Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spe 24398 MS
Spe 24398 MS
IN ROCK CUTTING
F. C. Appl
Professor
Mechanical Engineering
C. Carl Wilson
Associate Professor
Industrial Engineering
Induvadan Lakshman
Graduate Research Assistant
This might better explain how wear gets started, after which
there is a gradual transition from this relation to (14) as the
wear flat enlarges. According to this, wear would always be
initiated but the initial events are likely to be somewhat
probablistic in nature and hence the former conclusions remain
valid.
Correlation of the Wear Rate Model with Experimental Data
Generally the proposed wear rate model agrees with the
observed behavior of the experiments. The data was therefore
analyzed to determine how well the model would correlate with
the data and to establish the dependance of wear rate on cutter
.
temperature i.e. F (TI) To obtain the temperature relation, the
quantity (AVd/AVR)/ (Adp/Ap)was calculated and plotted vs TI,,, as
shown in Fig. 19. As expected it was found that in most of the
test series the values for the first few cuts were erratic
because the model does not represent these cases well. These
values were therefore not included in Fig. 19. For the most
part, the remaining values correlate reasonably well with TI.
The results show that the diamond wear rate increases at an
increasing rate with respect to temperature T1 up to
approximately 500 C. Basically it is expected that the diamond
wear rate depends on the diamond hardness in an inverse manner.
As Lee and Hibbs found [3] the diamond hardness varies linearly
with respect to temperature up to 700 C. An empirical fit of
their data for hardness indicates that
Where H is Hardness
C is Constant
T is Diamond Temperature
Therefore, to fit the wear data it was assumed that F(T1) would
have the form
Where C1, C2, and C3 are Constants and (C2-TI) represents the
hardness. The constants were determined by a least squares fit
of the data. This resulted in relation
Granite I I I spray m i s t
Spray M i s t
Water Jet
6 10 5A
I
J 500 s t d . .020 s t d . .020n s t d . Mostly d r y
Georgia (T1=1400C)
8 3 5A Granite .040 i p r .010 i n . T1=1400C
( 10"long
9 7 2C
I .010 i p r
I
5
.040 i n .
I
5
T1=4000C
T1=2000C
13
10
4
4C
6C
I
.I
5
300 SFM
T1=5000C
Dry ( A i r jet )
T1=5000C
5 5 T1=2000C
Dry
5
.040 5 Dry
TABLE 2
EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL DATA
Force Analysis
TEST CUTTER CUT V d COOLANT
SERIES NO. NO. (fpm)
..................................(in)
1980 STRATAPAX 1 323 0.0060 WATER
2 2A 1 500 0.0250 AIR
3 2B 1 500 0.0550 AIR
4 3A 1 500 0.0580 MIST
5 4A 1 500 0.0510 WATER
6 5A .1 500 0.0265 AIR
9 2C 1 500 0.0475 WATER
11 5B 1 500 0.0545 WATER
12 4C 1 500 0.0560 WATER
13 6C 1 500 0.0560 AIR
14 7C 1 500 0.0360 WATER
15 5C 1 300 0.0034 WATER
17 7B 1 300 0.0585 WATER
STRATAPAX 1
2A 1
2B 1
3A 1
4A 1
5A 1
2C. 1
5B 1
4C 1
6C 1
7C 1
5C 1
7B 1
+ I-, 1.5 Material - Brass
EXPERIMENTAL --43.44+919.6*Wp
m EXPERIMENTAL -0
I a THEORETICAL + EXPEWMENTAL I
0
I
8
/
I ! 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Rock Volume Vr
500
300
e 250
450
-
-
3
X 400 I-
?!
L
m - 2
g 200 350
L
300 + :
Q
150
250
o-)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8
!0
9
Cut No.
46 60
;\I3
"12
-
TI1
1 9
10
n
8
+!
d 7
\ 6
P
4
w
3f 3
2
"
fi
0 1
I I I 1 I 1 I 1