Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry Making C
Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry Making C
net/publication/228352341
CITATIONS READS
146 7,388
2 authors, including:
Avi Hofstein
Weizmann Institute of Science
182 PUBLICATIONS 12,705 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Avi Hofstein on 30 July 2014.
In this paper, we present the development and implementation over the period of more than
15 years of learning materials focusing on industrial chemistry as the main theme. The work was
conducted in the Department of Science Teaching at the Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel.
The project’s general goal was to teach chemistry concepts in the context of industrial chemistry in
order to present chemistry as a relevant topic both to the students personally as well as to the soci-
ety in which they live. The learning materials that were developed during this period were in align-
ment with the changes and reforms that were conducted in the Israeli educational system. These
developments were accompanied with intensive and comprehensive professional development
courses and workshops. In addition, several research and evaluation projects were conducted with
the goal to assess students’ achievements and to probe into the students’ perceptions regarding the
classroom learning environment and the teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards the various
instructional and learning materials techniques that were implemented in the programme through-
out these years. This paper is structured attempting to describe the curricular cycle in alignment
with Goodlad’s and Van den Akker’s curriculum representations.
Introduction
In an era of reform in science education both the content and pedagogy of science
learning are being scrutinized, and new standards intended to shape meaningful,
authentic, relevant, and contextualized science education are emerging. For exam-
ple, the new standards in science education (National Research Council, 1996)
suggest that the goals for school science are to educate students who experience the
richness and excitement of knowing and understanding the natural world and
engage intelligently in public discourse regarding debate matters of scientific and
technological concerns. It was suggested that chemistry should be taught not only to
prepare students for an academic career in chemistry, but also to help them become
informed citizens in today’s society (Ware, 2001). These future citizens will eventu-
ally appreciate how science and technology contribute to their daily life as well as to
the society in which they live.
Modern society is highly influenced by scientific advances and its accompanying
technological ramifications. Consequently, in order to educate the future citizens,
chemistry should be taught with appropriate emphasis on relevance to everyday life
and its role in industry, technology, and society. However, most of the science
curricula developed during the 1960s omitted societal and technological applications
of the scientific concepts. Science was taught as a means of advancing knowledge
and explanations, and not as means for improving society (Hofstein & Yager, 1982).
Following a general international trend (Ware, 2001), in the Israeli educational
system many students found their chemistry studies boring and non-relevant, and
therefore the enrolment of students in chemistry studies either in high school or in
higher education decreased significantly (Milner, Ben-Zvi, & Hofstein, 1987).
Moreover, the general public and the media tend to overemphasize the negative
image and the hazardous aspects of chemistry. This approach neglects the positive
contribution of industrial chemistry to society by producing useful materials and effi-
cient technologies to serve individuals as well as the society.
Teaching chemistry without incorporating aspects of the chemical industry
ignores one of the most important features of modern life and its technological
achievements. In addition, chemistry studies also have an important role in educat-
ing future citizens to cope objectively with societal and ethical issues in general, and
environmental implications in particular. Therefore, the emphasis of the chemistry
curriculum needs to change from the approach of focusing on the structure of the
discipline (focusing only on theories, key concepts, and processes) to a multidimen-
sional approach, in which students are provided with the appropriate tools in order
to obtain a balanced view of industrial issues and to educate them to evaluate objec-
tively such information. Kempa (1983), for example, suggested that future develop-
ments of teaching and learning chemistry (as well as the development of learning
materials) should include the following interrelated six dimensions:
● The conceptual structure of chemistry.
● The process of chemistry.
● The technological manifestations of chemistry.
● Chemistry as a “personally relevant” subject.
● The cultural aspects of chemistry.
● The societal implications of chemistry.
We believe that these dimensions can be implemented by introducing industrial
contexts into the chemistry curriculum using industrial case studies or other related
forms of learning and teaching materials. The different industrial chemistry learning
materials as well as instructional techniques developed in Israel in high-school chem-
istry have thus attempted to place greater emphasis on applied chemistry; teaching
Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry 1019
production processes in the chemistry plant. It also provides us with the opportunity
to describe the contexts of real situations and actual problems that exist in the chem-
ical industry, as well as topics related to the use of its products. Our approach was to
develop a series of case studies that are based on the contexts of local chemical
industries on the one hand, and relate these to the concepts of the chemistry curric-
ulum (students’ conceptual background) on the other.
