SPH - Field and Operations Report - DRAFT - 21112023

ANMA OFFSHORE WIND FARM PROJECT Document No.
AWF-SII-TEC-REP-ENV-0001
Revision A
Document Title: Field and Operations Report
Date 26-Jul-2023
ANMA OFFSHORE WIND FARM

PROJECT
OFFSHORE SITE INVESTIGATION

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
FIELD AND OPERATIONS REPORT
Contractor Doc. No. : [AWF-SII-TEC-REP-ENV-0001]

Contractor Revision No. : [A]
A 26-Jul-2023 Issued for Review Rhyan Risnadi Ramkumar A R

REV. DATE DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED
ANMA OFFSHORE WIND FARM PROJECT Document No. AWF-SII-TEC-REP-ENV-0001
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
Change Log
Revision Change Description Remark
Hold Record
No. Hold Description Remark
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 4
2 SCOPE OF WORK................................................................................................................................... 6
2.1 CONSTRAINTS FOR SURVEY AND REVISED LINE PLAN..................................................................
2.2 PRIORITY UHRS SURVEY....................................................................................................................
2.3 GEOPHYSICAL DIGITAL AND ANALOG SITE SURVEY – AREA A & AREA C......................................
2.4 GEOPHYSICAL ANALOG SITE SURVEY – AREA B...........................................................................
2.5 GEOPHYSICAL EXPORT CABLE ROUTE SURVEY...........................................................................
2.6 SURVEY STATISTICS – AREAS A & C, AREA B AND EXR.................................................................
2.7 TIELINES AND RECONNAISSANCE LINES.......................................................................................
3 SURVEY OPERATIONS SUMMARY...................................................................................................... 15
4 PERSONNEL & EQUIPMENT................................................................................................................ 20
4.1 PERSONNEL – SURVEY CREW.........................................................................................................
4.2 PERSONNEL – MARINE CREW..........................................................................................................
4.3 SURVEY VESSEL................................................................................................................................
4.4 CHASE BOAT.......................................................................................................................................
4.5 EQUIPMENT........................................................................................................................................
5 WORKING GEODETIC PARAMETERS.................................................................................................. 25
5.1 HORIZONTAL DATUM.........................................................................................................................
5.2 VERTICAL DATUM...............................................................................................................................
6 OFFSHORE SURVEY OPERATIONS.................................................................................................... 26
6.1 DGPS POSITIONING SYSTEM...........................................................................................................
6.2 NAVIGATION LOGGING SYSTEM.......................................................................................................
6.3 GYRO COMPASS................................................................................................................................
6.4 USBL POSITIONING SYSTEM............................................................................................................
6.5 SOUND VELOCITY PROFILER...........................................................................................................
6.6 SINGLE-BEAM ECHO SOUNDER.......................................................................................................
6.7 MULTIBEAM ECHO SOUNDER...........................................................................................................
6.8 SIDE SCAN SONAR.............................................................................................................................
6.9 SUB-BOTTOM PROFILING SYSTEM..................................................................................................
6.10 ULTRA HIGH RESOLUTION SEISMIC (UHRS)...................................................................................
6.11 SINGLE CHANNEL SEISMIC (S-UHR)................................................................................................
6.12 MAGNETOMETER...............................................................................................................................
7 SYSTEMS CALIBRATIONS.................................................................................................................... 31
7.1 DGPS INTEGRITY CHECK..................................................................................................................
7.2 GYRO CALIBRATION..........................................................................................................................
7.3 MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION................................................................................................................
7.4 USBL DYNAMIC CALIBRATION..........................................................................................................
7.5 UHRS & S-UHR SEA TRIALS..............................................................................................................
8 DATA PROCESSING.............................................................................................................................. 34
8.1 NAVIGATION........................................................................................................................................
8.2 BATHYMETRY.....................................................................................................................................
8.3 SIDE SCAN SONAR.............................................................................................................................
8.4 SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER...................................................................................................................
Enviros Korea
Page 1 of 39
This document is proprietary and confidential. The copyright © therein is vested in ENVIROS. All rights reserved. Neither the whole, nor any part of this document may be disclosed
to any third party nor reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted in any form nor by any means (electronic, mechanical, reprographic, recording nor otherwise) without
the prior written consent of the copyright owner.
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
8.5 MAGNETOMETER...............................................................................................................................
8.6 ULTRA HIGH-RESOLUTION SEISMIC (UHRS)...................................................................................
8.7 SINGLE CHANNEL SEISMIC (S-UHR)................................................................................................
9 SURVEY OPERATION SUMMARY........................................................................................................ 37
10 HSSE RECORD AND PERFORMANCE................................................................................................. 40
FIGURE LIST
FIGURE 1: OVERVIEW MAP WITH PROPOSED WTG, OSS AND MR LOCATIONS.....................................4

FIGURE 2: MAP WITH SURVEY BLOCKS...................................................................................................... 6
FIGURE 3: PRIORITY UHRS SITE SURVEY LAYOUT....................................................................................8
FIGURE 4:OWG DIGITAL AND ANALOG SITE SURVEY LAYOUT - AREA A & AREA C................................9
FIGURE 5: OWF ANALOG SITE SURVEY LAYOUT - AREA B......................................................................10
FIGURE 6: EXPORT CABLE ROUTER SURVEY LAYOUT...........................................................................11
FIGURE 7: TIELINES AND RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY LAYOUT............................................................14
FIGURE 8: SURVEY OPERATIONAL SUMMARY - PIE CHART...................................................................18
FIGURE 9: SURVEY OPERATIONAL SUMMARY- BAR GRAPH..................................................................19
FIGURE 10: MV ENVIROS SURVEYOR........................................................................................................ 21
FIGURE 11: R V TAM SA HO......................................................................................................................... 22
FIGURE 12: UHRS DATA PROCESSING FLOW...........................................................................................36
FIGURE 13: SAFETY OBSERVATION CARD SUBMISSION STATISTICS...................................................41
TABLE LIST
TABLE 1: DETAILS OF PRIORITY UHRS SURVEY........................................................................................ 7

