Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vitamina C
Vitamina C
Background: We compared serum vitamin C (VIC) status of the adult (≥20 y) US population in the National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017–2018 with combined data from 2003–2004 and 2005–2006.
Methods: VIC was measured using HPLC with electrochemical detection. Mean data were stratified by age, sex,
race/Hispanic origin, income, body mass index, dietary intake, supplement use, and smoking status. Prevalence
of VIC deficiency (<11.4 μmol/L) was calculated.
Results: In NHANES 2017–2018, the mean VIC was 8 μmol/L higher in people ≥60 y compared with those 20–59 y
of age, 10 μmol/L lower in men vs women, 8 μmol/L lower in low vs high income, 11 μmol/L lower in obese vs
healthy weight, and 15 μmol/L lower in smokers vs nonsmokers. Differences in mean VIC across race/Hispanic
origin groups ranged from 2 to 7 μmol/L. Mean VIC was 27 μmol/L higher with vitamin C-containing supplement
use and positively associated (Spearman ρ = 0.33; P < 0.0001) with increasing dietary intake. The associations
between mean VIC and the investigated covariates were generally consistent and the prevalence of deficiency
was not significantly different between survey periods (6.8% vs 7.0%; P = 0.83). However, a few subgroups had
double the risk. We found no significant survey differences in mean VIC (51.2 vs 54.0 μmol/L; P = 0.09).
Conclusions: Overall VIC status of the US adult population has remained stable since last assessed in the NHANES
2005–2006 survey. Vitamin C deficiency remained high for those with low dietary intake and who smoke.
a
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA; bOak Ridge Institute for Science and
Education, Oak Ridge, TN; cCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.
*Address correspondence to this author at: National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Nutritional Biomarkers Branch,
Atlanta, GA 30341. E-mail rschleicher@cdc.gov.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention/the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Received May 17, 2022; accepted August 19, 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfac093
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023.
This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
IMPACT STATEMENT
The VIC status of the US adult population was reassessed using NHANES 2017–2018 data. The overall mean
and prevalence of deficiency were essentially unchanged compared with NHANES 2003–2006. Smoking sta
tus, obesity, low socioeconomic status, low dietary intake, or not using supplements were confirmed to still be
associated with low VIC. Additionally, younger people, non-Hispanic Black people, and men had low VIC com
pared to their counterparts.
older people aged ≥60 years, and a supplemental categories. Poverty income ratio (PIR), which is the
sample of pregnant women. Starting in 2007, ratio of family income to poverty guidelines specif
NHANES no longer oversampled adolescents and ic to family size, was defined as low (0–1.85), mid
pregnant women, oversampled the entire Hispanic dle (1.86–3.5), or high (>3.5). Body mass index
population (compared to only the Mexican– (BMI) was defined as healthy weight (18.5–
American population), non-Hispanic Black people, 24.99 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.99 kg/m2), or
low-income non-Hispanic White people and other obesity (≥30 kg/m2). Self-reported 24-hour total
people, and non-Hispanic White people and other dietary vitamin C intake recorded at the mobile
one pool per 20 samples) ranged from 11.2– the historical comparisons, weighted arithmetic
98.6 μmol/L with an overall CV of 6%. See means were computed from combined NHANES
Supplemental Table 1 in the online Data 2003–2004 and 2005–2006 cycles to provide esti
Supplement for QC pool statistic details. Bench QC mates with greater statistical precision. Four-year
were evaluated using a SAS Institute Incorporated weights for 2003–2006 were calculated using the
(Cary, NC) QC program (20). Blind QC results were original 2-year MEC weights (original weight/2).
evaluated against 3 SD of the characterization P values to compare either the weighted means
means (20 runs per pool). Two levels of National or weighted prevalences across multiple categor
Table 1. For the US population 20 years and older, weighted prevalence (in percent) of vitamin C
deficiency (serum vitamin C <11.4 µmol/L) and weighted mean serum vitamin C concentrations,
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017–2018.
