Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PLBA 1500 - Assignment #2
PLBA 1500 - Assignment #2
PLBA 1500 - Assignment #2
Dame Valencia
that outlines the fundamental rights and freedoms of all individuals, regardless of their
citizenship status. While the Charter generally applies to everyone in Canada, including
non-citizens, there are certain limitations and distinctions that can arise due to the specific
rights guaranteed and the legal context. The Charter’s equality rights guarantee equal
protection and benefit of the law without discrimination based on various grounds, including
national or ethnic origin. This means that non-citizens are generally entitled to equal
protection under the law and cannot be discriminated against based on their nationality or
ethnicity. Section 6 of the Charter protects the rights of every citizen of Canada to enter,
remain in, and leave Canada. While this section explicitly mentions citizens, the rights related
to mobility can have implications for non-citizens as well, particularly with respect to the
right to enter and remain in Canada. Section 7 protects the right to life, liberty, and security of
the person. Non-citizens in Canada are generally entitled to these rights, but limitations may
be imposed in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice, which could include
various legal rights, including the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure,
the right to not be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned, and the right to a fair trial. These rights
are generally applicable to all individuals, regardless of citizenship. Canada has a Charter of
Rights and Freedoms as part of its Constitution Act, 1982. The Charter outlines the rights and
freedoms of individuals in Canada, including non-citizens. While many rights are guaranteed
to “everyone” or “every citizen”, there are certain limitations and distinctions that may apply
to non-citizens. Section 15 of the Charter guarantees equality before and under the law,
without discrimination based on various grounds, including race, national or ethnic origin,
color, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability. Non-citizens are generally protected
by these provisions, but there may be instances where distinctions are made based on
immigration status. Section 6 of the Charter protects the right of citizens and permanent
residents to move and work freely in Canada. Non-citizens, including temporary residents
and refugees, may not have the same mobility rights, and their ability to work or move within
the country can be restricted by immigration laws. Section 3 of the Charter protects the right
of citizens to vote and run for public office. Non-citizens are generally excluded from these
political rights.
While Sections 7 to 14 of the Charter protect various legal rights, such as the right to
life, liberty, and security of the person; protection against unreasonable search and seizure;
and the right to a fair trial. These rights are generally applicable to all individuals in Canada,
regardless of citizenship. Language rights, including the right to use English or French in
legal and government proceedings, are generally applicable to everyone in Canada, however
specific provisions may be made for linguistic minorities. In addition, Section 6 protects the
right of citizens to move and work freely within Canada. While it primarily applies to
citizens, there are provisions that allow temporary residents to move freely within the
country. It's essential to note that the interpretation and application of the Charter can evolve
through legal decisions and precedents, and there may be ongoing discussions and legal
laws and policies complement the Charter and may impose additional restrictions or rights on
non-citizens in the country. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the Charter in protecting the
rights of non-citizens can depend on how its provisions are interpreted and applied by the
legal system. Court decisions and legal precedents play a crucial role in shaping the impact of
the Charter on different groups. The legal landscape and societal attitudes can evolve over
time. Amendments to laws, changes in government policies, and shifts in public opinion may
influence how the Charter is implemented and its impact on non-citizens. Comparing
Canada’s approach to international human rights protections for non-citizens with that of
other Western democracies involves considering a range of factors, including domestic laws,
international treaties, and specific policies related to immigration and human rights. Issues
related to the rights of non-citizens, including refugees and immigrants, are often subject to
ongoing debates and advocacy efforts. Legal challenges, policy discussions, and public
awareness campaigns can contribute to changes in the legal landscape. The experiences of
non-citizens can vary based on factors such as immigration status, reasons for migration, and
other intersecting identities. For example, refugees, asylum seekers, and temporary residents
may face different challenges and legal considerations. Moreover, Canada is a party to
various international human rights treaties, such as the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCOR) and the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural
Rights (ICESCR). The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as part of the Canadian Constitution,
incorporates certain rights aligned with international human rights standards. These rights can
apply to non-citizens within Canada’s jurisdiction. The Charter may provide avenues for
non-citizens to seek protection and remedies for violation of their rights. Legal challenges
based on Charter rights can be brought before Canadian courts, influencing the interpretation
and application of international human rights norms domestically. In addition to the Charter,
there are federal and provincial human rights statutes that prohibit discrimination based on
various grounds, including race, nationality, and immigration status. These statutes provide
additional avenues for non-citizens to address human rights violations. Despite these
mechanisms, there may be challenges and gaps in the protection of non-citizens' rights. Issues
such as detention practices, access to legal representation, and the treatment of vulnerable
populations may be areas of concern where international norms are not fully realized in
practice. The implementation of international human rights norms can be influenced by
government policies and practices. Changes in immigration policies, border control measures,
This landmark case challenged the constitutionality of the Immigration Act provisions that
allowed for the deportation of refugee claimants without a full hearing. The Supreme Court
ruled that certain provisions violated the rights to life, liberty, and security of the person
deportation cases. Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), [2007] 1 S.C.R. 350:
This case dealt with the constitutionality of security certificates used in immigration cases
involving non-citizens accused of being security threats. The Court held that the previous
regime of security certificates violated Section 7 of the Charter, emphasizing the right to a
fair hearing and the need to balance national security concerns with individual rights. Dore v.
Barreau du Québec, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 395: This case established a framework for assessing the
While not specific to non-citizens, this framework is relevant when considering the balance
between individual rights and state interests in immigration and refugee cases. In setting
cases end to end, it's important to consider the doctrinal evolution of the Court's approach.
This involves examining how the Court has interpreted and applied constitutional principles,
including the Charter, in the context of non-citizens' rights. Issues of procedural fairness,
security, and the balancing of rights and state interests are recurring themes in these cases.
Additionally, the Court's recognition of the evolving nature of constitutional and international
human rights norms is an essential aspect of understanding the doctrinal framework. The
engagement of the Court in these cases reflects the ongoing evolution of legal principles
concerning the rights of non-citizens in Canada. Canadian immigration and citizenship
policies have undergone changes over the years, and governments may implement reforms to
address various concerns, such as national security, economic considerations, and public
citizens and permanent residents. There have been instances where the Canadian government
has strengthened provisions related to citizenship revocation. This may include situations
where individuals who hold dual citizenship and are convicted of certain serious offences
may face the possibility of having their Canadian citizenship revoked. Changes in residency
requirements for citizenship applicants have been implemented. The government may
increase the time that permanent residents must spend in Canada before being eligible to
apply for citizenship. As the legal landscape evolves, ongoing dialogue and engagement with
Government of Canada, D. of J. (2022, April 5). Learn about the Charter. Government
https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/learn-apprend.html
Government of Canada, D. of J. (2023, June 29). Section 7 – life, liberty and security of
https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art7.html
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/const_index.html
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/39/index.do
Decisions and resources - SCC cases. Decisions and Resources - SCC Cases. (n.d.).
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/
https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/fr/item/7998/index.do