International Human Rights

VISHAKHA AND OTHERS V. STATE OF

RAJASTHAN
(AIR 1997 SC 3011)
Sexual Harassment Landmark Case
Bench Of Judges: CJI, Sujata V. Manohar, B. N. Kirpal

SUBMITTED TO : SUBMITTED
BY :
Prof. Ekta Muskan Sharma
BA. LLB 9th Sem.
(Medical Grounds)

1
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my special thanks of gratitude to my teacher

Prof. Ekta who is also a director who gave me the golden opportunity to
do this enriching research on the topic, “Vishakha and others v. State of
Rajasthan”, which also helped me in doing a lot of studying and I came
to know about the guidelines provided by this case as this case is of the
landmark judgements of the Supreme Court. The meaning of sexual
harassment at workplace and its initiation and the methods to tackle it
has been very well defined in the case.

Secondly, I would like to thank my parents and friends who helped me a

lot in finalising this project within the limited time frame.

-Muskan Sharma

2
 CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project report entitled, ‘VISHAKHA AND
OTHERS VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN’, submitted to Prof. Ekta, in
partial fulfilment for the award of the degree of be B .A LLB, is it
recorded were carried out by Ms. Muskan Sharma, University Institute
of legal studies.
I hear by declare that this project report is an original work and has not
been copied, however all the information taken from other sources has
been acknowledged. I further declare that this report project has been
carried out for academic purpose only.

- Muskan Sharma

3
 INDEX

S.NO. TOPIC PAGE NO.

1. LIST OF ABBRIVIATIONS 5

2. INTRODUCTION 6-7

3. FACTS OF THE CASE 8

4. 9
ISSUES RAISED
5. JUDGEMENT 10

6. CRITICAL ANALYSIS 11-15

7. CONCLUSION 16-17

8. BIBLIOGRAPHY 18

4
 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

S.NO ABBREVIATIONS FULL FORM

1. § Section

2. & And

3. AIR All India Reporter

4. Art. Article
5. Anr. Another

6. HC High Court

7. Hon’ble Honourable

8. Ors. Others

9. SC Supreme Court

10. SCR Supreme Court Reporter

11. U.O.I Union Of India

12. v. Versus

5
 INTRODUCTION

I raise up my voice—not so that I can shout, but so that those without a

voice can be
heard. We cannot all succeed when half of us are held back.
-Malala Yousafzai

As Malala Yousafzai gave voice to numerous women who weren’t

heard, similarly, there was a woman who raised her voice against sexual
harassment at the workplace in the late 1990s. In the present scenario,
we all have the appropriate legislation of Sexual Harassment of Women
at the Workplace, 2013 to be claimed in instances of any harassment or
to safeguard and provide a safe environment for working to women. But
have you ever thought what would be the scenario back in 1992, which
is almost 15 years before 2013? Owing to the need for distinct
legislation in this regard, the Supreme Court ruled the Vishaka
guidelines in this case for the protection of women from sexual
harassment in the workplace.

Vishaka & ors. v/s state of Rajasthan is a case which deals with the evil
of Sexual Harassment of a woman at her workplace. It is a landmark
judgment case in the history of sexual harassment which as being decide
by Supreme Court. Sexual Harassment means an uninvited/unwelcome
sexual favor or sexual gestures from one gender towards the other
gender. It makes the person feel humiliated, offended and insulted to
whom it is been done. In many of the cases, it has been observed that
homosexual labor harass an employee belonging to the same sex to
which he belongs.

Sexual harassment is also termed as “Eve Teasing” in India, and it can

be determined from the following acts like- passing of indicative or
typical comments or jokes, uninvited touching, making appeals for sex,
sexually blunt pictures or text messages or emails, discredit person
because of sex. Accordingly, Sexual Harassment violates the
fundamental right of the women of gender equality which is codified
under Article 14 of Indian Constitution and also the fundamental right to
life and to live a dignified life is violated/infringed under Article 21 of
constitution of India. Even though there has been no provision for sexual
harassment at workplace under Indian Constitution.

6
Justice Arjit Pasayat beholder from his beautiful thought that- “while a
murderer destroys the physical frame of the victim, on the other hand the
rapist defiles the soul of a helpless female”.
Sexual harassment is one of the social evil faced by the fragile portion of
the society. Now at this point of time the high society people or the
people who commits sexual harassment should become aware about the
vital needs or rights of women or either when this tranquil volcano of
anger will erupt will cause immense danger and shattering which would
have equal consequences which is cause from the burst or eruption of an
inactive volcano.