TABLE 2: DETAILS OF DIGITAL & ANALOG SURVEY - AREA A & AREA C.................................................12
TABLE 3: DETAILS OF ANALOG SURVEY - AREA B....................................................................................12
TABLE 4: DETAILS OF EXPORT CABLE ROUTE SURVEY..........................................................................13
TABLE 5: DETAILS OF TIELINES AND RECONNAISSANCE LINES............................................................13
TABLE 6 SURVEY OPERATION SUMMARY................................................................................................. 17
TABLE 7: SURVEY OPERATIONAL STATISTICS.......................................................................................... 18
TABLE 8: PERSONNEL - SURVEY CREW.................................................................................................... 20
TABLE 9: PERSONNEL - MARINE CREW..................................................................................................... 20
TABLE 10: LIST OF EQUIPMENT.................................................................................................................. 23
TABLE 11: DETAILS OF SINGLE CHANNEL SEISMIC EQUIPMENT...........................................................24
TABLE 12: GEODETIC PARAMETERS.......................................................................................................... 25
TABLE 13: DGPS INTEGRITY CHECK RESULT........................................................................................... 31
TABLE 14: GYRO CALIBRATION RESULT.................................................................................................... 31
TABLE 15: MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION RESULT..........................................................................................32
TABLE 16: USBL DYNAMIC CALIBRATION RESULT...................................................................................32
TABLE 17: OVERALL SURVEY STATISTICS................................................................................................. 37
TABLE 18 OWF/WTG PRIORITY SURVEY SUMMARY................................................................................39
TABLE 19: OWF, ECR AND RECCE SURVEY SUMMARY...........................................................................39
TABLE 20: GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY HSE STATISTICS...............................................................................40
TABLE 21: PERSONNEL MAN-HOURS STATISTICS...................................................................................41
Enviros Korea
Page 2 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDICES
Appendix A. DAILY PROGRESS REPORT
Appendix B. VESSEL OFFSET DIAGRAM
Appendix C. TIDE DATA
Appendix D. DGPS VERIFICATION & GYRO CALIBRATION
Appendix E. MBES CALIBRATION
Appendix F. USBL DYNAMIC CALIBRATION
Appendix G. SOUND VELOCITY MEASUREMENT
Appendix H. ANALOGUE LOGS
Appendix I. DIGITAL LOGS
Appendix J. NAVIGATION LOGS
Appendix K. QC LOGS
Appendix L. ONBOARD TIME TO DEPTH CONVERSION (tdc)
Appendix M. SURVEY TRACK PLOT -A3
Appendix N. FISH TRAP/BUOY/NET MAP
Appendix O. UHRS/S-UHR SEA TRIAL RESULTS
Appendix P. HSE INCIDENT REPORTS
Enviros Korea
Page 3 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
1 INTRODUCTION
Anma Offshore Wind Energy Co., Ltd. (“AWC”) Is a special purpose company set up to develop the
Anma offshore wind farm project located adjacent to Anma Island, Yeonggwang-gun, South Jeolla
Province in the Republic of Korea. The Project is certified by two Electricity Business Licenses (“EBL”):
first with a permitted capacity of 224MW (“EBL 1”) and second with a permitted capacity of 304MW
(“EBL 2”) and is supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (“MOTIE”) since 2018 as part
of the government’s offshore wind promotion plan.
Enviros Korea has been awarded the contract to provide the Geophysical Survey Services within the
following company offshore wind farm and associated sites (Figure 1):
 Offshore Wind Farm Area
 Offshore Sub Station Site
 Offshore Military Radar Tower Locations
 Export Cable Route
Figure 1: Overview Map with Proposed WTG, OSS and MR Locations
The geophysical survey service will provide information needed primarily for the following:
 Foundation concept selection and design
 Geo-hazard assessment
 Planning of geotechnical investigations
 Morphological Seabed Assessment
 Support mapping of soil properties for cable design and installation
Enviros Korea
Page 4 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
The objectives of the Surveys are as follows:
 To accurately determine bathymetry over the survey area by single beam and multibeam
echosounder.
 To identify all seabed infrastructure, features, targets, debris, or obstructions across the survey
area by side scan sonar
 Seabed classification and mapping of seabed morphology.
 To delineate the shallow geology to a depth of approximately 10m by a sub-bottom profiler.
 To delineate the deeper geology to 100m below seabed using Ultra High Resolution Seismic and
Single Channel Seismic.
 To provide information on geohazards (a geohazard is defined as a “Geological state or feature

which is or has the potential to be a hazard that poses a risk to one or more aspects of the
proposed activity or development at a site.”).
The survey work was categorized into two phases - deeper water and shallow water – based on the
available water depths across the survey areas. The deeper water operations (Phase 1) commenced
on 24-Apr-2023 and was completed on 06-Jul-2023. The survey operations for phase 1 although faced
numerous obstructions from fishing activities and associated surface & subsurface hazards, were able
to complete as per the requirements of AWC. The areas of survey in phase 1 included
1. Digital and analogue survey at Priority WTG, OSS, and Military Radar Tower locations
2. Digital and analogue survey at OWF Site Area-A and Area-C locations
3. Digital and analogue survey at tie line locations
4. Analog survey at OWF Site Area-B location
5. Analog survey at Export Cable Route locations (Two Segments)
6. MBES and SBP survey at Reconnaissance Survey Line
This Field and Operations report summarises the survey operations conducted in Phase1 detailing the
areas of survey, the equipment used for the survey, equipment performance, factors that affect the
survey operations and HSE events.
Enviros Korea
Page 5 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
2 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work included Geophysical surveys covering the Export Cable Corridor (EXC) and the
nearshore approach.
The initial survey line plan for Export Cable Corridor (EXC) survey included:
 Main Lines with 25m line spacing.

 Cross Lines with 1000m line spacing.
 Survey route is divided into 7 blocks (Block-1 to Block-7).
 Water depth is ranging from 0m to 21m
 All lines were to be surveyed with MBES, SSS, MAG and SBP
 Lines at line spacing that ensure the complete coverage of the EXC site with MBES and obtain
200% coverage with SSS data.
Figure 2: Map with Export Cable Route Survey Blocks
Enviros Korea
Page 6 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
2.1 Constraints for Survey and Revised Line Plan
Numerous fishing traps were observed scattered across the survey area. These traps were found
floating at sea surface and submerged below sea. These were hazards for the towed survey
equipment and hampered the survey operation. The EXR site route was covered with reconnaissance
survey to map the fishing gear.
The survey line plan priority was modified as following table
Initial Scope Revision Scope

Main Line Cross Line Main Line
Block Corrido Length Corrido Length
Numbe Spacin Numbe Spacing Numbe Spacing
r (m) (km) r (m) (Km)
r g (m) r (m) r (m)
Block-1 1,000 2.72 41 25 2 1,000 500 2.72 6 100
Block-2 1,000 1.7 41 25 2 1,000 500 1.7 6 100
Block-3 1,000 3.07 41 25 3 1,000 500 3.07 5 100
Block-4 1,000 10.63 41 25 10 1,000 500 10.63 11 50
Block-5 1,000 6.75 41 25 7 1,000 500 6.75 6 100
500 4.52 6 100
Block-6 1,000 10.21 41 25 10 1,000
1,000 5.69 21 50
Block-7 1,000 2.2 14 50 3 1,000 1,000 2.2 14 50
Table 1: Survey Scope Revision
2.2 Priority UHRS Survey
The Priority UHRS survey consisted of mainlines of length 1km and two wing lines of length 650/700m
at 30m Offset from centreline. The mainlines are centred on the proposed WTG, OSS and MR
locations (Figure 3). The line heading was adjusted further depending on the fishing trap buoy or fish
net alignment within the WTG survey perimeter to avoid/minimise entanglement with fishing
equipment.
Survey of some of the survey lines within high-risk area (high dense buoy area) were conducted in low
spec mode (Towfish was flown at higher altitude) to avoid entanglement incident.
Planned Quantities Executed Quantities

