pd Two polar molecules that don’t have hydrogen bonding
Pd - Id Polar – non-polar molecule
Id - Id Occurs in all molecules
Only type of bonding in non-polar molecules
Note the strength of ion-dipole interactions depends on the charge
density of the ion, hence some salts e.g. AgCl are insoluble in water
o This however is an oversimplification:
For the purposes of chem bonding, if something is soluble it can be
said to be an exothermic process
However, that (obviously) isn’t true: Ammonium salts dissolve
endothermically; even NaCl’s dissolution is endothemic
That is when entropy will have to come in to account for solubility by
ΔG = ΔH – TΔS
Entropy change is not necessarily positive with 2 soluble compounds
(see Energetics)
Solubility VS Miscibility
o Soluble implies that there is a saturation point where the solute can no longer
be dissolved in water (e.g. NaCl in water)
at the saturation point, there may no longer be sufficient energy release
from the (now not present) solvent-solvent interactions
o Miscible implies that there is no saturation point, you can add any volume of
solute & solvent and a homogenous mixture will be obtained (e.g. Ethanol &
Water)
This is because the solute-solvent interaction is very similar to the
solute-solute/solute-solvent interaction
o Soluble/Insoluble generally refers to a solid – liquid combination
o Miscible/Immiscible generally refers to liquid – liquid
Application of Chem Bonding: Physical Periodicity
o Melting point from Na to Ar
o The greater the distance between the two lines, the greater the deviation from
ideal gas
Explain the deviation using intermolecular forces/molecule size
Larger molecule deviates more
Stronger intermolecular forces deviates more
Chapter 4 – Redox and Stoichiometry
Quick revision & summary:
o Relative (something) mass is the average mass of (something) relative to
1/12th the mass of a carbon-12 atom
o Exception for this is for relative isotopic mass, where the word “average” is
not needed
Empirical formula is the simplest formula of a compound: it’s the RATIO of elements
o Table for calculating empirical formula based on their %masses:
Element
Mass in 100g of sample
Ar
η
Divide by smallest
number of moles
Ratio
Molecular formula shows the ACTUAL NUMBER of atoms
o To get molecular formula using empirical, take the Mr and divide it by the
“Mr” of the empirical formula
o e.g. 176 = (C2H4O)n , therefore n = 176/44 = 4
Balanced equations & mole ratio:
o (obviously) matter must be conserved -> in other words, for any reaction, the
elements in both the reactants and products must be the same
o USEFUL TIP FOR BALANCING CHEMICAL EQUATIONS WITH IONS:
Your charge has to stay the same throughout; balancing charge may give
you a little push in the right direction :)
o The coefficient of each reagent in a balanced equation will give you the mole
ratio (literally ratio of amount of substance that will react) – this serves as the
foundation for everything else
o FOR GASES ONLY: their volume ratio will give you the mole ratio as well
o FOR GASES ONLY: you can look at the molar volume for gases in the data
booklet at both s.t.p and r.t.p (this s.t.p is the gaseous state one)
Limiting reagents & excess:
o X mol of (stuff) requires Y mol of (stuff) for complete reaction, but more/less
moles of Y is present as (compare values), therefore Y is in excess/the limiting
reagent.
actual amount of product
yield of a reaction = ( 100% )
theoretical yield ( based on mole ratio )
Redox Reactions!