The goals regarding the new generation case studies were:
a. To demonstrate the application of basic chemical principles and concepts in
Industrial Chemistry.
b. To demonstrate the importance and relevance of the chemical industry to the
students personally, and to the society in which they live (and operate).
c. To develop a basic knowledge of the technological, economic, and environmen-
tal factors involved in the establishment and operation of the chemical industry.
d. To investigate some of the specific problems faced by a local chemical industry,
such as the location of an industrial plant, the supply of raw materials, labour,
ways of taking care of the environment, and its related economical aspects.
e. To present the special language used in industry regarding basic technology,
economy, and industrial processes.
f. To show the differences between a laboratory and an industrial process and the
scaling-up steps needed for industrial production design.
g. To demonstrate the dynamic nature of industry (i.e., changes that chemical
industries undergo continuously).
h. To provide information regarding economical, environmental, and technologi-
cal problems that face the chemical industry.
i. To show the connection between the chemical industry and social and political
issues (environmental issues and debates, including moral and ethical dilemmas).
It was assumed that by attaining these goals we shall provide Israeli students with a
more comprehensive view regarding the importance of Industrial Chemistry, and
present chemistry in a more relevant and applied context. Thus, it was assumed that
will motivate them to study chemistry and will create a learning environment in
which varied instructional techniques could be implemented.
(the final national examination set centrally by the Israeli Ministry of Education).
This approach is aligned with the definition made by Wandersee and Roach (1997)
who recommend to include units based on contexts as a substitute for conventional
treatment of content.
The development of the new generation of case studies comprised two stages. In
the first stage, during the late 1980s (see Figure 1), the case studies focused mainly
on scientific concepts and its related technological aspects; while in the second
version (in the late 1990s; see Figure 1) more emphasis was given to related envi-
ronmental issues. This is based on changes that were made by the Israeli govern-
ment, who decided to implement new environmental standards and regulations. As
a result, the chemistry industries opened their gates to society in general, and to
schools in particular, with the goal in mind to be more sensitive to environmental
issues. It was assumed that presenting these issues in the case studies will provide
students with a balanced view of industry. The updated case studies emphasize the
development of the student as an independent thinker and confront them with
genuine and relevant issues and problems. In addition, they incorporate the peda-
gogical strategies that were developed during the dynamic implementation of the
first generation of these case studies. For example, the students are asked to cope
with environmental dilemmas (e.g., using public debates) and to think about advan-
tages and disadvantages concerning issues such as the use of products, location of
the industrial plant, industrial processes, construction materials, and separation
techniques. They have to think about the pros and cons of certain issues, to suggest
solutions or to choose a compromised solution based on scientific data. Some of the
activities are based on group work (collaboration) in order to encourage the
students to conduct collaborative discussions, compare different solutions, and eval-
uate information.
Tentatively, for the new generation of case studies, the following criteria have been
applied in the selection of industrial plants to develop the industrial case studies:
1. The chemical industry has local importance and is based on local raw materials.
2. Students should be able to understand and apply the key chemical concepts that
underline the process of a particular industry. These key chemical concepts
should be based on the students’ prior chemistry knowledge.
3. These industrial processes and concepts included in the case studies could be
applied to technological, economical, environmental, and societal issues.
4. The case study provides opportunities to vary the classroom learning environ-
ment by implementing different instructional techniques and pedagogical inter-
ventions.
5. The case study has the potential to place students in the centre of learning and
construct their knowledge either individually or in small collaborative groups.
6. The industry is willing to cooperate, both in the developmental stage, as well as
in the various implementation stages (e.g., to provide relevant background infor-
mation, take part in the teachers’ in-service training courses, and support and
encourage field trips).
Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry 1023
7. Teachers will be actively involved (at least partially) in the various stages of the
developmental process. These were mainly related to the development of teach-
ing strategies and pedagogical interventions that could be readily implemented
in the classroom. It is assumed that this approach (and procedure) has potential
to increase the teachers’ feeling of ownership (more details about this issue can
be find in the section dealing with the implementation of industrial chemistry;
i.e., the perceived curriculum).
The various components of the second version of the new generation of case studies
are presented (and detailed) in Table 1.
For the description of the developmental process of the formal curriculum, we will
show how these criteria have been integrated and implemented within the case study
about “Bromine and its compounds”, in the instructional design of “industrial
Table 1. Topics and concepts included in the updated second-generation case studies
Table 1. (continued)
Treatment of wastes
Disposal of wastes
Accident prevention
Environmental issues
Safety rules
Safe transportation
Recycling
Recovery
Air pollution
Water pollution
Earth contamination
Safety equipment
Safe storage
Purity of raw materials and products
Other aspects (societal) Location of plant
Economical aspects (profitability, supply and
demand, production costs etc.)
Manpower considerations
Licensing
Patents
Quality control
Total quality management
Marketing and sales
Political aspects
visits” and in the instructional design of the “Internet site”. Note that this is only an
example and that similar educational approach is used to all the case studies that
were developed.
Figure 2. Overview of the case study about “Bromine and its compounds”
underlying chemistry topics and concepts related to the industrial processes, the
related technological, societal, economic, and environmental issues, and their inter-
relationships (Criteria 2 and 3). All these efforts were conducted in an attempt to
involve the students in learning experiences that will eventually enhance their
perceptions that chemistry is not only pure but also relevant and applied (Criteria 4
and 5). Figure 3 illustrates the general instructional framework of the case studies.
One of the key elements of teaching about industrial chemistry is to provide the
Figure 3. The instructional framework used for the industrial case studies
Figure 3. The instructional framework used for the industrial case studies
developed more recently (Frailich, Kesner, & Hofstein, 2006; Kesner, Frailich, &
Hofstein, 2003), is an Internet site designed to provide students and teachers with
varied-type curriculum-based learning materials related to chemistry concepts and
issues (databases) and learning experiences (activities) in to the context of chemical
industry and daily life applications. This in fact is the approach in which we bring
the industry to the classroom. It should be noted that both the industrial visits as
well as the Internet site relate to general aspects of chemical industry that are
included in the two case studies mentioned earlier, and also to other industrial
chemical plants. This comprehensive approach enabled teachers to provide informa-
tion on various industrial issues in various locations in the country.
could be educationally ineffective and a waste of time (Orion, 1993). The issue is
how to make the visit educationally effective, relevant, and meaningful. Orion, and
Orion and Hofstein, for example, stated that the main role of field trips (outdoor
educational activities) is the direct experience with concrete phenomena and materi-
als. They developed an instructional model that consists of three phases, which we
adapted for our purpose:
1. the pre-visit phase to equip the students with the necessary information needed
for an educationally effective visit;
2. the actual visit to the industrial plant; and
3. the post-visit (summary) phase in which a discussion regarding the students’
experiences was conducted in the classroom.
It was found (Orion & Hofstein, 1994) that in cases that strictly followed the
suggested instructional model, students demonstrated a significant improvement in
their knowledge and attitudes compared with students from classes that followed a
non-structured approach. To make this model adequate for industrial visits, we
involved the industrial personnel in the planning of the field trips and in the process
of preparing manuals for these visits (Criterion 6). Teachers underwent professional
development procedures including gaining scientific and technological background
about the industrial plant, as well as methods to prepare their students for such visits
(Criterion 7).
During the visits to chemical industries the students are involved in various activi-
ties, usually performed in small groups (Criterion 5; e.g., working on work-sheets on
specific questions and small group inquiry tasks). At some of the industrial sites they
can obtain additional information regarding these tasks from the industry personnel
(e.g., laboratory and engineering personnel). At some of the industrial sites, students
perform chemical analyses and test-tube experiments that simulate the industrial
process. Their findings and observations are recorded and are later used for the post-
visit discussions and deliberations.