Number of
Locations
Locations Number of Number of
Total KM Total KM
lines lines
Wind Turbine Generator 38 114 91.2 97
Offshore Sub Station 1 1 1 1 94.2
Military Radar Tower 2 6 4.8 4
Remarks: Wing lines were not run at OSS location as data has been acquired at ECRS1 survey
Enviros Korea
Page 7 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
site.
Survey Tools:
 Bathymetry
 Ultra-High Resolution Seismic
 Sub Bottom Profiler
 Side Scan Sonar
 Magnetometer
Table 2: Details of Priority UHRS Survey
Enviros Korea
Page 8 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
Figure 3: Priority UHRS Site Survey Layout
2.3 Geophysical Digital and Analog Site Survey – Area A & Area C
The geophysical survey at Area A consisted primarily of East-West lines. The survey could not cover
the entire Area A due to the presence of Fishing gears and buoys, both on surface and subsurface.
The conditions were similar at the Area C site. These surface and submerged fishing gear were
hazards to the towed survey equipment. These were mapped during the reconnaissance survey and
then the survey work was planned and executed as in Figure 04
Enviros Korea
Page 9 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
Figure 4:OWG Digital and Analog Site Survey Layout - Area A & Area C
Enviros Korea
Page 10 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
2.4 Geophysical Analog Site Survey – Area B
The survey lines were planned based on the reconnaissance survey conducted as conditions were
similar to Area A and Area C. The executed survey lines in Area B is depicted in Figure 5.
Figure 5: OWF Analog Site Survey Layout - Area B
Enviros Korea
Page 11 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
2.5 Geophysical Export Cable Route Survey.
The analogue survey at the Export Cable Route area was conducted across two segment/ blocks
defined based on the orientation of the route corridor. These blocks are placed adjacent to the OWF
site. The EXR blocks were largely clear of fishing gear and the survey was conducted as shown in
Figure 6.
ECR_Offshore_Section-1
ECR_Offshore_Section-2
Figure 6: Export Cable Router Survey Layout
Enviros Korea
Page 12 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
2.6 Survey Statistics – Areas A & C, Area B and EXR
The break-up of Digital and Analogue survey carried out within Area A & Area C, Area B and EXR are
tabulated in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 respectively.
Digital Lines Analogue Lines

Locations
Number of Number of
Total KM Total KM
lines lines
OWF Area A 16 21
144.8 151.9
OWF Area C 9 9
Survey Tools:
 Bathymetry
 Ultra-High Resolution Seismic
 Side Scan Sonar
 Magnetometer
Table 3: Details of Digital & Analog Survey - Area A & Area C

Locations
Number of Number of
Total KM Total KM
lines lines
OWF Area B - - 60 99.81

Survey Tools:
 Bathymetry
 Side Scan Sonar
 Magnetometer
Table 4: Details of Analog Survey - Area B
Enviros Korea
Page 13 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023

Locations
Number of Number of
Total KM Total KM
lines lines
ECR Offshore Section-1 - -

100 193.1
ECR Offshore Section-2 - -
1) ECR Offshore section1 was surveyed with line spacing at 50m.

Remarks:
2) ECR Offshore section 2 was surveyed with line spacing at 25m.
Survey Tools:
 Bathymetry
 Side Scan Sonar
 Magnetometer
Table 5: Details of Export Cable Route Survey
2.7 Tielines and Reconnaissance lines
Tielines were planned and surveyed to interconnect the data across the different survey blocks Six (6)
Tielines were surveyed with all the survey equipment. Reconnaissance survey for mapping the fishing
gear was conducted with Sub bottom Profiler and Multi beam Echosounder. The details of the Tielines
and Reconnaissance lines are listed in Table 5

Locations
Number of Number of
Total KM Total KM
lines lines
Tielines 6 27.5 6 27.5
Reconnaissance lines - - 18 147.8

Survey Tools:
 UHRS
 Bathymetry
 Side Scan Sonar
 Magnetometer
Table 6: Details of Tielines and Reconnaissance lines
Enviros Korea
Page 14 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
The Tielines and Reconnaissance survey conducted are depicted in Figure 7.
Figure 7: Tielines and Reconnaissance Survey Layout
Enviros Korea
Page 15 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
3 SURVEY OPERATIONS SUMMARY

The implementation of the survey scope started with the mobilization of survey personnel and
equipment to M V Enviros Surveyor on the 24-April-2023. The survey vessel along with chase boat R
V Tamsa arrived at the survey site on 12-May-2023 and commenced equipment calibration &
reconnaissance survey of the fishing gear scattered across the survey site.
The survey work commenced on 19-May-2023 and completed on 05-July-2023. MV Enviros Surveyor
and RV Tamsa sailed back to Busan port and completed demobilization on 07-July-2023.The details of
the survey operations and timeline of events are listed below in Table 6.
Date Activities Remarks

28/07/2023 Su Pyeong Ho (SPH) arrived at Busan Port SPH & ES at Busan Port
31/07/2023 Survey Personnel onboard Enviros Surveyor (ES) SPH & ES at Busan Port
01/08/2023 SPH & ES at Busan Port
- Side poles fabrication
To
- SPH Survey room furniture fabrication
06/08/2023
06/08/2023 SPH & ES at Busan Port
- Side poles fabrication
To
- SPH survey room preparation
07/08/2023
- Project Kick of Meeting at ES SPH & ES at Busan Port
08/08/2023
- Continue survey room preparation
- Side poles fabrication SPH & ES at Busan Port
09/08/2023
- Continue survey room preparation
- Side poles fabrication SPH & ES at Busan Port
10/08/2023
- Standby weather due to typhoon
- Pole installations & MPI Test
11/08/2023 - Continue survey room preparation
ES at Busan Port
To - Transducer installations
SPH at Mastek Shipyard
14/08/2023 - Equipment function test
- Port calibration preparation
- GCP measurement
15/08/2023 - DGPS verification SPH & ES at Busan Port
- Gyro calibration
- Davit Installation including MPI & Load Test
16/08/2023 - Equipment and setting parameter
To - Equipment function test SPH & ES at Busan Port
17/08/2023 - Sea trial
- Departure preparation
18/08/2023 - Vessel departure to Mokpo Anchorage SPH & ES are on Transit
- ES & SPH were on sailing to Mokpo

19/08/2023 SPH & ES at Mokpo Anchorage
- Emergency drills at ES
20/08/2023
- Survey system preparation & test
To SPH & ES at Mokpo Anchorage
- Standby waiting for Innomar Topside arrival
21/08/2023
22/08/2023
- Continue system preparation & test
- Equipment function test and sea trial
23/08/2023
- Sea trial at Mokpo anchorage
24/08/2023 SPH & ES were on Transit
- ES & SPH were on sailing to Anma Island
25/08/2023 - Survey system preparation SPH & ES at Anma Do shelter
Enviros Korea
Page 16 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023

- MBES calibration
- SVP measurement
- Scouting/reconnaissance survey
26/08/2023 - Survey operation at Block 6&7 SPH & ES at Anma Do shelter
- Survey operation at Block 6&7
27/08/2023 SPH & ES at Anma Do shelter
- SPH VHF radio breakdown
- Survey breakdown due to SPH VHF radio repair ES at Anma Do shelter
28/08/2023
- Standby weather SPH at Gyema Port
- Survey breakdown due to SPH VHF radio repair ES at Anma Do shelter
29/08/2023
- Standby weather SPH at Gyema Port
- SPH was going back to Anma Do shelter
30/08/2023 - MEDEVAC of ES Chief Officer SPH & ES at Anma Do shelter
- Survey stand down
31/08/2023 - ES & SPH were on sailing to Mokpo Anchorage SPH & ES at Yu Dal Shipyard
- Gangway Modification Works at Enviros
01/09/2023 Surveyor SPH & ES at Yu Dal Shipyard
- Survey system setup, interfacing and wet test
- Vessel moved out to Anchorage area
- W2W exercise
02/09/2023 - Survey system setup (preparation for sea trial) SPH & ES at Mokpo Anchorage
- Safety stand down meeting, attended by all ES
and SPH POB
03/09/2023
- Standby waiting for arrival of replacement
equipment
04/09/2023
- Vessel moved out to Hankook Shipyard
- CSR signing off ES
05/09/2023 - Replacement of SBP transducer and MBES
To topside SPH & ES at Hankook Shipyard
06/09/2023 - Equipment function test
- Food provision and fresh water bunkering
New CSR and ES CO were joined ES
- Vessel moved out to Anchorage area
07/09/2023 - MEDEVAC communication drill SPH & ES at Mokpo Anchorage
- Sea trial
- ES & SPH were on sailing to Anma Island
- Installation of P2 Pro DGPS
08/09/2023 SPH & ES at Survey Site
- Survey system preparation
- MBES calibration
09/09/2023 - Survey setting parameter and trials
To - Scouting/reconnaissance survey SPH & ES at Survey Site
10/09/2023 - Survey operation at Block 6 & 7
- Survey operation at Block 6 & 7
11/09/2023 SPH & ES at Survey Site
- Approved mobilization by CSR
12/09/2023
- Survey operation at Block 6 & 7
To SPH & ES at Survey Site
- Standing by due to bad weather in particular time
18/09/2023
- Survey operation at Block 6
19/09/2023 - Sheltering from bad weather to Mokpo SPH & ES at Mokpo Anchorage
Anchorage
20/09/2023 - Standing by due to bad weather
SPH & ES at Hankook Made
To - Service & maintenance at Enviros Surveyor
Shipyard, Mokpo
21/09/2023 - Service & maintenance of survey system
22/09/2023 - Standing by waiting for replacement generator SPH & ES at Hankook Made
Enviros Korea
Page 17 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023