o A process that involves REDuction and Oxidation simultaneously
OIL RIG: Oxidation = gain e- ; Reduction = lose e-
Oxidation = increase in oxidation state
Reduction = decrease in oxidation state
The number of electrons gained by the oxidising agent is equal to the
number of electrons lost by the reducing agent
A reducing agent (RA) reduces something else by giving it
electrons, i.e. itself will lose electrons and be oxidised
An oxidising agent (OA) oxidises something else by taking
away that thing’s electrons, i.e. itself gains those electrons and
is reduced
Oxidation states
o The correct way to assign oxidation states
(if compound is covalent) Draw out the Lewis structure
Assuming each covalent bond is perfectly ionic, give the electrons in
each covalent bond to the more electronegative atom
E.g C-Cl becomes C+ Cl-
In monoatomic ions, the charge is the oxidation state
o General rules for assigning electronegativity:
Elements have an oxidation number of zero
In monoatomic ions, oxidation number = charge
In polyatomic ions, sum of oxidation numbers = charge
In neutral compounds, sum of oxidation numbers = 0
Some general reference numbers to take note of for EN calculation:
P4O10
Drawing looks like this:
BTW while 1 “PO4” thing is polar
as dipole moment of C=O is not the
same as C-O, P4O10 isn’t polar as the
whole molecule is “tetrahedral” =>
the 4 C=Os are arranged
“tetrahedrally”
Chlorides
o Structure, Bonding, Melting Point
Same as Ch 1 & 2, NaCl/MgCl2 are ionic, SiCl4/PCl5 are simple
covalent (just note PCl5 is a solid at r.t.p, PCl3 is a liquid)
PCl5 can ionise into PCl4+ and PCl6- -> strong ionic interactions
increase the melting point so it’s a solid
The exception: AlCl3
In vapour phase, AlCl3 is simple covalent, forming an equilibrium with
gaseous Al2Cl6 dimers
AlCl3 is covalent because Al3+ has high charge density -> polarising
power high + Cl- is large -> low charge density -> very polarisable
Time for reactions :(
o Very very fast and quick summary:
o Metal (ionic) oxides are basic | Na, Mg
o non-metal (covalent) oxides are acidic | Si, P, S, Cl
o Al2O3 has both ionic & covalent character due to the high polarising power of
the Al3+ ion, this can behave as either acid or base (amphoteric)
o Amphoteric oxides: ZAP – Zinc, Al, Pb (lead)
o These are not redox reactions; hence the oxidation state of the period 3
element will not change :)
o Your charge has to stay the same throughout; helpful in determining the
amount of H+ / OH- needed :))
Reactions of Period 3 oxides
o Reactions with water
metal oxides contain the O2- ion, which is a strong strong base and
reacts with H2O to give OH- (i.e. metal hydroxide)
Na2O + H2O -> 2NaOH | pH = 13 | vigorous & exothermic
MgO + H2O -> Mg(OH)2 | pH = 9 | slow reaction; Mg(OH)2 sparingly
soluble
Al2O3 is insoluble in water (very negative LE) i.e. pH = 7
SiO2 has no reaction with water (strong Si-O covalent bond) i.e. pH = 7
acidic oxides react with water to form the respective acid:
P4O10 + 6H2O -> 4H3PO4 | pH = 2 | violent
SO3 + H2O -> H2SO4 | pH = 1 | violent and exothermic
[FYI] P4O6 + H2O -> H3PO3 (a DIBASIC!!! acid)
[FYI] SO2 + H2O -> H2SO3
o Reactions with acids (metal oxides)
React the oxide with water, then H+ (neutralisation)
because remember an acid has to be aqueous; got water
Gives you the metal cation & water:
Na2O + 2H+ -> 2Na+ + H2O
MgO + 2H+ -> Mg2+ + H2O
Al2O3 + 6H+ -> 2Al3+ + 3H2O
o Reactions with NaOH (covalent oxides)
Forms the anion of the acid/salt (for Al, it’s the aluminate)
Al2O3 + 2OH- + 3H2O -> 2[Al(OH)4]-
Al(OH)3 + OH- -> [Al(OH)4]-
for BOTH of these, the base must be in EXCESS (remember your QA,
white Al(OH)3 ppt soluble in excess NaOH)
SiO2 + 2OH- -> SiO32- + H2O
Only possible in hot, concentrated NaOH
P4O10 + 12OH- -> 4PO43- + 6H2O
(what I mean about conserved charge) you have 4P in P4O10 -> 4PO43-
formed > total charge is 12- -> 12OH- required
SO3 + 2OH- -> SO42- + H2O
Reactions of the metal chlorides (NaCl, MgCl2, AlCl3)
o charge density of cation is important
o Down the period, Z increases, shielding effect and number of quantum shells
remains relatively constant -> Zeff increases, ionic radius will decrease + the
charge of the cation increase
o i.e. charge density of cation increases from Na+ to Mg+ to Al3+
o Higher the charge density, higher the extent of hydrolysis:
o What’s hydrolysis?