Although important and educationally effective, very often teachers who plan
and conduct such events face many logistical problems. Among these problems
are the communication with industry, transportation costs, school schedule, and
safety regulations. In an attempt to overcome all these problems a link centre was
established at the Weizmann Institute of Science: the Israeli Chemical Industry–
Education Link Centre (ICIELC). This centre is directly responsible for providing
information, background materials, ideas for school visits in industries, and many
other initiatives that are intended to strengthen the link between the educational
system and chemical industries in the country (Criterion 6). This centre helped
teachers to communicate with industries and provided support to overcome some of
the logistical problems (Hofstein & Kesner, 1996).
In order to provide teachers and students with effective alternatives (in cases in
which field trips were not accessible) we developed several vicarious alternatives
such as films, overhead transparencies, and, more recently, an Internet site on which
we shall now elaborate.
1028 A. Hofstein and M. Kesner
sional needs. Thus, together with the curriculum developers, teachers have a signifi-
cant impact in the development and implementation of the teaching materials.
The whole process of implementing the various industrial case studies and its
related learning and teaching materials in more schools (all over the country)
included providing teachers with intensive summer courses and continuous support
during the school year. Thus, throughout a period of about 15 years of implementa-
tion processes, many teachers were involved in professional development initiatives
in which they obtained appropriate content and pedagogical background, and, more
recently, also information regarding computer-based technological skills (ICT).
Evaluation of our professional development initiatives were conducted as part of
the implementation procedures (Kesner et al., 1997a). The research was done using
pre-questionnaires and post-questionnaires and interviews that provided back-
ground information about the teachers (n = 150), as well as about their problems
and feelings regarding teaching the subject of industry and their expectations from
these professional development courses. Interestingly, we found that about 66% of
the teachers did not take any university course on chemical industry and about 33%
of the teacher population did not even visit any chemistry plant during their studies.
When asked about their feelings regarding teaching the subject of industry, in the
setting of high-school chemistry, the teachers claimed (for example):
We feel insecure because we have no background in this field.
It is hard to teach about industry.
We are afraid that it will be boring for the students.
It demands a completely different way of thinking.
These claims confirm that the chemistry teachers had rather a limited background
(owing to their university training) to cope with this unique interdisciplinary-type
topic. These findings were in fact a call to conduct short intensive courses for large
populations of chemistry teachers during the first years in which the implementation
of the case studies took place.
This was, in fact, a call for varying the instructional techniques utilized in the chem-
istry course in Israel in general, and in the industrial programme in particular.
Therefore, in the Operational Curriculum, we planned to provide students and
teachers with an effective and diverse classroom learning environment that will
enable students to interact physically and intellectually with instructional materials
through hands-on experiences and through minds-on and inquiry-oriented activities
(Criterion 4).
Several instructional strategies and pedagogical interventions have been developed
in order to increase the students’ involvement in the learning process and their inter-
est in chemistry in general, and in their chemistry studies in particular (Criterion 5).
These include laboratory investigations based on real problems originating from
industrial case studies and everyday topics, activities that simulate real industrial
situations, mini-projects, classroom debates on controversial issues, discussion about
information allocated from the written and visual media, field trips, and, more
recently, the Internet site. The Internet site provides relevant and up-to-date infor-
mation on industries, products, and other background information to help students
in performing small-scale research projects.
Teachers who underwent intensive professional development (in the workshops,
see section on Perceived Curriculum) were asked to implement (during the teaching
of the industrial case studies) at least five different instructional strategies—and not
to use solely traditional text-book based teaching approach (Kesner et al., 1997a).
Information about teachers’ operations was obtained through qualitative-type
assessment procedures (namely, interviews, observations, and self-reports). Based
on the findings from these assessment methods it was apparent that they made a
great effort to provide students with activities and assignments that will put them in
the centre of learning, as opposed to the other group (those students whose teachers
did not participate in the intensive workshops) in which it was clear that in most
cases the teachers were in the centre of the classroom interactions. These findings
have implications regarding the development of future professional chemistry teach-
ers in the area of applied chemistry and its related industrial topics. In other words,
there is a need to put greater emphasis on effective teaching strategies and varied-
type learning methods to be implemented in the teachers’ professional development
initiatives. All these were developed at the ICIELC.