arrival Shipyard, Mokpo
- SPH & ES sailed back to survey site
23/09/2023 - Standing by due to bad weather upon arrival at SPH & ES at Survey Site
site
- Survey preparation (lowering down the pole, etc)
24/09/2023 - Multibeam calibration SPH & ES at Survey Site
- Survey operation at Block-6
25/09/2023
To - Survey operation at Block-1 to Block-6 SPH & ES at Survey Site
29/09/2023
30/09/2023 - SPH & ES demobilized to Busan
01/10/2023
To - Demobilisation works at Busan Port
03/10/2023
Table 7 Survey Operation Summary
The survey scope of work (Phase 1) with MV Enviros Surveyor was completed successfully with good
data quality. Survey equipment generally worked reliable with minor breakdowns during these
campaigns. A copy of Daily Progress Reports (DPR) is reflected in Appendix A.
The total man hours spend for the different segments of the survey operations from mobilisation on
24-Apr-2023 till demobilisation on 07-Jul-2023 has been computed and tabulated in Table 7. The
corresponding percentages of the total man hours has been tabulated as well.
No Event Code TOTAL (HOUR)
1 Mobilisation M 530.17 33.5%

2 Demobilisation D 41.00 2.6%
3 Single Pass Survey OP 33.40 2.1%
4 Digital Survey OD 27.05 1.7%
5 Analog Survey OA 97.17 6.1%
6 Transit T 26.12 1.6%
7 Standby - Scouting S-S 112.72 7.1%
8 Standby - Weather S-W 299.93 18.9%
9 Standby - Non-Weather S-NW 190.18 12.0%
10 Standby - Port Call S-P 131.25 8.3%
11 Standby - Client Instruction S-C 6.15 0.4%
12 Standby - Other S-O 37.78 2.4%
13 Disputed Time DT 0.00 0.0%
14 Breakdown - Equipment BS 51.08 3.2%
15 Breakdown - Vessel BV 0.00 0.0%
Enviros Korea
Page 18 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
No Event Code TOTAL (HOUR)
TOTAL 1584.00 100.0%

Table 8: Survey Operational Statistics
The survey time breakup and operational summary is shown in the pie diagram (Figure 8) and in Bar
graph in Figure 9.
Figure 8: Survey Operational Summary - Pie Chart
Enviros Korea
Page 19 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
Figure 9: Survey Operational Summary- Bar Graph
Enviros Korea
Page 20 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
4 PERSONNEL & EQUIPMENT

4.1 Personnel – Survey Crew
The survey personnel mobilised for the project and their function are listed in Table 8.
N
NAME FUNCTION NATIONALITY
O
1 Rhyan Risnadi Party Chief Indonesian
2 Izzad Aiman bin Mohd Fajuri Surveyor Malaysian
3 Wan Ahmad Balya Wan Mat Analog Malaysian
Wan Mohamad Danial bin Mohd
4 Geophysicist Malaysian
Faris
5 Muhammad Nazmi bin Mohd Amir Geophysicist Malaysian
6 Muhammad Firdaus Ramlan Data Processor Malaysian
7 Moh Yusof Zainuddin HSE Officer Malaysian
Table 9: Personnel - Survey Crew
4.2 Personnel – Marine Crew
The details of the marine crew for MV Enviros Surveyor are listed in Table 9.
N
NAME FUNCTION NATIONALITY
O
SU PYEONG HO
1 Kim Gap Joo Captain / Skipper Korean
Park Ki Su Korean
2 Assistant Skipper
Kim Cheol Hwan Korean
ENVIROS SURVEYOR
1 Lee Doo Seuk Master Korean
Roh Cheul Kuon Korean
2 Chief Officer
Lee Hyun Korean
3 Y.H Song Chief Officer Korean
4 Kim Song Il Chief Engineer Korean
5 Ha Eui Take 2nd Engineer Korean
6 Muaz Ishak Oiler Indonesian
7 Mohamad Afandi bin Mohya Cook Malaysian
Table 10: Personnel - Marine Crew
Enviros Korea
Page 21 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
4.3 Survey Vessel
Su Pyeong Ho is a Korean registered modified boat to accommodate survey spread that suited the
requirements of the survey work. The details of the Survey vessel are listed in Figure 10.
DESCRIPTION
Type: Shallow Water Survey Boat
Classification: Korea Maritime Transportation Safety Authority
Built/rebuilt: 1994
Port of registry: Pohang, Republic of Korea
DIMENSIONS / PERFORMANCE
Length over all: 13.6m
Breadth: 4.4m
Draught: 1.2m
GRT: 15 Tonnes
Speed max: 8.5 knots
FACILITIES
Passengers 10
Cabin 1
Enviros Korea
Page 22 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
4.4 Accommodation Vessel
MV Surveyor is a Korean registered survey vessel with accommodation and survey space that suited
the requirements of the survey work. The details of the Survey vessel are listed in Figure 10.
DESCRIPTION
Vessel Name Enviros Surveyor
Call Sign D7XA
Type: Survey Vessel (Tug)
Classification: Korean Register (KR)
Built: 2021
Home Port/Flag: Busan, Republic of Korea
IMO/ MMSI: 9776353 / 441419000
DIMENSIONS / PERFORMANCE
Length over all: 38.0m
Breadth: 12.0 m
Draught: 3.3m
GRT: 455 Tonnes
NRT: 136 Tonnes
Speed max: 10 knots
ACCOMODATION
Total 26 pax
Messrooms 1
Survey Survey Lab
Figure 10: MV Enviros Surveyor
Enviros Korea
Page 23 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
4.5 Equipment
The equipment provided onboard MV Enviros Surveyor are listed below with the
specifications/standards mentioned (Table 10). All equipment was mobilised with sufficient spares
and/or redundancy to ensure the continuous performance of the entire scope of work.
CATEGORY SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT QTY