Prevalence Mean
(95% CI)a Wald F (95% CI)a Wald F
Variables Variable categories n (%) P valueb (µmol/L) P valueb
(continued)
Table 1. Continued
Prevalence Mean
(95% CI)a Wald F (95% CI)a Wald F
Variables Variable categories n (%) P valueb (µmol/L) P valueb
Vitamin C-containing supplement use Yes 1133 0.5 <0.0001 70.6 <0.0001
(0.2, 1.5)d (67.5, 73.7)d
No 3336 9.2 43.5
(6.9, 12.1)e (40.9, 46.2)e
Table 2. Multiple linear regression resultsa for serum vitamin C concentrations in the US population 20
years and older, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017–2018.
Beta coefficient
Variablesb Variable categories Reference category (95% CI) P valuec
groups compared to low PIR. Adults of healthy weight ascending dietary intake quartile ranging 4.3–
or who were overweight had 10.5–10.7 µmol/L sig 22.1 µmol/L compared to the lowest (<20 mg/day).
nificantly higher vitamin C than adults with obesity. Mean VIC concentrations were significantly higher
VIC concentrations were significantly higher in each by 22.3 µmol/L (95% CI [19.5, 25.1]) in those taking
vitamin C-containing supplements. Nonsmokers Nonsmokers had 8.6 µmol/L (95% CI [5.9, 11.3])
had significantly higher mean VIC than smokers by higher VIC concentrations than smokers. After
14.8 µmol/L (95% CI [11.7, 17.8]). examining all the pairwise interactions from the
model, there were 3 statistically significant interac
Regression Model tions: age and sex (P = 0.0243), age and vitamin
After adjusting for all covariates, there were no C-containing supplement use (P = 0.0001), and sex
longer any significant differences among race/ and smoking status (P = 0.0247). Selected estimated
Hispanic origin groups or PIR seen in 2017–2018 conditional marginal means from the model pre
80
Conditional marginal mean mmol/L
60 60
70
50 60 50
40 50
40
30 40
30 30
20
20
20
10 10
0 0 10
20-39 40-59 ≥60 20-39 40-59 ≥60
0
Age (years) Age (years)
Nonsmokers Smokers
Fig. 1. NHANES 2017–2018 conditional marginal means and 95% confidence intervals derived from a
multiple linear regression with interactions for age and sex, age and vitamin C-containing supplement
use, and smoking status and sex.
Table 3. For the US population 20 years and older: weighted prevalence (in percent) of vitamin C
deficiency (serum vitamin C <11.4 µmol/L) and weighted mean serum vitamin C concentrations,
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006, along with the estimated mean
difference between the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–2018 and 2003–2006.
Mean difference
2003–06 2003–06 2017–18 minus
Prevalence Mean 2003–06
Variable (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) P value of mean
Variables categories na (%) (µmol/L) (µmol/L) differencesb
(continued)
Table 3. Continued
Mean difference
2003–06 2003–06 2017–18 minus
Prevalence Mean 2003–06
Variable (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) P value of mean
Variables categories na (%) (µmol/L) (µmol/L) differencesb
age and sex and age and supplement use were pri apart. The precision of the laboratory method was
marily among those ≥60 years. These differences in excellent with bench QC CVs ranging from 1.7% to
VIC (men vs women and supplement users vs nonu 7.6% (2003–2004), 3.7% to 5.7% (2005–2006), and
sers) were approximately twice the size of the other 3.6% to 4.1% (2017–2018). Although we did not par
age groups. Regarding smoking, the mean VIC dif ticipate in external quality assurance programs such
ference between men and women is only significant as INSTAND (Düsseldorf, Germany) and The Royal
in nonsmokers. College of Pathologists of Australasia (New South
A major strength of this study is that essentially Wales, Australia), and a direct method comparison
the same analytical method has been used to com between the old and new methods could not be
pare data over 2 time periods more than a decade done because the old instrument was no longer
Nonstandard Abbreviations: VIC, serum vitamin C; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; BMI, body
mass index; PIR, poverty income ratio; MEC, mobile examination center; NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics.
