Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Constitutional Law of India Chapter 11 Cultural and EducationalRights
Constitutional Law of India Chapter 11 Cultural and EducationalRights
Constitutional Law of India Chapter 11 Cultural and EducationalRights
(Articles 29-30)
(1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof
having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to
conserve the same.
Clause (1).-
Clause (1) gives protection to every section of the citizen having a distinct
language, script or culture by guaranteeing their right to conserve the same.
If such sections desires to preserve their own language and culture, the State
would not stand in their way. Article 29(1) includes the right to agitate for the
protection of the language. Making promises by a candidate to work for the
conservation of the electorate's language does not amount to a corrupt
practice.
The Supreme Court has emphasized that the purpose and object of the
linguistic States, which have now come to stay in India, is to provide greater
facility for the development of the people of the area educationally, socially
and culturally in the regional language. The concerned State or the University
has every right to provide for the education of the majority in the regional
medium.
Clause (2).-
(1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to
establish and administer educational institution of their choice.
(1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of
an educational institution established and administered by a minority, referred to in
clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such
law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the
right guaranteed under that clause.
The expression 'minority' in article 30 remains undefined though the Court has
observed that it refers to any community which is numerically less than 50 per cent.
of the population of a particular State as a whole when a law in consideration of
which the question of minority right is to be determined is a State law.
State of Bihar v. Syed Asad Raza, MANU/SC/0616/1997 : AIR 1997 SC 2425: 1997
AIR SCW 2339: JT 1997 (5) SC 97: MANU/SC/0616/1997 : (1997) 11 SCC 442:
1997 (2) SCJ 304: (1997) 3 SCR 658: (1997) 3 SCALE 723: 1997 (4) Supreme 587.
It has been held that for creation of post in a minority institution for appointment,
prior approval of the vice-chancellor is not necessary and the persons so appointed
would be entitled to grant-in-aid.