Veripos LD5 C2 (617D+LBR) 1 set
Veripos Quantum (soft licence) 1 unit
Surface Positioning Veripos Quantum TIDES (soft licence) 1 unit
System Fugro Starfix P2-Pro 1 set
Teledyne TSS Meridian Surveyor - Gyro 1 unit
Qinsy 9 Nav System 1 unit
Teledyne SBES E20 Topside 1 unit
Teledyne SBES E20 transducer c/w 30m cable 1 unit
Edgetech 6205 MBES Topside 1 unit
Echosounder Edgetech 6205 230/550kHz MBES Transducer 1 Unit
Teledyne Saturn-10 (MRU) 1 unit
TSS-DMS05 (MRU) 1 unit
AML - BASE X - SVP (100m rated) 1 unit
Innomar SES-2000 Medium Topside Unit 1 unit
Sub Bottom Profiler
Innomar SES-2000 Medium Transducer 1 unit
Side Scan Sonar Edgetech 6205 230/550kHz SSS Transducer 1 unit
Geometrics G882 Magnetometer with 200m soft tow 1 unit
Magnetometer
cable
Table 11: List of Equipment
Enviros Korea
Page 24 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
5 WORKING GEODETIC PARAMETERS

5.1 Horizontal Datum
The survey data is acquired, processed, reported and charted using the geodetic parameters provided
by AWC. These are presented in Table 12 below
Table 12: Geodetic Parameters
5.2 Vertical Datum
All bathymetric soundings recorded during the survey are reduced to Mean Sea Level (MSL) for QC
and onboard processing using Veripos GPS Tide.
All bathymetric sounding will be reduced to ALLW datum (approximately 2.98m below MSL) on the
final charting
Enviros Korea
Page 25 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
6 OFFSHORE SURVEY OPERATIONS

6.1 DGPS POSITIONING SYSTEM
The Starfix GNSS as the primary positioning system and Veripos as the secondary positioning system
were mobilised for operations throughout the survey period. Throughout the survey, these reference
stations were utilized for the positioning system:
The StarPack unit consists of a survey grade GNSS combined L-Band receiver and powerful
processor, running Linux multitasking operating system. The receiver is capable of tracking all current
satellites (GPS, GLONASS) and is Galileo ready. StarPack can be extended with a second GNSS
card (in the same unit), to provide accurate, GNSS derived heading. In addition to GNSS
observations, the second card also provides L-Band functionality, creating an independent source of
corrections for backup.
The combination of receiver and processor provides robust multiple simultaneous precise position
calculations and extensive QC. For maximum system reliability, the internal software is embedded in a
flash memory. The system can be controlled and configured via the front panel, web interface or a
serial port. The embedded processing software of the StarPack GNSS receiver provides multiple
configurable simultaneous precise positioning solutions, the following are the main solutions that will
be used during the project.
Fugro’s Starfix.XP is a GPS and GLONASS positioning system that is based on orbit and clock
corrections obtained from a third-party supplier. Starfix.XP2 is a Precise Point Positioning (PPP)
technology, which distinguishes itself from the traditional differential approach as satellite errors are
not lumped together but estimated per source, per satellite. The GPS and GLONASS orbit and clock
corrections are computed separately, free of ionospheric and tropospheric effects. Further positional
enhancements are undertaken in Fugro’s software resulting in greater positional accuracy, typically 10
cm and 20 cm (95%) in the horizontal and vertical planes respectively
Accuracy in positioning depended upon the prevailing atmospheric conditions, the quality of the base
station coordinates provided, the location of system antennae, and the number of satellites observed/
available for the region.
The positioning system performed well and up to specifications during the survey and no downtime
was recorded due to signal failure or quality of coverage.
6.2 NAVIGATION LOGGING SYSTEM
Differentially corrected GPS position data from the DGPS positioning system was output to QINSy
Version 9 navigation software package. The navigation tracking and logging system comprised a
desktop computer, video monitors and a fix output box.
The QINSy software runs on compatible PCs. These PCs can be configured to allow connection to a
remote external monitor for the helmsman and additional ports for other input and output devices.
QINSy receives position data from the DGPS receiver and processes it to provide a real time,
alphanumeric or graphical navigation display on the PC and external monitor. The data received from
sensors such as echo sounder, and gyro can also be displayed and logged to a file.
The vessel’s positions as well as depths from the echo sounder were continuously logged into the
navigation system. The positioning data from the navigation computer were transmitted to the side
scan sonar, echo sounder and sub-bottom profiler systems real-time via navigational string and
Enviros Korea
Page 26 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
annotated at 12.5m intervals for the geophysical site survey and 10m for the debris survey. The QINSy
navigation system performed well throughout the survey.
6.3 GYRO COMPASS
The TSS Meridian gyro system onboard the survey vessel is an on-line master heading reference
instrument employing the effect of the gravity and earth’s rotation to produce a true North reference.
The movements of three gimbals rotating at an X, Y and Z-axis cutting the earth’s magnetic field thus
producing a true magnetic heading dictates the gyro heading. The analogue signal is then converted
to digital signal via a repeater and transmitted via serial cable to the navigation computer.
The Gyro compass mobilised for the survey was functional throughout the survey period except when
the vessel power went off too long and had to wait for the system to calibrate and be reliably used.
6.4 MOTION REFERENCE UNIT
Saturn 10 - fibre optic gyrocompasses is a compact system providing attitude and heading for a vessel
when no stationary reference is available. In addition, INS models provide velocity and position data.
All units contain an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) with three linear accelerometers and three fibre
optic gyroscopes (FOGs). These devices are all navigation grade sensors designed to deliver
measurement accuracy and reliability under a wide range of operating conditions.
The IMU supplies high speed data to a powerful microprocessor running a Teledyne TSS-developed
inertial algorithm to deliver accurate measurements of attitude, heading, heave, velocity and inertial
position.
The Saturn includes an array of precision linear accelerometers and fibre optic gyroscopes (FOGs).
These sensors are mounted in a precision machined frame called the Inertial Measurement Unit
(IMU), so that each of the principal IMU axes includes one accelerometer and one FOG.
An inertial algorithm developed by Teledyne TSS uses raw data supplied by the IMU, together with
aiding data from GPS, EM Log, or DVL sources to produce the following outputs:
 identification of the true north meridian and therefore measurement of Saturn’s true heading
 measurement of Saturn’s angles of roll and pitch
 measurement of Saturn’s vertical displacement away from the mean vertical position (the
heave measurement)
 a velocity and position solution based on inertial navigation.
The Saturn transmits measurements to navigation and external survey system (Echosounder, Innomar
and Edgetech 6205) at a user-selectable update rate, or continuously at the fastest rate compatible
with the selected communication protocol
6.5 SOUND VELOCITY PROFILER
The conventional velocity profiler logs depth, temperature, salinity and velocity at 20cm interval while it
is lowered from sea-surface to seabed. A second set of reading is logged while recovering the system
to the sea surface.
The speed of sound propagation in the water column at the site was determined with an AML - BASE
Enviros Korea
Page 27 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
X - SVP. The SVP measurement derived the average velocity that was input into the echo sounder,
USBL, and side scan sonar settings.
The measurements were conducted every 6 hours when conditions and weather are permitted. The
results of the measurements are reported in the attached Appendix G.
6.6 SINGLE-BEAM ECHO SOUNDER
A side-mounted Teledyne SBES E20 dual frequency Echo Sounder was used to record water depths
throughout the survey. The soundings were heave-compensated with a Teledyne INS-20 motion
sensor.
The recording parameters used in the survey were:
• Output frequency 33 and 200 kHz
• Recording Scale of 20m between 10m and 25m
Echo sounders have theoretical sub-centimeter accuracies in ideal conditions. However, in reality, sea
conditions and survey conditions usually mean the degree of accuracy is at least an order of
magnitude worse.
A soft copy of the raw soundings together with the heave compensated data was logged onto the
navigation computer hard disk together with the coordinates of the echo sounder transducer position.
6.7 MULTIBEAM ECHO SOUNDER & SIDE SCAN SONAR
Multibeam echo sounder and side scan sonar survey used Edgetech 6205 side mounted transducer
system.
The EdgeTech 6205 is a combined, fully-integrated, swath bathymetry and dual frequency side scan
sonar system. The 6205 uses multiple receive element transducers, and one discrete transmit
element, to produce real-time high-resolution 3D maps of the seafloor, while also providing co-
registered, simultaneous dual frequency side scan and bathymetric data. The high number of channels
enables superb rejection of multi-path effects, reverberation, and acoustic noise.
The 6205 provides bathymetry and dual frequency side scan, operating at 230/550 kHz or 550/1600
kHz. Bathymetry data are obtained on either the 230 kHz or the 550 kHz frequency, while the Side
Scan imagery is collected simultaneously on both frequencies. The sonar electronics and arrays are
mounted onto a streamline body that is deployed over-the-bow or side of a survey vessel. Sonar data
is transferred from the transceiver to the processing unit on board via an Ethernet network interface.
The standard configuration for the 6205 includes an integrated sound velocity sensor.
The system can interface with standard DGPS/RTK systems, MRUs, SVPs, CTDs, Altimeters, and
Gyros—altogether offering a powerful and versatile acquisition system that is suitable for many
different applications.
6.8 SUB-BOTTOM PROFILING SYSTEM
The shallow seismic within the survey area was acquired using a side-mounted Innomar SES-2000
Medium sub-bottom profiling system. The raw sub-bottom signals were recorded digitally by Innomar
recording system. The digital copies of the SBP data were used for interpretation. The acquisition and
Enviros Korea
Page 28 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
recording parameters were as follows:
Recording Length : 45ms