7
 FACTS
The facts of this case are given below:
 Bhanwari Devi who was a social activist/worker in one of the Rajasthan’s
villages. She worked under a social development program at rural level which
was about to stop child marriage in a village and this social program was
administered/ initiated by the Rajasthan’s state government.

 Bhanwari Devi en-devoured to stop the marriage of the Ramkaran Gujjars

(thakurs) daughter, who was merely less than one year old i.e., she was an
infant only. As a part of her duty, Bhanwari Devi tried to terminate the
marriage of her infant daughter.

 Even of her vain -full efforts to stop the marriage, it happened, but Bhanwari
devi was not excused or pardoned for her’s this fault.

 She was exposed to or put forward to social punishment or boycott.

 September 1992, she was gang raped by Ramkaran Gujjar and his five friends
in front of her husband. The male doctor at normal primary health center
declined to survey her and the doctor at Jaipur only made confirmation of her
age without any recommendation of her being raped in her medical report. At
police station too she was been continually taunted by the women countable for
the whole of the midnight. In past midnight she was been asked by the
policeman to leave her lehnga as the evidence of that incident and go back to
her village.

 After that, she was only left with the bloodstained dhoti of her husband to wrap
her body, as a result of which they had to spend there whole night in that police
station.

 The Trail Court made the discharge of the accused people for not being
guiltyThe High Court in his judgement propounded that –“it was a case of gang
rape which was conducted out of revengeful situation.

 All these statement and judgement, aroused women and NGO’S to file petition
(PIL) in Supreme Court of India.

8
 ISSUE RAISED IN THE CASE:
 The Supreme Court had inspected the case which highlighted the
problem of Gender inequality, outraging the modesty of women,
sexual harassment at the workplace and rape as societal issue of
utmost intensity.

9
 JUDGEMENT
The judgment of Vishakha’s case was announced by Chief Justice J.S
Verma as a representative of Justice Sujata Manihar and Justice B.N
Kripal on account of writ petition which was file by Vishakha the victim
of this case. The court observed that the fundamental rights under
Article 14[2], 19[3](1)(g) and 21[4]of Constitution of India that, every
profession, trade or occupation should provide safe working
environment to the employees. It hampered the right to life and the right
to live a dignified life. The basic requirement was that there should be
the availability of safe working environment at workplace.

The Supreme Court held that, women have fundamental right towards
the freedom of sexual harassment at workplace. It also put forward
various important guidelines for the employees to follow them and avoid
sexual harassment of women at workplace. The court also suggested to
have proper techniques for the implementation of cases where there is
sexual harassment at workplace. The main aim/objective of the Supreme
Court was to ensure gender equality among people and also to ensure
that there should be no discrimination towards women at there
workplace.

After this case, the Supreme Court made the term Sexual harassment
well defined, accordingly any physical touch or conduct, showing of
pornography, any unpleasant taunt or misbehaviour, or any sexual desire
towards women, sexual favour will come under the ambit of sexual
harassment.

10
 CRITICAL ANALYSIS

The Supreme Court specifically underlined the definition of Sexual

Harassment which conveys any unwanted or uninvited physical touch or
conduct or showing of pornography or any definable sexual comments
or texts will come under the ambit of Sexual Harassment. According to
me any such conduct done directly hampers the right of women to life
and it also affects there dignity to live. It also hinders the mental and
physical health of women. Sexual harassment shall be avoided and the
equality between the genders shall be established at workplace.

The Supreme Court held out guidelines that, the person-in-charge of the
particular institution, organisation or office whether be it private or
public, will be responsible in taking effective steps to prevent sexual
harassment. Penalties shall be charged from the accused people for
conducting sexual harassment. It had became a very crucial topic to act
upon for the prevention of sexual harassment women at workplace. In
case of private companies the strict rules regarding the punishment of
sexual harassment shall be included. In case the sexual harassment is
conducted by the outsiders, the person-in charge of that institution must
take strict action for the conduct of such crime.

1. This writ petition has been filed for the enforcement of the
fundamental rights of working women under Arts. 14, 19 and 21 of
the Constitution of India in view of the prevailing climate in which
the violation of these rights is not uncommon.. With the increasing
awareness and emphasis on gender justice, there is increase in the
effort to guard against such violations: and the resentment towards
incidents of sexual harassment is also increasing. The present petition
has been brought as a class action by certain social activists and
NGOs with the aim of focussing attention towards this societal
aberration, and assisting in finding suitable methods for realisation of
the true concept of ‘gender equality’; and to prevent sexual
harassment of working women in all work places through judicial
process, to fill the vacuum in existing legislation.