o The hydrogen in H2O is already δ+, then you have a metal cation that polarises
the H2O electron cloud even more -> H becomes very very δ+, O-H bond
becomes weaker, allowing the H atom to become acidic in nature
o BTW the bonds in complex ion are ion-dipole interactions, for high charge
density cations like Mg2, Al3+ (and in TM chemistry) they can be considered
covalent bonds due to polarised electron clouds
o Just note (especially when compared to organic chem’s hydrolysis) this is a
rare case where hydrolysis = acid-base reaction
o Extent of this hydrolysis depends on the charge density (hence polarising
power) of the metal cation
o NaCl (s) -> Na+ (aq) + Cl- (aq)
Low CD, hydrolysis does not occur
pH = 7
o MgCl2 (s) + 6H2O (l) -> [Mg(H2O)6]2+ (aq) + 2Cl- (aq)
o [Mg(H2O)6]2+ (aq) + H2O (l) -> [Mg(H2O)6]2+ + H3O+ (aq)
Mg2+ has moderate charge density -> slight hydrolysis occurs
pH = 6.5
Hence MgCl2 cannot react with CO32- to form CO2 gas
o [Limited water] AlCl3 (s) + 3H2O (l) -> Al(OH)3 (s) + 3HCl (g)
HCl given off as steamy white fumes , Al(OH)3 is a white solid
o [Excess water] AlCl3 (s) + 6H2O (l) -> [Al(H2O)6]3+ (aq) + 3Cl- (aq)
o [Al(H2O)6]3+ + H2O (l) -> [Al(H2O)5(OH)]2+ + H3O+ (aq)
Al3+ has a very high charge density -> O-H bond in [Al(H2O)6]3+ are
sufficiently polarised & weakened to donate protons
Further extent of hydrolysis in the Al complex than Mg
(distinctly) acidic solution, pH = 3
Hence AlCl3 can react with CO32- (a base) to form CO2
2[Al(H2O)6]3+ + 3CO32- -> 3CO2 + 3H2O + [Al(H2O)3(OH)3]
o This also means AlCl3 can react with NaOH to deprotonate the [Al(H2O)6]3+
complex; this occurs 3 times
Overall: [Al(H2O)6]3+ + 3OH- -> [Al(H2O)3(OH)3] + 3H2O
[Al(H2O)3(OH)3] is basically Al(OH)3 ; white ppt
IN EXCESS NaOH: Al(OH)3 + OH- -> [Al(OH)4]- complex
Reactions of the covalent chlorides (SiCl4 , PCl5)
o SiCl4 is a colourless fuming liquid; PCl5 a solid (because of the ion thingy)
o Complete hydrolysis occurs to form HCl -> solutions are strongly acidic | pH
= 1 if water is in excess; HCl (g) -> HCl (aq)
o Violent reaction with water to produce white HCl fumes
o works even with moist air! -> chlorides must be kept in airtight containers
o SiCl4 (l) + 4H2O (l) -> SiO2•2H2O (s) + 4HCl(g/aq)
o PCl5 (s) + 4H2O (l) -> H3PO4 (aq) + 5HCl (g/aq)
o [if water added dropwise]
PCl5 (s) + H2O (l) -> POCl3 (l) + 2HCl (g)
Some other fun facts relating to this section
o [Fe(H2O)6] is most acidic out of the M3+ cations Al3+, Fe3+, Cr3+
o Extra elaboration on why MgCl2 doesn’t react with CO32-:
pKa Mg2+ = 11.4, pKa H2CO3 = 6.35 (1st) , 10.3 (2nd)
HCO3- is a stronger acid that Mg2+ => CO32- will not react with Mg2+ to
give the stronger acid-base pair
o (H3-ish) Mechanism of hydrolysis & NCl3 story
PCl3 + 3H2O -> H3PO3 (the dibasic acid!!) + 3HCl
PCl5 hydrolyses via a “SN2-elimination” mechanism of sorts, with the
LP of electrons on O (in either water of a say, alcohol) attacking the
electron deficient central P atom before the Cl- is kicked out
which is why in both POCl3 and PO43-, you’ll have a P=O bond; it
comes from the formation of a P=O bond kicking out Cl
N is a period 2 element; and doesn’t have energetically accessible d-
orbitals (unlike Period 3 P) to undergo “SN2-elimination” like
PCl5/PCl3 does; in fact, N central atom in NCl3 is a nucleophile with its
lone pair!