Delay : 12.5ms
Firing Rate : 60 msec / 8-12kHz
Filter : Nil
6.9 MAGNETOMETER
During the data acquisitions, Geometric 882 Magnetometer was used for recording magnetic data.
The survey is for the detection of metallic debris, cable and magnetic object on or below seabed. A
single G-882 was used. The sensor alignment was set up to allow better data collection along the
center-alignment line.
This equipment is efficient to detect buried pipeline and metal which can’t be seen SSS image. The
magnetometer is attached 10 meters behind the SSS at speeds of around 3.5 knots. Ideally, the
Towfish should be at a distance of approximately 3 times the length of the vessel to avoid disturbances
of the magnetic field related to the vessel herself. Due to limited water depth and the prevailing
conditions, the Towfish was towed in piggyback setup. The Towfish position during survey operation
was less than 3 times the length of vessel. The systematic noise from vessel body may have
contributed to the degradation of the quality of the recorded magnetometer data.
Enviros Korea
Page 29 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
7 SYSTEMS CALIBRATIONS
7.1 GCP ESTABLISHMENT
Ground Control Points are required for any positioning calibration and verification. Two GCPs were
established at positioning calibration and verification location. The GCPs were established by doing
DGPS measurement for one hour duration for each point. the detail established GCPs that observed
on 15th August 2023 at Busan Jetty is described on Appendix-X and following table.
Observed Coordinates (ITRF2014/ UTM Zone 52N)

CONTROL
POINT
Easting (m) Northing (m) Latitude Longitude
CP1 503552.08 3884042.06 35 05’ 57.033” N 12902’ 20.304” E
CP2 503523.29 3884050.36 35 05’ 57.302” N 12902’ 19.167” E
Table 13: Ground Control Points
7.2 DGPS INTEGRITY CHECK
The verification of the DGPS positioning system integrity installed onboard Su Pyeong Ho was
undertaken while the boat was alongside at the Busan Jetty on 15th August 2023. The results are
reported in the calibration report attached as Appendix D. The main results are enumerated in Table
13 below:
Secondary GNSS Antenna Against Land Station Easting (m) Northing (m)
Land Survey Method (Mean Value) 503542.910 3884039.19
Qinsy Navigation Logged (Mean Value) 503542.989 3884039.250
Difference (m) -0.079 -0.058
Std dev 0.20 0.23
Note: ITRF2014/ UTM Zone 52N
Table 14: DGPS Integrity Check Result
GNSS comparison observation was done between verified Veripos LD5 and new installed Fugro
Starfix P2 Pro to verified the accuracy of P2 Pro unit on XX September 2023. The results are reported
in the calibration report attached as Appendix XX. The main results are enumerated in Table 13
below:
Observed Coordinates
GNSS (ITRF2014/ UTM Zone 51N)
Easting (m) Northing (m)
Veripos LD 772821.5748 3914540.215
Starfix P2 Pro 772822.1778 3914539.761
Distance Between Two Receiver
Physical Measurement Observation Calculation
0.755m 0.660m
Differences: 0.095m
Enviros Korea
Page 30 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
Table 15: GNSS Comparison Result
7.3 GYRO CALIBRATION
A gyro calibration was also performed whilst the vessel was alongside at the Busan Jetty on
15th August 2023. The calibration report inclusive of procedures and observations is attached
as Appendix D and results are tabulated below in Table14:
Mean Computed Mean Gyro

Gyro System Heading Heading Mean C-O Std Dev. C-O
(C) (O)
Primary –
28.41 282.6 1.71o 0.40
TSS Meridian Surveyor
Table 16: Gyro Calibration Result
Enviros Korea
Page 31 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
7.4 MULTIBEAM CALIBRATION
A series of Edgetech 6205 MBES system calibration was carried out prior / in between the survey
operation. The original / initial calibration was partially blocked by the presence of fishing activity
around the calibration location. The calibration was repeated after redeployment of the side mount
pole , the calibration had to be repeated. The calibration reports are presented as Appendix E and the
results are tabulated in Table 15:
Calibration Detail Calibration Results

No
Date Location Error Observed Port Correction STB Correction
Roll Error + 2.737 + 3.468
Easting: 769959m
Pitch Error + 4.675 - 1.814
01 25 Aug 2023
Heading Error + 1.181 + 1.659
Northing: 3913423m
Latency 0 sec. 0 sec.
Roll Error - 0.345° + 0.844
Easting: 769959m
Pitch Error - 1.337° - 0.599
02 08 Sep 2023
Heading Error - 1.424° - 3.796
Northing: 3913423m
Latency 0.00 sec 0.00 sec
Roll Error -0.433° -0.285
Easting: 769959m
Pitch Error 9.000° 13.418
03 24 Sep 2023
Heading Error -5.200° -4.777
Northing: 3913423m
Latency 0.00 0.00 sec
Table 17: Multibeam Calibration Result
Enviros Korea
Page 32 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
8 DATA PROCESSING
8.1 NAVIGATION
All navigation data and charting were processed off-line onboard the vessel using QINSy version 9.
The vessel and other sensors such USBL and SBP positioning data were checked and processed
before being inputted to AutoCAD to generate survey track plots.
The drawings produced onboard for the site survey include all following node position:
- Antenna track plot