11
. 2. The immediate cause for the filing of this writ petition is an incident
of alleged brutal gang rape of a social worker in a village of Rajasthan.
That incident is the subject-matter of a separate criminal action and no
further mention of it, by us, in necessary. The incident reveals the
hazards to which a working woman may be exposed and the depravity to
which sexual harassment can degenerate; and the urgency for safeguards
by an alternative mechanism in the absence of legislative measures. In
the absence of legislative measures, the need is to find an affective
alternative mechanism to fulfil this felt and urgent social need.

3. Each such incident results in violation of the fundamental rights of

‘Gender Equality’ and the ‘Right to Life and Liberty.’ It is a clear
violation of the rights under Arts. 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. One
of the Constitution. One of the logical consequences of such an incident
is also the violation of the victim’s fundamental right under Art. 19 (1)
(g) to practice any profession or to carry out any occupation, trade or
business. Such violations, therefore, attract the remedy under Art. 32 for
the enforcement of these fundamental rights of women. This class
action under Art. 32 2 of the Constitution is for this reason. A writ of
mandamus in such a situation, if it is to be effective, needs to be
accompanied by directions for prevention; as the violation of
fundamental rights of this kind is a recurring phenomenon. The
fundamental right to carry on any occupation, trade or profession
depends on the availability of a safe working environment. Right to life
means life with dignity. The primary responsibility for ensuring such
safety and dignity through suitable legislation, and the creation of a
mechanism for its enforcement, is of the legislature and the executive.
When, however, instances of sexual harassment resulting in violation of
fundamental rights of women workers under Arts. 14, 19 and 21 are
brought before us for redress under Art 32, an effective redressal
requires that some guidelines should be laid down for the protection of
these rights to fill the legislative vacuum.

4. The notice of the petition was given to the State of Rajasthan and the
Union of India. The learned Solicitor General appeared for the Union of
India and rendered valuable assistance in the true spirit of a Law Officer
to help us find a proper solution to this social problem of considerable
magnitude. In addition to Ms. Meenakshi Arora and Ms. Naina Kapur
who assisted the Court with full commitment. Shri Fali S. Nariman
appeared as Amicus Curiae and rendered great assistance. We place on
record our great appreciation for every counsel who appeared in the
case and rendered the needed assistance to the Court which has enabled

12
us to deal with this unusual matter in the manner considered appropriate
for a cause of this nature.

5. Apart from Art. 32 of the constitution of India, we may refer to some

other provisions which envisage judicial intervention for eradication of
this social evil. Some provisions in the Constitution in addition to Arts.
14, 19 (1) (g) and 21, which have relevance are :

Article 15:
15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex
or place of birth.-
(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on only of
religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them. .

3 (3) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any
special provision for women and children.
42. Provision for just and humane conditions of work and maternity
relief The State shall make provision for securing just and humane
conditions of work and for maternity relief.

Article 51A :
51A. Fundamental duties.
- It shall be the duty of every citizen of India;- (a) to abide by the
constitution and respect its ideals and institutions......
(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst
all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or
sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of
women;

6. Before we refer to the international conventions and norms having

relevance in this field an the manner in which they assume significance
in application and judicial interpretation, we may advert to some other
provisions in the Constitution which permit such use. These provisions
are :
Article 51 :
51. Promotion of international peace and security.- The State shall
endeavour to (c) foster respect for international law and treaty
obligations in the dealings of organised people with one another; and

Article 253 :
253. Legislation for giving effect to international agreements.-
Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Chapter,

13
Parliament has power to make any law for the whole or any part of the
territory of India for implementing any treaty. Agreement or convention
with any other country or countries or any decision made at any
international conference, association or other body.

Seventh Schedule :
List 1 -
Union List
14. Entering into treaties and agreements with foreign countries and
implementing of treaties, agreements and conventions with foreign
countries."

7. In the absence of domestic law occupying the field, to formulate

effective measures to check the evil of sexual harassment of working
women at all work places, the contents of international Conventions and
norms are significant for the purpose of interpretation of the guarantee
of gender equality, right to work with human dignity in Arts. 14, 15, 19
(1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution and the safeguards against sexual
harassment implicit therein. Any International Convention not
inconsistent with the fundamental rights and in harmony with its spirit
must be read into these provisions to enlarge the meaning and content
thereof, to promote the object of the constitutional guarantee. This is
implicit from Art. 51 (c) and the enabling power of the Parliament to
enact laws for implementing the International Conventions and norms
by virtue of Art. 253 read with Entry 14 of the Union List in Seventh
Schedule of the Constitution. Article 73 also is relevant. It provides that
the executive power of the Union shall extend to the matters with
respect to which Parliament has power to make laws. The executive
power of the Union is, therefore, available till the Parliament enacts
legislation to expressly provide measures needed to curb the evil.