Author Contributions: All authors confirmed they have contributed to the intellectual content of this paper and have met the follow
ing 4 requirements: (a) significant contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data;
(b) drafting or revising the article for intellectual content; (c) final approval of the published article; and (d) agreement to be accountable
for all aspects of the article thus ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the article are appropriately
investigated and resolved.
Authors’ Disclosures or Potential Conflicts of Interest: No authors declared any potential conflicts of interest.
Role of Sponsor: No sponsor was declared.
REFERENCES
1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for United States: 2003–2004 National Health and Nutrition
Vitamin C, Vitamin E, selenium, and carotenoids. Examination Survey (NHANES). Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:
Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2000. 1252–63.
p. 154. 8. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of
2. Levine M, Rumsey SC, Daruwala R, Park JB, Wang Y. obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States,
Criteria and recommendations for vitamin C intake. J Am 2017–2018. NCHS data brief, no 360. Hyattsville (MD):
Med Assoc 1999;281:1415–23. National Center for Health Statistics; 2020.
3. FDA. Daily value on the new nutrition and 9. Angeles-Agdeppa I, Sun Y, Denney L, Tanda KV, Octavio
supplement facts labels. https://www.fda.gov/food/ RD, Carriquiry A, Capanzana MV. Food sources, energy
new-nutrition-facts-label/daily-value-new-nutrition- and nutrient intakes of adults: 2013 Philippines National
and-supplement-facts-labels (Accessed April 2022). Nutrition Survey. Nutr J 2019;18:59.
4. Levine M. New concepts in the biology and biochemistry 10. Kim J, Choi Y-H. Physical activity, dietary vitamin C, and
of ascorbic acid. N Engl J Med 1986;314:892–902. metabolic syndrome in the Korean adults: The Korea
5. USDA. What we eat in America nutrient intake data tables National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008
2003–2004 and 2017–2018. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ to 2012. Public Health 2016;135:30–7.
northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human- 11. UK Government. National diet and nutrition survey
nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/ results from years 1, 2, 3, and 4 (combined) of the rolling
docs/wweia-data-tables/ (Accessed April 2022). programme (2008/2009–2011–2012). https://www.gov.
6. Mishra S, Stierman B, Gahche JJ, Potischman N. Dietary uk/government/statistics/national-diet-and-nutrition-
supplement use among adults: United States, 2017– survey-results-from-years-1-to-4-combined-of-the-
2018. NCHS data brief, no 399. Hyattsville (MD): National rolling-programme-for-2008-and-2009-to-2011-and-
Center for Health Statistics; 2021. 2012 (Accessed April 2022).
7. Schleicher RL, Carroll MD, Ford ES, Lacher DA. Serum 12. Langlois K, Cooper M, Colapinto CK. Vitamin C status of
vitamin C and the prevalence of vitamin C deficiency in the Canadian adults: findings from the 2012/2013 Canadian
Health Measures Survey. Statistics Canada Health 22. CDC. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Reports 2016;27:3–10. 2005–2006 Vitamin C. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/
13. Curtin LR, Mohadjer LK, Dohrmann SM, Montaquila JM, nhanes/2005-2006/labmethods/vic_d_met.pdf (Accessed
Kruszon-Moran D, Mirel LB, et al. The National Health and July 2022).
Nutrition Examination Survey: sample design, 1999– 23. CDC. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
2006. Vital Health Stat 2 2012;155:1–39. 2017–2018 Vitamin C. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/
14. Curtin LR, Mohadjer LK, Dohrmann SM, Kruszon-Moran D, nhanes/2017-2018/labmethods/VIC-J-MET-508.pdf
Mirel LB, Carroll MD, et al. National Health and Nutrition (Accessed July 2022).
Examination Survey: sample design, 2007–2010. Vital 24. Parker JD, Talih M, Malec DJ, Beresovsky V, Carroll M,
Health Stat 2 2013;160:1–23. Gonzalez JF, et al. National Center for Health Statistics data
15. Johnson CL, Dohrmann SM, Burt VL, Mohadjer LK. presentation standards for proportions. National Center
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2017;2:175.