NCl3 actually goes through a different mode of hydrolysis, where Cl is
the electrophile (rmb EN N > EN Cl) and -NCl2 acts as the LG
NCl3 + H2O -> NHCl2 + HOCl
o CCl4 vs SiCl4
Because Si is a larger atom than C, there is more effective orbital
overlap & less steric hindrance by the Cl groups
C also has no energetically accessible d-orbitals, and unlike NCl 3, it
will be the electrophile (not the Cl)
Group 2 Metals
o Link to E-Chem: Eº values become more negative because … -> atomic radius
increase -> electrons are lost (oxidised) more readily -> reducing power
increases down the group
Group 2 Carbonates:
o Unstable towards heat | MCO3 -> MO + CO2
o Become more thermally stable down the group -> decomposition
temperature higher
o Diagram of decomposition
o high oxidation state TMs are not found as free ions but in polyatomic ions (e.g
MnO4-)
o (as with quite a bit of this topic) you can explain things with “energy level of
3d subshell is similar to that of 4s”
o i.e. when 4s e- are removed, 3d e- can be removed without too much extra
energy
o The number of possible O.S. increases from Ti to Mn then decreases to Cu
Before Mn (3d1 -> 3d5), there are more available d-electrons to lose,
therefore max oxidation state is highest
After Mn (3d5 4s2), max O.S. decreases from +7 because pairing of d-
electrons occurs, so fewer d-electrons can be lost after the 4s ones
e.g. Ni (3d8 4s2) only has 2 unpaired d-electrons, hence its max O.S. is
2 + 2 = +4
Catalytic properties
o TMs can exist as catalysts due to presence of energetically-accessible d-
orbitals & variable oxidation states
o In heterogenous catalysis, the substrates adsorb using the partially-filled d-
orbitals of the TM
o Mechanism of a TM homogenous catalyst
You WILL need to talk about the Eºcell of each step, sucky as it is :(
Generally speaking, if Eº(oxidised) < Eº(catalyst) < Eº (reduced), the
catalyst will work
because the catalyst will react with both species separately; you can
balance redox reactions on the spot using data booklet if you don’t
want to memorise
just know what is getting oxidised & reduced
The I- - S2O82- reaction is actually energetically feasible but not
kinetically feasible (the negative charge repelling thingy)
Eº (I2 | I-) = + 0.54V, Eº (S2O82- | SO42-) = + 2.01V
2I- + S2O82- -> I2 + 2SO42- , Eºcell = +2.01 – 0.54 = +1.47 > 0!
Eº (Fe3+ | Fe2+) = +0.77V ; + 0.54 < +0.77 < +2.01
Fe3+ is a suitable catalyst because both steps will involve collisions
between oppositely charged ions & it has presence of vacant d orbitals
& variable oxidation states
2Fe3+ + 2I- -> 2Fe2+ + I2 | Eºcell = 0.77 – 0.54 = 0.23
2Fe2+ + S2O82- -> 2Fe3+ + 2SO42- | Eºcell = 2.01 – 0.77 = 1.24
They can also test other stuff like Fe2+ & H2O2:
Eº (H2O2 | H2O) = + 1.77 , Eº (O2 | H2O2) = + 0.68
0.68 < 0.77 < 1.77 so yes this works :)
o Other than that go revise kinetics; it’s the same story as before (e.g. mode of
action of a catalyst)
o Evidence of catalysis:
increased (you have to compare!) rate of reaction
e.g. Fe2+ catalysed decomposition of H2O2 into O2 + H2O:
vigorous effervescence
Colour changes
must go BACK to the original colour
All about the idea of regeneration
prescence of an intermediate
if mechanism given, can cite mechanism and explain (if possible) how
the catalyst will lower Ea
catalysts are only needed in small amount
watch out for stuff like “few drops of”
Transition Metal Complexes
o When you write CuSO4 (aq), Cu2+ (aq)
isn’t just some random free ion, but
has ion-dipole interactions! (see left)
o The difference between ion-dipole
interaction & ligand bonds will be the
charge density of the ion involved
o TM cations have high charge density
hence the electron cloud of the ligand
is polarised, leading to greater
covalent (dative) character
o TM cations have energetically-
accessible & vacant 3d-orbitals (and 4s + 4p too) to act as Lewis acids &
accommodate this lone pair of electrons
o In fact, it’s another spectrum:
Ion-dipole -> Hydrogen bonding -> dative bonding
o Cu exists as an “aqua-complex” (aqua meaning water) [Cu(H2O)6]2+
2+
Complexes exist as an entire polyatomic ion; and can thus form salts
such as [Cu(H2O)6]SO4
o Each H2O bonds datively to the cation using it’s lone pair of electrons, and is a
Lewis base
Ligands
o Number of bonds formed with a central ion
Monodentate – 1 bond per ligand
Bidentate – 2 bonds per ligand
Polydentate – multiple bonds per ligand
o Chelation
Polydentate ligands are able to hold a metal ion like a “claw”
Hence, complex ion is more stable (more electrostatic forces of
attraction needed to remove that ligand)
o Examples of ligands