- CDP/CMP track plot
- SBP track plot
- SSS track plot
- Magnetometer track plot
8.2 BATHYMETRY
Raw bathymetric soundings were checked for erroneous spikes using QINSy Qimera. All bathymetric
soundings recorded during the survey are reduced to Mean Sea Level (MSL) using MSS Tide Data.
The QINSy version 9 Integrated Navigation System with MBES data acquisition module records the
swath bathymetry, transducers position, vessel’s orientation and motions (heave, pitch, roll, and yaw),
date, and time.
The raw MBES data for each ping are plotted as time series graphs for initial data quality control. They
are checked for erroneous spikes that are either adjusted or rejected. The resulting data are then
replayed to generate a new “clean” MBES data set, which is also corrected for tidal variations and
sound velocity. The corrected MBES data are displayed in longitudinal profile views, plan views, and
swathe views and are cleaned, filtered, and merged to detect miss-ties.
The processed MBES depth data are exported as sounding grids that are used for the generation of
bathymetry soundings, contours, profiles, XYZ data, and sun illumination displays. The DTM/sounding
grids are generated based on the following parameters:
 Cell/bin size : 0.50 x 0.50m

 Attribute : Mean Value
 Algorithm : Triangulation
The processed MBES backscatter data are exported as raster datasets for detailed investigation of the
seabed morphology , mapping of features and seabed sediment classification.
8.3 SIDE SCAN SONAR
The sonar data was interpreted onboard the vessel during the preparation of the preliminary report.
The sonar images were classified based on amplitude, surface texture, and roughness.
Anomalous features apparent in the data were assigned a designation and plotted intuitively from
survey line to survey line. The strength of sonar (high, moderate, low) and uniformity of tone (texture
whether smooth or rough), and the presence of acoustic shadows were used to identify features and
map the seafloor sediment type.
Enviros Korea
Page 33 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
Side scan sonar data set (JSF/XTF) is loaded to SONARWIZ application to check the positioning data
and data quality and plotted as mosaic data. Side scan sonar anomaly identification was conducted in
the SONARWIZ application. All the identified anomalies are then documented in the anomaly table/list
and plotted as a DWG file.
8.4 SUB-BOTTOM PROFILER
The sub-bottom profiler data was interpreted onboard the vessel during the preparation of the
preliminary report. Following onboard data QC, processing, and interpretation were conducted:
- Extract the positioning data from the SES3 dataset and plot it as a DXF track plot.
- In case of a positioning problem SES3 dataset, injection of corrected NAV was carried out on
the SEGY dataset.
- Convert the SES3 dataset to SEGY dataset.
- Load SEGY dataset into KINGDOM and/or SONARWIZ application to check the heave
correction.
- Data interpretation was done in KINGDOM and/or SONARWIZ application and generate the
ISOPACH Map.
Further all the data will be loaded and interpreted in KINGDOM and/or SONARWIZ application and the
ISOPACH Map will be generated for the final report.
8.5 MAGNETOMETER
The magnetometer data was recorded directly to Qinsy Navigation System. The magnetometer log
data was then plotted in XLS to evaluate if there were any significant magnetic anomalies within the
survey line. All the identified magnetic anomalies the documented in the anomaly table/list and plotted
as a DWG file. Further the same process will be executed over the entire survey site.
Enviros Korea
Page 34 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
9 SURVEY OPERATION SUMMARY

The survey operations of phase 1, although faced numerous obstructions from fishing gears and
buoys, were able to complete with the work on 06-July-2023. The details of the executed survey work
during the phase1 are listed below and executed survey kilometers are tabulated in Table 17.
1. Digital and analog survey at Priority WTG, OSS, and Military Radar Tower locations
2. Digital and analog survey at OWF Site Area-A and Area-C locations
3. Digital and analog survey at tie line locations
4. Analog survey at OWF Site Area-B location
5. Analog survey at Export Cable Route locations
6. MBES and SBP survey at Reconnaissance Survey Line
OWF PRIORITY Total Survey Length

MUHR Priority (WTG, OSS and MRs) 42.28 Km
Priority Mag (WTG, OSS and MRs) 49.49 Km
Priority SSS (WTG, OSS and MRs) 49.51 Km
Priority SBP (WTG, OSS and MRs) 94.23 Km
Priority MBES (WTG, OSS and MRs) 94.23 Km
OWF DIGITAL (Zones A & C) Total Survey Length
MUHR WTG Tielines 27.57 Km
MUHR Mainlines Zone A 106.53 Km
SCS East Zone C 38.27 Km
OWF ANALOG (Zones A & C) Total Survey Length
Mag Zone A and C 146.06 Km
SSS Zone A and C 166.78 Km
SBP Zone A and C 179.51 Km
MBES Zone A and C 179.51 Km
OWF ANALOG ONLY (Zone B) Total Survey Length
Mag Zone B 78.32 Km
SSS Zone B 96.31 Km
SBP Zone B 99.81 Km
MBES Zone B 99.81 Km
EXPORT CABLE ROUTE SURVEY Total Survey Length
Mag ECR 193.02 Km
SSS ECR 193.14 Km
SBP ECR (including Innomar Medium infill / reruns) 297.78 Km
MBES ECR (including Innomar Medium infill / reruns) 297.78 Km
Recce Data (processing at discretion of AWC) Total Survey Length
Recce MBES (processing at discretion of AWC) 147.80 Km
Recce SBP (processing at discretion of AWC) 147.80 Km
Table 18: Overall Survey Statistics
Enviros Korea
Page 35 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
The priority survey at the WTG, OSS and the MR Location were based on UHRS and Analogue
equipment. The main/ Centre lines were run with UHRS, MBES, SSS, SBP and Maggy. The two wing
lines were run with MBES, SSS, SBP and Maggy Survey at some locations were limited to Analogue.
The details of the survey work done at the WTG, OSS and MR Locations are tabulated based on the
equipment used for the survey and the results are presented in Table 18.
WTG Easting Northing

UHRS S-UHR SBP MBES SSS Maggy Remarks
Location (m) (m)
WTG-A01 757515 3918139  X     1 Centre Line + 2 Wing Lines
WTG-A03 759286 3918189 X X   X X 1 Centre Line
WTG-A08 763713 3918313 X X   X X 1 Centre Line
WTG-B01 757616 3915400  X     1 Centre Line + 2 Wing Lines
WTG-C01 757708 3911928  X     1 Centre Line + 2 Wing Lines
WTG-C03 759647 3911985 X X   X X 1 Centre Line
WTG-C06 762556 3912071 X X   X X 1 Centre Line
WTG-D01 757820 3908417  X     1 Centre Line + 2 Wing Lines
WTG-D04 760729 3908497 X X   X X 1 Centre Line
WTG-D07 763638 3908578 X      1 Centre Line + 2 Wing Lines
Enviros Korea
Page 36 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
WTG Easting Northing

UHRS S-UHR SBP MBES SSS Maggy Remarks
Location (m) (m)
OSS 767465 3913490  X     1 Centre Line + 2 Wing Lines
MR-01 757190 3918446  X     1 Centre Line + 2 Wing Lines
MR-02 757478 3908061 X X   X X 1 Centre Line
Table 19 OWF/WTG Priority Survey Summary
The details of the equipment used for survey within the different survey blocks are tabulated in
Table 19.
Survey Location UHRS S-UHR SBP MBES SSS Maggy Remarks
OWF Site Area-A  X     16 Lines

OWF Site Area-B  X     60 Lines
OWF Site Area-C X      9 Lines
Tie Line Survey  X     6 Lines
ECR-Offshore_Section-1 X X     22 Lines
ECR-Offshore_Section-2 X X     41 Lines
Reconnaissance Line X X   X X
Table 20: OWF, ECR and Recce Survey Summary
The track plots for all areas of survey are presented in Appendix M.
Enviros Korea
Page 37 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
10 HSSE RECORD AND PERFORMANCE