In general, teachers have the freedom to select for their classes the case studies as
well as those activities that are more aligned with the nature and location of the
school, students’ interests and abilities, and his/her personal teaching preferences. It
was found that many teachers chose to take their students to industrial visits (about
50%, n = 3,500 of the students’ population who opted to study chemistry). Also,
we observed that in many classes the teachers varied the classroom learning envi-
ronment by using popular (or semi-popular) articles that are related to industrial
chemistry and other aspects of applied chemistry. In locations in Israel in which
there are environmental problems, teachers conducted debates in which students
had opportunity for role-playing (e.g., the industry, environment, chemists, and
citizens).
1032 A. Hofstein and M. Kesner
As mentioned earlier, the Internet site was constructed so that the chemistry teach-
ers will have maximum flexibility to choose activities that are aligned with their
teaching style and in addition will be suitable for their students. To illustrate the idea
of “flexible implementation”, we describe how two teachers (Teacher M and
Teacher S) integrated the Internet site in their 10th-grade classroom.
Teacher M came to the course with little experience regarding teaching chemistry
in a technologically rich learning environment. However, she was highly motivated
and enthusiastic about the idea of trying the new instructional technique in her
chemistry classroom. Her headmaster provided her with technical support and
encouraged her efforts to use the site. We observed her behaviour in the classroom,
and it is clear that she makes a big effort to create an effective learning environment.
More specifically, she had clear goals that she wants to attain, she provided constant
guidance to her students in this student-centred learning, and she prepared clear and
valid worksheets for her students. Moreover, it was clear that she followed the guide-
lines that she obtained from the site developers, and she implemented the activities
and experiences in which she was involved in the summer workshop. We observed
that Teacher M underwent a pronounced professional change and thus her attitude
and confident in using the computer as a communication device in general, and
Internet as a teaching tool in particular, increased significantly.
Teacher S came to the summer workshop with a lot of uncertainty regarding the
use of an Internet site in the chemistry classroom. She had many reservations and
questions regarding the effectiveness of this instructional technique. However, after
the summer workshop her confidence increased and she thought that the Internet
could help her in increasing the students’ motivation to learn chemistry in general,
and to enrol in more advanced courses in chemistry in particular. Our observation of
Teacher S showed that she was using the site as a basis and a starting point for her
teaching, in contrast to Teacher M who was using the site just as she was instructed
by the developers; Teacher S elaborated, and developed more activities for her
science-oriented class. All the teaching of 10th-grade chemistry was conducted in
the computer laboratory, since she had a highly motivated class with a majority of
computer-literate students. Moreover, her students reported their homework on the
computer (using email) and she provided them with feedback electronically. In addi-
tion, she encouraged her students to use the Internet also at home in order to extend
their chemistry knowledge regarding issues that were discussed in class. She used the
site with a lot of flexibility, including inserting more activities and ideas. She
reported that the teaching style that she had adopted enhanced and improved her
communication and interaction with her students. Thus, we believe it had a positive
impact on her classroom learning environment. Recently she decided to involve her
students’ parents in the activities with the goal in mind of improving the home learn-
ing environment and gaining the parents’ support for her students.
Each of the two teachers implemented the site according to their own teaching
style and to their students’ interest and abilities. Teacher M implemented the site as
Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry 1033
(Goal b). In general, it was found that the experimental group outperformed the
control group regarding the interest and enjoyment of chemistry studies. In addition,
it was revealed that these students found their chemistry studies more relevant to
their daily life compared with the control group. To conclude, integrating web activ-
ities that emphasize the relevance of chemistry to industry into the curriculum, and
integrating daily life applications into the regular teaching and learning of chemistry,
has the potential to contribute to students’ learning, both in the cognitive as well as
the affective domains.
Table 2. The components and rationale for the activities in the “Industrial Initiatives”
programme
Table 3. Examples of activities within the context of the four different learning environments
the chemistry teachers were not familiar with investigative laboratory-based projects
as well as its aligned alternative assessment methods. At the initial stages of the
implementation of the programme, we offer the teachers topics and ideas that they
could use in their classroom. However, their involvement in the programme encour-
ages them to try their own original ideas and activities. We had ample opportunities
to build on our experiences and have the professional development meetings to serve
as a platform for teachers’ reflections and for obtaining feedback from their peers. In
addition, all the ideas, initiatives, mini-projects, and laboratory experiments are
made accessible to other chemistry teachers in the country on the web site that was
constructed.
