Number of members of each household

3
5 Column1
6
4 Mean 5.833333333333
7 Standard Error 0.473134451452
8 Median 5.5
6 Mode 5
9 Standard Deviation 2.007339474206
10 Sample Variance 4.029411764706
4 Kurtosis -0.440193936811
6 Skewness 0.501808131119
7 Range 7
5 Minimum 3
8 Maximum 10
3 Sum 105
4 Count 18
5
5 Based on the data summary, it can be interpreted that the distributio
could also mean as 6 members with a standard deviation of approxim
 reted that the distribution (the number of members in each household of sample of 105) whose mean is 5.83 that
ard deviation of approximately 2 members, is a negatively skewed (0.501 is less than 0) and platykurtic (-0.44 is less than 0 distribution
4 is less than 0 distribution
Students Pre-Test Post-Test
Ana 32 46
Mica 35 45
France 46 47 t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
Diego 40 47
Loy 39 48 Variable 1
Shane 30 44 Mean 37.77777777778
Joel 35 46 Variance 26.94444444444
Alvin 43 49 Observations 9
Mico 40 45 Pearson Correlation 0.68028193064
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 8
t Stat -6.00354505201
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.0001610592
t Critical one-tail 1.859548037531
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.000322118401
t Critical two-tail 2.306004135204
 Mean Sd Mean Difference df t-value
Variable 2 Pre-test 37.77 5.19
8.56 8 -6
46.333333333 Posttest 46.33 1.5
2.5
9 Data Interpretation
There is a significant relationship between the given data of pre-test and posttest of students
 t-critical value Ho Vi
2.31 R S

t and posttest of students.

Scores of Male Students Scores of Female Students
39 45
27 44
36 34
35 19
43 20
46 36
26 34
29 39
39 46
38 32
40 33
44 45
22 24
38 26
41 31
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Variable 1 Variable 2
Mean 36.2 33.8666666666667
Variance 50.457142857143 79.552380952381
Observations 15 15
Pooled Variance 65.004761904762
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 28
t Stat 0.7925648927519
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.2173478408285
t Critical one-tail 1.7011309342659
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.434695681657
t Critical two-tail 2.0484071417952

Mean Sd
Scores of Male Students 36.2 7.1
Scores of Female Students 33.87 8.91

Data Interpretation:
There is no significant relationship between the scores of male students and female students.
 Mean Difference df t-value t-critical value Ho VI
2.33 28 0.79 2.05 FR NS

students.