Health, Safety and Environment has the highest priority during the survey operations. All activities
associated with the survey work were ensured to comply with all HSE regulations. All HSE related
events have been studied, evaluated and remedial actions undertaken, if required including further
training, awareness campaigns, restructuring processes to ensure that similar events do not recur. The
survey was completed without any lost man-hours or major incidents. The survey operations were
completed with no reportable incidents being recorded and with no lost man-hours with regards to
Health, Safety or the Environment. No illnesses or injuries were recorded.
HSSE induction was carried out by the Officers to each new crew that has just joined the vessel during
mobilisation.
Toolbox meetings were held prior to the commencement or a change in survey operations. A safety
induction drill was carried out before the survey operations started with good response from both the
marine and survey crew. Appropriate personal safety equipment, including safety boots, hard hats and
life vests, was worn at all times, especially during back-deck operations.
The hazard safety observation card submission meets the target. This performance shows the good
level of safety awareness of all POB.
The HSE statistics recorded and monitored during the survey campaign onboard MV Enviros Surveyor
and RV Tamsa are tabulated in Table 20 and as pie diagram in Figure 13.
Event Number of Events

Kick Off Meeting 2
Toolbox Meeting 62
Safety Induction 24
Incident 2
Equipment Damage/Lost 2
Significant Observations 5
Abandon ship / Mustering Drill 2
Fire Drill 2
Man Overboard Drill 2
Hazard Safety Observation Cards Received 103
Table 21: Geophysical Survey HSE statistics
The recorded events during the survey operations include
1) Entangle of side scan sonar Towfish with floating rope of fishing gear on 25-May-2023
2) Entangle of side scan sonar Towfish with floating rope of fishing gear on 26-May-2023
3) Dangerous maneuvers of Fishing Boats near the survey vessel on 15-Jun-2023.
4) Dangerous maneuvers of Fishing Boat near the survey vessel on 18-Jun-2023.
Enviros Korea
Page 38 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
5) Entanglement of sparker towed equipment/ catamaran with floating fishing debris on 23-Jun-2023
6) Damage to High voltage cable of sparker system due to floating debris on 02-July-2023.
The incident reports for all the events are included in Appendix P.
Man hours recorded for the survey work has been tabulated and listed in the Table 21.
MV ENVIROS SURVEYOR
Survey Crew 13 pax 9744 Hours
Marine Crew 7 pax 6120 Hours
Client Representative 1 pax 756 Hours
TOTAL 21 pax 16620 Hours
RV TAMSA
Survey Crew 1 pax 756 Hours
Marine Crew 7 pax 5184 Hours
Liaison Officer 1 pax 564 Hours
TOTAL 9 pax 6504 Hours
Table 22: Personnel man-hours statistics
Figure 11: Safety Observation Card Submission Statistics
Enviros Korea
Page 39 of 39
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX A. DAILY PROGRESS REPORT
Enviros Korea
This document is proprietary and confidential. The copyright © therein is vested in ENVIROS. All rights reserved. Neither the whole, nor any part of this document may be disclosed to
any third party nor reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted in any form nor by any means (electronic, mechanical, reprographic, recording nor otherwise) without the
prior written consent of the copyright owner.
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX B. VESSEL OFFSET DIAGRAM
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX C. TIDE DATA
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX D. DGPS VERIFICATION & GYRO

CALIBRATION
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX E. MBES CALIBRATION
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX F. USBL DYNAMIC CALIBRATION
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX G. SOUND VELOCITY MEASUREMENT
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX H. ANALOGUE LOGS
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX I. DIGITAL LOGS
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX J. NAVIGATION LOGS
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX K. QC LOGS
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX L. ONBOARD TIME TO DEPTH

CONVERSION (TDC)
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX M. SURVEY TRACK PLOT -A3
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX N. FISH TRAP/BUOY/NET MAP
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX O. UHRS/S-UHR SEA TRIAL RESULTS
Enviros Korea
Revision A
Date 26-Jul-2023
APPENDIX P. HSE INCIDENT REPORTS
Enviros Korea

SPH - Field and Operations Report - DRAFT - 21112023

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SPH - Field and Operations Report - DRAFT - 21112023

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ANMA OFFSHORE WIND FARM PROJECT Document No.

ANMA OFFSHORE WIND FARM

OFFSHORE SITE INVESTIGATION

FIELD AND OPERATIONS REPORT

Contractor Doc. No. : [AWF-SII-TEC-REP-ENV-0001]

A 26-Jul-2023 Issued for Review Rhyan Risnadi Ramkumar A R

FIGURE 1: OVERVIEW MAP WITH PROPOSED WTG, OSS AND MR LOCATIONS.....................................4

TABLE 1: DETAILS OF PRIORITY UHRS SURVEY........................................................................................ 7

Appendix A. DAILY PROGRESS REPORT

Appendix B. VESSEL OFFSET DIAGRAM

Appendix C. TIDE DATA

Appendix D. DGPS VERIFICATION & GYRO CALIBRATION

Appendix E. MBES CALIBRATION

Appendix F. USBL DYNAMIC CALIBRATION

Appendix G. SOUND VELOCITY MEASUREMENT

Appendix H. ANALOGUE LOGS

Appendix I. DIGITAL LOGS

Appendix J. NAVIGATION LOGS

Appendix L. ONBOARD TIME TO DEPTH CONVERSION (tdc)

Appendix M. SURVEY TRACK PLOT -A3

Appendix N. FISH TRAP/BUOY/NET MAP

Appendix O. UHRS/S-UHR SEA TRIAL RESULTS

Appendix P. HSE INCIDENT REPORTS

 Offshore Wind Farm Area

 Offshore Sub Station Site

 Offshore Military Radar Tower Locations

 Export Cable Route

Figure 1: Overview Map with Proposed WTG, OSS and MR Locations

 Foundation concept selection and design

 Planning of geotechnical investigations

 Morphological Seabed Assessment

 Support mapping of soil properties for cable design and installation

The objectives of the Surveys are as follows:

 Seabed classification and mapping of seabed morphology.

 To delineate the shallow geology to a depth of approximately 10m by a sub-bottom profiler.

 To provide information on geohazards (a geohazard is defined as a “Geological state or feature

3. Digital and analogue survey at tie line locations

4. Analog survey at OWF Site Area-B location

5. Analog survey at Export Cable Route locations (Two Segments)

6. MBES and SBP survey at Reconnaissance Survey Line

 Main Lines with 25m line spacing.

Figure 2: Map with Export Cable Route Survey Blocks

2.1 Constraints for Survey and Revised Line Plan

The survey line plan priority was modified as following table

Initial Scope Revision Scope

Table 1: Survey Scope Revision

2.2 Priority UHRS Survey

Planned Quantities Executed Quantities

Wind Turbine Generator 38 114 91.2 97

Offshore Sub Station 1 1 1 1 94.2

Military Radar Tower 2 6 4.8 4

Table 2: Details of Priority UHRS Survey

Figure 3: Priority UHRS Site Survey Layout

2.4 Geophysical Analog Site Survey – Area B

Figure 5: OWF Analog Site Survey Layout - Area B

2.5 Geophysical Export Cable Route Survey.

Figure 6: Export Cable Router Survey Layout

2.6 Survey Statistics – Areas A & C, Area B and EXR

Digital Lines Analogue Lines

Table 3: Details of Digital & Analog Survey - Area A & Area C

Digital Lines Analogue Lines

OWF Area B - - 60 99.81

Table 4: Details of Analog Survey - Area B