Conclusion
We live in an era in which chemistry should be presented to the student not only as a
body of knowledge, but also as a vehicle for presenting the technological manifesta-
tions of chemistry and its influence on the students’ personal life and the society in
which he/she lives. The need for relevance in chemistry education has always been
clearly recognized even if its realization has been elusive. The different industrial
chemistry learning materials as well as instructional techniques developed in Israel in
the context of high-school chemistry have attempted to place greater emphasis on
applied chemistry (teaching chemistry in its context) and on its socio-economic and
environmental consequences.
The various research studies that were conducted throughout the years (and detailed
in this paper) provided us with ample evidence that learning Industrial Chemistry
topics and using various types of industry-based learning materials and learning strat-
egies have the potential to provide a unique chemistry classroom learning environment.
The success of any such programme requires the cooperation of four “partners”:
the industry personnel, the teachers, the Ministry of Education (who are responsible
for the syllabus), and the programme designers. In this paper an attempt was made
to describe a curriculum process that took place over a period of more than 20 years.
In addition it should be stated that such a long-term project could be conducted if
all the curricular components (development implementation and evaluation) will be
conducted under the same roof. In this paper we presented the Industrial Chemistry
project as a mean of attaining the goal of teaching chemistry in context. In addition,
we demonstrated how the various learning materials that were developed enabled us
to present the chemistry as a relevant topic both to the student personally as well as
to the society in which they operate.
The dynamic and long-term nature of the project enabled us to make changes
aligned with changes in the education system in Israel in general, and the changes in
content and assessment methods that were implemented more recently in particular.
In conclusion, since the context is highly influenced by changes in the educational
system, reforms in education, and new standards that are employed, it is suggested
that curriculum development centre who specializes in context-based chemistry
should operate in a manner that will cater for to such changes.
1038 A. Hofstein and M. Kesner
Note
1. An English version is available online (http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sci-tea/Brombook).
References
Abad, V. J. (1999). “Hebdo-Chim”: A Web application to support learning in a chemistry meth-
ods pre-service course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 283–290.
Barker, V., & Millar, R. (1999). Students’ reasoning about chemical reactions: What changes occur
during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education,
21(6), 645–665.
Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International
Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999–1015.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M. E., & Palincsar, A. (1991).
Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational
Psychologists, 26(3), 369–398.
Brand, M., Gerrans, G., McCarogher, K., & Pool, C. (1991). Zinc today and through the ages.
Spectrum, 29(1), 17–20.
Byrne, M., & Johnstone, A. (1988). How to make science relevant? School Science Review, 70(251),
43–46.
Campbell, B., Lazonby, J., Millar, R., Nicolson, P., Ramsden, J., & Waddington, D. (1994).
Science: The Salters approach—A case study of the process of large scale curriculum develop-
ment, Science Education, 78(5), 415–447.
Childs, P. E., & Walsh, M. (1989). The chemical industry in Ireland: A directory for teachers. Plassey,
Limerick, Eire: Thomond College of Education.
Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A (2006). The influence of web-based chemistry learning on
students’ perceptions, attitudes and achievements. Paper at the NARST Conference, San Francisco.
Gess-Newsome J., (1999). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: An introduction and Orientation
(1986). In J. G. Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining Pedagogical content knowledge,
The construct and its implications for Science Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Goodlad, J. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York: McGraw-
Hill.
Hofstein, A., & Yager, R. E. (1982). Societal issues as organizers for science education in the 80s.
School Science and Mathematics, 82(7), 539–547.
Hofstein, A. (1985). The teaching of industrial chemistry-widening the scope of high school chem-
istry. In Y. Takeuchi (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth Chemical Education Conference on Widening
the Scope of Chemistry (pp. 107–114). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Hofstein, A., & Kempa, R. F. (1985). Motivating aspects in science education: An attempt at an
analysis. European Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 221–229.
