Republic of the Philippines

11th JUDICIAL REGION

3RD MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT OF NABUNTURAN-MAWAB-
MONTEVISTA
Nabunturan, Davao de Oro

For Criminal case No :1472

OFFICER’S RETURN
This is to certify that the following proceedings were undertaken by the undersigned in
the tender or service of the copy/ies of Summons, as well as the complaint together with its
attached annexes upon the named defendant/s herein:
PERSONAL SERVICE (Individual) under Sec. 5, Rule 14, Revised Rules of Civil Procedure
(A.M. No. 19-10-20 SC)
Name of Defendant/s Date of Service

RAMON C. GENOVIA AUGUST 25, 2022

The above-named defendant/s personally received the summons as evidenced by the

signature/s appearing opposite his/ her/ their respective name/s in the original copy of the
Summons, informed the defendant that he/she is being served.
The defendant/s with notation “ “ has have refused to affix his/her/their
signature/s by the summons was nonetheless rendered to him/her/them by leaving the
summons within the view and in the presence of the defendant/s.
SERVICE UPON DOMESTIC PRIVATE JURIDICAL ENTITY (President, Managing Partner,
General Manager, Corporate Secretary, Treasurer, In-house counsel or in their absence or
unavailability on their secretaries) under Sec. 12 Rule 14, Revised Rules of Court.
Name of Juridical Entity Name of Receiving Officer Position

By leaving copies of the summons at the defendant’s or regular place of business with some
competent person in charge thereof. A competent person includes, but is not limited to one who
customarily receives correspondence/s for the defendant.
BY SUBSTITUTED SERVICE UNDER Sec. 6 Rule 14 Revised Rules of Civil Procedure (AM No. 19-
10-20 SC)

For Defendant/s Name of authorized or competent Date of Service

person/s

a person of suitable age and discretion residing therein as evidenced by the signature/s
appearing opposite the respective name/s of the defendant/s in the original copy of the
Summons at the dorsal side hereof.
by leaving copies of the summons, if refused entry upon making his or her authority and
purpose know, with any of the officers of the homeowners’ association or condominium
corporation or its chief security officer in charge of the community or the building where the
defendant may be found.
by sending an electronic mail to the defendant/s electronic mail address, if allowed by the
court.
Further, I hereby certify that substituted that service of summons was resorted to in the
foregoing instance for the reason that the defendant/s mention in the case/s cannot be served
after three (3) attempts on the two (2) deferent dates. Proof of which is that on the following
dates indicated herein:
Name of Defendant/s First attempt Second attempt Third attempt Information

The undersigned went to the address/es indicated on the summons and despite diligent efforts
of causing the personal service of the summons, he/she was unsuccessful in having the same
personally served upon the concerned defendant/s. More over, as part of the due diligence
asserted, the undersigned was informed by the informant that

WHEREFORE the ORIGINAL copy of the Summons is hereby returned to the Court for this
information and guidance.
SERVED respecting defendant/s RAMON C. GENOVIA

UNSERVED as regards defendant/s

On the ground that, on several attempts of causing the service, defendant/s persons or his
whereabouts cannot be found for the reason that per information relayed to the undersigned
by .
As there is refusal on the part of the persons above-mentioned to receive summons despite
as least 3 attempts on two different dates, service was done electronically, per order of the
court dated
.

At Nabunturan, Davao de Oro, AUGUST 26, 2022

ARIES DANIEL N. LUMANTAS

Junior Process Server