8. Thus, the power of this Court under Art. 32 for enforcement of the
fundamental rights and the executive power of the union have to meet
the challenge to protect the working women from sexual harassment and
to make their fundamental rights meaningful. Governance of the society
by the rule of law mandates this 5 requirement as logical concomitant of
the constitutional scheme. The exercise performed by the Court in this
matter is with this common perception shared with the learned Solicitor
General and other members of the Bar who rendered valuable assistance
in the performance of this difficult task in public interest.

14
9. The progress made at each hearing culminated in the formulation of
guidelines to which the Union of India gave its consent through the
learned Solicitor General, indicating that these should be the guidelines
and norms declared by this Court to govern the behaviour of the
employers and all others at the work places to curb this social evil.

10. Gender equality includes protection from sexual harassment and

right to work with dignity, which is a universally recognised basic
human right. The common minimum requirement of this right has
received global acceptance. The International Conventions and norms
are, therefore, of great significance in the formulation of the guidelines
to achieve this purpose.

11. The obligation of this Court under Art. 32 of the Constitution for the
enforcement of these fundamental rights in the absence of legislation
must be viewed along with the role of judiciary envisaged in the Beijing
Statement of Principles of the Independence of the judiciary in the
LAWASIA region. These principles of the Independence of the
Judiciary in the LAWASIA region. These principles were accepted by
the Chief Justices of the Asia and the Pacific at Beijing in 1995 as those
representing the minimum standards necessary to be observed in order to
maintain the independence and effective functioning of the judiciary .
The objectives of the judiciary mentioned in the Beijing Statement are :
Objectives of the Judiciary : The objectives and functions of the
judiciary include following : (a) to ensure that all persons are able to
live securely under the Rule of Law; (b) to promote, within the proper
limits of the judicial function, the observance and the attainment of
human rights; and (c) to administer the law impartially among persons
and between persons and the State.

15
 CONCLUSION
Sexual Harassment of women at workplace happens at a very frequent
rate in India. If any strict action will not be taken towards this crime, it
will directly hamper the working ration of the women in India and on
other hand it will hamper the economic situation of India. Government
should make strict laws regarding the aversion of sexual harassment at
workplace, because it should realize that, women also constitute the
working population of our country.

It should be abolished to prevent the dignity and the respect of the

women. Various new approaches and skills shall be implemented by the
institutions, organisations to prevent there women employees from such
a social evil. The main objective behind the stabilization of this right is
to promote gender equality at workplace without any kind of
discrimination and discernment among the workers of an organisation.

The National Commission for women (NCW) , which is a statutory and

autonomous body constituted by the Government of India ‘to secure
justice for women, safeguard their rights and promote women’s
empowerment’ , has taken up sexual harassment of women at work place
as one of the focal issues in the realm of promotion of gender equality
and women’s empowerment .

Accordingly, in the year 1996 the Commission took up ‘sexual

harassment of women at the work place’ as one of its focal issues. This
was pursued with the various Central Ministries/Departments. In an
effort to promote the well being of all women employees at the work
place, the NCW in 1998, formulated a Code of Conduct for work
Place putting down the Supreme Court Guidelines, in simple
language and in accordance with the directives given by the Supreme
Court and circulated it widely amongst all the Central Ministries and
Government Departments. The Commission also circulated the Code to
all State Commissions for women, NGOs and apex bodies of the
Corporate Sector (CII, FICCI, ASSOCHAM etc.,) and to the Media.
The Supreme Court has also ordered that as a part of the complaint
mechanism, a Complaint Committee with a third party representation

16
therein, should be constituted in each organization viz Government
Departments and Non-governmental Organizations for investigating
charges of sexual harassment to deal effectively with the complaints of
sexual harassment at workplaces. Such Committees should have not less
than half of the members as women and a women to head it. The
complaint Committee must make an Annual Report to the Government
department concerned, of the complaints and Action Taken by (i) them.
The employers and person in charge will also report on the compliance
with the aforesaid guidelines including on the reports of the Complaints
Committees to the Government Department. These guidelines were
published by NCW in August, 2001

17
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

 https://main.sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/13856.pdf
 https://blog.ipleaders.in/case-comment-vishaka-vs-state-rajasthan/
 http://ncwapps.nic.in/pdfReports/Sexual%20Harassment%20at
%20Workplace%20(English).pdf
 https://www.equalrightstrust.org/ertdocumentbank/Microsoft
%20Word%20-%20Vishaka_edited.pdf

18