Hofstein, A., Kesner, M., & Ben-Zvi, R. (2000). Students’ perception of an industrial classroom
learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 2(3), 291–306.
Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (1996). Bringing industrial chemistry into the classroom: The Israeli
experience. In M. Mapletoft & R. Isuyama (Eds.), Synergy, 5 case studies on education–industry
partnerships. Heslington, York, UK: Chemical Industry Education Centre, Department of
Chemistry, University of York.
Hofstein, A., Shore, R., & Kipnis, M. (2004). Providing high school chemistry students with oppor-
tunities to develop learning skills in an inquiry-type laboratory—a case study. International
Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 47–62.
Hofstein, A., & Walberg, H. J. (1995). Instructional strategies. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg
(Eds.), Improving science education. The NSSE yearbook. Chicago, IL: The International
Academy of Education.
Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry 1039
Holbrook, J. (2005). Making chemistry teaching relevant. Chemical Education International, 6(1).
Retrieved November 1, 2002 from http://stwww.weizmann.ac.il/g-chem/learnchem/.
Isuyama, R. & Mapletoft, M. (1996). Synergy, 5 case studies on education–industry partnerships.
Heslington, York, UK: Chemical Industry Education Centre, Department of Chemistry,
University of York.
Kempa, R. F. (1983). Developing new perspectives in chemical education. Paper presented at the 7th
International Conference in Chemistry, Education, and Society, Montpellier, France.
Kesner, M. (1999). Visits to chemistry plants as a tool in chemistry studies: How teachers and high school
students see the visit in the chemistry plant? Paper presented at the National Association for
Research in Science Teaching (NARST) annual meeting, Boston, MA.
Kesner, M. (2003). Industrial chemistry initiatives—are they useful tools for increasing the relevance and
applicability of chemistry studies? Paper presented at the ESERA conference, Noordwijkerhout,
The Netherlands.
Kesner, M., Hofstein, A., & Ben-Zvi, R. (1997a). The development and implementation of two
industrial chemistry case studies for the Israeli high school chemistry curriculum. International
Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 565–576.
Kesner, M., Hofstein, A., & Ben-Zvi, R. (1997b). Student and teacher perceptions of industrial
chemistry case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 725–738.
Kesner, M., Frailich, M., & Hofstein, A. (2003). Implementing the Internet learning environment
into the chemistry curriculum in high schools in Israel. In M. S. Khine & D. L. Fisher (Eds.),
Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 209–234). Singapore: World
Scientific.
Milner, N., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein A. (1987). Variables that affect students’ enrolment in science
courses. Research in Science and Technological Education, 5(2), 201–208.
Nae, N., Hofstein, A., & Samuel, D. (1982). The case for case studies: School chemistry and
chemical industry. Education in Chemistry, 19, 20–21.
Nae, N., Hofstein, A., Mandler, V., & Samuel D. (1982). Chemistry in action: How to plan a visit
to a chemical industry. Journal of Chemical Education, 59(7), 582–582.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral
part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(6), 325–331.
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1994). Factors influencing learning during scientific field trip in a natu-
ral environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1097–1119.
Osgood, C. F., Suci, G. I., & Tenenbaum, P. H. (1975). The measurements of meaning. Urbana, IL:
Illinois University Press.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching, Educational
Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Tamir, P. (1985). The potential and actual roles of evaluators. In P. Tamir (Ed.), The role of evalu-
ators in curriculum development. London, UK: Croom-Helm.
Van den Akker, J. (1998). The science curriculum: Between ideas and outcomes, In B. Frazer &
K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 421–447). Dordrecht, The
Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wandersee, J. H., & Roach, L. M. (1997). Interactive historical vignettes. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H.
Wandersee, & J. D. Novak, (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding (pp. 281–306). San Diego,
CA: Academic Press.
Ware, S. A. (2001). Teaching chemistry from societal perspective. Pure and Applied Chemistry
(IUPAC), 73(7), 1209–1214.
Yager, R. E., & Hofstein, A. (1986). Features of quality curriculum for school science. Journal of
Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 133–146.