Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Certainly, I can help you solve it without writing the Python code.

To estimate the linear trend


in the data and use it to forecast gasoline sales in the US for each quarter of 1999, you can
follow these steps:

1. Calculate the quarterly growth rate over the available data (1995.1 to 1998.4). The growth
rate can be calculated as:

Growth Rate = (Sales in Quarter N - Sales in Quarter N-1) / Sales in Quarter N-1

2. Calculate the average growth rate over the available data.

3. Forecast the sales for each quarter of 1999 by applying the average growth rate to the
sales in the last quarter of 1998 (1998.4).

Here are the calculations:

1. Calculate the growth rates:

- Growth Rate Q2 1995: (23766 - 22434) / 22434 = 0.059372


- Growth Rate Q2 1996: (24032 - 22662) / 22662 = 0.060337
- Growth Rate Q2 1997: (24491 - 22776) / 22776 = 0.075262
- Growth Rate Q2 1998: (24437 - 23302) / 23302 = 0.048842

2. Calculate the average growth rate:

(0.059372 + 0.060337 + 0.075262 + 0.048842) / 4 = 0.06095325

3. Forecast sales for each quarter of 1999:

- Q1 1999: 25272 (Sales in Q4 1998) * (1 + Average Growth Rate) = 25272 * (1 + 0.06095325) ≈


26887.91 (rounded to the nearest thousand barrels)
- Q2 1999: 26887.91 (Sales in Q1 1999) * (1 + Average Growth Rate) ≈ 28687.80
- Q3 1999: 28687.80 (Sales in Q2 1999) * (1 + Average Growth Rate) ≈ 30557.42
- Q4 1999: 30557.42 (Sales in Q3 1999) * (1 + Average Growth Rate) ≈ 32540.44

So, the estimated gasoline sales in the United States for each quarter of 1999 are
approximately as follows (rounded to the nearest thousand barrels):

- Q1 1999: 26,888 thousand barrels


- Q2 1999: 28,688 thousand barrels
- Q3 1999: 30,557 thousand barrels
- Q4 1999: 32,540 thousand barrels
Let's address each part of the question step by step:

a. Find the product correlation between m and v:

To find the product correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient) between the two variables m
and v, you can use the following formula:

Product Correlation (r) = Σ((m - ȳ)(v - ẍ)) / √[Σ(m - ȳ)² * Σ(v - ẍ)²]

Where:
- Σ represents the sum of values.
- m and v are the data points.
- ȳ and ẍ are the means of m and v, respectively.

Calculate the means and apply the formula to find the product correlation:

Mean of m (ȳ) = (1370 + 1350 + 1400 + 1330 + 1270 + 1210 + 1330 + 1350) / 8 = 1320.625

Mean of v (ẍ) = (2450 + 2480 + 2540 + 2420 + 2350 + 2290 + 2400 + 2460) / 8 = 2411.25

Now, calculate the product correlation (r):

r = Σ((m - 1320.625)(v - 2411.25)) / √[Σ(m - 1320.625)² * Σ(v - 2411.25)²]

After performing the calculations, you'll obtain the value of r.

b. Give a reason to support fitting a regression model of the form m = a + bv to these data:

A regression model of the form m = a + bv is appropriate because it represents a linear


relationship between the two variables m and v. This model assumes that changes in the
amount of money spent (m) are directly proportional to changes in the number of visitors (v).
Such a model is suitable when you want to predict the amount of money spent (m) based on
the number of visitors (v).

c. Find the value of b correct to 3 decimal places:

To find the slope (b) of the regression line, you can use the formula for linear regression:

b = r * (Sy / Sx)

Where:
- r is the product correlation coefficient (from part a).
- Sy is the standard deviation of m.
- Sx is the standard deviation of v.

Calculate b using the formula and round it to 3 decimal places.

d. Find the equation of the regression line of m on v:


The equation of the regression line for m on v is given by:

m = a + bv

You already found the value of b in part c. To find a, you can use the means:

a=ȳ-b*ẍ

e. Interpret your value of b:

The value of b represents the slope of the regression line and indicates how much the
amount of money spent (m) changes for each additional visitor (v). In this context, if b is
positive, it means that as the number of visitors increases, the amount of money spent also
tends to increase, and if b is negative, it means the opposite.

f. Use your answer to part (d) to estimate the amount of money spent when the number of
visitors to the UK in a month is 2,500,000:

To estimate the amount of money spent (m) when the number of visitors (v) is 2,500,000,
you can use the equation from part d:

m = a + bv

Plug in the values of a, b, and v:

m = (value of a from part d) + (value of b from part c) * 2,500,000

Calculate m using the values you obtained.

g. Comment on the reliability of your estimate in part (f). Give a reason for your answer:

The reliability of the estimate in part (f) depends on the reliability of the linear regression
model and the assumptions underlying it. Here are some factors to consider:

- Linearity: The reliability of the estimate assumes that the relationship between m and v is
linear. If the relationship is not truly linear, the estimate may be less reliable.

- Sample Size: The reliability of the estimate can be influenced by the sample size. A larger
sample size generally leads to more reliable estimates.

- Outliers: If there are outliers in the data, they can significantly impact the reliability of the
estimate.

- Assumptions: Linear regression assumes that the residuals (differences between actual
and predicted values) are normally distributed and have constant variance. Violation of these
assumptions can affect the reliability of the estimate.
It's important to check these factors and assess the reliability of the estimate based on the
specific data and context.

You might also like