Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Relation To Gadamer
In Relation To Gadamer
being said at the critical moment of application for the fusion of horizons in a proper
conservation involves this same self recognition. Here, structure does not refer to the
way something said or its syntax; rather, to the fact that it is taken as a whole and
assumed to be meaningful by the person who can, then come to recognise something
of relevance to themselves in it as a result. (Gadamer, 1996)
Ref.
Gadamer’s Ontology (1996). “Gadamer’s ontology: An examination of Hans-Georg
Gadamer’s concept of being in relation to Heidegger, Plato and Hegel.” Structure of
proper conversation,p.117.
Ref.
Siegfried Kracauer (1889-1966). “Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural
Theory.” Edited by Neil Leach, p.51.
Rifiaoglu &Guchan (2008). Given that a place spirit is shaped by both tangible and
intangible elements, preserving and understanding it within a historical urban context
is a challenging and complex topic. The first section discusses the ideas and problems
surrounding the notion of spirit of place in the context of urban morphology and
conservation; second presents the approach taken by these disciplines to comprehend
and preserve spirit of place.
Ref.
Rifiaoglu &Guchan (2008).“Understanding and preserving Spirit of place By an
integrated Methodology in Historical Urban Context.” Conference:16th General
Assembly and Scintific Symposium of ICOMOS, 29 Sept-4 oct.,2008,Quebec City,
Digital Publication